The Schumann Resonance

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: bboyer, MGmirkin


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:12 pm

Nick C said: So according to EU theory Sirius B is not a super dense star with the mass of the Sun squeezed into the size of a planet, then where did the Dogon come up with that idea?
Well, I certainly can’t dispute that; why do the myths hint at Sirius B as a “dark companion” to Sirius A or that Sirius B is a super dense star?

There is some “evidence” that the “mathematical models” of Sirius B as a "super dense star" are correct.

White Dwarf Theories Get More Proof ... ore-proof/
Observations of the white dwarf star, Sirius B, made with NASA’s Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE) satellite give astronomers firm new evidence that mathematical models widely used to predict white dwarf star mass and radius are correct.

The FUSE result is important because Sirius B is one of the few stars that astronomers have to test their ideas on the relationship between mass and radius for white dwarf stars. White dwarf stars are small but astonishingly dense stars. Sirius B is the size of the Earth and as massive as the sun.
On the other hand … ... usred.html
This, however, is not the end of the Sirius mystery because the Dogon include in their traditions the belief that Sirius once appeared red, as indeed it would have done when it passed through its red giant phase in the remote past. Long ago, as a red giant, Sirius B would have greatly outshone its conventionally-sized, white companion so that the combined system, as seen from Earth, would have looked like a single brilliant red star. The trouble is, according to current theories of stellar evolution, there is no way that Sirius B could have evolved from a red giant to its present white dwarf stage in a matter of a few thousand years.

First, over half a century ago, when Griaule first noted the Dogon reference to the red color of Sirius, astronomers had not established the red giant/white dwarf evolutionary link (in fact, the consensus at the time was that red giants were very young stars.) Second, historical references to a red Sirius are not confined to the Dogon. In ancient Babylonian, Greek, and Roman literature, the appearance of Sirius is likened to that of Mars and the orange-red star Arcturus. Both Seneca, in the first century AD, and Ptolemy, in the second, mention Sirius as being red, while in the sixth century, Gregory of Tours, in a text intended to guide monks in their vespers duties, gives Sirius the nickname Rubela, meaning "ruddy."

Unfortunately, even this additional mystery does not require the theory of alien intervention. A credible astrophysical explanation has been put forward according to which, although Sirius B could not have been a red giant in historical times, it may nevertheless have taken on the appearance of one. A white dwarf is made up of a highly compressed carbon-oxygen core surrounded by a thin layer of helium topped with a very thin "atmosphere" of hydrogen. The suggestion is that it might be possible for a small amount of hydrogen to percolate down into the interior and then, with carbon and oxygen acting as nuclear catalysts, for the hydrogen to begin fusing into helium. This sudden, brief resumption of energy-making would release a pulse of heat which, upon reaching the surface, would cause the hydrogen atmosphere to billow out to thousands of times its normal size. As the atmosphere expanded it would cool and glow bright red. Calculations indicate that after about 250 years the atmosphere would collapse again, losing its ruddy brilliance and returning the white dwarf to its previous state of dim anonymity.
Why do myths refer to Sirius B as “dark” in comparison to Sirius A?

Are “dark stars” those that are in “dark current mode”? Were Sirius A and Sirius B formed by fissioning? Could the difference in mass and current density between Sirius A and B have anything to do the fact that during fissioning, they became two unequally sized spheres?
Red and Brown Dwarfs

The first region on the lower right of the diagram is where the current density has such a low value that double layers (DLs) (photospheric granules) are not needed by the plasma surrounding the (anode) star. This is the region of the brown and red "dwarfs" and giant gas planets. Recent discoveries of extremely cool L - Type and T - Type dwarfs has required the original diagram to be extended to the lower right (See below). These 'stars' have extremely low absolute luminosity and temperature.

The orbiting X-ray telescope, Chandra, recently discovered an X-ray flare being emitted by a brown dwarf (spectral class M9). This poses an additional problem for the advocates of the stellar fusion model. A star this cool should not be capable of X-ray flare production.

However, in the ES model, there are no minimum temperature or mass requirements because the star is inherently electrical to start with. In the ES model (if a brown/red dwarf is operating near the upper boundary of the dark current mode), a slight increase in the level of total current impinging on that star will move it into the normal glow mode.

Main Sequence Stars

Continuing toward the left, beyond the "knee of the curve", all these stars (K through B) are completely covered with tufts (have complete photospheres), their luminosity no longer grows as rapidly as before. But, the farther to the left we go (the higher the current density), the brighter the tufts become, and so the stars' luminosities do continue to increase. The situation is analogous to turning up the current in an electric arc welding machine

White and Blue Stars

When we get to the upper left end of the main sequence, what kind of stars are these? This is the region of O type, blue-white, high temperature (35,000+ K) stars. As we approach the far upper-left of the HR diagram (region of highest current density), the stars are under extreme electrical stress - too many Amps per sq. meter. Their absolute luminosities approach 100,000 times the Sun's. Even farther out to the upper left is the region of Wolf-Rayet stars. Extreme electrical stress can lead to a star's splitting into parts, perhaps explosively. Such explosions are called novae. The splitting process is called fissioning. A characteristic of Wolf-Rayet stars is that they are losing mass rapidly.


Wal Thornhill once said:

"….. internal electrostatic forces prevent stars from collapsing gravitationally and occasionally cause them to "give birth" by electrical fissioning to form companion stars and gas giant planets. Sudden brightening, or a nova outburst marks such an event. That elucidates why stars commonly have partners and why most of the giant planets so far detected closely orbit their parent star."

If a sphere of fixed volume splits into two smaller (equal sized) spheres, the total surface area of the newly formed pair will be about 26% larger than the area of the original sphere. (If the split results in two unequally sized spheres, the increase in total area will be something less than 26%.) So, to reduce the current density it is experiencing, an electrically stressed, blue-white star may explosively fission into two or more stars. This provides an increase in total surface area and so results in a reduced level of current density on the (new) stars' surfaces. Each of two new (equal sized) stars will experience only 80% of the previous current density level and so both will jump to new locations farther to the lower-right in the HR diagram.

If the members of the resulting binary pair turn out to be unequal in size, the larger one will probably have the larger current density - but still lower than the original value. (This assumes that the total charge and total driving current to the original star distributes itself onto the new stars proportionally to their masses.) In this case, the smaller member of the pair might have such a low value of current density as to drop it, abruptly, to "brown dwarf" or even "giant planet" status. That may be how giant gas planets get born (and are in close proximity to their parents).

The final distribution of mass and current density is sensitive to the mechanics of the splitting process. Such a process can only be violent - possibly resulting in a nova eruption. Some mass may be lost to the plasma cloud that later can appear as a planetary nebula or nova-remnant that surrounds the binary pair. If the charge on the original star was highly concentrated on or near its surface, and the fissioning process is similar to the peeling off of an onion's skin, then most of that original charge (and current) may end up on the offspring star that is constituted only of the skin of the original star. In this way the smaller, rather than the larger of the two members of the resulting binary pair, can be the hotter one. In any event, both stars will move to different positions in the HR diagram from where their parent was located.

User avatar
nick c
Posts: 2483
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by nick c » Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:53 pm

Hi Lizzie,
There is some “evidence” that the “mathematical models” of Sirius B as a "super dense star" are correct.
That is not very convincing. These are the same gravity only "mathematical models" that, though quite "elegant," do little to explain what is observed. Any model can only go as far as its' a priori assumptions allow.
The problem I brought up with the supposed density of Sirius B is that the implications of the compression of matter, such as mainstream assigns to the white dwarf class, is irreconcilable with EU theory. If white dwarfs are indeed super dense planetary sized bodies with stellar mass, then that shows that a star can be collapsed by the force of gravity and as follows a larger stellar mass could compress into a neutron star, or an even larger stellar mass could compress into a Black Hole. So by accepting the mainstream description of a small but massive white dwarf one leaves the door open for Black Holes, the logic is unavoidable. It amounts to a total rejection of the role of electricity in stellar dynamics. This is contrary to the massive amount of evidence compiled by Thornhill, Scott, Juergens, et al.
How does mainstream arrive at the conclusion that a white dwarf must have a stellar mass in a planet sized diameter? Stars at the white end of the spectrum are supposed to be hot and luminous, yet white dwarfs are dim. So in order to reconcile these opposite qualities they calculate that the star must be hot but incredibly small (and hence of low total luminosity). The EU explanation is that white dwarfs are not planet sized, but rather stars that are under low electrical stress, typically the incoming galactic current is being usurped by a larger companion, such as Sirius A. The white dwarf is operating in glow mode, that is why it is white and also dim, it is like a florescent light, it does not have the arc mode tufting such as the Sun. So there is no need to compress a sun's matter into the size of a planet. The electric force which is 10^39 x more powerful than the force of gravity prevents collapse. All of fusion powered at the core stellar theory is based on ideal gas laws, but stars are not composed of gases but of plasmas, and they don't know about those laws.
Why do myths refer to Sirius B as “dark” in comparison to Sirius A?

Are “dark stars” those that are in “dark current mode”?
Sirius B is not a dark star, it is just dim and difficult to see in a telescope because of its' bright companion A. It might even be visible in binoculars if it wasn't for its' proximity to A. Usually the term dark star refers to brown dwarfs which are often found alone, free floaters in interstellar space. Jupiter and Saturn are dark stars, if they were free floating in interstellar space they would be shining as brown dwarf stars, presently their glory is being usurped by the Sun. As Thornhill points out, Jupiter's magnetosphere is in dark mode, if it were to move into glow mode Jupiter would appear larger than the moon to an earthbound observer.

As far as Sirius A or B appearing red in ancient times, there is testimony that that may have been the case. Although some have said the Chinese in 2C BCE called it white. I suspect that it may have appeared red in an earlier time.
A star's electrical state can change rapidly, the H-R diagram is not a chart of stellar evolution but rather a depiction of different electrical conditions for stars. There are other verified instances of stars changing their (color) position on the H-R diagram, including one in the 20th C. This of course is a major anomaly for mainstream theory.
Scott's Electric Sky has a section on the subject.

I still think the Dogon were taught about Sirius B by the French (see the link on my previous post) especially since the French probably also taught them that there was a Sirius C. Early in the 20th C it was accepted that Sirius C had been observed, but more recent observations determined that the star in question was merely visually aligned and not part of the system. So the Dogon incorporated it into their lore. Now it may turn out that there is a C, perhaps a very dim red dwarf, that would not be a surprise. Multiple star systems are the rule, our solitary Sun is an exception.

nick c


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:19 am

Nick C said: That is not very convincing. These are the same gravity only "mathematical models" that, though quite "elegant," do little to explain what is observed. Any model can only go as far as its' a priori assumptions allow.
Yes, I agree with you there. Just because there is “evidence” provided by “mainstream scientists doesn’t mean it is "true." We can be very good at making the “evidence” fit the “model.”
Nick C said: How does mainstream arrive at the conclusion that a white dwarf must have a stellar mass in a planet sized diameter? Stars at the white end of the spectrum are supposed to be hot and luminous, yet white dwarfs are dim.
I don’t know how mainstream scientists arrived at the conclusion about the stellar mass of a white dwarf stars. I was interested primarily in why the Dogon myths claimed that Sirius B was "super dense". Why would so-called “primitive” people invent such a myth unless there was some “core of truth” involved?

If any of the Dogon myth is true, then I believe that eventually there will be a plausible “electric star model” to be found.

What is super sense matter? ... ze=largest

Does “super dense matter” come from electric magnetars?

All magnetic fields are produced electrically, also the field of magnetars. Their new electric model was partly published by the author in the book The Electric Universe in 1998. The new model is based on the positive charge which is collected in the presupernova´s core via the different masses and sizes of proton and electron.

Why does a neutron star have a magnetic field ? One of the old answers was: the neutron star inherited its field from the field of the presupernova. Chandra, however, showed the Crab pulsar´s two jets in its rotational axis, clearly without precession. Magnetic and rotational axes are identical, but the pulsar pulses. This old model cannot explain this identity and also the non-axial jet which was recently discovered by Chandra !

The proton has a 1836 times larger mass than the electron. Because of this asymmetry, the protons have a 43 times lower velocity than the electrons in the same temperature due to the Boltzmann-equation. The core will be positively charged, since more electrons than protons leave the core. During the forming of the neutron body, already 1 cm³ of protons in overbalance form a "proton-skin". This mono-proton-layer is fixed to the neutron body by the strong nuclear force

The electric current of a neutron star is in order of 1020 A which does not flow in the body but it rotates with the body in this model! Therefore, this star does not need power for the sustaining of its magnetic field. Only the rotation of the protons emits synchrotron radiation which calculably consumes the rotational energy very slowly and very evenly. This spin down due to the synchrotron radiation is well known since decades without an exact model. Now it became calculable! This positive star produces the cosmic ray particles by its high voltage of +1025 V (easy to calculate via sphere-condensator and charge of 1 cm3 protons !). This highest voltage of the Universe strips the electrons from falling atoms, attracts and fixes them. It repulses the positive atomic nuclei electrostatically along lightyears to relativistic velocities. These are the cosmic ray particles.

The neutron body contains not only 1 cm³ of free protons on the surface, but often many m³ of them in the depth. These are partly fixed to the neutrons and to each other, but the strong electrostatic repulsion somewhat expands their volume, therefore they swim slowly upwards. I name them "proton bubbles". They arrive at the surface one after another in thousands of years. Naturally, such "proton bubbles" elevate quicker if they are larger and during a star-quake. A surfaced "proton bubble" explodes into the empty space. The erupted protons form a filament and fly parallel in it, see non-axial, cold filament of the Crab above, three ones in N 49 and 4 filaments in Vela below. The proton filament will be repulsed by the proton skin along lightyears. The result of the strong acceleration is the emission of hard X ray. The rotation of the magnetar shows this proton volcano repeatedly
What is unique about the composition of some meteors -- they contain Platinum Group (super conductive) metals? Why did the ancients worship "black stones"? Was it because of their "superconductive properties"?

Ultimate Metals ... er_min.php
By studying the Periodic Table of the Elements, we learn that Gold (AU) is only slightly different than the ‘transition elements’ known as the Platinum Group metals right next door. By subjecting Gold to certain alchemical processes, it is clear that the ancient Egyptians trans-mutated pure Gold, a fairly common and plentiful earth metal, into an even more valuable commodity – the basis of pure light and life both on a physical as well as spiritual plane – the Platinum Group ‘transition element’ of high-spin Iridium.

In the exact center of row 6 of the Periodic Table, in the very heart of the ‘transition elements’ sits element #77 – Iridium. Iridium is only found on the earth in deposits associated with impact craters of meteors. Meteors are composed primarily of Iron (Fe) and Nickel (NI), the base transition elements, but through interaction with the gravitational field of earth’s atmosphere, intense magnetic stimuli, and the incredible heat and light generated from its pre-impact flight, other ‘higher spin’ transition elements such as Rhodium and Iridium are produced. Iridium is truly an amazing element. It is named after the Greek word Iris – meaning ‘rainbow’.

But, speaking of Element 77, there are even more ‘coincidences’. According to the Cabalist, Jacob Boehme, 77 is the total number of “divine names of God”.

Is it just a coincidence that pure, high spin iridium powder has a trio of electron orbits – five around the nucleus, sixty in an inner ‘ring’ and twelve around an outer orbit for a total electron molecular ‘weight’ of 77? Are the ancient Egyptian texts giving us a coded, alchemical clue? But there is more. Jesus asks His disciples to forgive 70 plus 7 times,

Why has nothing been published by the mainstream press that explains the incredible potential of high-spin PGMs in cellular health and human longevity, especially the treatment of chronic disease states?
Nick C said: Sirius B is not a dark star, it is just dim and difficult to see in a telescope because of its' bright companion A.
Yes, Sirius B is not a dark star; it is a white dwarf. But Sirius C, if it exists, is supposed to be a red or brown dwarf. Couldn’t the “electric star model” possibly fit a brown dwarf star in a binary star system where the main sequence star is visible and the “companion star” is in “dark current mode”? A “slight increase” in the level of total current impinging on the brown dwarf star could move it to glow mode or even arc mode. People on the ground would believe that a star suddenly appeared in the heavens.
However, in the ES model, there are no minimum temperature or mass requirements because the star is inherently electrical to start with. In the ES model (if a brown/red dwarf is operating near the upper boundary of the dark current mode), a slight increase in the level of total current impinging on that star will move it into the normal glow mode.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:48 am

The Sirius lore
In 1931, the French anthropologists Marcel Griaule and Germaine Dieterlen visited Mali, home of the Dogon tribe, and came up with what they announced it to be a very important discovery. The Dogons knew from their ancestors that Sirius A ( sigu tolo in their language) had an invisible companion, Sirius B ( po tolo ). They even asserted the existence of a third star. Sirius C, which they called Emme Ya (extremely small).

A minority of astronomers did not exclude the possibility that Sirius B had evolved from an earlier massive star and was visible to the naked eye in the historical past. But transforming to a dwarf this would have taken at least 500,000 years; so how could ancient astronomers describe a red giant in the vicinity of Sirius while the latter is known to be bluish-white?

It happened that the book published by the French anthropologists attracted the attention of Robert Temple, who in 1970 wrote one of the best selling books on the subject, The Sirius Mystery, which suggested the Dogons might have taken their knowledge from the ancient Egyptians for they had initiated the worship of Sirius A, the star of Isis, so perhaps Sirius B related to Osiris and C to Anubis or vice versa.

I believe the mistake lay in that all the information the scientists relied on came from one source, namely the Dogons. Looking into other cultures we find equal myths about the same type of story. To the Indians the name "Tishtrya" goes back to the Sanskrit term "three stars".

In Arab mythology there are abundant poems on the Sirius lore. They believed there were three stars getting along well. They called the original star "Al-Shi'ra Al-Yamaniyyah", denoting Sirius A in Canis Major, and another "Al-Ghomaisaa". But the latter is not Sirius B, but Procyon in Canis Minor; the appearance of which above the horizon heralds the coming of Sirius approximately an hour later. Perhaps it was because Procyon was also called by the Arabs "Al-Shi'ra" (Sirius) that Griaule took it for Sirius B and impelled the Dogons unnoticeably or involuntarily to accepting it this way; thus attributing them more knowledge than they actually possessed.

A third star in the set is Suhayl in the Constellation Carina (part of Argo), known as "the ship of the desert". There are the three most important stars for the Arabs, along with Ursa Major. It meant they recognised the triplet Sirius-Proycon-Canopus, in which the last was the brother of the first two sisters and Sirius is married to Canopus.

This is similar to the Dogon story. But where did the Arabs hear it? Clearly from the ancient Egyptians. Sirius-Procyon-Canopus is no more than Isis-Nephthys-Osiris. It follows that Sirius is Isis, Procyon is Nephthys and Canopus is Osiris.

It seems that Canopus or Suhayl, and not Orion, designates the Egyptian star Sah, piloting Osiris. Egyptologist Alexander Badawi, known for his theory of the unification of King Khufu with Osiris via the king's southern shaft, instead considered Betelgeuse "Alpha-Orionis" to denote "Sah".

As for Canopus, it does not rise or set, yet it does appear to move but remains at about the same height above the horizon for a few hours, passing through its lowest point in the sky. The Arabs calls it Al-Wazn (the weight); for the star seems to rise with difficulty from the horizon.

Another reason for calling it the weight is that it is virtually directly south of Sirius. Coppens also had a point here: when Isis is identified with Sirius, her husband Osiris would have to be equal, and hence would also be a single, brilliant star, Canopus. So the trade-off here is that since Isis was the brightest, then it should marry no less than Canopus having the most important position, the "throne of heaven", the South Pole Star, around which Sirius revolved.

Betelgeuse is associated with Sirius in what is called the Winter Triangle (with Sirius and Procyon) which is easy to locate with the naked eye: first find Betelgeuse on Orion's shoulder, then follow a direction down from Orion's Belt to Sirius, then trace a V upwards to Procyon, then return to Betelgeuse to complete the triangle. They form an almost equilateral triangle in the southern sky.
The Canopus Revelation


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:59 am

Perhaps Nibiru is not a planet at all, but a small system consisting of a Brown Dwarf Star and a small accompanying planet. Brown dwarfs were, until recently, only theoretical planet/star hybrids. Astronomers believe that they have now located some brown dwarfs, whose luminosity is so low as to make their detection extremely difficult. Essentially, they are the product of an accreting gas cloud that is several times more massive than that which eventually made Jupiter. Beyond a certain threshold of mass, reactions within this world lead to the emission of heat and a minute amount of light, but the body is still too small to set off the thermonuclear chain reactions that ignite a conventional star. They appear a dull red, contrary to the colour that their name would suggest, and do not increase beyond the spherical dimensions of Jupiter, despite having a greater mass.

They are thought to be relatively commonplace in the Universe, and their relative lack of appearances, thus far, reflects their dark star qualities. If one is in orbit around the Sun, then it is quite plausible that its detection by telescope has not yet occurred, so one can understand the paucity of tangible data from further afield. But as we become more able to detect and observe planets around other stars, so will our ability to observe this maverick in our own system increase.

So, what if this Brown Dwarf in fact had planets circling in close proximity around it? Surely this would better explain the presence of life. After all, the Nibiruans are supposed to have lived on the Earth and then fled to their home planet, which takes it on a 3600-year orbit out of the known solar system. If that was the case, and it was just a planet and not an actual Brown Dwarf/Planetary system, how could life be sustained in the far reaches of our Solar System? The Brown Dwarf theory makes much more sense and has a correlation with the Hopi Prophecies.

Its elliptical orbit takes it around two suns. The other sun it orbits is our suns dark twin. Our best telescopic equipment on and off earth is closely monitoring Nibiru’s inbound approach. This is one of many reasons the orbiting Hubble telescope live feed is hidden from our view.

Each time it approaches it starts a chain of events that culminates with it passing by and causing our earth's surface to change. These changes are the cause of massive death and destruction. History is rich with these stories. Many people from the past didn't draw the connection between what looked to be a large comet overhead and what they were experiencing at the time (volcanoes erupting, earthquakes, land masses sinking and rising, tidal waves, severe weather and floods).

In 1995 Planet X became close enough to us that its magnetism started to effect earth in a big way, which increases now daily. The closer it gets to us the faster it moves toward earth and the stronger its magnetic effects become.

Our own sun's gravity is what is pulling it closer and faster. Planet X is not going to hit earth or the sun because of the repulsion force which comes into play as they near each other. There is still reason to be forewarned and concerned.

Earth now has two strong magnetic influences in the vicinity (our sun being the main one) and its core is heating up because of it. The sun is pushing and pulling on earth one way and Planet X is now upsetting that balance with its own set of influences. This has been the reason for all the strange weather and seismic activity as of late.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:08 am

Is human society manipulated and controlled behind the scenes only by a human ruling elite (the Illuminati?) What if the Illuminati are answerable to "higher powers" who manipulate and conrol them?

Nungal - Great Lords. "Fallen Angels". Book of Enoch: watchers. Bené Elohim (Sons of the Elohim). Those who coupled with human females without authorization of Yahvé (An-Enlil). Akkadian: Igigi. Male. Created (in great haste) by Sa'am and Mamitu-Nammu from Imdugud genes on which Abzu-Abba had been experimenting. Considered as Life Designers although no knowledge of cloning. Followers of Osiris and Horus. A Gina'abul rebel race**

Anunna - Warriors. "Angels of Yahvé". Created by An and Ninmah on Dukù, Mulmul (Pleiades), from a genetic patrimony discovered by Ninmah on Nalulkára. No doubt the cell line was enhanced Šutum. Wars among the Gina'abul brought them to the Earth. Anunnaki = "Anunna of the Earth." Have manipulated humans for millennia.
Nibiru and the Anunnaki
Amitakh explains that she is presenting her account of the Nibiru, which is quite different from those currently in circulation for the very reason that most accounts of the planet are in fact based upon Sitchin's writings, and she disagrees with Sitchin.

With Sitichin's theory and his presentation of the story, one can actually feel sorry for the Anunnaki as he argues that their home planet is dying and that the Anunnaki are attempting a rescue of their planet. On the contrary, no possible sympathy for the Anunnaki can be found in Amitakh's writing about them. She exposes them by stating: "If you imagine the worst characteristics you can conceive in Satan, you have well concocted the impression of the Anunnaki."
Nibiru and the Anunnaki by D.M.
A question arises: Is Nibiru real? The answer to that is a resounding "Yes". There are those who believe that the Anunnaki of Nibiru are coming back to Earth soon. They believe that Planet X is going to pass by Earth, in May or June of 2003, on its 3,600 year orbit around our sun. Such believers are terrified of the consequences that a close pass by Nibiru might bring.

Although Nibiru has been called The Twelfth Planet, technically it is not a planet of our solar system. In fact, it is a planet from another solar system and the star that was the sun of its solar system has been extinguished. Nibiru was never visible from the Earth but the star which was the centre of Nibiru’s solar system was visible in the skies from Earth. The orbiting pattern of Nibiru gave the Anunnaki the advantage of having a mobile observatory from which they could observe and investigate many other planets near its orbit.

The Anunnaki were one of the many technologically advanced alien races at the time. In fact, their civilization was advanced far beyond most others of their time. The Anunnaki called their home star (sun) "ZAOS". The Anunnaki are a belligerent and conquering race. They are fierce, evil, lustful, incestuous, bloodthirsty, deceitful, jealous and domineering.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:50 pm

THE CHRONICLES OF THE GÍRKÙ / Neb-Heru, the Morning Star ... _add03.htm
I am not in accord with author Zecharia Sitchin's thesis concerning Nibiru. I am absolutely certain that he describes Venus before it entered the orbit that we know today.
In my appendix to Ádam Genisiš, NEB-HERU, The Morning Star, I bring numerous new elements, in rapport with mythology, that explain that there existed a planet between Mars and Jupiter which I name Mulge (the Black Star). This planet was the base of the Life Designers in the solar system.

I saw at the time that I received knowledge of this history that Venus was then its satellite. The war that brought the Anunna against their opponents exploded Mulge more than 10,000 years ago. When Mulge exploded, its satellite (the future Venus) was ejected and roamed in the solar system for several thousand years.

In the heart of the ancient Egyptians, Venus is Neb-Heru (the lord Horus), the avenger of his father Osiris. The funerary texts explain this marvelously and clearly associate Horus and afterwards the dead kings (the images of Horus) to the Morning Star.

I speak of it in my appendix. I am thus on this point in accord with the work of Immanuel Velikovsky ("Worlds in Collision").

Ádam Genisiš includes an appendix of this name, highlighting very telling ancient texts concerning the planet Venus, which they called (among other appellations) the Morning Star, and which they describe as having been a roving star ("astre") before taking its present position in the solar system.

As he says, this interpretation was developed by in Immanuel Velikovsky in "Worlds in Collision".

Parks examines a number of singular documents that confirm, in part, the proposals of Velikovsky, as well as the cosmic events described in Ádam Genisiš, involving the "astre" Mulge-Tab (companion of Mulge). The most eloquent of these documents are funerary Egyptian texts, but others are just as convincing.

Here is a brief outline (paraphrased from Ádam Genisiš) of the method Parks used to develop his "Neb-Heru / Morning Star" scenario:

Document the total conviction of the Mesopotamians about the place of origin of their gods. Set against this ideology the recent astronomical discoveries concerning the solar system. This serves to reestablish a truth long distorted by authors such as Zecharia Sitchin who wished to see in a wandering member of the solar system, the original home of the Anunna "gods" of the Mesopotamian texts.

Attempt to identify this perturbing celestial object. It is found to be mentioned in the Indian Rig-Veda. Draw parallels between this Vedic text and the Egyptian ideology. Note that there is a common source.

Establish that Enki and Osiris were one and the same personage. This leads to the possibility of authenticating the amphibian filiations of Enki-Osiris (Sa'am) as well as his consanguinity with the Abgal Designers-of-Life from Sirius -- those which were considered to be KIR-IS-TI. Together, these facts connect the Kiristi with the Christ, symbolized by the Morning Star in the hermetic passages of the Bible. This in turn leads to interpretations of the meaning of the various crosses found in different parts of the world.

Also, explore the sacrificial tradition of the Dogons which recounts the death of Nommo, the "Christ" of Mali. In consequence of this sacrifice, the universe was disrupted, along with the positions of the stars. All of this gives for the first time the opportunity to assimilate the sacrificed celestial Nommo to a celestial body, whose destruction produced the birth of the planet Venus.

Perform a close study of the origins and formation of the planet Venus as seen by different cultures. Note that Venus is always born from the destruction of its progenitor.

Explore the connections between various myths that see the planet Venus as having caused floods over the ages. Noting that in the Mesopotamian traditions, Venus and its progenitor bore the names Neberu and Mulge, begin to understand the hermetic ideology of the Egyptians that saw in the dismembered Osiris the asteroid belt. Discover that the shattered tree of the horizon and the primordial hill from which emerged the new sun (Venus) form an identity: a celestial image of Osiris in the sky.

Osiris symbolizes the hill of the ancient gods (Kadištu) because he is their representative on Earth. Horus the Avenger, the posthumous son of Osiris, represents the Morning Star. Show that the various Pharaohs (images of Horus) all symbolize Venus. Discover through a study of the Egyptian funerary texts that the soul of the Pharaohs must make the celestial voyage that permits the rejoining of the dismembered body of Osiris in the sky and restoration of the previously disrupted universe.

For that, they must follow the ancient path of Neb-Heru (Horus-Venus), the orbit that goes from the light to the shadows. All these discoveries lead to the resounding evidence that the Mesopotamian astre Neberu and the Egyptian Neb-Heru form the same astral image.

Put simply: there was indeed a wandering object in the solar system, which was occasionally highly disruptive to the Earth (and other planets). Its birth out of the destruction of another celestial body was observed by humans, as was its eventual assumption of a stable solar orbit. We know it as Venus. It never was the home of the gods, and there is no such place associated with the solar system.

But there are deep connections between this object - Venus - and Horus/Neb-Heru, with Osiris identified as its progenitor.
The Age of Uras
Parks has examined the translations of Samuel Kramer, Jean Bottéro, Marie-Joseph Seux, Thorkild Jacobsen, René Labat, and André Caquot. While they differ from one another, their core information is the same, and Parks and his associates couldn't help noticing a surprising similarity between his flashes and the basic story written down on the ancient clay tablets - certainly more than 5000 to 6000 years old!

He found striking similarities on concepts having to do with cloning, well detailed on the tablets, which have also been discussed by modern authors Zecharia Sitchin, R. Boulay, and David Icke.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:23 pm

THE CHRONICLES OF THE GÍRKÙ / Notes (Neb-Heru) ... _add03.htm
Readers are likely aware that Carl Sagan and co-author I. S. Shklovskii (Intelligent Life in the Universe) were taken with Babylonian historian Berosus' account of the amphibious teacher Oannes, who brought knowledge to the neolithic peoples of the Persian Gulf. Their discussion, along with the work of Zecharia Sitchin, whose first book was published ten years after Sagan's and Shklovskii's, on the mystery of the Oannes and the related Nommo legends of the Dogons of Mali, and Robert Temple's (The Sirius Mystery) focusing more on the Nommo, constitute the sources of the many ongoing discussions and speculations on extraterrestrial contact with early human civilizations.

As it happens, Parks' virtual-reality memories are filled with information about the Oannes and Nommo amphibians, who are Abgal originally from Sirius, and this is conveyed in both of his books to date, Le Secret des Etoiles Sombres and Ádam Genisiš. In the present section of his Neb-Heru appendix to Ádam Genisiš, Parks checks his memories against ancient legends and myths, and shows that the contact, if that is what it was, left much wider residue for us to consider.

This is important not only in itself, but in its bearing on the Mulge / Mulge-Tab / Morning Star scenario, due to a major connection between the amphibious Abgal and the lost planet Mulge.

The Egyptian term Abdju (Abydos) possesses a homophone whose sense is "fish". This sacred fish served as pilot of the solar bark of Râ. Its function was to warn the passengers of the bark of enemies sent by Seth. We have no difficulty in identifying the Abdju fish with a symbolic Horus or even better a reincarnated Osiris, while the Sumerian counterpart of Osiris is Enki who himself possessed the fish symbol.

This fish that precedes the solar bark is evidently the planet Venus which today leads [at least it does sometimes] the course of the sun (Râ).

We know that the fish equally represents Sirius, the Egyptians' other sacred star and the home of the amphibian Life Designers. Of course this reminds us of the aquatic beings called Nommos frequently mentioned in Ádam Genisiš. The Dogons affirm that the Nommos restored the world several times and that they transmitted to humanity such gifts as speech and grain.

To the Sumerians the Nommos are the famous Abgal who follow Enki's directives. The Sumerian term Abgal translates to Apkallû in Akkadian, a designation for a sage and, as follows, a priest.

Berossus, the Babylonian historian and priest of the Temple of Bel in Babylon brings us some details concerning an Abgal-Apkallû in a surviving fragment of his book The Babyloniaca, unfortunately lost in the meanderings of history.

His descriptions are reminiscent of those of the Dogon:
In Babylon there were many people of diverse origins who dwelled in Chaldee and lived lawlessly, like animals in the fields.

In the first year there appeared a being that came out of the Erytheraeum Sea that runs parallel to Babylon. It said its name was Oannes and it was an animal gifted with reason. Its body seemed to be that of a fish. It had under its fish's head another head; it also had feet like those of a man, coming from its fish's tail. Its voice and language were human in their articulation. This representation has been conserved down to our time.

This being was accustomed to passing the day among men, but it never took any food. It gave them elements of learning in letters, science, metallurgy, art, the manner of constructing cities, of founding temples, creating laws; it taught the principles of geometry. It showed them how to distinguish the grains of the earth and to harvest fruits. In short, it instructed them in each thing that would serve to "sweeten" their mores and to humanize their life.

At that time, no material needed to be added to improve these instructions. And when the sun rose, this being, Oannes, returned to the water, to pass the night in the depths, because it was amphibian.

There followed other animals resembling Oannes.

Berossus, in The Ancient Fragments, Isaac Preston Coy, 1980.
The records of the Egyptian Helladius report that a man-fish named Oe lived in the Persian Gulf. He had come out of a luminous egg and consecrated himself to the erudition of humanity.

There is a myth among the indigenous Pomo tribes of California that tells of the arrival of a supreme founder being who "came out of the ocean and transformed himself into a man."

In China there appeared the Lingyus, aquatic beings with human face, hands, and feet, but with the body of a fish.

In Egypt, fish was consumed by the people, but was strictly forbidden at the royal table of the Pharaoh! Doubtlessly, the pharaohs knew the symbolic truth of the fish. In a way, some of them remembered the "amphibian" origins of their "god" Osiris who was "massacred" by his enemy Seth.

Strangely, Jesus Christ was sacrificed on a Friday, the day when the Christians eat fish. The Christian church has obviously chosen to hijack the symbols

There is a quasi-homophone of Abdju [Abzu] in the Egyptian language: Abtu. According to Budge, this term has the meaning: massacre, carnage, bloodshed. He noted that the term equally signified "sacrifice(s)", and that as late as the 19th dynasty, as revealed in The Book of the Amduat, the Egyptians believed that human sacrifices originated from the time when Osiris was buried.

Continuing with this development, Parks shows that the hieroglyphic representation of the name Sa'am carries the meanings "to kill" and "to assassinate". The name "Osiris" (Usir = the seat of the eye) was given to Sa'am after his death by the Egyptians, who knew his true name.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Fri May 01, 2009 9:17 pm

In retrospect it seems most likely that Nibiru would be the sun’s binary companion, a dark star (possibly a brown dwarf) rather than a rogue planet. However, according to Andy Lloyd, it appears that Nibiru had seven orbiting moons, two of which are major, one minor. How could a solitary rogue planet maintain life upon it unless it traveled in the presence of its sun?

The True Sun of the Incas ... loyd_9.htm
The secret knowledge of the Dark Star appears to be widespread within esoteric literature. It often takes the form of an anomalous symbol connected with seven stars, and featured as a counterpart to the Sun and Moon. Sometimes, the Dark Star is described in words, as a 'true' Sun that is more significant than the Sun itself:

For instance, the Persian and, later, Roman cult of Mithras:

"It thus appears that the Mithraists somehow believed in the existence of two suns: one represented by the figure of the sun god, and the other by Mithras himself as the "unconquered sun". It is thus of great interest to note that the Mithraists were not alone in believing in the existence of two suns, for we find in platonic circles the concept of the existence of two suns, one being the normal astronomical sun and the other being a so-called "hypercosmic" sun located beyond the sphere of the fixed stars."

The fourth book of Zecharia Sitchin's Earth Chronicles, entitled 'The Lost Realms' (1990), deals with South American and Meso-American evidence for the existence of the Anunnaki. He argues that early Sumerian myths transferred to South America with the migration of the Anunnaki themselves, who were celebrated by later indigenous peoples there as their ancient gods.

Included in this are symbolic references to the Winged Disc:

"Tribal beliefs...held that at the very beginning there was an Olden God, creator of All Things, of the Heaven and of the Earth, whose abode was in the highest heaven, the twelfth heaven:

This amazingly sounds like a rendering of Mesopotamian celestial-religious beliefs, according to which the head of the pantheon was called Anu ("Lord of Heaven") and who, with his consort Antu ("Lady of Heaven") resided on the outermost planet, the twelfth member of our Solar System. The Sumerians depicted it as a radiating planet whose symbol was the cross.

The symbol was thereafter adopted by all the peoples of the ancient world and evolved to the ubiquitous emblem of the Winged Disc. Quetzalcoatl's shield and symbols depicted on early Mexican monuments are uncannily similar."

The civilizations of Central and South America do not appear to have been as ancient as those of Mesopotamia and Egypt, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest that some cross-pollination of culture occurred, possibly via such sea-faring nations as the Phoenicians, or even the Sumerians. As amazing as it may seem, some artifacts that have been unearthed in Bolivia, in the vicinity of Lake Titicaca, are inlaid with cuneiform script that seems to be of Proto-Sumerian extraction

The renowned author of Central American myth, Maurice Cotterell, has investigated whether these Ages may be connected with great solar cycles of about 3750 years.
This brings the phenomenon within reach of the orbit of the Dark Star: Sitchin approximates to 3600 years for his Nibiru, and I have suggested the inter-calendrical period of 3760 years for my Dark Star. All of which is suggestive of a cosmic time-period lying at the heart of ancient religious thinking.

What is missing is a direct mythological reference to the Dark Star amongst the remaining archaeological evidence. Was such direct evidence lost, or did it never exist in the first place?

So if Coricancha was not dedicated to the Sun, then what did the Incas devote their golden temple to? In the centre of the diagram of the High Altar is a massive golden ellipse. To either side of it are the Sun and Moon, and depictions of Venus as the Morning and Evening Star. The ellipse is surmounted by a cross of stars, and further stars lie below it. This celestial scene focuses upon the ellipse as the all-important source of the Universe in the form of the god Viracocha.

Does the elliptical disc that was the centre-point of the Inca religion point to a quite different 'true sun'? Might this heretical religious belief be the true meaning of the widespread devastation of the indigenous culture by the Conquistadores?

"Pachacuti does not tell us explicitly what was the “Sun called Viracochan pachayachachi” only that it was not our Sun, which he designates as Inti.

Sammer goes on to argue that the symbolism is meant to depict Saturn, but I think this is unlikely. Is the ellipse and cross of stars a representation of the Dark Star? We know that Nibiru's orbit is highly elliptical, and that it is symbolically connected with a celestial cross. There's every chance that this diagram indicates that the Incas were aware of the Dark Star and its return to our solar system. If Sitchin is correct about the Anunnaki's love of gold then we have a further connection with the rich contents of Coricancha, the 'golden enclosure'.

So I wonder whether the ’celestial barge’ is the return of the Dark Star Nibiru, surrounded by its halos and companion ’stars’ (really moons). If so, then telescopes are evidently required to see the heavenly apparition, which is itself interesting. A point I shall pursue in my new book ’Binary Companion’, (which I hope to finish one of these days...) The lower and rather prominent ’comet’, or sizeable meteor, is perhaps a sign of danger; the potential for a catastrophe associated with the return of Nibiru.

Perhaps this is portending the end of an Age when the ’True Sun’ returns?


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Fri May 01, 2009 9:32 pm

This is really interesting. The “dark star theory” in some way seems to be related to the “Saturn theory.” I feel there is a connection, but I can't figure it out.

It must be related in some way to the the "lost planet" or astre Mulge-Tab; was this Maldek or Tiamet? Mulge was also called the "black star." This was the "celestial battle"? Venus was originally one of its satellites? The amphibious Nommos were supposed to be from the Sirius star system. Does Sirius play a role in all this as well? ... 463#p20409
In my appendix to Ádam Genisiš, NEB-HERU, The Morning Star, I bring numerous new elements, in rapport with mythology, that explain that there existed a planet between Mars and Jupiter which I name Mulge (the Black Star). This planet was the base of the Life Designers in the solar system. I saw at the time that I received knowledge of this history that Venus was then its satellite. The war that brought the Anunna against their opponents exploded Mulge more than 10,000 years ago. When Mulge exploded, its satellite (the future Venus) was ejected and roamed in the solar system for several thousand years.

Noting that in the Mesopotamian traditions, Venus and its progenitor bore the names Neberu and Mulge, begin to understand the hermetic ideology of the Egyptians that saw in the dismembered Osiris the asteroid belt. Discover that the shattered tree of the horizon and the primordial hill from which emerged the new sun (Venus) form an identity: a celestial image of Osiris in the sky.

Ádam Genisiš includes an appendix of this name, highlighting very telling ancient texts concerning the planet Venus, which they called (among other appellations) the Morning Star, and which they describe as having been a roving star ("astre") before taking its present position in the solar system.

Establish that Enki and Osiris were one and the same personage. This leads to the possibility of authenticating the amphibian filiations of Enki-Osiris (Sa'am) as well as his consanguinity with the Abgal Designers-of-Life from Sirius -- those which were considered to be KIR-IS-TI. Together, these facts connect the Kiristi with the Christ, symbolized by the Morning Star in the hermetic passages of the Bible.

Also, explore the sacrificial tradition of the Dogons which recounts the death of Nommo, the "Christ" of Mali. In consequence of this sacrifice, the universe was disrupted, along with the positions of the stars. All of this gives for the first time the opportunity to assimilate the sacrificed celestial Nommo to a celestial body, whose destruction produced the birth of the planet Venus ... 463#p20413
This is important not only in itself, but in its bearing on the Mulge / Mulge-Tab / Morning Star scenario, due to a major connection between the amphibious Abgal and the lost planet Mulge.
The Cosmology of Tawantinsuyu
The account of Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa (fl. 1532-1572) adds several significant details:

“The natives of this country say that in the beginning, before the world was created, there was one whom they called Viracocha. And he created the world dark and without the Sun, nor Moon, nor stars.”

The Sun, according to Sarmiento’s narrative, emerged only after the Deluge.

We may observe that the dominant deity depicted on the altar is not the Sun, but a large oblong disk, which, the author tells us, was made of gold. This disk, by far the largest object on the altar, is flanked on either side by the Sun and Moon and by Venus, depicted in its two aspects as the Morning and Evening Star. Had the Sun been the chief object of worship in Tawantinsuyu, as the chroniclers have been assuring us thus far, we would expect its image to have the predominant place in the kingdom’s chief temple, ostensibly dedicated to its worship. Instead, we find it relegated to a definitely subordinate position.

They believed and said that the world, heaven and earth, sun and moon, had been created by one greater than they: they called him Illa Tecce, which means “Eternal Light.” The moderns added another name, that is, Viracocha, which means “Great God of Pirua,” meaning whom Pirua, the first settler of these lands, worshipped, and from whom the entire country and empire took the name Pirua, which the Spaniards have corrupted to Peru or Piru.

Of the Sun they said that it was the son of the great Illa Tecce and that the physical light which it gave off was part of the divine nature which Illa Tecce had imparted to it, that it might direct and govern the days, the times, the years and the seasons, and also kings and kingdoms and lords and other things. Of the Moon they said that she was a sister and wife of the Sun, and that Illa Tecce had given to her a portion of his divinity, and made her mistress of the sea and of winds, of queens and princesses, of women’s labor, and queen of heaven. The Moon they called Coya, which means “queen.”

Of Dawn [i.e., the Morning Star] they said that she was a goddess of young maidens and princesses, and originator of the flowers of the fields, and mistress of the dawn and twilight; and that it was she who threw dew onto the earth when she shook her hair, and they thus called her Chasca [i.e., hairy].

Jupiter they called Pirua, saying, first of all, that it was this planet that the great Illa Tecce had commanded that should be the guardian and lord of the empire and provinces of Piru, and of its government and of its lands and for this they sacrificed to this planet all the first fruits of their harvests and all that which seemed most noteworthy and finest by its nature, such as an ear or grain of maize, or other harvests and fruits and trees.

Mars - Aucayoc - they said they had charged with matters relating to wars and soldiers; Mercury -Catu Illa - with those having to do with merchants and travelers and messengers. Saturn - Haucha - they charged with pestilence and slaughter and famine, and lightning and thunder; and they said that he held a club and bows and arrows to hurt and punish men for their evils.

Among the Incas, just as among the Greeks and the Romans, Zeus, or Jupiter, was known as supreme among the gods. Ares, or Mars, was the god of war, Hermes, or Mercury, of travelers and merchants. Saturn’s malevolent nature was also recognized among the Greeks and Romans. How can these similarities be explained?

Whatever the explanation for the similarities with the mythology of the Old World, the anonymous Jesuit provides important information about the nature of the Inca cult.

Besides the Coricancha he mentions a Temple of Viracocha, a Temple of the Planet Jupiter, and one which we may call a “Dragon Temple.”

“The Temple of the Sun,” was later converted into the Church of Santo Domingo, but according to Martin de Morua and other writers, the Church of Santo Domingo is the former Coricancha.

Thus the “Temple of the Sun” and the Coricancha are one and the same temple. But we have already examined the altar of the Coricancha and found no evidence that the Sun’s cult was pre-eminent there. Its chief object of worship is identified as Viracochan Pachayachachi. The cult of the Coricancha was, it seems, some heavenly body which was called “sun” before the Inti, the sun of our days was created. Was it Jupiter who, according to the chronicler, was given sovereignty over the whole land? But Jupiter had a temple separate from the Coricancha. Was it Saturn?

Saturn, or Haucha, is not otherwise depicted on the altar and no separate temple to this planet is known to exist. Saturn seems a more likely choice than Jupiter; however, the sources on Tawantinsuyu presently at our disposal give no direct indication of the true nature of the chief cult of the empire with its sanctuary, the Coricancha; they surmise that it was Saturn must be based on extraneous sources, mainly from Babylonia and China.

That a celestial body should be called “the sun” and yet be something other than the sun may at first appear strange. But a close parallel is available in Babylonia. In Babylonian astronomy Alap-Shamash, “the star of the sun” was Saturn. Ninib, another Babylonian designation for Saturn, “is said to shine like the sun.” In India the appellative of the sun, arki, was also applied to Saturn.

In Sanscrit arka means “belonging or relating to the sun.” But Arki is a name for Saturn, the most distant of the planets visible with the naked eye. Arc means “to shine, be brilliant,” Arkin means “radiant with light.” Arkaja, the name often applied to Saturn, designates it as an offspring of the Sun (Markandeya Purana). Diodorus of Sicily (II. 30. 3-4) reported that the Chaldeans called Kronos (Saturn) by the name Helios, or the Sun.

Hyginus also wrote that Saturn was called “sun.” (De Astronomia II. 42. 8-10.) These examples demonstrate that there is no incongruity in interpreting the reports of the Inca devotion for the sun and of the cult of the sun in the Coricancha as referring actually to Saturn.

The evidence from China throws even more light on the cosmology of Tawantinsuyu; but in order to be able to use this evidence properly, we must first say something about the political organization of the Inca kingdom.

Tawantinsuyu means “the four quarters” of which the Inca empire consisted - Chinchasuyu to the North, Qollasuyu to the South, Antisuyu to the East and Kuntisuyu to the West. At the center of Tawantinsuyu was Cusco, the capital, with the Inca ruler and the Coricancha. From Cusco four roads led toward each of the suyus or quarters.

These roads, described in detail by Polo de Ondegardo, had a significance that went far beyond their value as means of communication. Here is Polo’s description:

“From the temple of the Sun went, as from the center, certain lines, which the Indians called ceques; and they were divided into four parts according to the four royal roads that went out of Cusco. . .”

And Polo goes on to describe in great detail the shrines that were situated along the ceques and the roads. The organization of the Inca kingdom resembles closely the political organization of the Chinese Empire. According to the Han historian Ssuma Ts'ien, the planet Saturn “corresponds to the center.” The four other planets represented the four cardinal points; Saturn was placed at the pole, and the entire stellar sphere was said to revolve around it.

The earthly kingdom was set up to reflect the heavenly sphere. Just as Saturn occupied the central position in the sky, so the imperial palace and the emperor occupied the central location in the Chinese empire. At the center of the Inca empire stood the Coricancha, the shrine of Viracocha.

If we may on this basis draw the surmise that the center of Tawantinsuyu, too, was dedicated to Saturn, it would then follow that the Coricancha was a temple of Saturn, and Viracocha, the chief object of worship in that shrine, was none other than Saturn.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Sat May 02, 2009 8:17 am

The Worm Hole of Daath - Recap
In the course of this study, we have come across various pieces of information which add together to indicate the possibility of a comet, asteroid or planetoid with Sirius connections passing close to, or colliding with the Earth around 2012, or 2013. Let me just run through these snippets again.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Sun May 03, 2009 9:41 pm

Re: Dogon Cosmology, Sirius, and Hydrogen Astrophysics ... 30509bb63d
The Dogon actually say that there are three major stars in the Sirius system:
Po Tolo, Sigi Tolo, and Emma Ya Tolo.

Po Tolo (Sirius B) is the oldest of stars, and its name means 'deep beginning'. It is a twin of the Po - the Black hole at the center of the galaxy. The Dogon consider Po Tolo the reservoir and source of all things in this realm, and the germ of creation for our Solar System. They say it is the smallest, yet heaviest of celestial objects, and that it ejects it essence out into creation by its fast spinning. The particles of its essence are 'infinitely small'.

Modern astrophysics shows that indeed, Sirius B is a very old green dwarf star that has completed the cycle of regular star life. Sirius B ejected its outer atmosphere into space ages ago. Its interior has transformed from gaseous hydrogen plasma to a solid ionized hydrogen crystal. Once about the size of the Sun, it is now condensed to the size of the earth. As a twin of the Po, Po Tolo is a star that has many of the qualities of a Black Hole. Dwarfs are 'Black stars' in that they have low luminosity (they do not shine bright). They do emit considerable UV radiation, however. Their primary energy is not nuclear-thermal, but piezoelectric (ionic energy due to gravitational pressure). Dwarfs have electromagnetic fields that are stronger and a billion times larger than regular stars. They rotate incredibly fast, and circulate their particles for several thousand light-years.

Dwarfs are very heavy and their weight bends (warps) time and space considerable. Thus, dwarf stars have great influence on the organization of orbits and cycles of neighboring stars and planetary systems. Without a doubt, the cycles, orbits, and rotations of our Solar system are defined and governed by Sirius B.

Emma Ya Tolo is the female twin of the Po. The Dogon say that she is the 'Mother of Cereal Grains' and the 'Guardian of the Feminine Essence'. She appears to correspond to the Kemetic Goddess Auset. The Dogon say the Emma Ya Tolo is invisible and undetectable. She is the Great Mystery, the sacred seed of the feminine principle of womanhood and motherhood that Amma placed totally out of the reach of Ogo. To date, modern astronomers have not been able to observe or confirm the presence of Sirius C.

The movement of Po Tolo keeps all other stars in their respective places: in fact, one says that without this movement none of them would "stay in place". Po Tolo forces them to keep their trajectory…One calls it the "pillar of the stars"…. Po Tolo is the axis of the entire world…

To the Dogon, Sigi Tolo is the youngest star to come out of Amma's womb. The Dogon consider it is the celestial testament of the sacrifice of the Nommo Semi. They say the life force of the emasculated Nommo Semi drains through Sigi Tolo. However, the life force of Sigi Tolo impregnated P0 Tolo, giving it the force needed to reorganize heaven and earth. Also, the life force falls on Ogo's placenta (our Sun and Earth), purifying it as well.

Modern astrophysics shows that indeed, Sigi Tolo - Sirius A - is a young, type A blue star. It is 'emasculated' in that it is not burning its own hydrogen. It is 'sacrificing' its hydrogen by feeding it to Sirius B. In a binary star system of a dwarf and regular star, the gravitational pull of the dwarf often siphons off the hydrogen essence of the regular star. The hydrogen is sucked into the dwarf and then ejected out into space by the fast rotation. This is the relationship between Sirius A & B. The hydrogen essence of Sirius A is feeding Sirius B. Po Tolo is taking the hydrogen essence of Sigi Tolo and using the energy to renew the Sirius system and our own planetary system.

The Dogon also say that the hydrogen essence (Nyama) of Sigi Tolo falls like 'cords of rain' to purify the earth. In other words, the hydrogen essence of Sirius A:

• Is ciphoned off from Sirius A by the gravitational pull of Sirius B;

• As it falls toward Sirius B, the hydrogen essence of Sirius A is thrown off of Po Tolo because of its incredibly fast rotation.

• The hydrogen essence of Sirius A gets hurled into space. It streams into the heavens following the celestial landscape created by the strong gravitational fields of Sirius B.

• The gravitational fields of Sirius B lead a stream of Sigi Tolo's nyama to our planetary system.

The Dogon say that this stream of ionized hydrogen from the Sirius system is purifying to the Sun and planet Earth. This force is the 'Reorganizer of the World', that will bring about a New Order in the world established by Amma and not by Ogo. This sacred energy is Eloptic Black Light. It is the 'Electric light' that associates with gravitational fields (it follows Sirius B's gravitational fields to Earth) and resonates in affinity with Hue-man alpha-wave thoughts. Earth is about to encounter this stream, the question is when.

As stated, the Sirius star system and the constellation Aquarius are on the same plane of heaven - about 15 degrees below the celestial equator. As the Earth moves into the Aquarian age, she will also come into alignment with the Sirius star system. When the Earth and Sirius align, the great conjunction Taba Tolo - The Re-uniting of the Twin Placentas -is going to occur. The Black Light of the Sirius system will cascade down upon the planet.
The Black Light Process
BlackLight Power has invented a novel chemical process of causing the latent energy stored in the hydrogen atom to be released as a new primary energy source. This allows the negatively charged electron that is otherwise in a stable orbit to move closer to the naturally attracting, positively charged nucleus to generate power as heat. BlackLight Power has recently achieved a breakthrough in power generation by the invention of a solid fuel that uses conventional chemical reactions to generate the catalyst and atomic hydrogen at high reactant densities that in turn achieves very high power densities. Plant designs utilize continuous regeneration of the solid fuel mixture using known industrial processes, and the only consumable, the hydrogen fuel, is obtained ultimately from water due to the enormous net energy release relative to combustion.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Mon May 04, 2009 6:48 pm

Mulge was also called Maldek or Tiamet. It was destroyed when one of the satellites (Nibiru) of the Sun’s binary companion collided with it. The destruction of Mulge caused the formation of the Asteroid Belt and gave birth to Venus as a cometary body as stated by Immanuel Velikovsky in “Worlds in Collision”

The Sun’s binary companion is a brown dwarf star in the Sirius star system. Our current sun could have been the outermost third star of a trinary Sirius star system in which Sirius A and B shared about 17 more planets in various orbits about themselves any of which could have struck Maldek. Our current sun could have replaced the former sun (Saturn)?

After the destruction of Mulge or Maldek, the Nommo took refuge on Phoebe, the 10th moon of Saturn.

The Worm Hole of Daath - Recap
In the course of this study, we have come across various pieces of information which add together to indicate the possibility of a comet, asteroid or planetoid with Sirius connections passing close to, or colliding with the Earth around 2012, or 2013.

THE CHRONICLES OF THE GÍRKÙ / Notes (Neb-Heru) ... _add03.htm
I am not in accord with author Zecharia Sitchin's thesis concerning Nibiru. I am absolutely certain that he describes Venus before it entered the orbit that we know today. In my appendix to Ádam Genisiš, NEB-HERU, The Morning Star, I bring numerous new elements, in rapport with mythology, that explain that there existed a planet between Mars and Jupiter which I name Mulge (the Black Star). This planet was the base of the Life Designers in the solar system.
Nibiru and the Dark Star
Andy Lloyd, author of "The Dark Star", presents a fascinating new theory about our Sun's binary or companion and the famed Niburu, based on the work of Zechariah Sitchin's "The Twelfth Planet". Lloyd believes that there is a failed star or sun circling our own with a cometary orbit beginning just outside the Kuiper Belt at 60 to 70 AU and stretching all the way out to the Inner Oort Cloud. Its orbital period is at least three sars or 10,800 years which is very close to what astronomers have given to Sedna's orbit. It orbits more or less on the same plane as the Sun and in the same direction as our solar system planets.

What is really unique about his theory is that this dark star has its own planets, the first five minor, the sixth an Earth-sized Homeworld, and the seventh the planet or object we call Nibiru. The Homeworld is much like Earth and is where our Annunaki "gods" live. Nibiru is largely uninhabitable and acts more as a ship or battle station. When the dark star is at perihelion(closest approach to our sun) at 60 to 70 AU, Nibiru's orbit, which is at 60 AU from its parent, has a wide enough orbit to cut through our solar system, usually in the vicinity of Jupiter's orbit.
The Maldek Files
"Maldek" is one of several now popular names given to the ancient fifth planet of our solar system, whose orbit used to lie between that of Mars and Jupiter. At some point in the past, it was destroyed, leaving what we now know as the asteroid belt in its former orbit. What caused the destruction of this planet? When did it occur? Was it populated at the time? What impact did this event have on the rest of the solar system and its planets?

The most common constant in these various theories and explanations is the approach of yet another celestial body which had a hand in Maldek's destruction. The most unique name for this other celestial body seems to be the one given to it by researcher and author Zecharia Sitchin: Nibiru.

One of the biggest missing factors that Sitchin may be overlooking in his first Earth Chronicles book is the far greater proximity of our Solar system in those days to the Sirius binary star system. I've heard it said that our sun was basically the outermost third star of a trinary Sirius star system in those days, and that Sirius A and B shared about 17 more planets in various orbits about themselves, any of which could have had an impact in our solar system or played a role in the epic in the days when Maldek was still in one piece.

Interestingly, Earth does not form from half of Maldek's remains, as Zecharia Sitchin postulated. Instead, Earth is already in existence, and the Maldek incident brings about the creation of Venus instead.... and interestingly, the portion of the "Enuma Elish" Epic of Creation that deals with what was created out of the intact half of Maldek/Tiamat is vague enough to suggest it could have been either Earth or Venus, or perhaps even a third alternative that has yet to be rediscovered.
The Destruction of Maldek
The destruction of Maldek, Malona, Nibiru, The Twelfth Planet, Lucifer, Phaeton, Tiamat, The Original Atlantis, between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, was the single greatest catastrophic event to occur in the history of this solar system.

From all the sources I've read it appears the great planet Maldek either destroyed itself in a nuclear detonation or was destroyed by huge planet-sized enemy ship (one of which may have been the famed Nibiru). There is no clear consensus on what actually happened except that the planet blew up and left its survivors wandering space for a new home.
So we find ourselves as having two variables to consider when we contemplate the time and place for the Return, the Crossover, of Planet X Nibiru. It arrives from the "Station of Jupiter", and it arrives from the direction of the Galactic Center. To satisfy both these variables, then Jupiter would have to be aligned with the Galactic Center when Planet X arrives from Jupiter's "Station".

Muller responded with his now-famous Nemesis hypothesis, that the Sun, like most stars of its age and ilk, has a companion, probably a barely visible star such as a red or brown dwarf or possibly a black hole. Muller hypothesized that Nemesis's orbit would bring it by every X million years, gravitationally jostling the Sun and destabilizing the Solar System. But thus far the lack of any direct observational evidence has kept the Nemesis hypothesis from gaining much traction. So what, if not Nemesis, keeps whacking the Solar System? Planet X, considered by some to be the tenth planet, discovered in 2005 and officially known as 2003UB313. It could indeed be the "x factor".
Sirius, Comets, Aliens & Omega
This New Isis Lodge was operated for seven years, until 1962. The purpose of this Lodge concerned “the influx of cosmic energy from a transplutonic power-zone known to Initiates as Nu-Isis.” This purpose was elsewhere described as, “receiving transmissions from the transplutonic planet, Isis”, and also for “transmitting the Magical Knowledge of Nu-Isis”.

This transplutonic, or “beyond Pluto” planet is also described as “Seat or Focus” of the Forces radiating from the Argenteum Astrum, which was the name of the Inner Order of the famous Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, but, as Grant reveals in his first book, actually refers to Sirius.
The Tarot as an Apocalyptic Cryptogram
It is interesting that Murry Hope sees Sirius as "the third, and probably most influential player in a celestial drama" which caused the orbit and axis changes to the earth and Moon, and that it is due, in the near future, to cause a speeding-up of time, and an evolutionary quantum leap for life on earth.

Here we have a possible connection with Sitchin's "12th Planet", as he says the asteroid belt was originally a planet (the tenth), with 11 moons, which was destroyed when it collided with one of the moons of "Marduk" (Nibiru) - the 12th planet on the 3,600 year orbit. What's more, that too was loaded with extra-terrestrial visitors. The Dogon say that the Nommo will come again. "A certain "star" in the sky will appear once more" - the star of the tenth moon. The Dogon also say that "po tolo (Sirius B) and Sirius were once where the Sun now is".
Beyond 2012
I spoke to Howard on the phone, shortly after the 99 Symposium, and he said that the alignment in 2012 will involve a planet currently beyond Pluto, which has just been discovered.

Since the event which occurs on this date is the conjunction of the Solstice Sun with Galactic Centre also in Sagittarius, I suddenly remembered that Zecharia Sitchin predicted that when Nibiru returns, it will reappear "in the regions of the constellation of Sagittarius".

"The solar system shall become a binary sun system, when the Blue Star returns...during the day it will appear as a silvery light, one hundred times brighter than the Morning Star...During the evening, it will appear as a moon...the Blue Star is a companion to Sirius B...the vibrations given off by the Blue Star will enable the soul to have an easier time in communication with its host...a new light body is being created."

I quoted Scallion as saying that the Blue Star "will appear from behind the Sun, traveling towards Arcturus."

The Dogon say that the "spaceship" of the visitors - the Nommo - looked "like a new star", and that they will RETURN one day, when "a certain star will reappear", and there will be a "resurrection of the Nommo". They also say that Sirius A and B "were once where the Sun now is". The star will be invisible before it "emerges", and is drawn with the rays inside the circle. It will only be "formed when the Nommo's ark descends, for it is also the resurrected Nommo's "eye" symbolically." Temple thinks this is Phoebe - Saturn's tenth moon.
Whale Dreamers
The Arcturus Probe describes the story of how the probe attempts to sound the 'fifth force' - the 'Xymox rang’ which allows the destroyed maldek planet (now the astroid belt) to take off. Maldek was the planet of wizards and serpents until it was destroyed by a jet of plasma from Saturn; one from Jupiter wiped out the Mars colony. The 12 (1 Jovian year) - 60 year (Jupiter and Saturn conjunct) timing frequency is the clock or mechanical time in the technosphere.
Earth’s Sirius Connection
Our Brightest Star Sirius is also one of our closest at only 8.7 Light-Years. It is a large White Star that is officially designated as Sirius A. It is accompanied by a telescopically-only visible White Dwarf Star referred to as Sirius B, as well as by a theoretical but as yet unseen smaller Sirius C. Recent evidence from astronomical observations seems to indicate that Earth's Sun's System and the Sirius System are traveling around the Galaxy as a unit, as a "sector". We slowly revolve around one another as we both revolve around the Galactic Center. There is a measurable "gravitational attraction" between the two.

Approximately 500,000 years ago, Sirius B existed as a Red Giant Star. It exploded and then collapsed in on itself to become ultimately the White Dwarf that it is today. In the course of this monumental Cosmic Event, one of the Planets in the Sirius System, the Planet Nibiru, got blasted free from its Sirius Orbit into our nearby direction, where eventually it was gravitationally captured by our Sun as the so-called "Twelfth Planet".

Dogon - Nommo from Sirius
The Dogon call Saturn the "star of limiting the place" and say that when the Nommo left they became the "star of the 10th moon" - Phoebe is the 10th moon of Saturn and although little is known about it, what is known about it is quite odd.

Dogon Tribe
The Saturn system is a very interesting one... no doubt why they are sending that Cassini probe out to investigate some more (ETA 2004). You will find some very interesting stuff about it in the first chapter of Temple's "The Sirius Mystery", especially about Phoebe

We should not forget that the Dogon say that the Nommos will return, and when they do it will be called The Day of the Fish. The first indication of their return, say the Dogon, will be that a new star will appear in the sky - the 'star of the tenth moon' will have returned...


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Mon May 04, 2009 8:27 pm

Are Jupiter and Saturn Brown Dwarfs, Not Planets? ... anets/5140
Let’s return to our solar system, where Nemesis is a brown dwarf that is predicted but not confirmed, to orbit our sun. Unless… Although lighter and less dense than typical brown dwarfs, Jupiter and Saturn have sometimes been considered stillborn stars and in some ways fit the definition of a brown dwarf. Both of these ‘giant planets’ emit more heat than they absorb. (Neptune does also.) Following this line of thought, our solar system would contain not only planets orbiting their star, but two brown dwarfs in such orbits as well. The many satellites of Jupiter and Saturn would then be called planets. Thereby re-classified, Jupiter and Saturn would be ‘brown dwarfs’ that have their own solar systems, and in turn be said to orbit a star called the ‘Sun’.
Saturn and Jupiter
A scenario such as this would explain the prominence of Saturn prior to its cataclysmic disruption and dismemberment—it must have been a larger body than it is now, possibly of the volume of Jupiter. Interestingly, for certain reasons G. Kuiper assumed that Saturn originally was of a mass equal to that of Jupiter. At some point during a close approach to Jupiter, Saturn became unstable; and, as a result of the influx of extraneous material, it exploded, flaring as a nova which, after subsiding, left a remnant that the ancients still recognized as Saturn, even though it was but a fraction of the celestial body of earlier days. In Saturn’s explosion much of the matter absorbed earlier was thrown off into space. Saturn was greatly reduced in size and removed to a distant orbit—the binary system was broken up and Jupiter took over the dominant position in the sky.
Planets or Dud Stars
Farther away, gases are coalescing around hunks of matter which will eventually make up the giant gas planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. These gas giants are made largely of common chemicals that evaporate at low temperature: hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and methane. If they were closer to the sun, they'd just boil away.

And here we run up against a problem: Why are many of these newly discovered "planets" -- remember, they're all giants, since we can only detect giants with today's technology -- so close to the star? Since they're large, the candidate planets must be composed of common elements, like the giants in our solar system. But why wouldn't these gases boil away if the planets are so close to their stars?

Black thinks hydrogen may be what's inside those giant "planets," an extra-planetary factoid that would make them more like stars than planets. But if they are stars, why don't they radiate light? Because they're a kind of star that never quite got cooking, Black says: "From my point of view, it's likely they are brown dwarfs."
Other stars, other worlds, other life?
In the last few years a new class of faint stars has been discovered. They are called L-Type Brown Dwarfs because the element lithium appears in their spectra. They are the most numerous stellar objects in the galaxy and bridge the gap between stars and Jupiter-sized planets.

Since an electric star is heated externally a planet need not be destroyed by orbiting beneath its anode glow. In fact life is not only possible inside the glow of a small brown dwarf, it seems far more likely than on a planet orbiting outside a star! This is because the radiant energy arriving on a planet orbiting inside a glowing sphere is evenly distributed over the entire surface of the planet.

All of these puzzles are simply explained by an electric star. There is no lower limit to the size of a body that can accept electric power from the galaxy so the temperatures of smaller dwarfs will range down to levels conducive to life. The light of a red star is due to the distended anode glow of an electrically low-stressed star. The blue and ultraviolet light come from a low-energy corona. (Our Sun's more compact red anode glow is seen briefly as the chromosphere during total solar eclipses. And the Sun is electrically stressed to the extent that bright anode "tufting" covers its surface with granulations and the corona emits higher energy ultraviolet light and x-rays as relativistic electrons strike it).

There are no seasons, no tropics and no ice-caps. A planet does not have to rotate, its axis can point in any direction and its orbit can be eccentric. The radiant energy received by the planet will be strongest at the blue and red ends of the spectrum. Photosynthesis relies on red light. Sky light would be a pale purple (the classical "purple dawn of creation").

L-type Brown Dwarfs have water as a dominant molecule in their spectra, along with many other biologically important molecules and elements. Its "children" would accumulate atmospheres and water would mist down. It is therefore of particular interest that most of the extra-solar planets discovered are gas giants, several times the size of Jupiter, orbiting their star extremely closely. It is our system of distantly orbiting planets that seems the odd one out. In fact it argues in favor of a galactic traffic accident between the Sun and a sub-Brown Dwarf like Jupiter or Saturn.
Twinkle,Twinkle Electric Star
Electric stars offer radically new ideas about life on other worlds and the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence. A galactic source of electrical energy provides more possibilities for sustaining life in the universe than the lottery of finding an Earth-like planet orbiting in a narrow ‘habitable zone’ about a bright star like the Sun. The probability of the latter occurrence is very low. But with electric stars, we can turn to the most numerous stars in the galaxy as likely incubators of life — the brown ‘dwarfs’ —which are actually red in color. They could be described as ‘cosmic plasma eggs.’ This picture is much more encouraging than conventional thinking on such dwarf stars.

Imagine giant Jupiter and its moons floating independently in deep space. Outside the Sun’s dominating electrical influence, Jupiter would become a dim electric star enclosed in the huge radiant red plasma shell of its ‘anode glow’ — a brown dwarf. Inside the glowing sheath is the most hospitable environment in the universe for life because the radiant energy received by each satellite is evenly distributed over its entire surface.
Interdisciplinary physicist Wal Thornhill ventures that, at one time, Earth may have been within the protective aura of a cool brown dwarf star, the proto-Saturn, which provided an ideal atmosphere for life on Earth. Given this configuration, Earth would have been bathed in Saturn's constant beneficent glow with no difference between day and night and a continual benign single season. This was the time "before time" that Talbott theorizes was the "Golden Age", "Age of Perfect Virtue", or "Garden of Eden", depicted in one way or another in all diverse myths and religions.

This can only mean that the axis of Earth was directed along a line running through the collinear system. When the earliest religious texts and mythical sources are permitted to speak for themselves, this is precisely the arrangement they describe. What the ancients were seeing when they depicted the Sun as three concentric discs was a different alignment of planets from what we see in the sky today. They suggest that at one time Earth was in a polar alignment - an alignment Talbott, Cardona, and Cochrane theorize as having been with Saturn, Venus and Mars; - the large outer disc in the pictographs being Saturn, the next inner disc representing Venus (often with rays emanating from it) and the center dark or red disc being Mars.

Another common theme in the myths of many distantly separated cultures is of a Doomsday that brought the Golden Age to an end. Could it be that a disturbance in the Saturn polar alignment was the Doomsday these cultures each independently remembered? The exact cause of the eventual breakup of the polar alignment is a mystery. It may have been the result of a close pass-by of an asteroid or comet.

Polar to solar alignment
The polar-to-solar shift: Here, I feel it is best to simply provide an excerpt from my book. However, I will preface the excerpt with the following: Because the Pleiades are the general indicator of the Galactic Anticenter, Guénon’s exposition of the symbolic and conceptual shift of the stars in the Big Dipper to the stars in the Pleiades indicates not only a polar-to-solar shift in cosmological orientation, but a shift to a galaxy-oriented axis as a superior cosmological framework in comparison to the older polar axis. This is nothing more than the esoteric shift from a Hyperborean to an Atlantean phase of the historical cycle (spoken in Traditionalist or metaphorical terms).
These men provided a model in which the ancients viewed Saturn as standing still in the sky. In front of this planet, a gaseous and light emitting orb, one found Venus. Behind Saturn, one found Jupiter and hidden behind Jupiter was the Sun. This was a collinear system in which Saturn and Jupiter were binary stars. When the ancients referred to the sun, they meant Saturn. Jupiter was hidden behind Saturn, the polar star.
Uncovering the Secrets of the Mayans ... maya05.htm
The Maya spoke of eras of 5,125.40 years each equaling 13 baktuns of 144,000 days each. Each cycle of 13 baktuns was reckoned as an Age or Great Cycle, a specific historical epoch. Like the days and the uinal months, each era had a qualifying meaning represented by its particular glyph. Each Great Cycle was said to be governed by a different Sun with a specific destiny for the evolutions of those incarnating during that era.
For 3000 years prior to Julius Caesar, the Egyptians had used a civil calendar and a Sothic calendar. The Sothic calendar was synchronized with the heliacal rise of Sirius with the morning sun. Since Sirius has a period of 365.2500 days, this was a celestial based leap year calendar for the Egyptians. This was the Egyptian celestial year to a star that was not the sun, but required no intercalation every four years. The civil calendar was thirty six ten day periods with one five day period to celebrate the birth of the children of Nut and Geb, Mother Sky and Father Earth.


Re: The Schumann Resonance

Unread post by lizzie » Tue May 05, 2009 6:33 am

5125 x 5 = 25,625 years - 5 magnetic field reversals of the Sun during a Grand Cycle?

The Lid of the Palenque
The Sun was, and is, known to go through a series of cycles that differentiate the rotation of the Suns core from the outer sheath of its body. The outer layer of our Sun revolves entirely once every 37 Earth days. This is understood today. This layer and the core rotate at different speeds. It may seem similar to an electric generator. Eventually the Sun reverses its magnetic fields. This may happen roughly every 18,000 years. At this time the Earth attempts to reverse its fields to align with the sun, which causes tremendous alteration of the Earths surface features. The continents may pull apart and the polar ice may melt and shift.

But there is a constant change of these magnetic fields taking place which produces cycles of sunspots that repeat.

Life forms conceived while the Earth is in a particular position in relation to the Sun and to a particular Sunspot configuration may have particular characteristics. This is the basis of what we now refer to as Astrology. In this respect it appears to be a conclusive science rather than anything requiring an alternative science belief system. This means that when the Earth is in one particular position in Space and the Sun is in a particular magnetic cycle a particular set of characteristics may be expected from any organisms conceived under these circumstances. The constellations simply mark where we are in relation to the sunspot cycle. Before the science became nebulous through the blurring of time, the constellations were used to chart the position of The Earth in relation to The Sun and its magnetic fields. This would be as reliable as charting the tides by the Moons particular positioning

To begin to understand the level of astronomical knowledge the ancients had we can look at some not so simple figures arrived at by scientist Maurice Cotterell. Cotterell, attributed with decoding the famed Lid of Palenque by the scientific community, first stated that the peak sunspot cycles occur every 11.1 years.

Next he mentions it is often said that we cannot ask the question "What is the angular difference between The Suns magnetic field and The Earths?" because we are on the face of it unable to quantify the differentially rotating fields in relation to The Earths position.
But there IS a method of achieving this, on which Cotterell has termed "Rotational Differentiation". He begins explaining it by displaying how the Polar magnetic pole (P) rotates once every 37 days; The Equatorial field (E) rotates once every 26 days. There comes a time (after 87.454545 days) when E overlaps, or begins to overtake P.

So, analysis of the sunspot cycles shows us that the Sun's magnetic field, and its effects in space, reverses about every 3,750 years- so that 5 magnetic reversals take place app. every 18,139 years, and each reversal takes 374 years to complete from start to finish.

Pacal votan and the telektonon prophecy ... pacalvotan
The Maya referred to the creator as hunab k'u. they teach us that hunab k'u is sending out a beam of energy throughout the universe. this beam originates at the great central sun of the universe and is carried through the universe by the stars. one of the many purposes of our sun is to relay the galactic synchronization beam to each of us. I envision the beam traveling from the great central sun of the universe, to the central sun of our galaxy, through Alcyone (the central sun of the pleiades), to our sun, and to us. The Mayan knowledge teaches us that each day an energy is present which comes to us from the sun. These energies cycle every 20 days.
2012, and the Mayan Calendar
Within the 5,125 year cycle lies 13 smaller cycles, known as the "13 Baktun Count," or the "long count." Each baktun cycle lasts for 394 years, or 144,000 days.

Each baktun was its own Historical Age, within the Great Creation Cycle, with a specific destiny for the evolution of those who incarnated in each baktun. Planet Earth and her inhabitants are currently traveling through the 13th baktun cycle the final period of 1618-2012 AD.

We entered this baktun cycle right after establishing the world wide coordination of Pope Gregory XIII’s 12 month calendar system (1582) as well as the introduction of 12 hour 60-minute mechanical clock (1600).

According to Valum Votan, (a Mayan Prophet), these two instruments are what manifested humanity's "error in time", which is the following of artificial instruments of time that served to separate Humanity from the rest of nature; operating by our own false timing frequency, to the ultimate detriment of our natural world.

The Gregorian calendar is not based on logic, science, or nature. It denies and covers up the True annual human biological cycle, which is conserved in the body of a woman. In simple terms, we're operating on the wrong "wavelength".
Insights About the Dreamspell Calendar
The Mayan Calendar is based on naturally occurring energy cycles and a close connection to Mother Earth, the Sun, and the Pleiades. The Maya gained knowledge about many cycles which occur on Earth. They recognized a 13-day cycle of energy which comes from galactic sources. They also came to know a 20-day energy cycle coming from the Sun.
Mayan End Times Prophesy ... 1-2012.htm
The Mayans knew that our Sun, or Kinich-Ahau, every so often synchronized with the enormous central galaxy. And from this central galaxy received a 'spark' of light which causes the Sun to shine more intensely producing what our scientists call 'solar flares' as well as changes in the Sun's magnetic field. The Mayans say that this happens every 5,125 years but also that this causes a displacement in the earth’s rotation, and because of this movement great catastrophes would be produced.

The Mayans believed the universal processes, like the 'breathing' of the galaxy, are cycles that never change. What changes is the consciousness of man that passes through it and is always in a process toward more perfection. Based on their observations, the Mayans predicted that from the initial date of the start of their civilization, 4 Ahau, 8 Cumku which is 3113 B.C., after one cycle being completed 5,125 years in their future, December 21st, 2012. The Sun, having received a powerful ray of synchronizing light from the center of the galaxy, would change its polarity which would produce a great cosmic event that would propel human kind to be ready to cross into a new era, The Golden Age. It is after this, that the Mayans say we will be ready to go through the door that was left by them, transforming our civilization based on fear to a vibration much higher in harmony.

The first prophecies were attained by their study of our Sun. The Mayans discovered that the entire solar system moved. That even our universe has its own cycles, repetitive periods which begin and end like our day and night. These discoveries lead to the understanding that our solar system rotates on an ellipse that brings our solar system closer and further from the center of the galaxy. In other words, according to the Mayans, our Sun and all of its planets rotate in cycles in relation to the center of the galaxy or Hunab-Kú, the central light of the galaxy. It takes 25,625 years for our solar system to make one cycle on this ellipse. One complete cycle is called a galactic day. The cycle is divided into two halves similar to our day and night. The half closest to the central light, is our solar system's 'day' and the half furthest away is its 'night'. Each day and each night lasts 12,800 years which is to say, the central galaxy is the Sun for our entire solar system.

The Mayans discovered that every grand cycle has its minor cycles that carry the same characteristics. One galactic day of 25,625 years is divided into five cycles of 5,125 years. The first cycle is the galactic morning when our solar system is just coming out of the darkness to enter the light. The second cycle is the mid-day when our solar system is closest to the central light. The third cycle is the afternoon when our solar system begins to come out of the light. The fourth cycle is the late-night when our solar system has entered its furthest cycle from the central light. And the fifth and last cycle is night before dawn when are solar system is in its last cycle of darkness before starting again. This is the cycle we are currently coming out of.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests