Sparky wrote:After a quick study of these formations and info about malta, i would lean toward natural limestone formations created when islands were submerged, then eroded when exposed.
There is also the possibility that the concrete the early people used for construction was used to create some of these to emulate the natural formations.
As for electrical discharge patterns, i don't know what limestone would do, shatter or melt, but that would be my last guess.
I would be interested in hearing from a real geologist who has spent a bit of time looking and testing these structures.
i have asked about these and other formations elsewhere and geology people have answered that it is erosion. when i ask how erosion formed these examples i get the answer erosion. after explaining that i would like an answer as to how erosion created each of these formations and many others on malta i get the answer erosion.
erosion seems to be the geologists answer to everything unexplainable in a gravity universe, perhaps we should start to call it dark erosion?
although i believe this to be EU formations i am not against them being "erosion" or more gravity universe natural, i just need an actual explanation as to how they were formed naturally.
there are things on malta that are perhaps more man made using torba than EU, the lines on pembroke hill for example that i have shown before. but why would these mini craters or whatever shapes you want to call them be man made? i have never seen formations like these mini craters anywhere else so not sure what man was imitating if they formed them.
the created naturally underwater then eroded when exposed idea does not make sense to me at the moment but i am happy to discuss why and how this is possible. the only way an idea, either mine or the opposite, can be shown to be true is if it is challenged. infact all ideas and theories must be challenged.
what formed these shapes underwater? why have they remained when they are limestone the same as the rest of the island? why are they not much taller? all these odd formations are only a few feet at the most above the rest of the island. none seem to ever be over a meter taller than the limestone around it. even the special grey rock lines only have a very thin covering of the grey, inside they are limestone.
Sparky wrote:Thanks....i have seen similar formations somewhere, but can't remember where...would like to find out if these cups have a bottom or are tubes..
thats a good question - all of these mini craters, starting rocks or whatever they are have a bottom, they are indeed bowl shaped. most bottoms are above or level with the floor. i would like to find out what is below one of them but the rocks they are found in are rock hard, like it has been tranformed by an event ... they are found around the island where you would expect to find them if you look at geology from an Electric Universe point of view. in fact the way i find them is by doing exactly that and it has never failed yet. i am starting to post more of my gEUlogy findings over the coming months and you will see that these are not the only examples.
you would also be amazed at how sharp this limestone can be, considering according to geologist it has to be very old. also they all look fairly new and have very little sign of "erosion" if they came up from the sea floor. are they fairly new as malta has legends from the 1300-1500 AD of immense events, especially the malta "tempest" of 23rd November 1343 that created Il-Maqluba and Filfla
according to local folklore.