http://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-rev ... milky-way/
https://www.insidescience.org/news/new- ... ark-matter
http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpBB3/v ... =3&t=15850
If you read those links, you'll note the following:
Since the now infamous "proof" of dark matter paper in 2006, there have been *numerous* published studies, all of which demonstrate that the mainsteam completely and totally botched the baryonic mass estimates of those galaxy clusters in 2006, and they screwed up royally in nearly every conceivable way possible.
They underestimated the number of stars in those galaxies by a *whopping* factor of between 3 and 20 times depending on the size of the star and the type of galaxy. They underestimated the brightness of those clusters by a factor of two to start with, and all of their baryonic mass calculations came from that flawed *brightness* calculation. They underestimated the number of stars *between* the galaxies in those clusters too. They couldn't have messed up more badly if they tried, and that's just the problems with their *stellar* mass estimation techniques.
Even more damning, they didn't even know until 2012 that superheated plasma is rotating around every galaxy just where their "dark matter' models predicted that more mass must exist. They didn't even know about it prior to 2012, and they didn't even know that it rotated with the galaxy until *JUST LAST YEAR*! They haven't even figured yet that the same hot plasma cloud extends into the core of the galaxy, it doesn't just rotate around the outside edges!
All of these observations are entirely consistent with EU/PC theory, and they're all consistent with our present understanding of gravity too. All of these later studies demonstrate that gravity probably works *exactly* as we believe it works, and the mainstream's baryonic mass estimates of all galaxies have been completely and totally FUBAR until just *last year*.
IMO, MOND theory is nothing more than another quaint method of denial for the mainstream. With MOND theory the mainstream can pretend to sweep all of those baryonic mass estimation problems they have right under the rug and "pretend" that it doesn't matter. They can *pretend* that no EM influences have to be considered, and the universe is controlled strictly by "gravity" to the exclusion of any EM influences. MOND theory is the *perfect* denial mechanism to hand to the press. It allows them to pretend to the press that gravity alone controls everything in space. It's just another con game, and it's another form of pure denial.
All of the observations over the past decade suggest that massive amounts of electrical current flow through our galaxy and that current heats up that hot plasma halo around the galaxy. If there's another influence *other than* gravity to be considered, it's electromagnetic influences, not some lame postdicted kludge of a gravity theory to keep them from embracing electricity in space!
It's all a con game for the press anyhow. Keep in mind that MOND theory is based upon *Newton's* formulas and concepts about gravity, not GR theory. How can the mainstream even *think* about using GR theory to stuff in "space expansion" and "dark energy" and to describe lensing patterns, while using Newton and MOND at the galaxy level? Talk about cherry picking gravity theories to suit yourself and to fix whatever ails you. Note also that the microwave background and their BAO calculations won't work out right without exotic matter, nor will their nucleosynthesis numbers work correctly either.
MOND theory isn't a "real" option, it's a denial mechanism, and public relations con game to avoid dealing with electricity in space. They want to keep everyone in the press believing that gravity and gravity alone dictates the movement of the stars. That's pure nonsense.
If the mainstream starts getting warm and fuzzy toward MOND and Newton again, then they damn well better get rid of "dark energy", and GR lensing techniques while they're at it. They can't have their GR cosmology cake and eat it too with MOND. What a bunch of hooey.
I think they're just desperate to avoid dealing with Birkeland's work in the lab, and Alfven's work on the application of circuit theory to events in space. They're running scared. LHC and LUX ate most of the dark matter lunch money and they've found exactly nothing. Lux-LZ is probably their last chance to find exotic matter.
From the second link:
There's your sign. They "assumed" one thing, and "discovered" something else altogether. Will they be men and women enough to admit their numerous mass estimation mistakes and come clean with respect to their need to upgrade their galaxy mass estimation techniques, or will they continue to push MOND at the press? Will they try to have their GR cake with dark energy and eat it too with Newton and MOND?“This flies in the face of expectations,” says Edmund Hodges-Kluck, assistant research scientist. “People just assumed that the disk of the Milky Way spins while this enormous reservoir of hot gas is stationary – but that is wrong. This hot gas reservoir is rotating as well, just not quite as fast as the disk.”