Physical Phenomena and Mathematical propositions

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
MikeHydroSoils
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:23 am

Physical Phenomena and Mathematical propositions

Post by MikeHydroSoils » Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:40 am

Mathematics is merely a tool used to analyze or an art form to design repeated shapes, it does not describe process it is merely a representation in a language of number or associate size links. That is the influence of one item on another, or lack of it by rest. You cannot invoke a suggestion of electric arc on rocks without evidence of burn, it is very easy to melt small pieces of rock with electric charge, to form the Moeraki Boulders you would have blown the entire geologic deposit apart with the energy and left a massive metamorphic aureole of molten differing fragments if the material is in situ, if detached from its base and removed elsewhere then that might have been possible as most of the record would have been destroyed. There is no necessity to invoke nonsense because some physicist fried a piece of rock, physicists have been frying on rock since the North African desert 1942, when they made bronze, during the industrial revolution, glass manufacture, 1945 in the USA desert in order to murder Japanese and try to install world domination with technology. Gun manufacturers do the same, missile builders. Also the electric arc formed rocks would all have to have common features (all rock is mainly carbon, iron, silica, oxygen, hydrogen and a few Na P K Cu parts, silicates and structural variation, so melting them forms the same end result), all the boulders residual are not the same result. It is a miracle that there are such sandstone, volcanic, water filtration, carbonate units, each with a unique pattern and formation, without crashing your spaceship into the dirt on Mars and the Moon, or even off Florida carrying a teacher. What Phoebe's brother called melting things in Friends and then ended up working with Nicolas Cage in Gone in 60 seconds which is where most laboratory practice ends. If you get out into the real world and observe then you might learn. Weathering residual mass. You have to research without destroying the object you study. ;)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests