Holofractal model compatible with EU theory?

[Spawn of Saturn]

Hello all,

This is my first post so forgive me if I was meant to post an intro somewhere else!

I just wanted to know how many of you are familiar with the theories of Nassim Haramein and his so called 'Holofractal Grand Unified Field Theory'?

His website is http://theresonanceproject.org/

He is working within the parameters of conventional particle and quantum physics but has some revolutionary ideas regarding the geometries and energies which dictate the actual structure of the universe.

There seem to me to be various overlaps with the EU model e.g. revisions of Einsteins equations, omission of the need for dark matter/energy, scalable/fractal geometries and features etc but also some areas which wouldn't seem so compatible e.g. the mini black holes for one thing.

However his paper on 'The Schwarzchild Proton' is well worth a look as, even if it is not wholly integrable with plasma physics and the Electric Universe theory, it totally blasts apart conventional and established ideas about the standard model of physics.

This is ultimately how i see the transition from old school to new, in terms of a scientific revolution, occurring. Confront the Luddites with evidence derived from their own over complicated and esoteric theories which shows that they have been drastically misguided. Only then will there be no choice that it is back to the drawing board. And a blank canvas is just what we need. (Hopefully not finding the Higgs will aid this process too.)

I am aware that Haramein has had a lot of stick over his theories and ideas (not least because he also talk about many taboo subjects which are indeed very controversial) but that is just another thing he has in common with the EU model.

Anyone have any opinions?

[Spawn of Saturn]

Here is the paper:

http://www.theresonanceproject.org/pdf/ ... ramein.pdf

Can anyone tell me why this would not work with the EU model?

[Goldminer]

Here is the paper:

http://www.theresonanceproject.org/pdf/ ... ramein.pdf

Can anyone tell me why this would not work with the EU model?

I don't come here to "tell" you anything, but please review S J Crothers work at S J Crothers

Basically, all the "math" "proving the "black hole" is based on a conflation of the symbol "r" used by Schwarzschild to represent a curvature, and disregarding his meaning, is used by others to represent a radius.

"Schwarzschild's solution has no black hole . . ."

Black Holes are supposed to be such concentrations of gravitational acceleration that they suck into themselves any nearby matter and keep growing. I understand that protons do not do this evil thing!

IMOHO, the proton is an aetheric soliton, but quite indestructible.
.

[Spawn of Saturn]

Thanks, I'll have a read of Crother's work.

[seasmith]

.... hole" is based on a conflation of the symbol "r" used by Schwarzschild to represent a curvature, and disregarding his meaning, is used by others to represent a radius.

"Schwarzschild's solution has no black hole . . ."

Radius is the special case. "r" , with duration, always a trajectory at minimum. Curvature, EUperspect, in the mains is magnetic. The twist is only a perfect radius ratio proagates magnetic flux. And don't be drifting off into any magnetic black holes. HoloFractal is one of the better ways to map that trajectory, so far.
s