Right on, GC. However, this news might be worthy of it's own thread.
From this
physorg article:
According to Emmert and colleagues, low solar EUV accounts for about 30% of the collapse. Extra CO2 accounts for at least another 10%. That leaves as much as 60% unaccounted for.
I think what they're failing to acknowledge is
electromagnetic induction from the fluctuating Interplanetary Magnetic Field (a time-varying field) causing inductive heating in the thermosphere, which should be treated as a plasma because with a significant population of free ions and electrons, that's what it is. The Ap index, which measures geomagnetic storms, is a pretty good proxy for IMF activity. The slope of the Ap index matches the slope of the thermosphere density/temp more closely than the other indices of EUV and F10.7 solar flux.
The thermosphere should be viewed as a
Inductively coupled plasma.
An inductively coupled plasma (ICP) is a type of plasma source in which the energy is supplied by electrical currents which are produced by electromagnetic induction, that is, by time-varying magnetic fields.
Now, consider the fact that the IMF is a time-varying magnetic field.
Compare the bottom graph of thermosphere density with the graph of the Ap index below it. The top two graphs are EUV and F10.7 flux respectively.
I don't have time to download and graph all the raw IMF data but I drew an approximate slope for the low points onto the Ap index as a proxy to demonstrate the probable correlation between IMF activity (for which Ap is a proxy) and thermosphere temperature/density.
A stronger IMF with more fluctuations should produce more inductive heating of the thermosphere while a weaker IMF with fewer fluctuations, like this current solar minimum, should produce less inductive heating. That induction mechanism should have a greater influence on thermospheric temps than either solar EUV or x-rays.
cheers