Cults, religions, falsification, LCDM, EU/PC theory

[comingfrom]

Thornhill predicted what would happen with the Temple 1 impact, more accurately then any other.
I guess that's why they feel the need to assassinate his character, rather than give him any credit.
Paul

[Michael Mozina]

Thornhill predicted what would happen with the Temple 1 impact, more accurately then any other.
I guess that's why they feel the need to assassinate his character, rather than give him any credit.
Paul

I think what bothers me the most is the fact that they willfully misrepresent Thornhill's statements and his position (no neutrinos, no water on comets), while *pretending* to take the high ethical road in the debate with their 'liar, liar pants on fire" routine. Talk about irony overload. Anything to distract everyone from the fact that their dark matter claims have been repeatedly and consistently blown out of the water in the lab for over a decade, and their solar model was falsified when it was revealed by SDO in 2012 that convection speeds are two orders of magnitude less than their 'predictions".

Reality Check (Brian Koberlein?) is by *far* the worst offender when in to comes to slander and his constant, willful misrepresentation of *everyone's* statements and models. Talk about a complete lack of ethics. I've never seen anyone like him on any topic anywhere in cyberspace. Wow.

FYI to the folks at ISF, I'm still waiting for Clinger's missing math homework assignment!

[willendure]

Thornhill predicted what would happen with the Temple 1 impact, more accurately then any other.
I guess that's why they feel the need to assassinate his character, rather than give him any credit.
Paul

Should have given him a job instead - that's the best way to handle people who are right. I think Thornhill shoots himself in the foot thought with his electrical gravity ideas.

[Specificity]

Thank you for putting this post together.