What if the theory of electricity we are all taught in school is not the full equation? What if the work by Maxwell and understood by him was not imparted to us correctly or in its original form? Are the formulas we learn in electronic college really Maxwells Theorum in all its slendor? Are we playing with a full deck so to speak! How many have actually read the original work and not someone's interpertation of the original work. We will not understand anything in total without some independent research into the original work....not relying on the interpertation of the work!

The bedrock of much of modern science is Classical Electromagnetic Theory (CEM). James Clark Maxwell developed this 136 years ago in an exotic algebra known as quaternions. In order to render it more assimilable for use by working electrodynamicists, it was deliberately re-written in much simpler language by Oliver Heaviside (and Gibbs) in 1903. This simplification (and truncation) eliminated a whole subset of the equations including the scalar electromagnetics and the gravitational aspects that were contained in the original theory. At last count, there are at least thirty-four known flaws in Oliver Heaviside (and Gibbs) hoary old theory, which is what is still taught in today’s classrooms. Some of the world’s leading scientists, such as Wheeler, Feynman, Bunge, Margenau, Barrett, Cornille, Evans, Vigier, and Lehnert have all written about CEM’s deficiencies.

When this missing "Heaviside subset" of Classical Electromagnetic Theory is restored and full EM Theory is viewed in Quaternions, and the brilliant 1903 and 1904 work of a Cambridge University mathematician, E.T. Whittaker introduced, but correct his work by factored in general and special relativity, all of a sudden one has the supposedly elusive Holy Grail of Science – a true Unified Field Theory that unites General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Classical EM Quaternion Theory and Tesla Scalar Longitudinal Waves.

For it is this "scalar potential" that stresses local space-time, i.e. the 3 spatial dimensions AND time, which allows the "bleed-through" of additional electromagnetic energy to create overunity electromagnetic systems. Indeed, the restoration of this missing subset also shows that Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity was also only a subset of the real theory that he was trying to write. Even though Einstein has been lionized for his theory of General Relativity (Time Magazine "Man of the Century"), he himself is on record as saying that the so-called foundations of physics need constant review, and that his Relativity Theory was not necessarily cast in concrete.

A further impediment to the theoretical extraction of "free" energy was also imposed on what was left of Maxwell’s already diluted EM Theory by H.A. Lorentz around 1902. He simply arbitrarily threw away the monstrous amount of current outside the circuit that was not intercepted by the circuit, and that he could not theoretically account for. This he termed "of no physical significance!" – even though it is approximately 1013 times greater than the intercepted current in our everyday electrical circuits! He thus perpetually locked EM systems in a theoretical and figurative iron box that would never allow them to go overunity and bleed in and capture additional energy.

THE MISSING SUBSET.

http://www.enterprisemission.com/whittaker1.html

In discarding the scalar component of the quaternion, Heaviside and Gibbs unwittingly discarded the unified EM/G portion of Maxwell's theory that arises when the translational/directional components of two interacting quaternions reduce to zero, but the scalar resultant remains and infolds a deterministic, dynamic structure that is a function of oppositive directional/translational components. In the infolding of EM energy inside a scalar potential, a structured scalar potential results, almost precisely as later shown by Whittaker but unnoticed by the scientific community. The simple vector equations produced by Heaviside and Gibbs captured only that subset of Maxwell's theory where EM and gravitation are mutually exclusive. In that subset, electromagnetic circuits and equipment will not ever, and cannot ever, produce gravitational or inertial effects in materials and equipments. Not a single one of those Heaviside/Gibbs equations ever appeared in a paper or book by James Clerk Maxwell, even though the severely restricted Heaviside/Gibbs interpretation is universally and erroneously taught in all Western universities as Maxwell's theory.

More surpression lies in the work of Tesla the master of electricity.

Scalar wave technology is another missing piece of the electric universe paradigm in all its glory. Tesla and his understanding of the EU is unsurpassed by any living human being.

Four Quadrant Theory of Electricity

If we do not include space time curve and the fluctations of the vaccum then our electric theorums are also still defunked therefore Einstein and Quantum effects must be added to the equation.Eric Dollard

(from Functional Thinking)

E:If we take Tesla's three phase electricity, or rotating magnetic field, we find that it is based on the archetypal form known as the Solar cross or by various other names.

T: Mandalas, medicine wheels?

E: ...these are four quadrant types of forms, a balanced cross as opposed to an unbalanced cross.

T: This is where you get the Four quadrant Theory of Electricity?

E: Electricity has to be viewed from a four quadrant type of situation. The right angle plays an extremely fundamental role in electricity. It is generally a right angle phenomenon.

(from Tesla's Longitudinal Electricity video):

Tesla experimented with impulse current and oscillating current.

our electricity is direct current and alternating current.

The Four Quadrant Theory of Electricity is

IMPULSE CURRENT, OSCILLATING CURRENT, DIRECT CURRENT, ALTERNATING CURRENT.

alternating current + direct current are transverse electromagnetic

impulse and oscillating current are longitudinal di-electric

A full understanding of Electric Theory must include Maxwells Original Theorum and the Subsets and must include Tesla Scalar Wave Modulation with curved spacetime of general and special relativity to understand the Supersystem.

Nikola Tesla's June, 1919 article in the Electrical Experimenter. The article outlines the differences between his wireless technology and that of academic convention. "The True Wireless" is one of the most important of Tesla's articles in that he explains in great detail HIS system of wireless. Also, this document, in his own words, smashes currently held beliefs about so-called "Tesla Technology". Written some years after his Wardencliff Project, Tesla explains the inefficiency and limitations of the Hertzian method of electromagnetic propagation (through the air) with great clarity -- and that his system of wireless which was vastly more effective, utilised the ground itself for propagation. Tesla states, "Properly constructed, my system [of wireless] is safe against static and other interference, and the amount of energy which may be transmitted is billions of times greater than with the Hertzian which has none of these virtues..." He explains in particular, with several analogs in diagrammatic representation, his single-wire-without-return system -- the heart of Tesla's radio and wireless power systems.

Early elemental radio devices like Tesla’s are fascinating and worthy of study because they remind us that powerful radio technologies can be so simple and accessible. Tesla’s transmitters produced high-voltage, sudden-pulse disturbances conducted through the earth at low frequencies. His radio is as taboo in official science as his wireless power, which works on the very same principals. Tesla said the radio physics of Hertz, still in vogue, was an "aberration," a "fiction." Modern radio took a lot from Tesla, but what did it ignore?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wypYFe3JXdE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLVzTkRn ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4FGkU84 ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc2r7Jyl ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzxown3s ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ3yXqDwM8c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSw5rkz0 ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USNDoy_v ... re=related

http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=45_ ... sublevel=0

http://www.cheniere.org/

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/ar ... read=38963

I find Kaluza Klein to be a very fundamental way to unite the above ideas in a 5d space

I also like the ECE Einstein-Cartan-Evans field theory model and find it to be very interesting. No black holes, no dark matter, no dark energy, accounts for Arps redshift anomalies.

Such a theory describes all of physics in a purely geometrical fashion. In ECE, gravity is the curvature- and electromagnetism is the torsion of spacetime. Indeed we live in a Geometric Universe with virtual flux and curved spacetime of scalar waves.

Quote:

"All the wave equations of physics, and first order differential equations of physics, come from the tetrad postulate, and the field equations from the Bianchi identity."

- Prof. Myron. W. Evans, AIAS Director (member of the Aberystwyth group)

"Physics is geometry - objective and deterministic. After a century of scientific uncertainty and void, the new ECE theory of Myron Evans establishes that there is no Higgs mechanism or boson, no strings or superstrings, no need for renormalization, no need for gauge theory, no missing mass or dark matter in the universe, no exotic new particles, and no singularities in nature (that is Big Bang and Black Holes)."

- Prof. Gareth J. Evans, AIAS fellow, former doctoral student of Myron W. Evans and member of the Aberystwyth group

"Finally, over half a century after Einstein made his contributions of general and special relativity, Myron Evans, following in the tradition of Einstein, accomplished the impossible. Instead of trying to quantify gravity in terms of discrete packets of energy (quanta) to make it comply with the standard model, Evans took the opposite approach, He succeeded in describing the standard model in terms of geometry. In the Evans Grand Unified Field Theory (now called Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) Theory - MWE), particle exchange is not the fundamental unifying factor. Instead, for each force there is a specific curvature of spacetime or spacetime geometry. The resulting equations can be applied to any area of science and engineering. The impact on the computer, transportation, medical, power, and manufacturing industries will ultimately be as profound as the discovery of fire."

- A. D. DeBruhl, "The Ultimate Truth" (2006), page 120

"As a result of the theory by Evans, an axial magnetic field component B(3) will exist in the direction of propagation of an individual photon. Regarding such a photon as an axisymmetric wave packet of limited transverse section, it is inevitable that the packet should possess a three-dimensional magnetic field pattern, having an axial field component B(3) and an associated angular momentum (spin). This fundamental contribution by Evans leads to a better understanding of the enigma of the photon than can be offered by conventional theory. Accordingly the results by Evans have inspired a number of scientists and research groups to perform further investigations along this line of approach. The research by Evans is thus of great importance to the scientific community and to the further development of modern physics and chemistry."

http://aias.us/index.php?goto=showPageB ... dard_Model

The evidence of the ECE model and geometry being the holy grail of the universe I believe that the E8 model is fundamentally correct in its premis as described by Antony Garrett Lisi. His theory claims to unify all fields of the Standard Model with gravity using a 248-point lattice of E8 geometry.

http://www.zometool.com/about-everything.html