How Would You Summarize Modern Cosmology?

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

How Would You Summarize Modern Cosmology?

Unread postby orrery » Mon May 28, 2012 4:25 pm

Our modern understanding has advanced significantly since the primitive days and theories of Carl Sagan's times. Modern Cosmology has overturned and invalidated 20th century musings like Black Holes, Neutron Stars, Pulsars, Quasars, and Big Bang Creationism of Catholicism. Much of 21st Century Cosmology is disdained by the Public due to the fact that it challenges their sacred religious beliefs founded in the Book of Genesis and repudiates the idea of a Creation Event and challenging them to accept a Universe infinite in time & space.

The following videos will give you the most accurate and truthful understanding of 21st Century Cosmology.
Universe: Cosmology Quest - part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFFl9S39CTM, part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb_EWnXCu2w

On the cutting edge of Cosmology are the advocates of The Electric Universe, you can watch their groundbreaking documentary Thunderbolts of the Gods. Professor Donald Scott, author of The Electric Sky, NASA guest lecturer, Ph. D of Electrical Engineering, highly praised by the most prestigious names in Government research like Anthony Peratt provides modern explanations for everything to the Sun, and debunking failed concepts Pulsars, and Black Holes using exciting science of Plasma Physics and Electrical Engineering.
Key Scientists of 21st Cosmology aren't people like Stephen Hawking.
They are people like:

    Dr. Hannes Alfven
    Dr. Anthony Peratt
    Dr. Eric Lerner
    Natural Philosopher Wal Thornhill
    Dr. Donald Scott
    Dr. Ari Brynjolffson
    Dr. Halton Arp

The momentum of previous decades still weighs heavy in cosmological discussions. People have yet to upgrade their Cosmology Firmware and still believe in outdated concepts like the Big Bang, Black Holes, Pulsars, Neutron Stars, Dark Matter, & Dark Energy.

Big Bang Creationism has long since been debunked through new modern interpretation of the Red Shift phenomenon by the world's leading Radiological expert Ari Brynjolffson. You can explore his website Plasma Redshift
Personally trained by Neils Bohr himself, Ari is one of the last remaining of a great generation of Scientists. He has been head of the Danish, US Army, and United Nations Radiological Research divisions. His scientific research, using the most advanced radiological and scientific instruments available in the world, prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that the Doppler Shift interpretation of Red Shift originally proposed by Catholic Preacher Georges Lemaitre is fundamentally flawed just as believed by Hubble & Einstein.

Brynjolffson has shown beyond any reasonable doubt that Red Shift is a consequence of the Electron Plasma Density.
When photons penetrate a cold and dense plasma, they lose energy through ionization and excitation, Compton scattering on the individual electrons, and Raman scattering on the plasma frequency. But in sparse hot plasma, such as in the solar corona, the photons lose energy also in plasma redshift. The energy loss per electron in the plasma redshift is about equal to the product of the photon's energy and one half of the Compton cross-section per electron. In quiescent solar corona, this heating starts in the transition zone to the corona and is a major fraction of the coronal heating. Plasma redshift contributes also to the heating of the interstellar plasma, the galactic corona, and the intergalactic plasma. Plasma redshift explains the solar redshifts, the intrinsic redshifts of stars, quasars, the galactic corona, the cosmological redshifts, the cosmic microwave background, and the X-ray background. The plasma redshift explains the observed magnitude-redshift relation for supernovae SNe Ia without the big bang, dark matter, or dark energy. It explains also the observed surface brightness of galaxies. There is no cosmic time dilation. The universe is not expanding. The plasma redshift, when compared with experiments, shows that the photons' classical gravitational redshifts are reversed as the photons move from the Sun to the Earth, provided they have adequate time to change their frequency. This is a quantum mechanical effect. As seen from the Earth, a repulsion force acts on the photons.

Big Bang Creationism and Cosmology, despite still being popular in Christian countries as the dominant explanation has been debunked for over 50 years. Plasma Cosmology is the only real game in town.

Once the Doppler Theory of Redshift had been debunked, all the work of "Expanding Universe" Theoreticians that built their work on the idea of Doppler Redshift became instantly invalidated. Once Redshift moved from a Doppler interpretation, to one of the Photon's Journey through Interstellar Space, the work of popular names like Stephen Hawking suddenly became toilet paper, and a new generation waits in the wings to take the baton and advance humanities understanding of the Cosmos. As we come to better understand the Photon's Pipe Journey through Space, we will be able to see further into Space than ever before through improved adaptive optics. The Universe becomes infinite in age & size and we are just opening our eyes to view deeper through the fog.
/r/plasmacosmology

I recommend the following books:

    The Big Bang Never Happened by Dr. Eric J. Lerner
    The Electric Sky by Dr. Donald E. Scott
    Cosmic Plasma by Dr. Hannes Alfven
    Physics of the Plasma Universe by Dr. Anthony Peratt
    The Electric Universe by Natural Philosopher Wal Thornhill
    Plasma Redshiftby Dr. Ari Brynjolffson
    Seeing Red by Dr. Halton C. Arp

In closing, I find it is always important to note, that much of the public believes that the Michelson-Morley experiment upon which early 20th Century Science was developed remains valid. Nothing could be further from the truth. It was once believed that Space was a vacuum. Since our first probes into Space, we have found this is not true. Far from disproving the existence of the Aether, it has come that we have instead disproved the existence of a vacuum.

Space is a gigantic Sea of Plasma consisting of electrons, quarks, and other exotic charged particles. I can not stress this enough, there is no vacuum in Space. Despite the illusion of a vacuum, you are living in a gigantic sea of electrified plasma, a complex dusty plasma makes up our Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy. This plasma is in a Dark Glow State, not enough energy goes into it to illuminate it, but we can see much of it through Infrared Telescopes. The "seeing" may seem great, but this electrified plasma currently limits our view to around 14 GLY and its density varies depending on the Electric Field of the object being encompassed by it. With the improved red-shifted viewing of the James Webb Space Telescope, its gold primary mirror will serve as an adaptive optic to this effect, allowing us to look further than ever before into the infinite sea of space.
"though free to think and to act - we are held together like the stars - in firmament with ties inseparable - these ties cannot be seen but we can feel them - each of us is only part of a whole" -tesla

http://www.reddit.com/r/plasmaCosmology
User avatar
orrery
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: How Would You Summarize Modern Cosmology?

Unread postby Osmosis » Mon May 28, 2012 11:19 pm

Well said, orrery, well said!

osmosis :)
Osmosis
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: San Jose, California


Return to Electric Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests