What the LHC is really looking for...

[kc0itf]

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... g-for.html

Hmmmm...... more funds to waste and ivory-tower jobs to protect at all costs!? Else, I got nothing...

[KickLaBuka]

1. They don't want to look foolish.
2. It would mean a scientific revolution harming oil ventures
3. It would mean divulging classified information to the general population
4. It would ruin the reputations of 10,000; 8,000; 2,000, or just a handful of quantum physicists
5. a failure would mean alien technology is probable and beyond current human knowledge, and that scares the controling power
6. Most of the population is illiterate and scare easily. In defense of the followers, they were led down this path. The real culprit is the ones who knew better and participated in counter-intelligence anyway. No wonder our education system is lacking.

[junglelord]

Mass is easy enough to define.
Well it is for me.
Higgs has no idea, because his boson does not exist and there is no equality in his equation.

[earls]

Wow Buka, don't forget #7: Hillary Clinton is a Reptilian.

What is your definition of mass, JL?

[junglelord]

Mass is a 2-d circular string scanning an aether unit.
Mass is only expressed as the electron or the proton and these two fundamentals are the basis of reality.
Mass is the 2-d portion of 3-d distributed charge.
Mass and charge are two views of the same thing.

[earls]

I see no fault in that logic.

[KickLaBuka]

I see no fault in that logic.

I fail to see how mass is a string. It has to make sense. JL probably has better math skills but string theory around an aether unit is poor physics. Focusing on the atomic scale at all goes against the purpose of the math.