terminology

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
squidworth
Guest

terminology

Post by squidworth » Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:31 pm

when i browse mainstream sites and they talk about ionizing radiation, and you guys say like low density currents, is this essentially the same thing?

squidworth
Guest

Re: terminology

Post by squidworth » Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:08 pm

or how bout when i hear of "a stream of radiation that consists of 90% protons", how does this compare to a moving positive charge found in a current

KickLaBuka
Guest

Re: terminology

Post by KickLaBuka » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:52 pm

You make empirical thoughts. I have my own thoughts about electromass and the electromagnetic spectrum, which are somewhat different than the current EU at small and large scales (but I'm wearing on them), and my ideas are totally different from the Standard Models at just about every scale. You will have to search this out on your own and discard as much as possible in order to still make sense of everything.

For example, I like to discard:
Strong Nuclear Force
Weak Nuclear Force
Aether
Supermassiveness
Acretion disks
Magnetohydrodynamics
Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Electrodynamics
Acceleration of the Universe
Expansion of the Universe
big bang
General Relativity
Electric Sun Model
Hydrogen Filled Sun Model (Standard)
I disagree about the location for Emission inside an atom
I expect a different constant than the fine structure constant to be discovered
I have my own ideas about time and how to introduce it to a new set of mathematics, but this is really out there stuff.

.....and so much more. It's really a personal journey. All I can offer is to be weary of confusing words because they were probably invented as a band-aid, a cover-up for a lack of understanding.

squidworth
Guest

Re: terminology

Post by squidworth » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:46 pm

honestly, in my ignorance it's not meant as a very "deep" question,. moving protons=moving positive charge? yes/no?, is it all about density? what is moving positive charge if not a stream of moving protons? I'm just trying to connect the dots and everyone speaks a different language

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: terminology

Post by junglelord » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:56 pm

squidworth wrote: what is moving positive charge if not a stream of moving protons? I'm just trying to connect the dots and everyone speaks a different language
Positrons.
:D
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

KickLaBuka
Guest

Re: terminology

Post by KickLaBuka » Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:03 am

Positrons - An antibody to electrons. A positive charge on an otherwise very small mass body. Theorized and I believe used on electrical terms. I am not the expert on physical chemistry and chemical reactions, but I am pretty sure that no element contains positrons. It doesn't mean they don't exist, so I cannot find a reason to discard the word.

Neutrino's - I'm not even sure what this means. A dielectric with a comparible mass to an electron? Not sure, but anti-neutrinos and neutrino's seem to be an integral part of explaining chemical reactions. New mathematics may either account for or explain the chemical observation in more real terms.

anti-matter - a fictional concept from a book-made-movie. Interesting and wonderful book and movie, but not real.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests