The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

[Arjun9]

Also for mercury,

http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2 ... n-of-lava/

[JeffreyW]

New Graphics video concerning Venus being older than the Earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT-_bR1k_AU

From the mainstream> NASA: "The Death of a Planet" --Venus Had an Ocean and Habitable Surface Temperatures for Two Billion Years >
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/20 ... -than.html


===

I think the hunch of Venus with oceans can be correct, ie it also fits GTSM.

How they get there scientifically is doubtfull.

Regards,
Daniel

How they got there is doubtful, you are correct. They usually say, "computer models", but we all know a human brain is a highly evolved biological computer so, yea. We can tell by the way the article is worded, quoted below,

Scientists long have theorized that Venus formed out of ingredients similar to Earth’s, but followed a different evolutionary path.

Definitely NOT a different evolutionary path. They word it to still try and keep the assumption that they are the same age, and formed around the Sun, very close their their current locations.

They formed out of the same evolutionary path, only one is vastly older than the other. Just because they are in their current orbits does not mean they were always like that. Given the assumptions they use, they will never figure out Venus, so how they came up with this idea is errie.

Thank you for linking this! Great news regardless if the source is from an organization that does not have strong leadership, and puts down dissenting views to the detriment of human life.

[JeffreyW]

Photosynthesis without organization in stellar metamorphosis.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1702.0262v1.pdf

[comingfrom]

Why doesn't it rain glucose, Jeffrey?

There is plenty of CO2 and H2O and sunlight in the atmosphere.

If your paper is correct, then we have a [sweet] solution for the global warming problem...

Paul

[D_Archer]

Why doesn't it rain glucose, Jeffrey?

There is plenty of CO2 and H2O and sunlight in the atmosphere.

If your paper is correct, then we have a [sweet] solution for the global warming problem...

Paul

There are only trace amounts of C02 in the atmosphere at this stage (uranus..) so sugar rain not likely..

@Jeffrey, are you sure this reaction can just occur? I never heard CO2 and water combining like this randomly... Usually water only absorbs CO2...

Regards,
Daniel

[JeffreyW]

Why doesn't it rain glucose, Jeffrey?

There is plenty of CO2 and H2O and sunlight in the atmosphere.

If your paper is correct, then we have a [sweet] solution for the global warming problem...

Paul

There are only trace amounts of C02 in the atmosphere at this stage (uranus..) so sugar rain not likely..

@Jeffrey, are you sure this reaction can just occur? I never heard CO2 and water combining like this randomly... Usually water only absorbs CO2...

Regards,
Daniel

You have to dissociate the water and CO2 with UV light. Also, it isn't like the all the water will combine with all the CO2 to make glucose. The odds of the material combining together to form other types of molecules are just as high as glucose. I just use that as an example. Free radicals are created with UV light, they can then combine with other free radicals. It all depends I guess on the strength of the UV light, and the amounts other molecules are present in.

Not only that, but CO2 is absorbed by water, but also remember, the majority of UV radiation is blocked by the ozone layer. If anything, and as a further note, very early plant life probably began trapping the glucose that was already formed as it rained down into lower areas of the ancient atmosphere.

As an additional note, it should be made aware to the readers that early evolutionary concepts concerning UV's significance in altering molecules is already available. The problem is that they have outdated planet formation/stellar evolution models. The trick here, and the whole purpose of this theory is to play a huge game of connect the (conceptual/procedural) dots, with regards to evolution.

Here is a cut and paste from wikipedia's ultraviolet page concerning evolution and molecular alterations.

The evolution of early reproductive proteins and enzymes is attributed in modern models of evolutionary theory to ultraviolet radiation. UVB causes thymine base pairs next to each other in genetic sequences to bond together into thymine dimers, a disruption in the strand that reproductive enzymes cannot copy. This leads to frameshifting during genetic replication and protein synthesis, usually killing the cell. Before formation of the UV-blocking ozone layer, when early prokaryotes approached the surface of the ocean, they almost invariably died out. The few that survived had developed enzymes that monitored the genetic material and removed thymine dimers by nucleotide excision repair enzymes. Many enzymes and proteins involved in modern mitosis and meiosis are similar to repair enzymes, and are believed to be evolved modifications of the enzymes originally used to overcome DNA damages caused by UV

In other words, there is a layer of a star's high atmosphere which contains disapportionate amounts of different molecules/elements which do combine/disintegrate in much stranger ways than they do on Earth as it currently is. It is stellar metamorphosis. Looking at Earth as it is now, and assuming it was always like this, is a worldview that establishment has a death grip on. It is very limited thinking.

[JeffreyW]

Here is an early paper.

Its simple, but I try to get the point across. There are so many false assumptions that are accepted, that it really makes me wonder how they even do science. This paper is about Jupiter.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1503.0050v1.pdf

[JeffreyW]

This thread has been here for 5 years now. Wow.

[JeffreyW]

Life Formation in Stellar Metamorphosis

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BtBOWKTMRk

[D_Archer]

long reply

Thanks for that.

In that case we (with we i mean you) should look at when an Astron develops its ozone layer, maybe at the beginnings of life, uranus/neptune the ozone layer is not yet there and UV plays this role you described...

Regards,
Daniel

[JeffreyW]

long reply

Thanks for that.

In that case we (with we i mean you) should look at when an Astron develops its ozone layer, maybe at the beginnings of life, uranus/neptune the ozone layer is not yet there and UV plays this role you described...

Regards,
Daniel

You are welcome. It's on the to do list for sure. It is a vast theory, and literally everything that connects star to planet is new. I just work on it one piece at a time. I want to remind my audience that if they want to contribute then just connect the dots. Conceptually connect stars and planets/exoplanets and you will have a greater understanding than 100% of astrophysicists across the entire earth. Illegal alien knowledge. Lol

[JeffreyW]

Video I made for Bibhas De

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BtBOWKTMRk

[D_Archer]

THIS IS ACTUAL SCIENCE. CRYSTALS AT THE EARTH’S CORE POWER ITS MAGNETIC FIELD:
http://www.universetoday.com/133791/act ... tic-field/
---

Not sure if this is actual science but in the article it is stated the Earth is still cooling.

Regards,
Daniel

[JeffreyW]

Newest graph.

http://stellar-metamorphosis.blogspot.c ... ellar.html

[JeffreyW]