sjw40364 wrote:Definitely caused by flow of current and magnetic fields, IMO.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... _small.jpg
http://www.wondermondo.com/Images/Ocean ... 2Oct03.jpg
Corona wrote:sjw40364 wrote:Definitely caused by flow of current and magnetic fields, IMO.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... _small.jpg
http://www.wondermondo.com/Images/Ocean ... 2Oct03.jpg
interesting pictures! I have often wondered the same... especially the clouds that look filamentary in structure
great Tpod from a while back:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2009/ ... clouds.htm
couldn`t this be tested by flying into a cloud and measuring if there is any charge?
Aardwolf wrote:Isn't the fact that clouds discharge (ie lightening) enough to prove they hold a charge?
PersianPaladin wrote:Aardwolf wrote:Isn't the fact that clouds discharge (ie lightening) enough to prove they hold a charge?
Well, I don't know. We don't know much about how lightning can form in thunderstorms and why they produce such high-energy radiation such as gamma and x-rays. The mainstream certainly doesn't see them as leaky-capacitors within a cosmic electrical circuit.
There is certainly more data that can be gathered on ordinary clouds that don't arc-discharge. And of course, these interesting "Morning Glory" clouds that appear to rotate in some cases.
Corona wrote:PersianPaladin wrote:Aardwolf wrote:Isn't the fact that clouds discharge (ie lightening) enough to prove they hold a charge?
Well, I don't know. We don't know much about how lightning can form in thunderstorms and why they produce such high-energy radiation such as gamma and x-rays. The mainstream certainly doesn't see them as leaky-capacitors within a cosmic electrical circuit.
There is certainly more data that can be gathered on ordinary clouds that don't arc-discharge. And of course, these interesting "Morning Glory" clouds that appear to rotate in some cases.
just noticed your sig. great website you got there- lots of stuff I haven`t come across yet. Keep up the great work!
PersianPaladin wrote:Aardwolf wrote:Isn't the fact that clouds discharge (ie lightening) enough to prove they hold a charge?
Well, I don't know. We don't know much about how lightning can form in thunderstorms and why they produce such high-energy radiation such as gamma and x-rays. The mainstream certainly doesn't see them as leaky-capacitors within a cosmic electrical circuit.
There is certainly more data that can be gathered on ordinary clouds that don't arc-discharge. And of course, these interesting "Morning Glory" clouds that appear to rotate in some cases.
If the pre-dawn weather remains calm and clear, the Morning Glory continues to roll south-southwest, appearing over Burketown in the early morning, where the glider pilots are waiting. The clouds rarely bring rain, but are often associated with a short, intense wind squall near the surface. Morning Glories don’t usually last long – after an hour or so of sun on them, they evaporate.
The clouds are most closely related to undulatus clouds.[3] Although they appear dark and storm-like, they tend to dissipate without a storm forming.[7] The ominous-looking clouds have been particularly common in the Plains states of the United States, often during the morning or midday hours following convective thunderstorm activity.[8] As of June 2009 the Royal Meteorological Society is gathering evidence of the type of weather patterns in which undulatus asperatus clouds appear, so as to study how they form and decide whether they are distinct from other undulatus clouds.[3][7]
Russell explains: "When methane makes its way into the upper atmosphere, it is oxidized by a complex series of reactions to form water vapor. This extra water vapor is then available to grow ice crystals for NLCs."
If this idea is correct, noctilucent clouds are a sort of "canary in a coal mine" for one of the most important greenhouse gases.

Return to Electric Universe - Planetary Science
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests