Stars Migrate Through Galaxy
- junglelord
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
- Location: Canada
Stars Migrate Through Galaxy
About half the stars in our celestial neighborhood may have traveled great distances through the Milky Way, according to a new study, which suggests our sun may be one of them.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ation.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ation.html
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
- nick c
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
- Location: connecticut
Re: Stars Migrate Through Galaxy
Oh no! more mathematicians playing with equations.
Space.com also has a story on the same study:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0 ... ation.html
I don't know how much significance one can attach to the conclusions reached in the study referenced in the article. That is, whether or not we can learn the path the Sun has taken in its' galactic journey from a model that is essentially "gravity only." It has been observed that stars in the spiral arms of galaxies do not conform to the [url2=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_problem]expected motions [/url2] that the laws of gravity demand, hence the need for an ad hoc assumption of a model saving and undetectable (other than through gravitational effect) Dark Matter. Which is assumed to be totally oblivious to EM radiation but, nevertheless still exerts a gravitational influence.
I have to ask questions of the scientists who made the study, are they even taking into consideration the fact that stars rotating around galactic centers don't typically care to obey the laws of gravity? are they factoring in the fantasy of Dark Matter's influence?
From what I can gather from the article these conclusions are based on a gravitational study (it's from mainstream so why wouldn't it be?) of our galactic neighborhood.
Since the initial assumption of the model (galactic rotation is solely gravity driven) is incorrect, it casts doubt on any conclusions that can be taken from the model.
nick c
Space.com also has a story on the same study:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0 ... ation.html
I don't know how much significance one can attach to the conclusions reached in the study referenced in the article. That is, whether or not we can learn the path the Sun has taken in its' galactic journey from a model that is essentially "gravity only." It has been observed that stars in the spiral arms of galaxies do not conform to the [url2=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_problem]expected motions [/url2] that the laws of gravity demand, hence the need for an ad hoc assumption of a model saving and undetectable (other than through gravitational effect) Dark Matter. Which is assumed to be totally oblivious to EM radiation but, nevertheless still exerts a gravitational influence.
I have to ask questions of the scientists who made the study, are they even taking into consideration the fact that stars rotating around galactic centers don't typically care to obey the laws of gravity? are they factoring in the fantasy of Dark Matter's influence?
From what I can gather from the article these conclusions are based on a gravitational study (it's from mainstream so why wouldn't it be?) of our galactic neighborhood.
Since the initial assumption of the model (galactic rotation is solely gravity driven) is incorrect, it casts doubt on any conclusions that can be taken from the model.
I guess we can agree with that.But if the findings of Roškar and his colleagues are true, stars would not necessarily originate from the place they're observed, making the analysis of galactic regions based on the makeup of stars difficult. "It makes galactic archaeology, if you will, more complicated," he said.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ation.html
nick c
- webolife
- Posts: 2539
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:01 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: Stars Migrate Through Galaxy
Say, Nick, all the evidence must eventually support the correct theory, so if evidence from gravitational observation correlates with the likelihood of migrating electric stars, this is welcome news indeed. The failure of gravity-only cosmology doesn't preclude the importance of gravitation based observations, eh?
Truth extends beyond the border of self-limiting science. Free discourse among opposing viewpoints draws the open-minded away from the darkness of inevitable bias and nearer to the light of universal reality.
- nick c
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
- Location: connecticut
Re: Stars Migrate Through Galaxy
Hello Webolife,
The Electric Universe teaches that stars are balls of electric plasma formed by a z pinch effect on galactic Birkeland currents often in forms of a chain, or, the result of fissioning into two usually unequal parts as a result of electrical stress. The HR (spectra) diagram represents the electrical state of a star. This is in sharp contrast to standard models.
So, if this study's initial assumption is gravity only for both galactic rotation and star formation, and that the HR diagram represents stellar evolution, then any conclusions must certainly be invalid in the context of the EU. If those conclusions are consistent with the EU then that has to be chalked up to coincidence since the path taken to reach those conclusions was invalid.
nick c
Agreed. The migrating stars are consistent with the EU. However, I was questioning whether the conclusion that the stars have migrated is based on calculations, or a model, that has assumptions that don't conform to galactic reality, so the model does not really tell us very much. They have not made observations of stellar migrations, it is only a model...equations and calculations from which they have arrived at some conclusions.Say, Nick, all the evidence must eventually support the correct theory, so if evidence from gravitational observation correlates with the likelihood of migrating electric stars, this is welcome news indeed.
The Electric Universe teaches that stars are balls of electric plasma formed by a z pinch effect on galactic Birkeland currents often in forms of a chain, or, the result of fissioning into two usually unequal parts as a result of electrical stress. The HR (spectra) diagram represents the electrical state of a star. This is in sharp contrast to standard models.
So, if this study's initial assumption is gravity only for both galactic rotation and star formation, and that the HR diagram represents stellar evolution, then any conclusions must certainly be invalid in the context of the EU. If those conclusions are consistent with the EU then that has to be chalked up to coincidence since the path taken to reach those conclusions was invalid.
nick c
-
- Guest
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests