Sunspots, Achilles' Heel of the standard model?

[Luna See]

An experiment that should prove, by direct observation, that stars are not spheres of hydrogen powered by fusion reactions at their cores, that they are electric phenomena.

Sunspots
It is currently claimed that these areas 'appear' dark compared to the area around them but are actually brighter than the light reflected from the moon if that area was isolated from the surrounding photosphere.

The experiment
Direct a laser beam into the center of a sunspot umbra. The light from the laser should pass through the sun's surface and continue into the cavity within the sun. It should also likely show a degree of refraction at the point of interaction with that surface.

If these results are observed during this experiment it will conclusively prove that stars are in fact 'hollow' and electric in nature and not 'fusion reactors' as stated by the current standard model.

Elegant Simplicity in action.

[Sceptical lefty]

Any decisive testing of crucial phenomena is to be welcomed. Unfortunately, this experiment is unlikely to deliver a useful outcome. There are too many factors which can be used to explain (or fudge) unwanted results -- e.g. distortions from chromosphere/photosphere fluctuations; spreading/diffusion of the beam; relativistic issues (real or imagined); etc.

You have to remember that you are trying to influence people who believe in the unarguable reality of Dark Energy. It's a bit like lecturing an audience of Jesuits on the merits of atheism and hoping for a favourable reaction.

[webolife]

Sunspots
It is currently claimed that these areas 'appear' dark compared to the area around them but are actually brighter than the light reflected from the moon if that area was isolated from the surrounding photosphere.

A similar relative darkness phenomenon occurs with so called absorption and emission spectra.
The "dark" absorption lines are very bright in comparison with a dark ambience.

On a more direct note, however, remember that sunspot umbras are zones of eruption from the the solar surface and their surrounding penumbras are areas where the ejected matter falls back to the surface. The umbra is therefore cooler/darker, while the penumbra is brighter/hotter than the average surface luminosity/temp. Driven by looping magnetic fields, sunspots and the toroidal complex that they comprise are a key to understanding the nature of an external power source for electric stars.

[Luna See]

Sunspots
It is currently claimed that these areas 'appear' dark compared to the area around them but are actually brighter than the light reflected from the moon if that area was isolated from the surrounding photosphere.

There seems to be no light, visible to the unaided eye, emitted from these areas. If these areas are just less bright than the surrounding area, then it would be expected that seeing them through a helioscope should show them to be just that, merely dimmer than the area around the umbra itself, but that is not what is actually observed. They are seen as completely black splotches (i.e. the absence of any visible light) when viewed by this method.

http://galileo.rice.edu/images/things/helioscopium.gif

http://galileo.rice.edu/images/things/s ... ina1-l.gif

From these observations two things could be possible:

The sun is mostly devoid of observable material below its surface and that light from the sun seemingly only travels outwards from its surface.

[webolife]

Sunspots
It is currently claimed that these areas 'appear' dark compared to the area around them but are actually brighter than the light reflected from the moon if that area was isolated from the surrounding photosphere.

There seems to be no light, visible to the unaided eye, emitted from these areas. If these areas are just less bright than the surrounding area, then it would be expected that seeing them through a helioscope should show them to be just that, merely dimmer than the area around the umbra itself, but that is not what is actually observed. They are seen as completely black splotches (i.e. the absence of any visible light) when viewed by this method.

http://galileo.rice.edu/images/things/helioscopium.gif

http://galileo.rice.edu/images/things/s ... ina1-l.gif

From these observations two things could be possible:

The sun is mostly devoid of observable material below its surface and that light from the sun seemingly only travels outwards from its surface.

You are not correct about the "blackness" of a sunspot.
This is about optics; try this easy experiment to help you understand it better: Project a black and white photo onto a white screen. For comparison, put a piece of black tape on the edge of the screen if the screen edge is not already black [many are]. Look at the black parts of the projected photo. These shadows are exactly the same tone as the white screen beyond the edge of the projection. The black photo regions are white compared to the black tape at the side of the screen. The sun is on the order of 400,000 times as bright as the moon, so the sunspots are relatively quite dark compared to the solar surface but very bright compared to the reflecting lunar surface.

[leo vuyk]

THE ACHILLES HEEL indeed, if we manage to prove that black holes are different from Hawkings proposals but are electric charged origins of COMET NUCLEI, ending as crashed starspots and all sorts of moon craters.
see: for the moon oriental basin: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl ... r-new.html