Miles Mathis "Light Bending"

[junglelord]

An electron expanding at the speed of light....a photon, assumes a double cardioid shape as it expands.

The function that produces this shape is the Compton function:



The photon expands in a cardioid shape.
My two cents.

[junglelord]

Structure and function cannot be seperated. What does a photon look like?
Moreover, what does aether look like?
How would you determine these structures?
With Quantum Constants.
We will stick to five constants.
Compton Wavelength
Coloumbs Charge
c
Mass of the electron
Planck Length

We can take a supposition that aether is real, so lets determine what aether is....
Aether is a rotating magnetic field with a quantum spin of two. That is the supposition.
One thing we know for sure....Matter HAS 1/2 spin. Spin is also known as Angular Momentum.

It is possible that matter which is 1/2 spin angular momentum is a product of the aether.

Do not forget that matter is a left-handed spin, antimatter spins right.
You can only look forward and back and spin left or right....therefore a Aether unit can produce all four fundamental particles, electrons, positrons, protons, antiprotons. Angular momentum must scan a aether unit based on its attributes of being angular momentum and must be constrained by the quantum constants structural components.

Putting those five quantum constants together and adding angular momentum and moving forward in time, we get a glimpse of the structural nature of matter and the aether from which it came. The geometry of the 2 spin magnetic rotating field of the aether unit with its encapsulated 1/2 spin angular momentum would appear like this.


Neutrons are not fundamental and are a composite of a electron and a proton with a folded aether unit over a unit of angular momentum from a neutrino. Folds are a structural component of Neutrons. But that is a composite particle, lets stick with fundamentals, like what do the curved constants look like. This is required as pi is a essential part of all charge equations.

Curved Constants are structual and appear as specific shapes.


Since we have a two charge EU, we need a two charge model.

4pi Spherical Electrostatic Charge & 4pi^2 Toroid Electromagnetic Charge = Electron two charge model


The rmfd constant is the constant that represents a quantum "particle" of the Aether. The dimensions of rmfd are equal to a unit of rotating magnetic field. The rmfd constant is equal to Coulomb's constant times 16pi2. 16pi2 is a geometrical constant, just as 4pi2 is the geometrical constant of a toroid, 4pi is the geometrical constant of a sphere, and 2pi is the geometrical constant of a circle. The 16pi2 geometrical constant looks like the double loxodrome image. The "Shape" of Aether doubleanalemma.


Looking at the environment as Aether, and seeing the Aether as having a geometrical constant of 16pi2, the "shape" of spacetime can be determined. The rmfd constant gives the mathematical basis for the observation that time is curved. Structure of Space Time should therefore have pi and forward spin.


Quantum Resonance clearly has a structural element.


Quantum Spin is a structural element based on the amount of spin.


The three force model, two charges and gravity can be depicted as coming from one force.
Gforce


In the end the Compton function controls the geometry of the photon, the expanding electron.

Compton Function

Angular Momentum Photon expanding as the Compton function

[Siggy_G]

JL: advanced topic this, but I still don't see why a photon should be an electron expanding at the speed of light. How can it sustain its extremely large expanding structure/radius while being so tiny of origin? (imagine the structural size of a lightyears' distant photon/electron). Its extremely large surface or containing string, still being that of an electron's tiny EM energy? It's "surface" or structure would intersect and interfer with all sorts of things through the galaxy while it expands. Have I misunderstood the term expansion in this context? Is it only expanding in one direction (i.e. extrusion) within a 1/2 spin field? If it is somewhat spherical, it sounds like it has to expand with 2*c in order for its travelling direction (radius) being c.

[junglelord]

How do photons become electrons?
How do electrons disappear to become photons?
Good questions.
That was my two cents on the subject.

The expanding structure is determined from the Compton Wavelength.
The five quantum constant apply to all matter, as far as we can tell.
The work of Miles questions if the Coloumb Constant is indeed constant.
We have totally seperate viewpoints...I like Miles work and it may be correct.

At the same time aether physics is basic algebra...that assumes the constants are indeed constant.

If Miles is right, then my concepts are only inclusive for a set scale, which is fine, as we trying to determine the structure of photons and electrons, which only come in quantum packages. So there is still a lot of middle ground.

[altonhare]

Nick,
according to Sansbury, and by adoption, Wal, the longitudinal aspect of light transmission is instantaneous; the distortional effects of light on the state of electrons [or what Ralph Sansbury calls subtrons] takes place at the rate of c.

Isn't the longitudinal aspect of light usually called "gravity"?

[junglelord]

No, gravity is not the longitudinal expression of a z pinch.
Magneto-dieletric fields are the longitudinal expression of a z pinch, aka lightning.

[webolife]

Actually, I can go with Alton's idea...from the viewpoint of R A Smith, and by adoption, me, light and gravity are two manifestations of the same universal/unified force system. But included in this system is also ES, which I usually refer to as voltage. All are direct rectilinear interactions between two points/objects in space, hence my use of "longitudinal". Add momentum, and you have a universal system of curvilinear motions of objects, hence angular momentum reigns. But in this view, neither gravity, light, nor voltage are considered "objects" per se.

[junglelord]

Actually, I can go with Alton's idea...from the viewpoint of R A Smith, and by adoption, me, light and gravity are two manifestations of the same universal/unified force system. But included in this system is also ES, which I usually refer to as voltage. All are direct rectilinear interactions between two points/objects in space, hence my use of "longitudinal". Add momentum, and you have a universal system of curvilinear motions of objects, hence angular momentum reigns. But in this view, neither gravity, light, nor voltage are considered "objects" per se.

The three force model, two charges and gravity can be depicted as coming from one force.
Gforce


Since we are still talking about structure, lets investigate another photon model.

New Photon Model
Consider, in dynamic equilibrium, a photon formed by two particles whose electric charges are opposed, and for this reason they attract each other.

This attraction is equilibrated by the centrifugal force generated when rotating one with the other. By rotating electrical charged particles, a perpendicular magnetic field is generated, also perpendicular to a stationary observer.
http://lighttheory.com/light/proposed.htm

[junglelord]

Aether Structures in Light? Who would have thought?

The Aether Physics Model induces the geometry of a quantum Aether unit as a tubular loxodrome. The Aether unit encapsulates angular momentum to produce electrons and protons. The Aether unit also carries angular momentum from electrons and positrons, which is a photon. That is, photons have the geometry of Aether units.

Naturally, it was just a matter of time before scientists discovered that photons and light have the geometry of Aether units. That is exactly what appears to be the case as posted in a recent article on Live Science.
http://www.livescience.com/technology/t ... 00117.html


The so-called "knots" are identical to Aether unit geometry.

In an earlier story on Live Science, it was shown that light in nanoscale structures exhibits force.
http://www.livescience.com/technology/0 ... force.html
This is evidence for the electron-positron angular momentum stored in photons. The electron-positron angular momentum activates the Aether's electrostatic and electromagnetic dipoles. By manipulating the angles of photons, one can create both attractive and repulsive forces between photons.
http://softaether.blogspot.com/

Again it seems that the structural element is the best way to understand the functional aspect of anything.
If you do not have a good idea, or any idea, of what a photon looks like, how can you possibly explain its function with any true conviction? I am convicted that the rmfd (rotating magnetic field) of the aether (16p2 x Coloumbs constant) reveals the geometry of both aether and photons.

What is your structural view of a photon and how does it explain the functions?

[webolife]

From the old "What is a photon?" thread:
Webolife: "You didn't ask me.. or did you?... but my view of the "photon" is simply that it is a convenient unit of measurement of a very small [infinitesmal] but finite light action. It is neither a particle nor a wave in itself.
I agree with JL that therre is no wave-particle duality, no uncertainty principle, and no E =mc^2 in the universe.
I further agree with JL that electrons do not travel or "flow" through a wire. Furthermore the electrical action of a wire is slowed only by its resistance factor, not by slowing the electrons down... When you flick the switch the electrons at the lightbulb filament begin to immediately vibrate in response. And I mean immediately. The relationship between electrons and light in my view is simply this. Centropic force is manifested when electrons drop to a lower energy level about the atom. This force is felt by your retina [ as a "tug", though I say push in the direction of the light bulb, and the "light" goes on in your brain."
Elsewhere I tried to describe the shape of a photon as a "beam" [of small but finite diameter] of vectors operating on a photoreceptor/detector. The beam though virtually cylindrical, is actually conical in that the light action originates at an atomic level but is felt on a macroscopic level by the detector. Attending the beam, is a vectoral gradient "field" that manifests itself as a spectrum surrounding the central line of the beam. The altitude of the cone = the distance between observer and light action centroid, but is a timeless unit... the photon beam unit exists at its apex [the centroid] and its base simultaneously. This "base" from the observer's perspective is the area of eg. a photoreceptor "tip", but actually extends beyond/"behind" the observer to an indefinite distance, at some point of which the light action intensity [ie vector density] is too low to be phenomenal. I am not satisfied with this definition of the photon shape, in that it does not actually fit my understanding of light as an action rather than as an object. In this description however, it is incorrect to think of light as bending, but it is possible to recognize that there is a pressure gradient about the central line of sight/light action which is intercepted by the receptor from/at an angle to that central line, creating the possible effect of light "bending". Refraction in this view is not about light "bending" as much as it is about the direction of the light vector instantaneously changing to a new line as it transects a medium of different density. Refraction "laws" [so-called] have been used for over a century as a means of calculating variable light speed, based on what I believe is an erroneous understanding of light as moving waves.