I think people have different ways of expressing the same concept. What’s fun is when you begin to realize that other models are supporting your model even though they use different terminology to do so.Webolife said: Milewski's "super-light" is the counterpart of Smith's T-field, and his "light ether" is what Smith calls the "integral matrix." In both models the origin of light [M's super-light] and gravity is not as an attraction in matter or matter centers, but is centropic, i.e., directed as a push toward the center from the infinite field.
Aether Tensile Stress, B-Field Torsion, Axion (spin) Field
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/torsion.htm
The "Magnetic Moebius Tripole"You will find in this topic some personal and speculative thinking based on my experimental approach for generating a "dynamic tensile stress" on the Aether by using the B-Field Torsion effect. The purpose is to use this effect for tapping Free Energy and/or generating space propulsion devices. I think that it is possible to use induced vortexes in the Aether for tapping free energy and also to generate spacetime distortion effect (torsion fields) for inducing antigravitational thrust.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tripole.htm
B-Field Torsion GeneratorIn this experiment, you will find a simple mean for building a Magnetic Tripole. This coil setup can generates some interesting effects in spacetime flow by using the divergent magnetic lines and special configuration of the vector potential. So, it seems possible to tap electromagnetic energy directly from spacetime by unipolar spherical magnets/coils.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/magvtx.htm
The Bipolar-Vortex Generator/ThrusterThe purpose in this experiment is to try to generate a sufficient torsion effect in B-Field so as to generate a magnetic vortex in the Aether itself. A vortex is an open system and it has self-sustained capabilities as long as a differential pressure exists between two layers. So, if it is possible to generate a double vortex in the Aether, it seems possible to build a self-sustained open system to get Free Energy forever from the vacuum itself.
The first step is to find a good apparatus for inducing torsion in the B-Field. An approach with a conventional coil is not sufficient because, as you can notice below, the lines of the B-Field are not able to produce the desired effect because the lines are only divergent and "not twisted".
In a conventional coil, field lines which are only divergent are not sufficient to initiate the spin of the magnetic energy, the only motion generated is the well known EMF effect.
So, I have used a special toroidal coil named "The Rodin's Coil". This coil has been invented by Marko Rodin and this seems a good mean for inducing a "twist" or a B-Field torsion effect in the Aether.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/dvtgv1.htm
The Dual-Vortex Engines SpaceCraftIn the double vortex generator the rotational energy begin very strong in the center and the rotational speed increase dramatically while the radius of the vortex decrease. When this aether pressure is released at this point, the energy is free to explode radially. The free energy released can be tapped by some output coils placed radially around the center.
Two special conical coils (1 and 2) are used for generating the B-Field Torsion effect. The special B-Fields generated by the conical shaped coil must be balanced in the case of the use only as a generator.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/emadyne.htm
A Primer on the Role of Electromagnetic, Electrostatic and Torsion Fields in Antigravity and Field-Effect PropulsionIn case of the B-Field is unbalanced the generator can produce an asymmetrical thrust due to the unbalanced Aether pressure above and below. In this case the device acts as an Aether thruster which is also able to produce usable energy. So, this will start a new device the Emadyne project (Electro-MAgnetic and DYNamic), which uses a big Dual Vortex Generator (DVGen) as a thruster in the center and three small units for the B-Field control.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienc ... vity02.htm
I spoke with Professor Uri Shumlak who told me that he and other UW staff from the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, along with a bevy of their grad students, are building a prototype of a fusion generator called an HIT, which stands for Helicity Injected Torus. Doughnut-ring shaped, the torus encloses a roundish chamber. Within that chamber a vacuum is first created, and then a volume of hydrogen gas is introduced and heated to a few million degrees Celsius, which separates the electrons and protons from their atoms, turning the whole stew into a quasi-neutral foam of plasma. Then the torus envelops the plasma with a magnetic field to keep it away from the sides of the chamber, enabling the plasma mass to stay hot and keeping the rest of Seattle cool.
Then, once the plasma field is contained, the magnetic field squeezes the plasma, fusing the nuclei of one hydrogen atom into another. As the hydrogen couples combine, a helium atom is created and a neutron is released, along with lots of energy in the form of heat.
One day, such a generator will give us unlimited amounts of electricity, as the heat can be transferred to other mediums to produce voltage.
Electrostatic Propulsion Systems
Electrostatic propulsion uses electrical fields differently than electromagnetism does. In EM a current flows and creates a field, while in electrostatic systems the current is static and a charge builds up in a field, such as in a capacitor or a fuel tank.
These theories are utilized on NASA’s Deep Space I, a probe bound for the outer reaches of our solar system. On board the probe, the propellant--a tankful of xenon gas--is excited electrostatically into positive ions. The containment vessel of the engine has a negative charge at the exit end, so the charged xenon rushes out the tail pipe with a greater thrust than if it was just using conventional chemical propellants. In fact, the electrostatic propulsion system on Deep Space I allows it to fly at 60,000 mph, or 10,000 mph faster than it would with a conventional rocket. In addition, only 82 kg of xenon is needed for its entire mission, so with its smaller mass and weight the probe will fly alongside its intended target, a comet, and drag-race on equal footing while filming and conducting studies. Again, not antigravity per se, but electrically charging Deep Space I’s fuel field sets the stage for a closer look at electrostatic propulsion.
Taking that closer look is Tim Ventura and his fellow researchers at American Antigravity, an organization based in Kirkland, Washington. Ventura and his crew use electrostatic asymmetrical capacitors to create a field that levitates objects, such as their small, kite-like "lifters". These lifters are very light, weighing only a few ounces, and have balsawood struts that support the capacitors. When two capacitors of different size and load receive their share of a 30,000-volt charge, the lifter lifts--with no motors, no wings and no apparent source of lift.
The lower and larger capacitor is a strip of aluminium foil stretched between the horizontal balsawood struts. The second capacitor is a thin strip of 50-gauge wire mounted about one inch above the aluminum foil. As capacitors, they store electrical charge but don’t pass it on in a current.
The negative lead goes to the lower aluminum foil, and the positive lead is attached to the upper wire. The three corners of the lifter are tethered to the work table so that the electrical leads from the power source are not broken off in flight.
The capacitors of the lifters are controversial, for asymmetrical capacitors are not supposed to hold charges of two different volumes. But here is what happens.
According to Ventura, "Ion wind is the movement of ionised air particles which flow downward according to electrical charge". Here’s his theory. The positively charged wire on the top part of the lifter steals electrons from the surrounding air, leaving the affected air molecules positively charged. These positively charged air molecules, or ions, then head downward toward the large source of negatively charged electrons generated by the aluminum foil. These air molecule ions are bigger and heavier than the electrons seeking them, so there is a net thrust downward, pushing the whole lifter up.
In flight, the lifter emits a high whining, hissing buzz, and I could feel a good breeze coming up at me from the work table underneath the lifter. Also, while standing next to the lifter but not touching it, the hair on the back of my head started to rise up in electrostatic-like fashion.
Is that ion wind? Well, there certainly was a breeze, and it sure felt like air, but how would I know if it was ionic?
Is the movement of wind why lifters fly, regardless of whether the air is ionized or not, or is the wind just a by-product and not the propulsion? Could the capacitors be creating a field that neutralizes gravity, allowing the craft to levitate? Or are they creating some kind of new field that is localized, the surrounding ambient field pushing this "field bubble" up--much like a helium balloon is pushed up by the surrounding heavier air trying to fill the emptier "field" of the lighter helium?
Ventura thinks at least two phenomena are at work. Ion wind is definitely one, he feels, for the breeze is self-evident. However, he thinks a second effect is at work, too, and many agree with him. Most speculation concerns what is called the Biefeld-Brown effect, the "Brown" being T. Townsend Brown.
The Biefeld-Brown effect, according to Ventura, is the theory that low-efficiency, high-voltage, air-gapped capacitors with different or asymmetrical capacities generate a net directional force upward from the larger element to the smaller element, which on the lifter is from the aluminum foil to the wire. This force then pushes against the ambient energy field of the surrounding area, perhaps pushing against a more rigid energy field of the zero point energy field.
