Wow. I am becoming a famous cat.Michael Mozina wrote:JeanTate wrote:... Zyxzevn is in a tiny minority, someone who proposed a test, ...
I understand both sides of the problem. Walked all the way through the university.
The mainstream has a lot of assumptions on certain subjects. From these assumptions,
we can do calculations with some mathematical models.
The EU makes other assumptions on certain subjects. The EU can do calculations as well with
certain mathematical models, but lacks the manpower to approach every angle. The EU has to use
the observations of mainstream, that are interpreted in a different way, and translate them into
EU models instead. It is like double the work.
The main difference in assumption is: The EU assumes that electromagnetism has much more influence
in the universe than mainstream assumes. This is based on the common logic that Plasma is
electromagnetically active. Something that we clearly see at the sun.
From this difference the EU might have found alternatives to models that the mainstream has no good observations for. These are:
1) galaxy rotation speeds. Model: Dark matter. Alternative: Electromagnetism.
2) high energetic objects. Model: dark holes. Alternative: Electric systems.
3) variations of redshift. Model: dark energy. Alternative: Influence of interstellar plasma.
Then there are some mainstream models that are clearly wrong:
4) high radiation in solar corona. Model: magnetic reconnection.
Alternative: Electromagnetically active plasma.
5) Corona of Comets. Model: Icy comets with geysers.
(I personally think that this is clearly wrong)
Alternative: Electrochemistry.
These alternative explanations are simple, and are confirmed in the laboratory.
The EU only needs to extend the laboratory models to the appropriate sizes.
Then the EU has alternative models for things that seem OK in the mainstream perspective.
And these models are usually attacked by many mainstream scientists.
6) redshift related to distance. Model: inflation. Alternative: interstellar plasma.
7) alignment of stars, shape of star formations. Model: dark matter/ big bang. Alternative: electromagnetism.
8) Lines of craters. Model: mysterious impacts. Alternative: Electromagnetic discharges.
9) Birth of stars. Model: gravity induced fusion. Alternative: Electric attraction and electromagnetic discharges.
Etc.
You will get my point. Electromagnetism everywhere..
While this might not always be true, it gives a realistic alternatives to certain models.
Especially alternatives to mythical dark stuff.
So as a scientists, I am very happy: we can test different models and learn more science.
But sadly most mainstream scientists just neglect any alternative ideas, as.. pseudoscience?
That is pure bullshit. Electromagnetism is far more real than "dark matter".
The question is more: How much electromagnetism do we need to add to the system to explain
the things that we see. Because there certainly is electromagnetism.
The force of electromagnetism can be a bipolar 1/r³ or polar 1/r² or a current 1/r or a flare +-1/sqrt(r)
So, if we look at the rotation speed of galaxies, we can assume a force 1/r. Such a force would
imply a current from the side to the centre. And if we look closely at a galaxy, we can indeed see
spiral structures from the centre to the edge. Assuming these might be currents, we might expect
that stars are forming along these spirals. And indeed they do.
So instead of dark matter that we can not find in any laboratory, we now have simple
electromagnetic currents.
We could search a nearby galaxy with some stars on the background. That way we may be able to see
dark-mode plasma currents. Not very hard. And because very strong magnetic fields already have been found
in some galaxies, this electromagnetic model is very promising.
Magnetism and charged objects on a large scale might even be responsible
for the rotation speed as well, since the force of a charged object in a magnetic field is stronger
when the object moves faster. So even within the Electric model, we have plenty of alternatives to test.
And even when we find not enough to explain the rotation speed, from the direct observations of magnetic fields it is clear that we will find some interesting new features of galaxies.