Visualizing matter

[Solar]

Gauss’s Law, formulated in 1835, and Coloumb’s Law (1780’s or so) both work with the concept of distributed charge. Concepts like ‘continuous’ charge distribution, through a volume, charge distribution over a surface, region, linear charge distribution, scalar charge distribution etc. It is not an understanding 'new' or unique to the APM - nor Backlight Power.

The Aether Physics Model arose while David Thomson was investigating the work of Nikola Tesla. While testing Tesla coils, he noticed there were two distinct different manifestations of charges. After searching the existing scientific literature in vain for an explanation, he decided to re-examine the foundations of physics. Within three weeks he discovered a mathematically correct Unified Force Theory. APM

Something in there is from Tesla. But I’m not going to beleaguer the point. I think we’ve effectively shanked Siggy’s thread enough. Hopefully something was of value insofar as his original post.

Hurry lads!! Solar prominaces are lifting portions of the suns magnetic field!!! We must save the helo .. heloi(?) ... magna.. The magnabubble!!!

[StevenO]

They don't disagree, and if you spend ten minutes on APM, the answer will reveal itself. Go forth and findout.

http://www.16pi2.com/mass_to_charge_ratio.htm

You still have'nt answered my question why they differ on the dimensions of force.

APM's law of proportionality of mass and APM "strong charge" is by definition. They first define an APM "angular momentum" for a particle that is the product of the mass of a particle and a constant (c*compton wavelength, which is equal to h/mass, though they do not define which mass), then they multiply it with another constant, the APM "conductance of the aether" to get the APM "strong charge". So what did they prove...that mass x a constant is proportional to mass ?

[junglelord]

Blazelabs is all space/time breakdowns.
That is just another way of looking at quantum constants.