However, prominent physicist Hal Puthoff has a different perspective: "I’m quite certain at this point that the so-called ’lifter’ phenomenon is just an electrostatic ion wind phenomenon, not ’antigravity’."
But Dr John J. Rusek, Adjunct Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics at both Purdue University and the United States Air Force Academy, says that "Initial findings of ’classroom’ experiments with lifters show ionic wind to be way too small a factor, by three orders of magnitude". Dr Rusek has formed a technology company, Swift Enterprises, to continue this research and bring it to the level that is "presentable to the mainstream physics community".
Along these lines, Jean-Louis Naudin shows on his extensive website not only how to build a lifter but also several photos of research into the ion wind issue. Naudin’s team has wrapped test lifters in plastic, yet they still produce antigravitational effects.
Dr Fran De Aquino’s Space-time Bubbles
Others may have a clue to the second or even a third force at work. Researcher Fran De Aquino, professor of physics at Maranhão State University in São Luís, Brazil, has described in the literature that "bubbles of localized space-time" can exist in variance to the surrounding fields.
Anecdotal experience suggests that the lifters may be undergoing such space-time anomalies.
Dr De Aquino stated: "If a particle absorbs or emits electromagnetic energy (for example, photons), its gravitational mass (not inertial mass) is changed. The gravity, as we know, is proportional to the gravitational mass; consequently, gravity is also altered." Could the lifter be levitating because it weighs less, bathing in the glow of 30,000 volts and some kind of anomalous magnetic field? Further, could it be levitating because gravitons are blocked in some kind of gravity-shielding manner? Ventura believes this is possible; so do some at NASA.
Another Huntsville operation, Transdimensional Technologies, is exploring these multi-faceted phenomena, and its extensive website shows it to be a frequent contractor to NASA, conducting research into "asymmetrical capacitive propulsion" and capacitor-based devices to test "ion wind" forces. Jeff Cameron, of Transdimensional, is said by Ventura to be "the father of the lifter", having developed the device while exploring anomalous torsional effects of high-energy lasers.
Vacuum Energy and Torsion Fields
Nevertheless, how would gravitons be blocked or gravity shielded? Dr Hal Puthoff says there are two ways of looking at it. Firstly, one can look at the issue from a quantum point of view: that there is a particle exchange between the gravitons and something else, and the net effect is antigravity. The hows and whys of that are speculative, so Puthoff turns to a classical approach for answers. He prefers the notion of "engineering the vacuum". To do that, one must first consider what the vacuum is.
As I understand it, we are all in the vacuum; everything is. The "vacuum" is the matrix that contains all matter and all energy. It is the engineering perspective of the zero point energy field, or "the field"--as popularized by Lynne McTaggart in her masterpiece, The Field.
Dr Puthoff shared with me statements from fellow researcher Dr T. D. Lee: "The vacuum is the seat of energetic particle and field fluctuations, and is the seat of space-time structure that encodes the distribution of matter and energy. The vacuum is energetic in its own right."
Thus energy can be drawn from the field, and spacecraft can have "vacuum propulsion systems, or propellant-less propulsion"--in other words, field-effect propulsion. Tim Ventura may be flying his lifter by having his capacitors push against the energy field of the vacuum.
Dr Puthoff’s current research has been to explore "the perturbation of atomic or molecular ground states, hypothesized to be equilibrium states involving dynamic radiation/absorption exchange with the vacuum fluctuations. In this model, atoms or molecules are expected to undergo energy shifts that would alter the spectroscopic signatures of excitations involving the ground state."
Puthoff says he’s had no success so far with this approach, but his words remind me of De Aquino’s speculation that objects lose mass as they absorb energy. Pull energy from the field around you and you lose weight. Bingo lift-off! But how does one pull energy from the field?
Torsion fields might play a role here, according to many, and the literature on antigravity is filled with the term "torsional effects". But what exactly is a torsion field?
"It has something to do with spin," Nick Cook told me on the phone. "You have a torsion field when you spin something. Add a little electromagnetism and you might have antigravity."
"When forces create curvature (such as rotation) in more than two planes, a torsion field results. Not only does the object go around, but it goes around and ‘down’ or ‘up’, and the up/down movement is an additional acceleration in that dimension. EM and gravitational fields differ by having a magnitude of force and only one direction of movement.
"A tornado is a structure of air in air. A whirlpool is a structure of water in water. So, because more than two planes are involved, objects can be created from ’nothing’; that is to say that objects can be created from the medium of the environment, such as a tornado from two air masses of differing temperature."
So, spin plus movement is the key. Tim Ventura demonstrated to me that spinning magnets will cancel out their magnetic fields sufficiently so that two magnets facing each other with like poles (positive-to-positive, or negative-to-negative) will not push each other away if one of the magnets is rotating perpendicularly to the force of opposition. It’s not antigravity, but it gets us closer to the heart of the matter.
Furthermore, Russian physicists, such as N. A. Kozyrev, have been researching the torsional effects of subatomic particle spin and the loss of gravitational mass in planets from the angular momentum of their orbits.
Spinning makes something happen, but what? Tornadoes and Mother Nature might have a few clues. Tornadoes spin and have anomalous effects that are legendary. How? It seems as if the laws of mass, gravity and inertia are melted as winds swirl at speeds up to 300 mph in an organized vortex pattern. Is this a clue to melting the pull of gravity?
Dr Dan Marckus, says that if ".you generate a torsion field of sufficient magnitude, the theory says you can bend the four dimensions of space around the generator. The more torsion you generate, the more space you perturb. When you bend space, you also bend time."
The torsion field, in effect, is "a pump, a ’coupling’ device that could dip into and then direct energy out of the zero point energy field".
"But," Marckus continues, "the vortex wasn’t a three-dimensional phenomenon or even a four-dimensional one. It couldn’t be. For a torsion field to be able to interact with gravity and electromagnetism, it had to be endowed with attributes that went beyond the three dimensions of left, right, up-and-down, and the fourth-dimensional time field they inhabited; something that the theorists for convenience sake labeled a fifth dimension--hyperspace."
Cook concluded from further conversations with Marckus that the torsion field would "bind with gravity to produce a levitational effect--an antigravity effect", yet "it wasn’t doing so in the four dimensions of this world, but somewhere else". That somewhere else is hyperspace.
Entering Hyperdimensional Space
So how do we activate torsion fields and enter hyperspace? Dr Eugene Podkletnov may have a clue.
Podkletnov, the Russian researcher working in Finland, has studied the gravity shielding effects of superconductors. Podkletnov claims that "if the superconductors are rotated considerably faster than 5,000 rpm, perhaps five to 10 times as fast, the disc experiences so much weight loss that it actually takes off"; or 25,000-50,000 revolutions per minute within some kind of torsion field creates levitation.
Podkletnov replied:
"[A] fast rotating object can, under certain conditions, cause the polarization of the volume that it occupies in space and around it. This polarization causes the gravitational effect as it modifies [the] local gravity field. The vortex of the polarized particles will create a vertical thrust with a certain force and spatial momentum. Some scientists call these polarized particles gravitons.
"The term graviton is an artificial one and at present we are not sure if it is a wave or a particle and what type of particle. Maybe it is a usual tachyon or a superluminal neutrino [a faster-than-light particle].
"Polarization of the media means that the spins of electrons, protons, neutrons and of small subatomic particles that constitute the fabric of space or vacuum would be parallel. Then a kind of gravity well is formed and the objects tend to fall into this well. We observe this picture as an object rising to the sky.
"Polarization of the media (of space) causes some glow around the object as it acquires additional energy and, because of it, the glow around some objects is observed."
What I understand from Dr Podkletnov is that gravity is the effect of spin--the spin of all subjected particles, from the subatomic level and up, being parallel; thus they are all aligned to fall into the gravity well of Earth. Spinning objects, such as his superconducting discs, when influenced additionally by an electromagnetic field will experience a shift in the spin of the subatomic and atomic elements. They will be turned and not be aligned in parallel. Thus, they are able to levitate.
But how to polarize the media and get things spinning? Enter Dr Marcus Hollingshed, an enigmatic figure allegedly from Cambridge University. Dr Hollingshed claims to have built a six-ringed toroidal coil antigravity device which achieved great effect using rotating magnetic fields.