"The electric force operates at a near infinite speed
on our cosmic scale, as it must inside the electron.
It is a significant simplification of all of the tortuous
theorizing that has gone into the nature of gravity and
mass. Einstein’s postulates are wrong. Matter has no
effect on empty space. Space is three-dimensional
something our senses tell us. There is a universal
clock so time travel and variable aging is impossible—
something that commonsense has always told us. But
most important—the universe is connected and coherent."
- Wal Thornhill
Matter has no effect on empty space
Space is three-dimensional something our senses tell us.
Sir Oliver Lodge deserves to be heard once more:
“..it may be that when the structure of an electron is understood, we shall see that an ‘even-powered’ stress in the surrounding aether is necessarily involved. What I do feel instinctively is that this is the direction for discovery, and what is needed is something internal and intrinsic, and that all attempts to explain gravitation as due to the action of some external agency, whether flying particles or impinging waves, are doomed to failure; for all these speculations regard the atom as a foreign substance -- a sort of ‘grit’ in the aether -- driven hither and thither by forces alien to itself. When, some day, we understand the real relation between matter and aether, I venture to predict that we shall perceive something more satisfying than that.”
This biophysical theory eventually developed into the concept of orgone (a word coined from the same root as “organism” and “orgasm”) which Reich saw as a massless, omnipresent substance, similar to luminiferous aether, but more closely associated with vital, living energy than inert matter.
In the late 19th century, luminiferous aether or ether, meaning light-bearing aether, was the term used to describe a medium for the propagation of light. The word aether stems via Latin from the Greek αιθήρ, from a root meaning to kindle, burn, or shine. It signifies the substance which was thought in ancient times to contain the manipulative forces beyond control.
A. L. Tchijevsky, a Russian professor of Astronomy and Biological Physics, noticed during World War I that particularly severe battles followed solar flares. Since the sunspots were in a peak period during 1916-17, no doubt the war and its various battles were heavily stimulated by the energies which are boiling off the Sun. Intrigued by the connection of human behavior to solar physics, Tchijevsky constructed an “Index of Mass Human Excitability”. He compiled the histories of 72 countries from 500 BC to 1922 AD to provide a strong database to articulate his correlations. After rating the most significant events, Tchijevsky found that fully 80% of the most significant human events, mostly related to war and violence, occurred during the 5 years or so of maximum sunspot activity.
The Odic force (also called Od [õd], Odyle, Önd, Odes, Odylic, Odyllic, or Odems) is the name given in the mid-19th century to a hypothetical vital energy or life force by Baron Carl von Reichenbach. Von Reichenbach coined the name from that of the Norse god Odin in 1845.
Matthew wrote:Nice points JaJa
So how do we put this together with the planets?
Is there a relationship between electron Shell orbits and the orbits of planets?
Dundere said: I find it hard to believe that such an alignment could have been stable for a long period of time (hundreds or thousands of years). After all each planet has a different rotational speed around the sun. Therefore the inner planets (earth, mars) would rotate faster than the outer planets (Venus, Saturn) and prevent a stable alignment. ... how did we end up with the radically different orbits of the planets around the sun in today`s solar system?
When physicists came upon the idea that the atom is built like a solar system, the atoms of various chemical elements differing in the mass of their suns (nuclei) and the number of their planets (electrons), the notion was looked upon with much favor. But it was stressed that " an atom differs from the solar system by the fact that it is not gravitation that makes the electrons go round the nucleus, but electricity"(h.n. russell)
Besides this,another difference was found: an electron in an atom, on absorbing the energy of a photon(light), jumps to another orbit, and again to another when it emits light and releases the energy of a photon. Because of this phenomenon, comparison with the solar system no longer seemed valid. "We do not read ion the morning papers that Mars leaped to the orbit of Saturn, or Saturn to Mars." wrote a critic. True, we do not read it in the papers; but in ancient records, we have found similar events described in detail, and we have tried to reconstruct the facts by comparing many ancient records. The solar system is actually built like the atom; only, in keeping with the smallness of the atom, the jumping of electrons from one orbit to another, when hit with the energy of a proton, takes place many times a second, whereas in accord with the vastness of the solar system, a similar phenomenon occurs only once in hundreds of thousands of years. from World in Collision pgs 381-2
mathew wrote:So two or more planets could conceivably occupy the same orbit (shell) as the electrons do.
Surely there would have had to be a big event changing these orbital paths making the planets become unstable.
, compared to what EU theory is saying about the universe, the solar system realignment was small. Kinda like a billiard game "break" using subatomic particles as the balls.big event
nick c wrote:mathew wrote:So two or more planets could conceivably occupy the same orbit (shell) as the electrons do.
I do not know if you are aware of this, but the Kepler telescope may have already discovered such a situation.
Two planets found sharing one orbit
The discovery of other solar systems has revealed that our arrangement is not necessarily typical. There are apparently many very different possibilities.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest