ELECTROMASS - The Same Principles at Every Scale

[KickLaBuka]

This forty page paper combines the work of both Halton Arp and Oliver Manuel. For those who know who these two people are, you understand the magnitude of this correlation. The concept agrees with every observation known, by making one key shift of mindset from classical physics as of 1870. It gives justification for the removal of such forces as the strong force, the weak force, supermassiveness, dark energy, big bang, etc. It agrees with Birkeland and Alfvien. It corrects Scott and Thornhill.

Electromass may be disproven, but for now it remains the key correlation. It is available for free. Email me at justinbcat@yahoo.com

-Justin

[mharratsc]

Why not just post the paper online and put a link in here?

[KickLaBuka]

I don't know how, and I would rather email directly to interested people. It's 3 megabytes. Hopefully that is ok.

[junglelord]

I am interested.
Can you send one to my email
tarzansalive@hotmail.com

Please and thankyou
Cheers
JL

[Lloyd]

I consider it remotely possible that Oliver Manuel's ideas about the cores of some or many stars being neutron stars are correct, which means they're much more likely wrong, because he assumes that pulsars are neutron stars that spin at very high velocity, whereas it's much more likely that the pulses from pulsars are electrical pulses, due to discharging with a mass near each such star, rather than rotaional pulses, so no neutronium is needed and there is thus no evidence that neutronium or neutron stars exist. His model also assumes that neutron stars are formed from supernova implosions, but supernovae are most likely electrical explosions of over-stressed plasma, rather than gravitational implosions into burnt-out nuclear cores. So Scott and Thornhill are more likely correct and Thornhill has already explained quasar and galaxy formation, based on Arp's findings, such as at http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=ep8d37ws

[KickLaBuka]

When dealing with philisophical questions, it is expected that people get closer and closer to the right track. But electromass has not been said yet and it avoids philosophy, to give way for physical principles. You are entitled to your opinions whether you read my 40 pages or not. My goal is not to argue with other people who also have a strong dislike of the standard model of astronomy.

-Justin

[Tina]

It corrects Scott and Thornhill.

It is available for free. Email me at justinbcat@yahoo.com

-Justin

I'm enjoying reading Electromass - haven't got to the part relating to correction of Scott and Thornhill.

Have you had opportunity to discuss this with Wal Thornhill?

[KickLaBuka]

Tina,

Thanks a lot. Let me clear up what I said. I have read scott's electric sky. I skipped thornhill's electric universe and went straight to arp's observations (Although by that point I had already decided on my viewpoint). The first thirty pages of arp's book was enough to set me over the edge. So in short, I only mention thornhill with respect that he is working on this. Since I have not read his work, I don't know exactly what to correct, but I understand the precepts of EU and my correction is that they are only half right.

I came up with the idea in September 08, and just finished writing the book. I haven't changed it since 6/11. I am hoping that those experts, thornhill, scott, arp and manuel would take the time for it, and I'm hoping that they catch wind of it from this thread.

-Justin

[Tina]

Tina,
I am hoping that those experts, thornhill, scott, arp and manuel would take the time for it, and I'm hoping that they catch wind of it from this thread.

-Justin

This thread might come to Thornhill's attention......

but I suggest you PM mmgirkin and ask him to approach Wal Thornhill on your behalf to seek permission to submit your Electromass papers for opinion/discussion. Michael is approachable but if he, for whatever reason, must decline then I have Plan B and Plan C.

[Tina]

Tina,
I am hoping that those experts, thornhill, scott, arp and manuel would take the time for it, and I'm hoping that they catch wind of it from this thread.

-Justin

This thread might come to Thornhill's attention......but don't be too humble here

I suggest you PM MGmirkin and ask him to approach Wal Thornhill on your behalf to seek permission to submit your Electromass papers for opinion/discussion. Michael is approachable but if he, for whatever reason, must decline then I have Plan B and Plan C.

[KickLaBuka]

Tina,

I sent a message to Mgmirkin(*sp) two days ago with no reply. I still have not gotten any positive feedback from any experts, so I must remain humble. Understand that I skewed from the accepted model quite abruptly and to the horror of my family and the confusion of my friends. It would be a great story if it turns out to be legitimate, but for now, I have accepted insanity, embraced electromass, and will never go back to the accepted model.

Your seriousness is a bit relieving.

I searched through some more communications at the time of discovery and adjusted the feedback section. If this does move, I would ask that the most current revision be used.

Best regards,
Justin