junglelord wrote:If you think about Dave Thomson's APM model, in my mind I could see it as a fluid plasma non material construct. Its not of course, its Aether, but it is elastic, fluid like, double layer charge, tiny vortices, tensegrity structures, branching networks from non material to material. Plasma is strangely similar. Electric magnetic tension, elastic, vorticies, branching networks, double layers, tensegrity, I fail to see the difference. Mind you I am a simple guy, I sometimes get reponses that my train of thought is hard to follow, I hope not. I just deal in similarities.
Agreed. I'm particularly fond of the Tensegrity relationship. I think accounts for the factor of 'integrating' the various "domains" seen as "fractal scaling relationships" throughout the 'system(s)'. But it's totally dynamic, never sitting still. That's an important hierarchical scaling relationship with electro-plasma dynamics.
Lets take look at this "non-baryonic matter" thing. In his reply "Dr. Wright is Wrong" Eric Lerner addresses this hypothetical entity:
The existence of "dark matter"
Dark matter, or "non-baryonic" matter
is a hypothetical form of matter different from any observed on Earth but which is nonetheless
required by the Big Bang. Current versions of the (ever-changing) theory require that total gravitating matter density be equal to 0.3 of the critical density but that of ordinary, baryon matter be only 0.05 of the critical density. This means that 0.25 of the critical density has to be in the form of some undiscovered, non-baryonic matter, generally described as Wimps, weakly interacting massive particles.
This "cold dark matter" or CDM, was hypothesized as essential for the Big Bang theory back in 1980--23 years ago. Since then
physicists have searched diligently with dozens of experiments for any evidence of the existence of these dark matter particle here on Earth. Oddly enough
every one of the experiments has had negative results. In fields of research other than cosmology this would have long ago led to the conclusion that CDM does not exist. But Big Bang cosmology does not taken "NO" for an answer. So the failure to find the CDM after so many experiments does not in any way shake the faith of Big Bangers in such CDM. This is evidence that what we are dealing with here is a religious faith, not a scientific theory that can be refuted by experiment or observation...
Observations of ultraviolet and soft x-ray absorption has revealed the existence of "warm plasma' with a temperature of only about 0.2keV, which amounts to a mass comparable to that of the entire Local group of galaxies.(Nature 421, 719). If we adds up the warm plasma, which is sufficiently dim to be observable only as it absorbs radiation from more dim objects, the hot plasma, and the white dwarfs, we have enough matter to equal that which is inferred by the gravitational mass of cluster of galaxies. So there is no need for non-baryonic matter and there is no room for it either.
Conclusion: the evidence against the existence of non-baryonic"dark" matter is stronger than ever. Ordinary matter is only the only type of matter that exists. "
Dr. Wright is Wrong": Eric Lerner
Lerner is not the only scientist who doesn't subscribe to the "dark matter" paradigm: "
Scientists Say Dark Matter Doesn't Exist".
So I'm curious as to how "dark matter filaments" came to exist since they can apparently be photographed. Which doesn't make them "dark" at all. From Physics world:
"
Dark-matter map points to galaxy formation" presents us with this seeming
oddly captioned photo. How does one show a photo of something that's never been directly detected??:
...regions of space containing large quantities of luminous matter almost always also contain large quantities of dark matter...
So it appears that the real filaments and the imagined filaments do indeed 'overlap'. This is a perfect example of how this type of nonsense can present contradictory evidence literally
side-by-side and have mind numbed "pseudo-intellectuals" phase-locked out of their reasoning skills without so much as one hand being raised to the contrary.
Anyway. There is more info available but I need to calm down for a few. Gonna go meditate on some Tensegrity for a bit.
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden