Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.
Moderators: bboyer, MGmirkin
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:30 am
- Location: London, England
Morphix wrote:And when dissenters are mentioned it is always a carefully selected dissenter who "all" are agreed upon to be wrong. No review of qualified contemporary supporters of that dissenter's ideas. And of course, no question of whether what is taken to be evidence for whatever standard theory could possibly fit as well into another theory. Humans apparently can't help but create new religions, replete with dogma and priesthoods, and the evidence for that is overwhelming.
And therein lies the problem - peer review.
The way it seems to work is roughly as follows:
A conference hall full of these people all join together & say that "so & so is wrong, we can prove it is wrong" and when asked for that proof they reply "we are all agreed it is wrong". At one point, the consensus opinion was that Bruno was a heretic & burned alive because of the medieval equivalent of "peer review" said he was wrong.
That is not Scientific Method, it is mass bullying by consensus ganging up on what they think of as mavericks.
The reality is that it does not take 1,000 to agree for something to be true - it takes just one person to be right. Arp summed it up beautifully when he translated the oft-used rejoinder "this violates the laws of physics" to read as "In this golden epoch, we know everything there is to know".
You will never get a man to understand something his salary depends on him not understanding.
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:39 pm
- Location: USA and Sweden
“There is no escape from a black hole in classical theory,” Hawking told Nature. Quantum theory, however, “enables energy and information to escape from a black hole”. A full explanation of the process, the physicist admits, would require a theory that successfully merges gravity with the other fundamental forces of nature. But that is a goal that has eluded physicists for nearly a century. “The correct treatment,” Hawking says, “remains a mystery.”
Dear Steven Hawking,
With all due respect, we are suggesting that gravity is the manifestation of a difference between electrostatic attraction and electrostatic repulsion.
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
PS: Or a LeSage, bombardment of aether..
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests