Rosetta's Final Image

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Rosetta's Final Image

Unread postby nick c » Sat Oct 07, 2017 8:16 am

comingfrom wrote:Meteorite showers like the Leonids aren't from comets, are they?
Or maybe they are from one that disintegrated.
Yes, meteor showers are associated with comets. It is basically the Earth moving across the orbital path of a comet and encountering the dust and particles that were left behind by the comet.
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~farnham/tt/shower.html
User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2241
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: Rosetta's Final Image

Unread postby Zyxzevn » Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:37 pm

Latest ThunderboltsProject video is about comets:
Dirty Snowballs Falsified – NASA Fails to Notice | Space News

There is so much difference between the unproven official theory:
From an unproven Ortcould
appears a unproven snowball
that unproven ejects water
forming an unproven water tail.
Not only are these parts unproven, in observations we can see that ALL
these assumptions are completely wrong.
The comets are rock
There is no real ejection of material, there is only erosion, mostly electrical erosion.
The tail is more an electrical charged particles instead of gas/ice particles.
The comet does not evaporate near the sun, and it must contain solid materials.
The ice-ball theory is more than falsified. It is wasted.

This is all more in line with an electrical comet theory.
The tail/tails are a product of electrical erosion and electrochemical processes.
Why this is exactly is not clear yet, but it may indeed be possible that
the electrical properties are depend on the path through the solar wind.

Yet I do not expect any change in the sciences.
An uncle of mine writes scientific articles for newspapers and journals about space.
As I spoke with him. he has no idea of any of this. While he is interested in alternative
ideas, he only repeats what he has learned from others.
He does not doubt much the theories, because no-one publishes papers
on the falsifications of these theories. He thinks that the "sceptics"
who defend the old theories, have actually looked into the facts.
And no-one writes about falsifications, because you have to go against
so many other "scientists". Facts don't matter.

It is clear that the corrective process in science is broken.
More ** from zyxzevn at: Paradigm change and C@
User avatar
Zyxzevn
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm

Re: Rosetta's Final Image

Unread postby moses » Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:25 pm

So comets and asteroids were formed on planets and then blasted into space almost certainly by electrical processes. The asteroids are mainly of two types which strongly suggests two different planets of origin. In time this may be proven and my theory that the two planets are Earth and Mars will be verified.

Cheers,
Mo
moses
 
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Rosetta's Final Image

Unread postby nick c » Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:10 pm

Here is a recent relevant Space News:
Dirty Snowballs Falsified – NASA Fails to Notice
User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2241
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: Rosetta's Final Image

Unread postby Sceptical lefty » Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:30 am

@ Zyxzevn
"Facts don't matter."
In fact, facts do matter.
The facts that matter are that credibility, reputations and jobs are at stake, here.
Everything else follows naturally. ;)
Sceptical lefty
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:53 pm

Re: Rosetta's Final Image

Unread postby Solar » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:57 am

Can the same dynamic go from this:

Image

To these Martian Geysers?

Image

Interesting comparison: On Mars during the spring thaw several “geysers” spewing blacked soot-like soil become “active vents”. Click the HIRise photo to see a multitude of them. This is kind of ice covered Martian dirt is, or was(?), what comets were portrayed to be like. However, obviously the blacked dirt covered image of 67p is totally different.

Here is a decent photo (Source). On the left the former “active vent” of a Martian geyser seems dormant. A hole has been left in the ice along with what appears to be the “spider” effect perhaps from pressure lifting the ice layer.

I get the impression that this kind of frost covered soil is what the previous generation of highly overexposed photos of comets led scientist and theorist to further believe that comet surfaces were supposed to look like a "dirty snowball". Instead, the comet surface is dry and black as pitch. Instead of dirt spewing through ice such as with Martian “geysers” during spring thaw, with comets, ice is supposedly spewing through dirt?

With the recently discovered comet C/2017 K2 sublimating "supervolitles" are being offered instead of regular good old sublimating surface ice.

“K2 is so far from the Sun and so cold, we know for sure that the activity — all the fuzzy stuff making it look like a comet — is not produced, as in other comets, by the evaporation of water ice,” Dr. Jewitt explained.

Instead, we think the activity is due to the sublimation of super-volatiles as K2 makes its maiden entry into the Solar System’s planetary zone. That’s why it’s special. This comet is so far away and so incredibly cold that water ice there is frozen like a rock.


I guess the inversion is what I'm finding odd.
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden
User avatar
Solar
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:05 am

Previous

Return to Electric Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron