The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Thu Jul 05, 2018 7:38 am

D_Archer wrote:
antosarai wrote:Doesn't the recently published paper by M.Keppler at ESO (http://www.eso.org/public/archives/releases/sciencepapers/eso1821/eso1821a.pdf) sustain, with images, both the circumstellar disk around a recently formed star and planet birth(s) in it?


Don't think so, the images are not very clear but they all look like plasma structures, governed by EM and charge. They say also the gas planet has a ring...

Also note that seeing an astron around another astron is not the same as seeing an astron being born. They have not observed this, they only assume it.

Regards,
Daniel


Yes, they've been assuming this for a long time now. In fact, the nebular hypothesis was actually applied to the nebulas that were observed in the night sky in the 18-19th centuries. Its original nemesis was the island universe hypothesis. The nebular hypothesis was the claim that the nebulas were forming solar systems. What had happened is that the island universe hypothesis (the nebulas were entire galaxies as discovered by Hubble and Humason) was battling the nebular hypothesis and won. Though, instead of discarding the nebular hypothesis as it was beat out by the galaxy theory (which is correct the nebulas are not forming solar systems but entire galaxies), they kept it. So now astronomers are still claiming that they see planets being formed in disks, when in fact, that hypothesis actually died back in the 1920's.

The nebular hypothesis is a ghost theory. Its already dead, but continues to haunt the minds of astronomers.

It is a twist of fate really. When the nebular hypothesis was supposed to fully die, the fusion model of stars propped it up, so now they made stars mutually exclusive of planets. So there you have it. The realization of stars cooling becoming "planets" is far, far outside the scope of astronomers. They will never figure it out. Ever. It will literally take a new generation that never learns it at all to fix the mess.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Rebuttal and Replacement of the New Planet Formation Claim

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Jul 09, 2018 9:46 am

PDS 70 and PDS 70b rebuttal and replacement.

I like the word replace now, much better than debunk or falsify. I have been learning that falsifying a hypothesis or theory does not make it go away as is the case of the nebular hypothesis. You have to replace it after debunking/falsifying it or else it will come back into favor.

Like removing water out of a puddle while its raining. Sure, you can remove the water (debunk/falsify), but unless you fill it up with concrete or asphalt the hole will fill back up with water again.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1807.0170v1.pdf

As well, I have not seen anything from EU concerning this discovery yet, that planets are highly evolved/evolving/dead stars, that they were never mutually exclusive objects. I am really starting to wonder why? This is the second most read thread on this entire forum, yet not a single peep.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Stellar Polymorphism, New Paper

Unread postby JeffreyW » Wed Jul 25, 2018 6:15 am

http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

An Open Correction to James Hutton's Uniformitarianism

Unread postby JeffreyW » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:22 pm

http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

The Polymorphic System HD 10180 on the WT Diagram

Unread postby JeffreyW » Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:59 am

http://vixra.org/pdf/1808.0052v1.pdf

New paper discussing the reality of polymorphic systems. They are probably extremely common, in fact, I would propose that each young star we see has multiple objects in orbit. We are dealing with a vast amount of systems, far beyond what establishment is willing to consider. Far, far beyond.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby D_Archer » Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:35 am

For posterity

Link to old forum thread: Exo Planets and Solar Systems:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1214
---
OP by Junglelord: Sep 16, 2008; Possible First Photo of Planet Around Sun-Like Star
---
JL highlight:
WASP-12b's size may also be a challenge to explain. The planet's width is 1.8 times that of Jupiter, larger than gas giants are thought to grow.

"The planet radius is suspiciously large," notes Sara Seager of MIT. "While observation is leading theory, it's uncomfortable to have a planet with a radius that cannot be accommodated by theory."

---

The thread is about exoplanet findings and different threads are linked together.

I link in the GTSM thread so anyone reading the old thread can directly apply GTSM to the findings if they want and/or contrast it.

Regards,
Daniel Archer
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
User avatar
D_Archer
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:19 am

D_Archer wrote:For posterity

Link to old forum thread: Exo Planets and Solar Systems:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1214
---
OP by Junglelord: Sep 16, 2008; Possible First Photo of Planet Around Sun-Like Star
---
JL highlight:
WASP-12b's size may also be a challenge to explain. The planet's width is 1.8 times that of Jupiter, larger than gas giants are thought to grow.

"The planet radius is suspiciously large," notes Sara Seager of MIT. "While observation is leading theory, it's uncomfortable to have a planet with a radius that cannot be accommodated by theory."

---

The thread is about exoplanet findings and different threads are linked together.

I link in the GTSM thread so anyone reading the old thread can directly apply GTSM to the findings if they want and/or contrast it.

Regards,
Daniel Archer


Thank you Daniel. I don't have a paper on this object and clearly at the rate it is being ripped apart, it is a fantastic candidate for an object that will be forced to sit below the Taylor Threshold. I will write up a paper with diagrams to explain this object the best I can.

Oh and Sept 16, 2008 I was a freshman at Florida State University. I remember exactly where I was when that thread was started. Jeeez.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:26 am

JeffreyW wrote:
D_Archer wrote:For posterity

Link to old forum thread: Exo Planets and Solar Systems:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1214
---
OP by Junglelord: Sep 16, 2008; Possible First Photo of Planet Around Sun-Like Star
---
JL highlight:
WASP-12b's size may also be a challenge to explain. The planet's width is 1.8 times that of Jupiter, larger than gas giants are thought to grow.

"The planet radius is suspiciously large," notes Sara Seager of MIT. "While observation is leading theory, it's uncomfortable to have a planet with a radius that cannot be accommodated by theory."

---

The thread is about exoplanet findings and different threads are linked together.

I link in the GTSM thread so anyone reading the old thread can directly apply GTSM to the findings if they want and/or contrast it.

Regards,
Daniel Archer


Thank you Daniel. I don't have a paper on this object and clearly at the rate it is being ripped apart, it is a fantastic candidate for an object that will be forced to sit below the Taylor Threshold. I will write up a paper with diagrams to explain this object the best I can.

Oh and Sept 16, 2008 I was a freshman at Florida State University. I remember exactly where I was when that thread was started. Jeeez.


Here is the paper:

New Paper here

In this paper I show the path of WASP 12b as a purple hockey stick path, it will move past normal evolutionary lines and below the Taylor Threshold, meaning no life will form on it. It will become a small moon as its thick atmosphere is ripped away.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby D_Archer » Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:07 am

NASA's TESS Satellite Will Supercharge Search for Nearby, Earth-Like Worlds:
https://www.space.com/40307-nasa-tess-satellite-earth-like-exoplanets.html

One of the big surprises from Kepler was to find this whole population of planets with sizes between that of Neptune and Earth — and there aren't any in our solar system, zero — and they're everywhere out there," said Latham, who's worked on the Kepler project for nearly 20 years.


TESS will survey the local neighborhood for planets like Earth.

---

TESS has begun operations just last month, interesting times ahead.

Also in the article i linked is said that after a discovery other satellite scopes will investigate it, a coordinated effort, so we should get more data per discovery, a boon to GTSM, a nightmare of surprises for the "standard model".

Lastly they are also searching for astrons in size between Neptune and Earth, i hope we get better data on water worlds and pre-earths. Maybe support for my From Neptune to Earth paper: http://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0149v1.pdf

Regards,
Daniel Archer
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
User avatar
D_Archer
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Thu Aug 09, 2018 6:57 am

D_Archer wrote:NASA's TESS Satellite Will Supercharge Search for Nearby, Earth-Like Worlds:
https://www.space.com/40307-nasa-tess-satellite-earth-like-exoplanets.html

One of the big surprises from Kepler was to find this whole population of planets with sizes between that of Neptune and Earth — and there aren't any in our solar system, zero — and they're everywhere out there," said Latham, who's worked on the Kepler project for nearly 20 years.


TESS will survey the local neighborhood for planets like Earth.

---

TESS has begun operations just last month, interesting times ahead.

Also in the article i linked is said that after a discovery other satellite scopes will investigate it, a coordinated effort, so we should get more data per discovery, a boon to GTSM, a nightmare of surprises for the "standard model".

Lastly they are also searching for astrons in size between Neptune and Earth, i hope we get better data on water worlds and pre-earths. Maybe support for my From Neptune to Earth paper: http://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0149v1.pdf

Regards,
Daniel Archer


Oh it is going to be a nightmare indeed.

The nebular hypothesis cannot explain objects that are in between sizes of Neptune and Earth, nor could it explain any object in the solar system, which is the correct conclusion they have yet to come to.

The hundreds of thousands of evolving stars that will be observed by the TESS should completely obliterate all acceptance of the nebular hypothesis. The Kepler was just a taste of what's to come.

That being said, if they still accept the nebular hypothesis after all the TESS data comes back in its proposed 3 year life (possibly extended to over 10 years), then we have a serious problem with astronomers and they need to be fired, or forced to resign. Their outdated theories are holding humanity back.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

The Life Paradigm (new video)

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Aug 20, 2018 1:01 pm

http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The Life Paradigm (new video)

Unread postby D_Archer » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:29 am



With caption >
A video about the beginning of stars and the evolution to its end as a dead world, highlighting when life starts and flourishes, accompanied by classical music from Beethoven, narrated by Jeffrey Wolynski, video made by Baz Taylor.

Great work guys!

Regards,
Daniel Archer
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
User avatar
D_Archer
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Phase Curves (new paper)

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Aug 27, 2018 6:36 am

Phase curves are presented to make more sense of the Wolynski-Taylor Diagram. They are curves on the graph which show the stage of evolution an object is in, as compared to a younger/older star. Explanation and clarification is presented so that stellar evolution (planet formation) is more easily understood. This graph is also subject to change as more data comes in, regardless this sets the precedent for thinking about astronomical matters in the 21st century.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1808.0568v1.pdf
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: Basic ideas of the Ganymede Hypothesis

Unread postby JeffreyW » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:32 am

tholden wrote: Starting from the most common idea of solar systems forming up from swirling masses of dust or plasma,


The star is the plasma that collects the dust forming the planet in its interior as it cools and dies.

Ganymede is just the remains of that process.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1806.0163v1.pdf
http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v3.pdf The Main Book on Stellar Metamorphosis, Version 3
User avatar
JeffreyW
 
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:30 am
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

Unread postby nick c » Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:47 am

Jeffrey,
Your (above) post was moved out of another thread that had nothing to do with GTSM.
As such it is viewed as an attempt to derail another thread into a discussion of your preferred hypothesis.
User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2328
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

PreviousNext

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: philalethes and 2 guests