Missing baryons found AGAIN!

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Missing baryons found AGAIN!

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:41 am

https://www.newscientist.com/article/21 ... lly-found/

The missing links between galaxies have finally been found. This is the first detection of the roughly half of the normal matter in our universe – protons, neutrons and electrons – unaccounted for by previous observations of stars, galaxies and other bright objects in space.


It's amazing how many times now that they've "found" those missing baryons they keep looking for. Keep in mind that they supposedly found most of this same mass back in 2012=2013.

https://newatlas.com/milky-way-halo/24312/
https://futurism.com/has-the-missing-ba ... en-solved/

And of course they found more missing mass earlier this year, not in the form of hot plasma, but in the form of cooler hydrogen gas:

http://spaceref.com/astronomy/missing-m ... alaxy.html

And of course all of this new missing mass was already on top of the mass they'd found in dwarf galaxies back in 2007.

http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2007/darkdwarfs/

And all of this of course was on top of the missing baryons they claimed to find "warm gas" in 2003=2005

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12610618
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15690033

So they've found "warm baryons" (plasma), "hot" baryons" (plasma), cool gas baryons (actual gas) since 2003, yet here they are in late 2017 claiming to have finally found the missing baryons. How many time can they find extra mass and pretend that they keep finding the same "missing baryons"?

Now of course this is all on top of all the mass estimation errors they made in that now infamous bullet clusterf*ck study from 2006. They underestimated the brightness of those galaxies by a factor of 2:

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/news/archi ... 439,en.php

They underestimated the number of ordinary sized stars in those galaxies by about 4 times:

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/gale ... 90819.html

They underestimated the number of red dwarfs by between 3 and 20 times too:

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2010/12/01/ ... stars.html

They underestimated the number stars *between* galaxies too:

https://www.realclearscience.com/journa ... 08929.html

You really have to wonder how long this denial process can continue when every single year they keep finding more and more "missing baryons" by the boatload. Now of course there have to be 20 failed dark matter "lab tests" too over that same time frame. Sooner or later you'd think they'd just accept the fact that they've been pretty clueless about how to actually locate and estimate *normal* matter, but NOOOOOOOOOO! Instead they keep burying their collective heads in the sand and pretending that LCDM is still somehow the "best" cosmology model in spite of all their lab failures and in spite of all the revelations about their ineptitude when it came to estimating mass in various galaxies.

In 2017, the mainstream doesn't have a "missing baryon problem" anymore, it has a "missing honesty" problem in the extreme. Not only were their ridiculous mass estimates from that bullet cluster study shown to be absurdly flawed, they've since found tons of additional mass that they've neglected to include no in just the last 10 years. Worse yet, they're lab failures have been too numerous to count, most recently from nEDM, PandaX-II and Xenon-1T experiments:

https://www.nature.com/news/dark-matter ... E-20171109
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/1 ... 119.181302
https://phys.org/news/2017-11-dark-narrowed.html

Both wimp and axion theories have been falsified in just the past month, and that's on top of their sterile neutrino failures from a couple of years ago:

https://www.space.com/33670-sterile-neu ... iment.html

I've heard of whipping a dead horse before, but the mainstream is whipping on dried dead bones at this point. Wow. Talk about pure denial. I can't even imagine how their models could fail more spectacularly than they've failed, but they keep teaching their failed model to innocent unsuspecting astronomy students in 2017. The mainstream should be ashamed of themselves at this point. Instead of dealing with reality, they keep citing that same falsified bullet cluster study as "proof" of exotic matter while ignoring every failed "test" from LHC, LUX, PandaX, Xenon-1T, nEDM, Icecube, etc. Sheesh. Billions of dollars have already been *wasted* supposedly 'testing" theory theory, but what good is any so called "test" when they simply refuse to take no for an answer?

Dark matter theory is a great example of denial in action, and a great example of a *non scientific* theory that defies falsification. Unjustifiable, unfalsifiable supernatural dogma isn't science, it's just bad dogma on a stick.
Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

NASA is full of it on the topic of dark matter....

Unread postby Michael Mozina » Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:14 pm

https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/f ... ark-energy

We are much more certain what dark matter is not than we are what it is. First, it is dark, meaning that it is not in the form of stars and planets that we see. Observations show that there is far too little visible matter in the universe to make up the 27% required by the observations. Second, it is not in the form of dark clouds of normal matter, matter made up of particles called baryons. We know this because we would be able to detect baryonic clouds by their absorption of radiation passing through them.


That exact paragraph, or something very close to it has been on the NASA website now since *at least* 2006 (I think since 1998), and it has been proven wrong, time and time and time again since it was first posted on their website. In 2008, they discovered that the universe was twice as bright as they *imagined* and that has a direct effect on their baryonic mass estimates which are based upon *brightness*. They also *grossly* underestimated the number of smaller stars which we cannot observe compared to the larger ones that emit enough light to be seen on Earth. Those issues demonstrate conclusively that at least some of that missing mass is in the form of stars and planets despite their boastful claims to the contrary.

They've also since found *at least* two different "halos" of ordinary gas and hot plasma that were and are absorbing light passing through them, but they didn't find the cooler gas halo until *this year*! They keep "assuming" their mass estimate techniques were correct when in fact they've been woefully inaccurate for 80+ years!

NASA is entirely full of it on this topic. They aren't "certain" about anything related to DM, and their claims to the contrary are nonsense. This is the kind of thing that really irritates the hell out of me. Not only haven't they modified that page to admit they blew it, they continue to leave it exactly the same to imply certainty when *nothing of the sort applies*! What a bunch of nonsense.
Michael Mozina
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA

Re: Missing baryons found AGAIN!

Unread postby Stephenwelsh » Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:00 pm

Great post Michael mozina thanks for all relevant links and detailed layout of events. I am with you 100%! You would think that if they sat down and laid it all out (as you have) they would wake up and smell the bull. lol
Stephenwelsh
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:52 am


Return to Electric Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest