comingfrom wrote:Thank you, Querious.querious wrote:Thank you, Querious.comingfrom wrote:querious wrote:LOL, I'd love to see where the Mathis got C=kg/sec. Another mangling of terms to fit his agenda. Charge is actually

kg.5 * m * s-.5The SI unit of charge, the coulomb, "is the quantity of electricity carried in 1 second by a current of 1 ampere".The ampere is that constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular cross-section, and placed one metre apart in vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force equal to 2×10−7 newtons per metre of length.One newton is the force needed to accelerate one kilogram of mass at the rate of one metre per second squared in direction of the applied force.

Quotes taken from Wikipedia.

You're missing the full Ampere defining equation, it's spelled out here....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permeability#The_ampere_defines_vacuum_permeability

Looking at the above equation, the question becomes, how do we assign the magnetic constant and Coulomb their proper mechanical units? By studying the relationships listed in this section....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space#Relation_to_other_constants

. . hopefully you'll see that vacuum permittivity and permeability both have dimension 1/c.

A little dimensional analysis reveals Coulomb = kg.5 * m * s -.5

They have assigned no mass to their field particles, and they have assigned properties to the vacuum instead.

Is what I see.

And what you show me again.

Huh? I just showed you that any mass dimension is assigned to the charge(^2) (Coulomb) of the particle, and NOT to the vacuum properties.