Moon Craters
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:28 pm
Re: NASA 1 million images online
One of the best website ever seen. Good job NASA.
Cheers,
Cheers,
- MGmirkin
- Moderator
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:00 pm
- Location: Beaverton, Oregon, USA
- Contact:
Re: NASA 1 million images online
Relatively new yes... Though I had proffered this already? Maybe it got gobbled by the last site outage?kmcook wrote:Is this site new?
I searched on craters and returned 2500+ pages of images!
http://www.nasaimages.org/
(NASA and Internet Archive Launch Centralized Resource for Images)
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/ju ... llout.html
Regards,
~Michael Gmirkin
"The purpose of science is to investigate the unexplained, not to explain the uninvestigated." ~Dr. Stephen Rorke
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law
"For every PhD there is an equal and opposite PhD." ~Gibson's law
- substance
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:07 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: NASA 1 million images online
I wonder why turns up nothing on NGC 7603. This site is more or less useless, because it shows only what they want you to see.
My personal blog about science, technology, society and politics. - Putredo Mundi
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:24 am
- Location: Greater Boston, Massachusetts
- Contact:
Fractal / Scalable Phenomena: Moon Crater Sizes
According to M. E. J. Newman's paper Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law at http://arxiv1.library.cornell.edu/abs/c ... /0412004v3, the diameter of the moon's craters are "power law" distributed. Although not given as the possible explanation in the paper, this is consistent with the "fractal / scalable" nature of plasma, in this case arcing.
This, combined with the nearly circular craters, ( and thus perpendicular evacuation mechanism, ) make for some interesting supporting evidence.
This, combined with the nearly circular craters, ( and thus perpendicular evacuation mechanism, ) make for some interesting supporting evidence.
- nick c
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
- Location: connecticut
Re: NASA 1 million images online
This thread is a merger of the following threads:
Recovered: Impact Shmimpact...
Recovered: Hexagonal Craters
Fractal / Scalable Phenomena: Moon Crater Sizes
NASA 1 million images online
Recovered: Impact Shmimpact...
Recovered: Hexagonal Craters
Fractal / Scalable Phenomena: Moon Crater Sizes
NASA 1 million images online
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 2:16 pm
New Craters on the Moon
May 17, 2013, impact on the moon. NASA has been seeing flashes for years:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sc ... narimpact/
What's the EU take on this? Flashes on the moon are real. The new crater appears real. So what caused it? Can the EU writers use this information to prove that the moon is STILL getting plasma strikes, causing craters? Or in fact are these meteorites and it proves the standard theory?
Please chime in!
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sc ... narimpact/
What's the EU take on this? Flashes on the moon are real. The new crater appears real. So what caused it? Can the EU writers use this information to prove that the moon is STILL getting plasma strikes, causing craters? Or in fact are these meteorites and it proves the standard theory?
Please chime in!
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:06 pm
New Crater on Moon
If this is already posted, sorry.
The March 17, 2013 impact crater on the moon should be of interest, since we can compare this impact crater with all those other craters:
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.ph ... ater!.html
I am no expert, but it seems to me that this impact crater does not look like most of the other craters you see on the moon.
I am also assuming they KNOW this is an impact crater: if all they saw was a flash of light, who knows? For sure, they didn't photograph a long electrical arc from way above the moon to its surface . . .
The March 17, 2013 impact crater on the moon should be of interest, since we can compare this impact crater with all those other craters:
http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.ph ... ater!.html
I am no expert, but it seems to me that this impact crater does not look like most of the other craters you see on the moon.
I am also assuming they KNOW this is an impact crater: if all they saw was a flash of light, who knows? For sure, they didn't photograph a long electrical arc from way above the moon to its surface . . .
-
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
Re: New Crater on Moon
Has anyone seen the Chinese moon rocket lately?Also note that new craters on the Moon were also formed by spacecraft impacts .
Oh dear!
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: New Craters on the Moon
Chelybinsk was February 15, 2013. This may be related to that debris cluster. Meteor impacts do occur and do not contradict EU theory.frankebe wrote:May 17, 2013, impact on the moon. NASA has been seeing flashes for years:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sc ... narimpact/
What's the EU take on this? Flashes on the moon are real. The new crater appears real. So what caused it? Can the EU writers use this information to prove that the moon is STILL getting plasma strikes, causing craters? Or in fact are these meteorites and it proves the standard theory?
Please chime in!
-
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
Re: New Crater on Moon
Flashes on the moon, glowing clouds, and dust rising , all can be attributed to electrical activity. The camera stationed at a permanent focus on the moon should catch
any activity. They claim a before and after image, but the strike??
any activity. They claim a before and after image, but the strike??
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: New Crater on Moon
Although it could have been a meteorite, they assume, erroneously, that all flashes of light denote impactors. Moreover, to be such a thing, as visibly bright and large as the flash was, the alleged Moon impactor would have been quite gigantic--orders of magnitude larger than Chelyabinsk. In other words what they observed, if it were an impactor, was not the size of a dust grain or even a car. It was the size of a micro-asteroid.Sparky wrote:Flashes on the moon, glowing clouds, and dust rising , all can be attributed to electrical activity. The camera stationed at a permanent focus on the moon should catch
any activity. They claim a before and after image, but the strike??
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 2:23 pm
Re: New Crater on Moon
I don't have a problem with it being a large rock. Why not? There is a lot of debris from the catastrophe(s) remaining in strange orbits. The Moon is an easy target, since it has no atmosphere, plasmasphere, or magnetic field. There's nothing to stop a rock hitting the surface.
According to calculations, the rock was around 40 kilos and was moving at about 90,000 kph. That's a lot of kinetic energy -- about 12,500 joules, give-or-take. Enough to blast-out a crater, no doubt. There's nothing electrical in the modern era that can create an explosion of that magnitude on the Moon.
According to calculations, the rock was around 40 kilos and was moving at about 90,000 kph. That's a lot of kinetic energy -- about 12,500 joules, give-or-take. Enough to blast-out a crater, no doubt. There's nothing electrical in the modern era that can create an explosion of that magnitude on the Moon.
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: New Crater on Moon
So an 80 pound object made that flash?Steve Smith wrote:I don't have a problem with it being a large rock. Why not? There is a lot of debris from the catastrophe(s) remaining in strange orbits. The Moon is an easy target, since it has no atmosphere, plasmasphere, or magnetic field. There's nothing to stop a rock hitting the surface.
According to calculations, the rock was around 40 kilos and was moving at about 90,000 kph. That's a lot of kinetic energy -- about 12,500 joules, give-or-take. Enough to blast-out a crater, no doubt. There's nothing electrical in the modern era that can create an explosion of that magnitude on the Moon.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 2:16 pm
Re: New Crater on Moon
So is it possible to tell the difference between a meteor strike and an electric strike? Everything about the appearance of the new crater, the internal dome, the rays, etc., seems to fit the EU theory. If it was not an EU-type event, then where are we?
-
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
Re: New Crater on Moon
They claim to have a camera focused on the moon.... a short explosion is probably an impact. Electrical discharges are probably in dark or glow mode and last some time longer than a kinetic impact.So is it possible to tell the difference between a meteor strike and an electric strike?
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests