This is really important IMO.

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

This is really important IMO.

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:01 pm

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases ... underbolts

IMO this is the kind of 'cutting edge' physics that is actually pretty exciting. I think we (as a community) would be well served by taking the time to digest this material and to try to apply it to cosmology theory, to SAFIRE experiments, and to any other empirical experiments in the future.

celeste
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona

Re: This is really important IMO.

Unread post by celeste » Tue Jul 11, 2017 1:46 pm

Michael,
Excellent find.
"In theory this effect has been known: in this case the scattering particle acts as a funnel, gathering incident radiation from a large area and concentrating it in a small volume within the particle."
Do you see a different picture here? In EU, there is a focus on how a filament can gather up energy/material, and focus it into a particle (sun,planet,whole solar system,etc)? How do we get star formation at a pinch,etc?
Here, we have the opposite, with "scattering particles" "acting as funnels", to focus the incident radiation.

So here is the bigger question: Do "particles" act as funnels to focus radiation? Or does focused radiation result in a particle?



.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests