Actually it is quite logical.
Private companies that are forced by government regulations designed to fight global warming will suffer increased costs that will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods produced. This enormous cost is pure waste if climate change has nothing to do with human actions, and can only serve to lower the overall standard of living.
Yes, another cost argument, with the myopic view of waste, if desired goal is not achieved or there are unintended consequences. And regulations designed to improve the environment are considered to lower standard of living?! come on! nonsense!
Aardwolf:
What cost argument are you referring to?

why are we spending billions on an unknown future problem while those billions could be used to save lives and generally improve the living condintions and health of millions of people right now.
Certain programs would do both! Think about what you said. It's nonsense.
Future problems? Such as a need for the largest military in the world to fight off the invasion of Florida by the Taliban?

All "arguments of costs"are applauded by "big business" and the ideology that supports them. We don't need coal, gas, and tar sands !
