1913 Great Meteor Procession

Historic planetary instability and catastrophe. Evidence for electrical scarring on planets and moons. Electrical events in today's solar system. Electric Earth.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

1913 Great Meteor Procession

Unread postby Tansi » Tue Dec 27, 2016 7:49 pm

I’m not sure if I’m posting in the right section - feel free to let me know and I’ll move to a more appropriate space.

What I wondered is if anyone had any EU perspective on a meteor even that happened in 1913.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1913_Grea ... Procession
(trusty wikipedia info ;) )

It was said to be a meteor procession though there were disagreements even at the time ranging from a decaying orbiting ‘moon’ ; multiple meteor events and even UFOs.

I understand the EU has a different concept of what makes a meteor (not the iced dust ball) - so I wondered if there might be any different theories of the possibility of what this 1913 event was or wasn’t.

Thanks for any input.
Tansi
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:02 pm

Re: 1913 Great Meteor Procession

Unread postby oz93666 » Mon Jan 02, 2017 12:56 am

This from wikipedia ....
........................................"The meteors were particularly unusual in that there was no apparent radiant, that is to say, no point in the sky from which the meteors appeared to originate. The observations were analysed in detail, later the same year, by the astronomer Clarence Chant, leading him to conclude that as all accounts were positioned along a great circle arc, the source had been a small, short-lived natural satellite of the Earth.."

Image

I doubt if the EU take on this event differs too much from the official one , NASA's view is " that a single large meteor once grazed the Earth's atmosphere and broke up. When the resulting pieces next encountered the Earth, they came in over south-central Canada, traveled thousands of kilometers as they crossed over the northeastern USA, and eventually fell into the central Atlantic ocean."

This site analyses the sightings in detail and says there are anomalies indicating an alien craft ... http://cognizantnationhq.weebly.com/blo ... ase-proven
oz93666
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:12 pm

Re: 1913 Great Meteor Procession

Unread postby jacmac » Mon Jan 02, 2017 9:29 am

Tansi:
I understand the EU has a different concept of what makes a meteor (not the iced dust ball)

Are you perhaps mixing up a meteor with a comet ?
Jack
jacmac
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: 1913 Great Meteor Procession

Unread postby oz93666 » Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:43 pm

jacmac wrote:Tansi:
I understand the EU has a different concept of what makes a meteor (not the iced dust ball)

Are you perhaps mixing up a meteor with a comet ?
Jack


I've just been looking at what establishment sciences defines as these two...from what I can gather , reading between the the lines ,there is no real difference , no sharp dividing line.

There is space debris ..... some has not spent too much time close to the sun ,and so has a higher component of volatiles .. this is labeled 'comet' when it does approach the sun ...the other has been sunning itself longer , so most of the volatiles have been boiled off by the heat from the sun ...labeled 'meteoroid' ...but no sharp division, a continuous spectrum of objects with different % of volatiles ...

Exactly the same as planets , the further out the planets are the more liquids and gasses they have, if you brought jupiter close to the sun , all the volatiles would go, and something like mercury would be left.

This UFO site is quite sensible ...http://cognizantnationhq.weebly.com/blo ... ase-proven ...and raises some good points.
oz93666
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:12 pm


Return to Electric Universe - Planetary Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest