The Scalar Universe

[junglelord]

Another look at the Scalar Universe.

One of the very best books, that has recently come out, is Dr. Milo Wolff's brand new book: Schrödinger's Universe.

I've now finished reading it and I predict that someday it will be ranked in importance right up there next to Newton's Principia.

Huygens — famous for the first pendulum clock and wave theory of light — admitted to Newton that the mathematical concept, in his Principia, was brilliant but Huygens complained to Newton that it didn't tell us why gravity and centrifugal force were happening.

Now, however, Schrödinger's Universe is finally beginning to show us why.

Wheeler and Feynman tried to prove the electron was a standing wave but failed. Milo Wolff did it by proving the electron was a scalar, standing wave.

I agree with the premise set forth in Milo Wolff's outstanding, new book that this is indeed a scalar, standing wave, resonance universe that gives us the answer as to why we have all of our NATURAL LAWS.

Dr. Wolff, by the way, was one of the few top mathematical physicists on the team that got us to the moon.

Dr. Milo Wolff has mathematically proven this main concept in his brilliant book: All electrons give and receive tiny bits of energy to and from each other, from as far away as the Hubble limit, and they do this basically (in all directions) in a scalar manner.

Milo has shown us conclusively that electrons are standing waves that keep reproducing themselves from electrons in their surroundings. Wolff has thereby shown us why this element of reproduction is so inherent to everything in our universe. This also implies that space is something that is constantly being reproduced as well and it's the rate that space is being reproduced that brings the main reason for the length of this paper and its surprise ending.

Milo Wolff has also shown us why surroundings are so important; thus, he has shown us the reason for Mach's principle or why, as Ernst Mach stated in 1890, "The law of inertia depends on the presence of the fixed stars." (Inertial mass depends on the far distant surroundings.) Berkeley knew this even before Mach. And Einstein used this knowledge to create General Relativity. Milo Wolff is the very first person to give us a mathematical proof of Mach's principle, or that inertial mass is caused by the distant surroundings.

Quoting from the Britannica 2009 DVD "Mach's principle: It was so called by Albert Einstein after the 19th-century Austrian physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach. Einstein found the hypothesis helpful in formulating his theory of general relativity-i.e., it was suggestive of a connection between geometry and matter-and attributed the idea to Mach, unaware that the English philosopher George Berkeley had proposed similar views during the 1700s. (Berkeley had argued that all motion, both uniform and nonuniform, was relative to the distant stars.)"

Dr. Wolff emphatically emphasizes that the electron is a scalar, standing wave, resonance having certain spin resonance properties.

This is exactly the type of resonance universe that Schrödinger claimed we have.

There are even some more important "firsts" in Dr. Wolff's book as well. His book makes one really think: If our NATURAL LAWS fail to show us why or how inertial mass, gravity and the other forces are caused then is it possible we've not even scratched the surface yet? Is solid-state pioneer Carver Mead right? Are our NATURAL LAWS so bad that we are still in the Dark Ages of science?

Do these Dark Ages of science stem mainly from Maxwell's way of looking at it? Remember Einstein proved Maxwell wrong but Maxwell's math is being used every day and is super useful and accurate provided we remain within certain parameters: we must remain within certain speed and mass parameters and be wary of the micro and macro worlds. But if we remain within these parameters then we do indeed get beneficial use and math accuracy with Maxwell's concept.

Even before Maxwell, Ampere gave us a far different method to view electricity and magnetism using relative motion. With Ampere's method, surroundings are utilized and there are no parameters. There is a perfect understanding of how everything works but no accuracy with Ampere's concept simply because we do not have the super-computers yet that can work out all the necessary phase details in the surroundings.

If you are given another eye to see things with (Ampere's concept) then why not use it?

Using Ampere's concept, we find an extremely relevant definite misalignment factor of electron spins in all the elements. The importance of this factor cannot be emphasized enough.

But why, at the peak of the energy curve, do we find perfect electron spin alignment (magnetism) in iron, nickel and cobalt? By reading this paper you will find the reason for this is that these elements, high on the energy curve, are more in phase with the surroundings than the rest of the elements.

What our Dark Age science has totally missed is that we do have this certain average spin misalignment of all the electrons in our surroundings up to the Hubble limit and this definite average spin misalignment of these electrons in our surroundings is of the utmost importance; without this certain average electron spin misalignment, there would be no NATURAL LAWS.

This definite average spin misalignment factor seems to approach a constant with a paucity of surroundings but also, like the speed of light, changes appreciably with acceleration and/or an increase of mass in the surroundings.

We begin to see the reason we must have this and general relativity too once it is realized that each electron must maintain a specified spacetime relationship to all the other electrons in its surroundings. Remember, if Dr. Milo Wolff is correct then each electron is a scalar, standing wave created by all the other standing wave electrons in its surroundings. A certain spacetime relationship between all these standing waves must be remaining the same; if it was not then they could not continue to exist as standing waves.

So if things are really set up this way then we should expect a limit to the speed of light, shouldn't we? And we do find that limit plus we find the speed of light being a constant in a vacuum; these two important things seem to imply that Milo Wolff might be correct about his electron scalar, standing wave hypothesis.

Not only must we consider the aforementioned electron spin misalignment factor but a definite average spin misalignment, of quarks and stars, seems to be of the utmost importance for the existence of our NATURAL LAWS as well; that is what makes this entire paper well worth reading.

I do believe this is the best true story I've ever been able to tell — and if you've taken time to try to understand it — it ends with a bang!

From Britannica 2009 DVD "Gödel's proof first appeared in an article in the Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, vol. 38 (1931), on formally indeterminable propositions of the Principia Mathematica of Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell."

Kurt Gödel proved that those who cannot see the entire universe might assume what they saw were universal laws; when instead these would really be nothing but subset rules, that applied only to their subset realm. Have we made this mistake? Are our NATURAL LAWS merely subset gauge rules, similar to those subset gauge rules used in quantum mechanics?

Schrödinger's Universe turns that seemingly remote possibility into a high probability. This is why Milo's book is so important. It really changes everything we previously thought was true!

If Milo is right — and I'm betting he is — then this turns out to be a phase related universe, in which everything has a certain phase relationship to its surroundings. Future super-computers will someday express all of our NATURAL LAWS in the simple terms of nothing but phase relationships.

This new concept of Milo Wolff's shows us that gravity, magnetism, charge and in fact all the forces along with space and time are all nothing but simple phase relationships with the surroundings.

Yes, this is totally ironic — to what we are now being taught — but yet absolutely true!

This paper gives you a glimpse into this new concept that future scientists will someday be using.

This new concept also shows us that we do indeed have quantum gravity. We can now precisely see what produces each quantum unit of gravitational attraction. Not only that but now we can see exactly why the gravitational force of a black hole can be felt even though no light can escape from that same black hole.

You will not only understand this but if you diligently read through all of this paper then even more things about this universe will make far more sense and you will also see where this new knowledge solves the riddle of the strong force and shows why it seems to act the way it does. This, in itself, is truly amazing.

I've worked in electronics all my life and know that phase is one of the most important elements when working with frequencies. What's difficult for me to believe, is that some of my quantum theorist peers — by mistakenly rejecting the concepts of Nobel prize winner Niels Bohr — have thereby eliminated the most important microcosm phase indicator from the standard model.

Yes, this is hard to believe — but this is what is happening!

And this has undoubtedly caused one of the main weaknesses in the standard model!

A Britannica 2009 DVD quote: "The standard model has proved a highly successful framework for predicting the interactions of quarks and leptons with great accuracy. Yet it has a number of weaknesses that lead physicists to search for a more complete theory of subatomic particles and their interactions."

Merely add the needed Ampère-Bohr phase indicator and Mach's principle to the standard model and you get the more complete theory everyone is looking for!

Once this is done, you will see if you read on that Schrödinger's Universe will give you the why for the symmetries of everything in the standard model.

The reason for this is simple: Electric motors, stars, galaxies and even electrons, all spin and behave in relation to the same phase rules where there is a binding type attraction when both elements are in phase and more of a repulsion the more out of phase they are to each other.

In this frequency world of Schrödinger, we then see why the electron's spin/orbital frequencies are a separate gauge from the quark's — much higher frequency — spin/orbital frequencies, in today's quantum world.

http://www.rbduncan.com/schrod.htm

[junglelord]

I got myself a large Zome tools kit. I need to build a E8 theory of everything model


http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/2771/e8rootszome.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:E8_roots_zome.jpg
http://www.zometool.com/brainfood/Golde ... metool-Pro
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_(mathematics)

What makes the onion layered type spherical nature of A. Garrett Lisi's model so important?



(Click link below to see Lisi's model.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xHw9zcCvRQ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Excepti ... Everything
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/graphi ... 114big.gif

The onion layered type spherical aspect of A. Garrett Lisi's model is extremely important!

The reason for this is because it is also the model of a Spherical, Scalar, Standing Wave, Resonance.

It is also -- something we would see as -- an SSSWR.

Once all this is recognized, and you listen to what Tom Van Flandern Van Flandern and Saul Perlmutter Saul Perlmutter are saying, then there is absolutely no doubt that A.G. Lisi has been the very first person to mathematically unify the invisible forces.

He has indeed given us the first mathematical answer to the Theory of Everything.

And it most certainly is a Scalar, Resonance (SR) answer.

The manner in which this works is a simple phase relationship because as Gabriel LaFrenière has pointed out, each of the layers in this spherical onion type SSSWR is at a distinctly different phase from the layer inside it or outside it.

What Milo Wolf has discovered about this same spherical onion type SSSWR, is that these layers seem to be moving from the center toward the outside: from in to out. But from the surroundings come reinforcements to the same spherical onion type SSSWR from far out in the surroundings to each of these separate spherical onion type SSSWRs (Mach's principle).

What I have shown is that you can approximate the changes in both space and time between all these SSSWRs by using Ampere's Laws .

And Ampere laws show us it is the phase of the outer layer of each of these SSSWRs that is of utmost importance.


And it is the phase change of these outer layers, as they change in respect to us, that we perceive as spin.

Gabriel gives us a representation of the in to out waves. Added to this is a spin resonance which Milo Wolff has mathematically proven is also a Scalar Resonance. But you must understand that we are now only finally scratching the surface as to what is really going on to produce a Spinning, Scalar Resonance.

And as Gabriel LaFrenière, so aptly states and clearly shows, because of the outward movement, some of us may prefer to see them not exactly as standing waves but pseudo standing waves or simply Spinning, Scalar Resonances or SSRs.

See: Milo Wolff's webSite glafreniere.Home Page http://www.amperefitz.com http://www.rbduncan.com/ and last but not least, even though you may not entirely agree with Gabriel, you simply cannot dismiss this evidence he has shown in: http://www.rbduncan.com/b1gabriel.htm

The implications of all of this is profound: What this implies is that space and time are not simply here but they are both phase differences that are constantly being produced.

This also implies a universe in which anti-particles such as the positron exist in abundance far from us: They must exist far, far beyond the Hubble limit, where they cannot affect us here at all. This also implies a fairly stable universe in which the number of particles, most probably, equal the number of anti-particles.

While this gives answers to 100% of all the unanswered questions, it is too big a step away from existing thinking to be believed by many today.

When the truth seems too fantastic to be believed then it won't be believed.

That is, it won't be believed for a long, long time.



April 2008

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
http://www.rbduncan.com/lisiimp.htm

[GaryN]

And if everything scales, what does this tell us about the stars, or 'black holes'?

[junglelord]

As black holes do not exist, it tells us nothing.
As stars exists, it explains they are electric.
It also explains Tesla was right, only longitudinal waves exist in space.

[lizzie]

http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpB ... 649#p36649

[lizzie]

Global Scaling

http://www.globalscalingapplications.co ... veinfo.htm

During his time in the Soviet Union and Russia, Dr. Müller conducted much revolutionary research and obtained corresponding results, including major contributions to the Soviet Space Program. In 1982, Dr. Müller developed the revolutionary “Global Scaling” Theory, regarded by many today as a highly significant and important contribution to the Natural Sciences

The Theory of Global Scaling assumes that matter resonates harmonically at its lowest level of energy. This lowest level global scaling theory is not merely designated the “physical vacuum”; however, the frequency spectrum of the natural oscillations of the vacuum comprises many orders of magnitude and is fractally developed, like a melody. This “melody of creation” is, according to the theory, the cause of the logarithmic-hyperbolic, scale invariant, fractal distribution of frequencies of most varied measure – from the elementary particles to the galaxies.

In the early 1980s, Russian Scientists were beginning to make discoveries that could not be explained within the framework of traditional physical theories. From 1982 to 1986, the German mathematician and physicist, Dr. Hartmut Müller was able to deliver the necessary scientific framework for these new discoveries with his theory of ‘Global Scaling’ in which he postulated the existence of a Standing Gravitational Wave in the universe. Over the course of several years this hypothesis was confirmed in the areas of gravitational wave astronomy, particle physics, high-frequency physics, cold fusion research and biophysics, biochemistry; and resulted in the development and application of research and development methodologies.

GLOBAL SCALING allows for the for the calculation of physical properties of technical systems with extremely high life expectancies (superstability).

GLOBAL TIMING allows for the optimization of the temporal order of technological processes.

GLOBAL RESONANCE-MATCHING is a physical methodology of space-energy extraction by means of resonance coupling with the Standing Gravitational Wave. This methodology has already been exploited by scientists in Russia.

The Music of the Spheres and a Bach Fugue in the Sky! The Fascinating Connection between Cosmology and Church Music

http://blog.adw.org/2010/02/the-music-o ... rch-music/

There are some pretty fascinating connections between cosmology and the music that has predominated in different ages of the Church. How do we see and understand the universe in which we live and our relation to it? And what does all this have to do with Church music? Hmm… let’s see.

Chant and the Unity of All Things- In the earliest days of Church music plainsong and chant predominated. A melody was sung unaccompanied and with no harmony. In fact there is early Church legislation that frowned on use of harmony seeing it too strongly connected with paganism. There was also a cosmology among early Christians that stressed the unity of all things. That everything, no matter how varied was ultimately from God and was united in God.

Polyphony and the Music of the Spheres – But moving forward into the middle ages and toward the Renaissance we begin to discover rich and extended harmonies introduced into Church Music. Here too a cosmology is lurking just beneath the surface. As the ancient Greek Philosophers began to be “rediscovered” the ancient cosmology of the “music of the spheres” began to re-emerge. The ancients pondered the planets and stars as they swept through space. Each planet was thought made a perfect circle around earth. As they made this perfect circle they each rang out a different tone or note. These different notes rang out as a beautiful celestial harmony. Now harmony in church music began to be seen as reflective of the celestial harmony. Such cosmology and celestial harmony reached its apex and perfection in Renaissance polyphony

Mathematical Baroque and the Ellipse of the Planetary Paths – Another change in cosmology is reflected another form of music. In the 16th Century Copernicus discovered that the planets orbited the sun, not the earth. Studies of the planets by Kepler and others at the same time revealed that planets do not orbit in perfect circles but in elliptical orbits, in a kind of a mathematical progression. This is really the insight of a musical form perfected at the time called the “fugue” A fugue introduces a musical theme and then develops the theme in a kind of mathematical progression.

Modern dissonance and relativity - In modern times, the theory of relativity has come to predominate. Most people interpret relativity to mean that truth varies (it does not) and that beauty and perfection are ultimately indefinable (everything is relative).

Pachelbel's canon in D Major

http://vodpod.com/watch/3232673-pachelb ... visation-1

Space Sound Music
http://www.neuroacoustic.com/nasa.html

In 1989, Dr. Jeffrey D. Thompson, D.C., B.F.A. was approached by representatives working with NASA and JPL to explore a series of powerful recordings which the Voyager I & II Spacecraft had sent back from Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. These recordings seemed to be having a profound effect on the scientists and researchers who were exposed to them. Dr. Thompson was approached as an expert in the field of sound and healing, and especially in his work with "Primordial Sounds.” Primordial sounds are human body sounds and nature sounds formatted in special ways to cause a deep response in the subconscious mind. These are extremely useful in all levels of healing. Could the space sounds actually be Primordial Sounds, also – from outer space but strangely familiar to us?