EU Breakthrough? - Gravity is Electro-Magnetic

[Sparky]

mpc, I see you have posted more BB/Einstein/quantum theory nonsense to support your displaced balls and springs gravity hypothesis.

You are obviously here to "educate" the poor, deluded souls who have been "taken in" by EU theory...

Is that your agenda? Or are you desperately trying to find someone, anyone, who will accept your hypothesis and feed your ego?

mpc,

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

What BB nonsense!....We don't have any idea at all where the universe came from or how it formed, other than the delusional speculations of standard cosmology.

This garbage that you are reading and distorting to fit into your view of the universe has nothing to do with reality. Your own explanations and examples of how this displaced balls and springs aether works falsifies it as gravity. It appears to be a cousin of Einstein's warped space/time.

'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth,---"We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'

Redshift, which is what their "data" is, does not equal distance!
Without a reliable distance, direction can not be calculated.

They admit that they don't know if clusters are coming or going.
The only honest and correct statement in the article!

People who believe this nonsense have a belief system from being indoctrinated into the "gravity/quantum" cult.

mpc,

What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward

No we don't! You have little understanding of what is being seen.
The so called experts, if they believe the BB model and stars are fusion engines, have little more understanding of what they are seeing. All of the modern theoretical constructs of the universe, BB, black holes, matter, energy, and neutron stars are nonsense! If you believe what they are telling you, it is no wonder you are confused and have these nonsense ideas that self destruct upon explanation.

Your evidence is baseless nonsense, and using imaginative drawings sure doesn't help support your fantasy gravity.
If this is the best evidence you can come up with, you have little chance of converting anyone here, especially those who have a solid background in math.

Your study and belief in pseudoscience and science fiction fantasy
may give you a "high" from some brain chemical release, but your hypothesis is not science, ie., can not be experimentally demonstrated, is not supported by data, without heavily biased distortion, nor is it predictive, and exclusive for an explanation, setting it apart from other theories.

And I will repeat, as you do not seem to be reading, understanding and considering what other's write, your own explanations and examples of how it works falsifies it.

Just because you read it online somewhere, or it is a published article, does not make it of any value, as a scientific hypothesis.

[mpc755]

mpc, I see you have posted more BB/Einstein/quantum theory nonsense to support your displaced balls and springs gravity hypothesis.

You are obviously here to "educate" the poor, deluded souls who have been "taken in" by EU theory...

Is that your agenda? Or are you desperately trying to find someone, anyone, who will accept your hypothesis and feed your ego?

mpc,

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

What BB nonsense!....We don't have any idea at all where the universe came from or how it formed, other than the delusional speculations of standard cosmology.

This garbage that you are reading and distorting to fit into your view of the universe has nothing to do with reality. Your own explanations and examples of how this displaced balls and springs aether works falsifies it as gravity. It appears to be a cousin of Einstein's warped space/time.

'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth,---"We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'

Redshift, which is what their "data" is, does not equal distance!
Without a reliable distance, direction can not be calculated.

They admit that they don't know if clusters are coming or going.
The only honest and correct statement in the article!

People who believe this nonsense have a belief system from being indoctrinated into the "gravity/quantum" cult.

mpc,

What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward

No we don't! You have little understanding of what is being seen.
The so called experts, if they believe the BB model and stars are fusion engines, have little more understanding of what they are seeing. All of the modern theoretical constructs of the universe, BB, black holes, matter, energy, and neutron stars are nonsense! If you believe what they are telling you, it is no wonder you are confused and have these nonsense ideas that self destruct upon explanation.

Your evidence is baseless nonsense, and using imaginative drawings sure doesn't help support your fantasy gravity.
If this is the best evidence you can come up with, you have little chance of converting anyone here, especially those who have a solid background in math.

Your study and belief in pseudoscience and science fiction fantasy
may give you a "high" from some brain chemical release, but your hypothesis is not science, ie., can not be experimentally demonstrated, is not supported by data, without heavily biased distortion, nor is it predictive, and exclusive for an explanation, setting it apart from other theories.

And I will repeat, as you do not seem to be reading, understanding and considering what other's write, your own explanations and examples of how it works falsifies it.

Just because you read it online somewhere, or it is a published article, does not make it of any value, as a scientific hypothesis.

Curved spacetime is displaced aether.

[mjv1121]

mpc755,

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

Not quite, but you're getting closer.

Michael

[mpc755]

mpc755,

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

Not quite, but you're getting closer.

Michael

Yes, quite.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle has a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether wave passes through both.

[mjv1121]

mpc755,

You need to chuck out all that SR and GR stuff, instead of trying to find new ways to make it sound plausible.

Curved spacetime is curved spacetime and is nonsense.

The aether is a moving material particle field that is the explanation for Newtonian gravity. Geometrical empty space is an attempt to displace Newtonian physics with maths; the hope being that if you can't understand it, may be you can calculate it. They really should have stuck to the trying to understand it. Constructing mathematical entities to replace reality does not improve understanding.

On a more positive note, it is good that you are thinking about it. Keep thinking.

Michael

[mpc755]

mpc755,

You need to chuck out all that SR and GR stuff, instead of trying to find new ways to make it sound plausible.

Curved spacetime is curved spacetime and is nonsense.

The aether is a moving material particle field that is the explanation for Newtonian gravity. Geometrical empty space is an attempt to displace Newtonian physics with maths; the hope being that if you can't understand it, may be you can calculate it. They really should have stuck to the trying to understand it. Constructing mathematical entities to replace reality does not improve understanding.

On a more positive note, it is good that you are thinking about it. Keep thinking.

Michael

I agree with Einstein and de Broglie.

Einstein defines aether as not consisting of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium."

"There may be supposed to be extended physical objects to which the idea of motion cannot be applied. They may not be thought of as consisting of particles which allow themselves to be separately tracked through time."

"The special theory of relativity forbids us to assume the ether to consist of particles observable through time, but the hypothesis of ether in itself is not in conflict with the special theory of relativity."

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable;...But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it."

Every time Einstein mentions motion as applied to the ether it is defined as the ether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time. This is different than Einstein's definition of mobility as applied to the ether.

The ether of general relativity is mobile.

"It may be added that the whole change in the conception of the ether which the special theory of relativity brought about, consisted in taking away from the ether its last mechanical quality, namely, its immobility."

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The mobility of the aether of relativity as defined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium"

The hidden medium is the aether. The "energetic contact" is the state of displacement of the aether.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.

Curved spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether.

[querious]

Here's a paper relating QCD quantum fluctuations to Dark Matter, with lots of supporting evidence...

http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0847

Dave

[Goldminer]

Here's a paper relating QCD quantum fluctuations to Dark Matter, with lots of supporting evidence...

http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0847

Dave

we present the first indications that dark matter may not exist and that the phenomena for which it was invoked might be explained by the gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum by the known baryonic matter.

At least he thinks "dark matter" may not exist. I am convinced that the electromotive force, stretching across galaxies in the form of plasma "ropes" handles all the problems for which "dark matter" was invented. I think gravity must be getting pretty tired trying to do all the things that consensus astronomers want it to do!

.

[ifrean]

mpc, mjv

so the aether is gravity, keeping matter in its place, really.....you couldnt make this stuff up.....oh wait you did.

im with sparky on this one, I observe no evidence in reality on what you are both espousing.

mjv if you say that matter displaces aether in the galaxy then how in reality can plancks constant measure something we cannot come into contact with until we get to empty space(err particle aether domianted areas of the universe). I wonder would the aether be dressed in blue and matter in red and we can witness the battle lines or would it be more like a football game, jolly good show chaps.

and why oh why mpc are you filling your posts with somebody elses musings, do you not have your own?

[mpc755]

Here's a paper relating QCD quantum fluctuations to Dark Matter, with lots of supporting evidence...

http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0847

Dave

The following article describes the aether as an incompressible fluid resulting in what the article refers to as gravitational aether caused by pressure (or vorticity).

'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3955

"One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity."

The following article describes gravity as a pressure exerted by aether toward matter.

'The aether-modified gravity and the G ̈del metric'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5654v2

"As for the pressure, it is equal to p = 53−αg,6a2 so, it is positive if αg < 3 which is the weaker condition than the previous one. One notes that the results corresponding to the usual gravity are easily recovered. Also, it is easy to see that the interval αg < 15 corresponds to the usual matter."

The following article describes a gravitating vacuum where aether is the quantum vacuum of the 21-st century.

'From Analogue Models to Gravitating Vacuum'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.1155

"The aether of the 21-st century is the quantum vacuum, which is a new form of matter. This is the real substance"

The following articles describe what is presently postulated as dark matter is aether.

'Quantum aether and an invariant Planck scale'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3753

"this version of aether may have some bearing on the abundance of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in our universe."

"mass of the aether"

'Scalars, Vectors and Tensors from Metric-Affine Gravity'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.5168

"the model obtained here gets closer to the aether theory of , which is shown therein to be an alternative to the cold dark matter."

'Unified model for dark matter and quintessence'
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0610135

"Superfluid dark matter is reminiscent of the aether and modeling the universe using superfluid aether is compatible."

[mpc755]

mpc, mjv

so the aether is gravity, keeping matter in its place, really.....you couldnt make this stuff up.....oh wait you did.

im with sparky on this one, I observe no evidence in reality on what you are both espousing.

mjv if you say that matter displaces aether in the galaxy then how in reality can plancks constant measure something we cannot come into contact with until we get to empty space(err particle aether domianted areas of the universe). I wonder would the aether be dressed in blue and matter in red and we can witness the battle lines or would it be more like a football game, jolly good show chaps.

and why oh why mpc are you filling your posts with somebody elses musings, do you not have your own?

One poster was trying to determine if gravity is a push or a pull. Gravity is a push. Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.

You witness the effects of aether displacement everytime a double slit experiment is performed.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit. The associated aether wave passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory.

Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves become disorderly. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

The offset detected between the light lensing through the space neighboring moving galaxy clusters and the galaxy clusters themselves is evidence the galaxy clusters are moving through and displacing the aether.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/100 ... 1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

What Voyager detected is evidence aether displaced by the solar system is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/de ... yager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

[Sparky]

Hasty Conclusion fallacies, at best. Nonsense, built upon nonsense.

[mpc755]

'Superfluid Is Shown To Have Property Of A Solid'
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/19 ... 072958.htm

'Northwestern University physicists have for the first time shown that superfluid helium-3 -- the lighter isotope of helium, which is a liquid that has lost all internal friction, allowing it to flow without resistance and ooze through tiny spaces that normal liquids cannot penetrate -- actually behaves like a solid in its ability to conduct sound waves. ... "Faraday's finding was the first indication that light and magnetism were related," says William Halperin, professor of physics and astronomy at Northwestern. "I wouldn't say that our discovery is of that magnitude, but it is significant as the first observation of a previously unknown mode of wave propagation in a liquid -- one that is of the type you would expect to see in a solid."'

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid.

The galaxy clusters in the following article are not traveling with dark matter. The galaxy clusters are moving through the aether. The galaxy clusters displace the aether.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubbl ... ature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The 'ripple' is a gravitational wave. The 'ripple' is an aether displacement wave.

The above is physical evidence of a moving 'particle' having an associated aether displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit. The associated aether wave passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves become disorderly. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Aether is not at rest when displaced. Displaced aether exerts force toward matter.

Aether displacement explains why the shape of the Milky Way's 'dark matter' is in the shape of a squished beach ball.

'Dark Halo Around Our Galaxy Looks Like Squished Beach Ball'
http://www.space.com/7746-dark-halo-gal ... -ball.html

"Dark matter seems to shroud the remaining visible matter in giant spheres called haloes."

The Milky Way's halo is displaced aether.

"But the new study found that the Milky Way's halo isn't exactly spherical, but squished. In fact, its beach-ball form is flattened in a surprising direction perpendicular to the galaxy's visible, pancake-shaped spiral disk."

All of the aether displaced by the Milky Way matter exerts force toward the matter. The force exerted toward the matter by the aether displaced perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy's spiral disk offset. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the spiral disk which exerts force toward the center of the galaxy. This forces the matter closer together which results in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball.

Matter does not move with dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... x/abstract

"We compile a sample of 38 galaxy clusters which have both X-ray and strong lensing observations, and study for each cluster the projected offset between the dominant component of baryonic matter centre (measured by X-rays) and the gravitational centre (measured by strong lensing). Among the total sample, 45 per cent clusters have offsets [greater than]10 arcsec. The [greater than]10 arcsec separations are significant, considering the arcsecond precision in the measurement of the lensing/X-ray centres. This suggests that it might be a common phenomenon in unrelaxed galaxy clusters that gravitational field is separated spatially from the dominant component of baryonic matter. It also has consequences for lensing models of unrelaxed clusters since the gas mass distribution may differ from the dark matter distribution and give perturbations to the modelling. Such offsets can be used as a statistical tool for comparison with the results of Lambda cold dark matter ( CDM) simulations and to test the modified dynamics."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet.

'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/new ... 0-023.html

'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'

The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is, a jet. Analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.

The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet:

http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html

The reason for the 'expansion' of the universe is the continual emission of aether into the Universal jet. Three dimensional space associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where aether condenses into matter.

The following is an image analogous of the Universe, or the local Universe, we exist in:

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/planetarium/g ... ckHole.jpg

Dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into and propagating through the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang. It's the Big Ongoing.

Einstein's definition of motion as applied to the ether is defined throughout the following article as the ether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time.

I interpret Einstein's definition of motion as applied to the ether as it can not be known if ether consists of particles or not.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium."

"There may be supposed to be extended physical objects to which the idea of motion cannot be applied. They may not be thought of as consisting of particles which allow themselves to be separately tracked through time."

"The special theory of relativity forbids us to assume the ether to consist of particles observable through time, but the hypothesis of ether in itself is not in conflict with the special theory of relativity."

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable;...But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it."

Every time Einstein mentions motion as applied to the ether it is defined as the ether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time. This is different than Einstein's definition of mobility as applied to the ether.

The ether of general relativity is mobile.

"It may be added that the whole change in the conception of the ether which the special theory of relativity brought about, consisted in taking away from the ether its last mechanical quality, namely, its immobility."

The mobility of the ether of relatiivty as determined by its connections with the matter is the state of displacement of the aether.

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the ether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the ether.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field"

The electromagnetic field is a state of aether.

Matter is condensations of aether.

DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2."

The mass of the body does diminish; however, the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether.

Matter evaporates into aether.

As matter converts to aether it expands in three dimensional space. The physical effects this transition has on the neighboring aether and matter is energy.

Mass is conserved. Energy is conserved.

A change in state of that which has mass is energy.

All 'delayed choice quantum eraser' experiments are explained by understanding conservation of momentum and a moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.

In the image on the right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_ch ... experiment
When the downconverted photon pair are created, in order for there to be conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is conserved. This means the downconverted photon pair have opposite polarizations. We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downconverted photons travels either the red or blue path toward D0 and the other photon travels either the red or blue path toward the prism.

There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and blue paths. The aether waves propagating toward D0 interact with the lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves create interference which alters the direction the photon travels prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the 'down' photons when they arrive at D0.

Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3. Since there is a single path toward D3 there is nothing for the wave in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4.

Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down' photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether waves create interference which alters the direction the photon travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all 'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created which reflects back to the interference pattern both sets of photons are creating at D0.

The following experiment will provide evidence of aether displacement.

Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters BSca and BScb. Replace mirror Ma with BSca and replace mirror Mb with BScb. Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a, D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b, and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even need to be created in order to determine the interference patterns both sets of photons are creating at D0.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.

[Sparky]

Hydrodynamics !

[mpc755]

Hydrodynamics !

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium."

If, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the aether as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that aether consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium which has mass.