EU Breakthrough? - Gravity is Electro-Magnetic

[querious]

Here's an article which shows how to derive Big G from the Dark Energy and COBE radius...

http://www.astronautical.org/sites/defa ... s_48-6.pdf (starts on pg 8)

More recent measurements to test the equation can be found here...

http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_matter.html

Dave

[mjv1121]

Gravity IS NOT Electro-Magnetic. Save your efforts.

Michael

[Bengt Nyman]

Gravity IS NOT Electro-Magnetic. Save your efforts. Michael

Gravity is Electro-Static, caused by subatomic dipole posturing.

[mjv1121]

Bengt,

Gravity is Electro-Static, caused by subatomic dipole posturing.

There is no such thing as a subatomic dipole.

Gravity is in no way electrical and in no way magnetic.

Sorry to push this point, but it is important. What is a dipole? And I mean, what actually is it?, not what are its operational characteristics. The answer is that it is a bar magnet. Electromagnetism is the result of free electron behaviour, so without an atomic structure to hold free electrons in a stable manner, there can be no dipole. The entire concept of a subatomic dipole is erroneous.

Michael

[Drethon]

Not saying I know what I'm talking about but if a subatomic object contains both positive and negative charge components, who is to say the charge cannot separate slightly. The neutron is believed to be a proton, electron and electron antineutrino due to the results of neutron decay. Why do those components (which have different charges) have to be balanced within the neutron?

[mjv1121]

Drethon,

"electron antineutrino" bollocks - no such thing. There is no such particle as a neutrino.

A neutron is a combination of an electron and proton, but electrons DO NOT have a negative "charge" and protons DO NOT have a positive charge. The entire concept of "positive" and "negative" "electrical charge" is utterly utterly erroneous. Charge is not "electrical", it is kinetic.

Michael

[mpc755]

Here's an article which shows how to derive Big G from the Dark Energy and COBE radius...

http://www.astronautical.org/sites/defa ... s_48-6.pdf (starts on pg 8)

"A historical, conventional analog to the idea behind the Casimir Force can be drawn considering training given to sailors of the tall-ship era who were instructed to not allow two ships to get too close to one another in choppy seas lest they be forced together by the surrounding waves requiring assistance to be pulled apart."

The ships can be forced together by the water displaced by both of the ships which encompasses the ships. Two large ships can be forced together by the surrounding displaced water in calm seas.

"So if the vacuum is never really empty"

Aether has mass.

More recent measurements to test the equation can be found here...

http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_matter.html

Dave

'Was the universe born spinning?'
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

The Universe spins around a preferred axis because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.

'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/new ... 0-023.html

'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'

The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet.

The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet.

http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html

The reason for the 'expansion' of the universe is the continual emission of aether into the Universal jet. Three dimensional space associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with the Universe moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where the increase in pressure caused by the aether continually being emitted into the Universal jet causes the aether to condense into matter.

The following is an image analogous of the Universe, or the local Universe, we exist in.

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/planetarium/g ... ckHole.jpg

The following is an image analogous of the Universal spin.

http://i.space.com/images/i/612/i02/040 ... 1292259454

Dark flow is the aether emitted into the Universal jet. Dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

[mjv1121]

Dark matter and dark energy are nonsense concepts invented to support previous nonsense concepts - they do not exist.

[mpc755]

Dark matter and dark energy are nonsense concepts invented to support previous nonsense concepts - they do not exist.

What is postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass.

What is postulated as dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.

[mjv1121]

mpc755,

Yes, aether has mass, but it has no inertial or gravitational mass.

"Universal jet"....really?

What is postulated as dark matter is a lack of understanding of gravity.

What is postulated as dark energy is a ridiculous and contemptuous invention to support big bang theory against the invention of dark matter.

Michael

[mpc755]

mpc755,

Yes, aether has mass, but it has no inertial or gravitational mass.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter IS gravity.

"Universal jet"....really?

Yes. It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing. The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.

What is postulated as dark matter is a lack of understanding of gravity.

What is postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter IS gravity.

What is postulated as dark energy is a ridiculous and contemptuous invention to support big bang theory against the invention of dark matter.

There is zero evidence of a 'big bang'. All of the evidence is evidence of an ongoing process. There is directionality and spin to the Universe which can not be explained by a 'big bang'.

What is postulated as dark energy is the change in state of the aether emitted into the Universal jet.

[ifrean]

aether has mass

so how and what did we measure aether with?

wow, been away a couple of days and all of a sudden the higgs has been found

its getting better all the time, the aether is gravity

[mpc755]

aether has mass

so how and what did we measure aether with?

wow, been away a couple of days and all of a sudden the higgs has been found

its getting better all the time, the aether is gravity

"Einstein's 'First Paper'"
http://www.worldscibooks.com/etextbook/ ... _chap1.pdf

"The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause [its] propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether moved by these forces."

The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause its propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether displaced by these forces.

The effects of aether displacement are observed everytime a double slit experiment is performed.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium"

The hidden medium is the aether. The "energetic contact" with a hidden medium is the state of displacement of the aether.

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110602/ ... 1.344.html

"Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."

What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit. The associated aether wave passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory.

Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves become disorderly. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~his ... ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubbl ... ature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The 'ripple' is a gravitational wave. The 'ripple' is an aether displacement wave.

The above is physical evidence of a moving 'particle' having an associated aether displacement wave.

What waves in a double slit experiment is what ripples when galaxy clusters collide; the aether. The ripple is a gravitational wave.

[mjv1121]

ifrean,

Planck's constant tells us that aether has mass. The mass of a a quantum aether particle is 1.47x10-50kg, travelling at c, it has a kinetic energy of 6.63x10-34 Joules.

The Hoggs Bison is a mythical creature that doesn't actually exist.

the aether is gravity

Now you're getting it.

Michael

[mpc755]

ifrean,

Planck's constant tells us that aether has mass. The mass of a a quantum aether particle is 1.47x10-50kg, travelling at c, it has a kinetic energy of 6.63x10-34 Joules.

The Hoggs Bison is a mythical creature that doesn't actually exist.

the aether is gravity

Now you're getting it.

Michael

Take it to the next step to really get it.

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.