Just how incompetent is the mainstream anyway?

[Michael Mozina]

Meet a Birkeland (field aligned) current called "Steve".

http://www.space.com/36583-new-aurora-f ... gated.html

What in the world is wrong with the mainstream anyway? They almost never use proper scientific terms correctly. They're constantly referring to a hot *plasma* as a "hot gas", and they keep referring to Birkeland currents with stupid terminology like a 'magnetic slinky" and now "Steve". What the heck is their problem when it comes to using proper scientific terms?

[comingfrom]

The problem is, it would give Birkeland the recognition he deserves,
and it would highlight the fact that they (mainstream scientists) are a hundred years behind in their thinking.

By assigning their own new name, they are in effect trying to claim credit for a discovery.
They are claiming to the discovery of a hot stream of "gas" pouring through the gas of the atmosphere.
(As if gases can behave this way.)

There are so many names for Birkeland currents.
For decades NASA has been calling them magnetic highways, flux tubes, magnetic ropes, ribbons, anything but Birkeland current.

But I have noticed the term Birkeland current being used a bit more lately, by some.
I think EU is having an impact.
~Paul

[Cargo]

So much that it makes one head spin and question your own reality.

Just look at the Cassian reports from today. They would have you believe the they the radio antenna can be used as a shield against 'particles'. Like a 10,000mph grain of sand is going to even notice it.

However, I have a devious thought. They actually do know about plasma fields andelectric things, and the reason they pointed the antenna that way is because they have reversed the polarity and have created a small plasma shield in front of the craft so it can break through the highly charged ring plane.

Unless that antenna is made out of vibranium it's not going to shield the craft form any particle at the speeds it's traveling.

[comingfrom]

Cassini’s First Grand Finale Dive: Milestones

[webolife]

Truth is, they don't yet know what kind of particles they may find there... but the minimal momentum of a smoke sized particle, even at spacecraft speeds, won't harm their antenna [much].

[oz93666]

Yes ... the list is endless even astronomers refer to satellites of other planets as 'moons' ... and to other stars as 'suns' !!!

Any scientific articles in the media are guaranteed to have half a dozen factual errors ..

This is partly due to the general dumbing down of the public .. brain damage caused by fluoride and mercury in the vaccines , and the trashy education system...

But make no mistake , the errors in top level of science are planned to be there . There's a conspiracy to give us a false view of the world , the wealthy controllers position their chosen ones in academic positions of power .. they make sure that each new generation of scientist don't disagree with the official line , those that do aren't employed.

[Bengt Nyman]

You have to look at the leadership of the mainstream in political terms.
They are not stupid, but they are politicians more than scientists.
They are in charge of a lot of resources.
They like to exercise and maintain control.
This makes them very likely to be what we consider corrupt.
Inside scientists are like privileged political party politicians, their language has to reflect and support the present party opinion.
Then you have the followers where facts do not matter, belief replaces science and huliganism is used to promote their beliefs.

P.S. Mainstream Standard Model beliefs and US space travel are not the same thing and not the same people. They obviously keep an eye on each other but they have different goals and therefore different tools.