The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:28 pm

nick c wrote:Jeffrey,
Your (above) post was moved out of another thread that had nothing to do with GTSM.
As such it is viewed as an attempt to derail another thread into a discussion of your preferred hypothesis.


You view it as an attempt to derail another thread.

Yet I've clearly posted a paper that addresses Ganymede, in a light that does not require additional conjecture.

Thus, it has literally everything to do with the general theory, which is a theory now, not just "a hypothesis".
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby nick c » Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:25 am

You have been allowed to have a platform on this forum to expound upon your views. Those views are at most tangentially related to the Thunderbolts Project, therefore with respect to your hosts you should refrain from encroaching upon other topics and keep your GTSM posts on this thread. I have previously informed you of such in PM's.

If that is not acceptable to you then your recourse is to contact the forum Administrator.
User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2457
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

The Evolution of Star Habitable Zones

Unread postby JeffreyW » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:18 am

new paper:

http://vixra.org/pdf/1809.0348v1.pdf

Establishment dogma has habitable zones as static concepts. They are not static, they evolve as the star cools and dies. This means the habitable zones shrink and become internalized inside the star itself.

Therefore you can have external and internal habitable zones.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:19 am

nick c wrote:You have been allowed to have a platform on this forum to expound upon your views. Those views are at most tangentially related to the Thunderbolts Project, therefore with respect to your hosts you should refrain from encroaching upon other topics and keep your GTSM posts on this thread. I have previously informed you of such in PM's.

If that is not acceptable to you then your recourse is to contact the forum Administrator.


You say "other topics". So you guys discuss things other than planet formation/stellar evolution?
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

The Stellar Disintegration Zone, New Paper

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:48 am

http://vixra.org/pdf/1809.0584v1.pdf

The stellar disintegration zone is the area that separates hot Jupiters from their more evolved and evolving counterparts. It shows that hot Jupiters lose their thick helium/hydrogen atmospheres faster if they orbit close to a much hotter host star, which is predicted by the General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis. The SDZ on this graph is between 5-9 Earth Radii, with a period shorter than 10 days. As well, the SDZ's can be different for different stars, this graph is only a generalization. Data is taken from various telescopes including the Kepler, and 2,504 evolving/dead stars are on the graph. The periods of the dead/evolving stars on the graph do not include the ones beyond 50 days, and objects beyond a radius of 23 Earths. Data for the points on the graph is included, as well as the objects' names.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Kepler 406, 406b and 406c

Unread postby JeffreyW » Wed Oct 10, 2018 12:07 pm

Kepler 406, 406b and 406c according to stellar metamorphosis

http://vixra.org/pdf/1810.0112v1.pdf

Basically one hot young sun like star, one ocean world, one Super-Mercury (which is a term which did not exist until now).

The hot young star is 50-100 million years old, the ocean world between 3 and 7 billion years old, and the Super Mercury a lower limit of 30 billion years old, given the iron/nickel core is about 3,660 km in radius.

It is a polymorphic system, clearly. None of these stars are related to each other, they are in an adopted system. The younger, bigger hotter star adopted the two objects and there are probably many more objects in this system that have yet to be directly/indirectly observed.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

972 Stars in Different Stages of Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Wed Oct 10, 2018 12:15 pm

http://vixra.org/pdf/1810.0091v1.pdf

A simple graph is provided on log10 scale for masses that young hot stars become colder older smaller stars, mislabeled "planets/brown dwarfs/exoplanets" by the establishment. The data is freely available online and is sourced in this paper.

Comments: 25 Pages. 1 graph, 1 data set of 972 objects
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Dinosaurs in 3 to 5 bar atmospheric pressure

Unread postby JeffreyW » Fri Oct 19, 2018 6:59 am

http://vixra.org/pdf/1810.0225v1.pdf

new paper explaining that dinosaurs would have needed higher atmospheric pressures to function as their bone structures suggest.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

The Polymorphic System HD 87646

Unread postby JeffreyW » Fri Nov 09, 2018 10:43 am

New paper on polymorphic system HD 87646.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1810.0424v1.pdf
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby D_Archer » Sun Nov 11, 2018 6:30 am

New paper> The Charge Engine of Stellar Evolution:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0168v1.pdf

Abstract: All matter recycles photons . This charge engine is explained, demonstrated visually and applied to the General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis (GTSM). The charge engine is the underlying driver of all evolutionary processes of Astrons (stars and planets); it is what enables astrons to be dynamic and open systems and have lifespans of many billions of years.
---

Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
User avatar
D_Archer
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

New book is up, Version 4

Unread postby JeffreyW » Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:36 am

http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby D_Archer » Wed Nov 21, 2018 1:09 am

Hi Jeffrey,

Is it close to being the first final edition?

I know you want to make the books yourself, but if you want to publish i would be happy to help with the costs.

Regards,
Daniel

ps. i am also thinking about translating it to Dutch, and publish a limited run here in the Netherlands.
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
User avatar
D_Archer
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Wed Nov 21, 2018 7:54 am

D_Archer wrote:Hi Jeffrey,

Is it close to being the first final edition?

I know you want to make the books yourself, but if you want to publish i would be happy to help with the costs.

Regards,
Daniel

ps. i am also thinking about translating it to Dutch, and publish a limited run here in the Netherlands.


No it is not close. Thanks for the costs offer though, I think it would be best to just let it ride out and get into the public sphere first, which it is doing right now. I have no interest in making money off it. The purest possible path is the best.

I think I wrote about the problem with money and ideas before. The best ideas cannot have dollar signs attached. The best ideas should be free, and that is my plan. My goal is to make sharing what the Earth is free, like the air we breathe.

Though if you want to translate some passages into Dutch, that would be cool. I'd love to learn what I'm saying looks like in Dutch. Maybe even pronouncing some of it to impress my dad. lol
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Experts are not always the prepared minds

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:27 am

http://vixra.org/pdf/1812.0032v1.pdf

Sometimes a genuinely prepared mind is not an expert.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v4.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 4
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby D_Archer » Thu Dec 06, 2018 7:31 am

The water in Saturn's rings and satellites is like that on Earth except for moon Phoebe, which is out of this world:
https://phys.org/news/2018-12-saturn-satellites-earth-moon-phoebe.html#jCp

Image

Quote:"we need to change models of the formation of the Solar System because the new results are in conflict with existing modelsl"
---

A lot of misunderstanding because they just have to follow the already disproven nebular hypothesis, the data just does not jive with their preconceived notions.

I looked into the 'deuterium puzzle' a whole can of worms...

But this "result" is no issue for stellar metamorphosis, deuterium levels could go down over time or not.. Earth may have orbited or was close to Saturn at one point and feeded the rings, anything is possible. What is not possible is that everything as we see it is the leftovers of 1 nebular formation process because nothing adds up or makes sense that way. Also deuterium is not just formed after the big because there never was a big bang, so they need to collect more data about where the deuterium is and where it can hide and where exactly it is possible to form naturally not from a magic starting point. My bet would be HH objects/galaxy births or maybe even larger birthing events....

Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
User avatar
D_Archer
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

PreviousNext

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests