Mathematics - a new basis

[msbiljanica]

See a picture that represents the relations of the two triangles

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzkWG0x ... hHV0E/edit

what is a "?"
3?3=3
3?3=4
3?3=5
3?3=6
3?3=7
3?3=8
3?3=9
3?3=10
3?3=12

[D_Archer]

From the picture all the products are wrong.

Or is ? some sort of magic operator?

Regards,
Daniel

[msbiljanica]

From the picture all the products are wrong.

Or is ? some sort of magic operator?

Regards,
Daniel

When you look at the solution below will not be clear
1. 3 + [0] 3 = 3
2. 3 + [1] 3 = 4
3. 3 + [2] 3 = 5
4. 3 + [3] 3 = 6 or 3 +3 = 6
5.33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 7
6.33Rd1 (6) d2 (8) +3 = 8
7.33Rd1 (6) d2 (9)+3 = 9
8.33Rd1 (6) d2 (10) +3 = 10
9.33Rd1 (6) d2 (12)+3 = 12
(1,2,3,4) - There are many forms of addition in the set N
(5,6,7,8,9) - numbers that are dynamic, where it is possible to add this

[D_Archer]

When you look at the solution below will not be clear
1. 3 + [0] 3 = 3

Indeed.

'1.' is 6 and not 3.

Regards,
Daniel

[msbiljanica]

When you look at the solution below will not be clear
1. 3 + [0] 3 = 3

Indeed.

'1.' is 6 and not 3.

Regards,
Daniel

3+3=6 and this expression gives this result - because there are different types addition 3+[0]3=6
------------
1 Mathematics Space
We'll tell mathematical space with two initial geometric object that can not
prove.
1.Natural geometric object - natural straight line .
2.Real geometric objects - real straight lines .
1.1 Natural along
In the picture there is a natural geometric object straight line (AB), it has a beginning (A)
and end (B) - this property natural long'll call point.

w1.png (5.24 KiB) Viewed 11656 times

1.2 The basic rule
Two (more) natural straight line are connected only with points.

[msbiljanica]

2 Natural Mathematics
2.1 straight line , semi-line "1"
"1"-from any previous evidence (axioms), a new proof
Theorem-Two (more) natural straight line merge points in the direction of the first AB
natural straight line .

EVIDENCE - natural straight lines (AB, BC) are connected - we get straight line AC.
1..
Natural straight lines (AB, BC, CD) are connected - we get straight line AD.
2..
Natural straight lines (AB, BC, CD, DE) are connected - we get straight line AE.
3..
...

Natural straight lines (AB, BC, CD, DE, ...) are connected - getting semi-line.
4..
picture (slike i formule) https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48F41121 ... CF17%21105
-------------
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
straight line - EVIDENCE ( line - Axiom)
semi-line - EVIDENCE (line -Axiom )

[D_Archer]

From the picture all the products are wrong.

Or is ? some sort of magic operator?

Regards,
Daniel

When you look at the solution below will not be clear
1. 3 + [0] 3 = 3
2. 3 + [1] 3 = 4
3. 3 + [2] 3 = 5
4. 3 + [3] 3 = 6 or 3 +3 = 6
5.33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 7
6.33Rd1 (6) d2 (8) +3 = 8
7.33Rd1 (6) d2 (9)+3 = 9
8.33Rd1 (6) d2 (10) +3 = 10
9.33Rd1 (6) d2 (12)+3 = 12
(1,2,3,4) - There are many forms of addition in the set N
(5,6,7,8,9) - numbers that are dynamic, where it is possible to add this

What is the difference between 1. and 4.?

Regards,
Daniel

[msbiljanica]

What is the difference between 1. and 4.?

Regards,
Daniel

1. ([1]) , 4.([3] or without this ([3]))
--------------

2.2 Numeral semi-line, numeric point "2.1"
Theorem-character mark points on the one-way infinite
long (A, B, C, ...), replace the labels {(0), (0.1), ..., (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 ), ...}
which are set circular and positionally.
picture ( https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48F41121 ... CF17%21105 - slike i formule )
Proof - is obtained by numerical along which the numerical point of {(0,00,000,
0000, ...), (​​0,1,10,11,100,101, ...), ..., (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, 12, ...), ...}.

[msbiljanica]

2.3 Natural numbers "2.2"
Theorem - There is a relationship (length) between Point in numeric (0) and
all points Numeral semi-line.

Proof - Value (length) numeric point (0) and numerical point (0)
the number 0
1..
Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (1) the number o1
2..
Ratio (required) numeric point (0) and numeric item (2) is the number 2
3..
Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (3) is the number 3
4..
Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (4) is the number 4
5..

...
Set - all the possibilities given theorem.
The set of natural numbers N = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, ...}.
picture ( https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48F41121 ... CF17%21105 - slike i formule )
--------
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
numeral semi-line - axiom
numerical point - axiom
set - axiom
natural numbers -axion

[msbiljanica]

2.4 Mobile Number "2.2,2.3"
Theorem-Natural numbers can be specified and other numerical
point other than the point numeric 0th
Proof - Value (length) numeric point (0) and numeric point (2)
the number 2
1..
Ratio (length) numeric point (1) and the numerical point of (3) is the number 2
2..
Ratio (length) numerical point (2) and the numerical point of (4) is the number 2
3..
...
A set of mobile numbers Nn = {[n]N}
pictures ( https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48F41121 ... CF17%21105 - slike i formule )

[msbiljanica]

PDF - Mathematics - a new base
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48f41121 ... CF17%21105

[GSingh]

Great solution with tutorial and thanks for the PDF...