The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

[Electro]

By the way, Jeffrey, I have this link in my bookmarks, but was wondering if you had another version (full) available with updates, or that's it? Thanks.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0157vC.pdf

[JeffreyW]

By the way, Jeffrey, I have this link in my bookmarks, but was wondering if you had another version (full) available with updates, or that's it? Thanks.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0157vC.pdf

The other main paper that I started working on, but need lots of help is this one:

http://vixra.org/abs/1506.0156

version 3

[JeffreyW]

The color books are good.

http://www.iupac.org/home/publications/ ... ology.html

The red and gold book are great to search for ideas.

[Electro]

The other main paper that I started working on, but need lots of help is this one:

http://vixra.org/abs/1506.0156

version 3

Just read the entire document. Not complete, but very interesting.

[JeffreyW]

The other main paper that I started working on, but need lots of help is this one:

http://vixra.org/abs/1506.0156

version 3

Just read the entire document. Not complete, but very interesting.

You see how much I need to do? I need about 200 people to work on the development of the theory over a period of 5 years for it to be as comprehensive as it needs to be. For the first 4 years its just been, "I can't believe it" mode for people. Now its time to buckle down and get to the nuts and bolts.

Each person at $60000 a year salary, * 200, *5 equals $60,000,000 to complete the theory to the standards that it needs to be completed. I basically have to win the Powerball to get what I need done.

[Electro]

Well, I'm not greedy. I'll only charge you half of that. It's for a good cause.

[Electro]

Here's a question I keep asking myself lately. On Earth, they can measure gravity with instruments (gravimeter). Have they done it on the Moon, physically? If they did, how do the results compare to the math?

Obviously, they cannot do it on other planets so gravity is calculated. According to GTSM, delta H may be what's causing gravity, not mass. Relying on mass, what if they have the math all wrong for the other planets? If Venus has almost no magnetic field, and almost no enthalpy either, why does it have a gravity similar to ours? Shouldn't it be closer to the moon's gravity? Same for Mars...

As for the gas giants, being much younger stars than Earth, the math is probably working by coincidence only.

[Electro]

Here's a question I keep asking myself lately. On Earth, they can measure gravity with instruments (gravimeter). Have they done it on the Moon, physically? If they did, how do the results compare to the math?

Obviously, they cannot do it on other planets so gravity is calculated. According to GTSM, delta H may be what's causing gravity, not mass. Relying on mass, what if they have the math all wrong for the other planets? If Venus has almost no magnetic field, and almost no enthalpy either, why does it have a gravity similar to ours? Shouldn't it be closer to the moon's gravity? Same for Mars...

As for the gas giants, being much younger stars than Earth, the math is probably working by coincidence only.

But, then again, NASA does manage to put probes in orbit around the planets quite nicely. They must have those numbers right?

[Electro]

Wait a minute! Venus has no magnetic field of its own, simply because it's rotating much too slowly for its liquid outer core to be generating a dynamo effect. It may still have an active core and sufficient enthalpy. There does seem to be volcanic activity still going on on the planet.

[Electro]

After posing many hypotheses about the mechanism involved in gravity, this one finally hit me. It fits nicely with the relation between gravity and mass!

http://franklinhu.com/NPA20GravityElectric.pdf

Before disregarding or accepting that hypothesis, more tests would need to be conducted. Remember, nobody knows what causes gravity. This makes a lot more sense to me than warped space-time...

[JeffreyW]

I'm not concerned with gravity anymore.

I'm more interested in biochemistry and books like this:

http://www.iupac.org/home/publications/ ... ology.html

[JeffreyW]

Here's a question I keep asking myself lately. On Earth, they can measure gravity with instruments (gravimeter). Have they done it on the Moon, physically? If they did, how do the results compare to the math?

Obviously, they cannot do it on other planets so gravity is calculated. According to GTSM, delta H may be what's causing gravity, not mass. Relying on mass, what if they have the math all wrong for the other planets? If Venus has almost no magnetic field, and almost no enthalpy either, why does it have a gravity similar to ours? Shouldn't it be closer to the moon's gravity? Same for Mars...

As for the gas giants, being much younger stars than Earth, the math is probably working by coincidence only.

But, then again, NASA does manage to put probes in orbit around the planets quite nicely. They must have those numbers right?

Not sure.

[JeffreyW]

Amrinder Singh has written a paper as well!

http://vixra.org/abs/1511.0002

[Electro]

Amrinder Singh has written a paper as well!

http://vixra.org/abs/1511.0002

Excellent, thanks! I haven't read it in detail yet, but it does provide a comprehensive complement to your theory.

[Electro]

Well, I just read the whole thing, and although the author does refer to stellar metamorphosis, he does not mention anywhere that a star is a dissipative system, and very little about phase transition (other than plasma recombination). At the end of his article, he refers to a link where he submits his own version of the fusion reaction system. He says fusion is responsible for forming the core. He does offer an interesting theory about sunspots, flares and CME's from rotating plasma fields generated by Z-pinch mechanism.

I don't know, but nature has a tendency to do it as simple as possible. Fusion, in my opinion, is not something that can easily happen naturally... Look how hard it is to achieve in a highly controlled environment...

http://vixra.org/abs/1510.0472