Bengt Nyman wrote:
The resonance I mention is in the gravity measuring system itself due to its own natural frequencies, if any.
Your question about what transmits gravity through space Is a good one. If recent data is correct gravity transmits with a speed very close to the speed of light. Were it instant, we would have missed the gravitational shift itself by 120 million years.
The reactions are interesting. Individuals recognize these relativistic terms and concepts as an attempt at a substitute for The Aether. People actually do recognize this. In conjunction with this is also a rejection of the supposed causes of gravitational waves in the relativistic faux Aether. As known, "Space", the inter-between objects is no longer considered empty, or void. That the name "space time" has been ascribed to same by this current crop; in no way dispenses with the historical context of its conceptual progenitor. Clearly Aether proponents are having an interesting time with the results of these antenna.
A Continuum has a very long history of being posited as the natural way of things. It seems that positing a geometrized "space time fabric" may have been an attempt to avoid the inability of early developments in Electrodynamic Theory to "model" The Aether. Now it "waves" as if the original could not - because it was thought to be "stationary", "entrained", "fixed", or "static". At best this is what Michelson-Morely experiment demonstrated i.e. they did not detect a "stationary" Aether. This was an incorrect assumption but no one considered the opposite; that The Aether moves. It conveys Motion, it imparts Motion, and is That through which the "transmission" of "Force" via inter-atomic and subatomic frequencies occurs.
Relativity simply attempts to co-opt known concepts that precede its terms and ideas by several ages. Aether proponents are not confused by this - they never have been; and never will be.
What is called "Gravity" is "transmitted across space" via the propagation of its frequencies, its particular wavelengths, through the Medium "due to its own natural frequencies"
as you perceive. That is more correct imho. Gravity is an integral aspect of The Aether "medium" in motion and as with the propagation of frequencies through air and/or water one does not say that the molecules of air and/or water moved in the direction of the propagating sound. Instead, while those respective molecules move in their own particular way, the frequencies of sound though those particular mediums impart (or impress) their sound frequencies upon the molecules themselves. The sound frequency resonantly "couples to" the existing variety of wavelengths already collectively composing the molecular array of the air or water.
Similarly: I don't agree with the light speed rate that they've offered. All this speaks to is the electrodynamic realm of interactions. The nearest analogy would be that "gravitonic waves" propagating through the energy density of charged matter ("background radiation" of charged quanta) and thereby constrained to 'light speed" (or less) are not a reference to the larger scope of gravitational waves.
G-Waves constrained to light speed are those g-waves that are resonantly 'captured' by matter. This is similar to the idea of the slow moving oscillatory progression of electrons along a wire which capture the advancing wave energy of the electric field which is said to be traveling much faster than the electrons themselves. The gravitational waves constrained to light speed are those waves that would have been captured and internally confined to the inertial configuration of a host electrodynamic "charges".
This suggest that the energetic 'structure' of electrodynamic quanta is deformable (they are not billiard balls but globular constructs) and that the propagation of the wave occurs via a type of longitudinal "polarization" of the electrodynamic quanta composing the "energy density" of "background EM radiation". If true the g-waves are slow to propagate through a background medium of matter in the form of charged species and there should be Supraluminal versions of these.
Recall that "there is no vacuum", there is no "emptiness", there is no "void". People are simply arguing over nomenclature; indeed merely a war of words ("Men substitute words for reality and then argue about the words." - Armstrong).
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden