Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technolgy

[mathew]

Thanks for the reply Johnny,
I see it in front of the safety net,
in the corner of the scaffold, but be that
could go either way- it was by any measure
a very strange fire. also, notice the rust
on the beam directly under the fire-
that is a brand new beam. What would
make it rust so quickly? Certainly not
just exposure to weather.



also the vertical beam in the deconstruct
picture above(with wfc's in the background)
looks so red- building steel should not do that.

[CTJG 1986]

Thanks for the reply Johnny,
I see it in front of the safety net,
in the corner of the scaffold, but be that
could go either way- it was by any measure
a very strange fire.

Fair enough, I'll have to respectfully agree to disagree here, having been in the construction business for many years and having helped assemble such scaffolding and netting systems and having blown up that pic to 300% and examined it closely I don't see any reason for their to be a brace in that location in the first place in addition to it simply looking like the netting to me.

But blowing the picture up doesn't increase the clarity any and it is hard to tell definitively so you are correct that it could go either way.

also, notice the rust
on the beam directly under the fire-
that is a brand new beam. What would
make it rust so quickly? Certainly not
just exposure to weather.

Again having dealt with steel frame construction on many occasions I have to say that does look like natural oxidation, and one should remember that the construction/installation of a beam may be new but the beam itself could be milled months before hand and receive plenty of exposure to all kinds of elements that cause oxidation to various degrees before ever even arriving at the site of construction.

But of course I could be wrong.

also the vertical beam in the deconstruct
picture above(with wfc's in the background)
looks so red- building steel should not do that.

And yet again I feel I should say that I have seen equally rusted steel beams in a number of buildings I have worked on over the years in which the Hutchison Effect was almost certainly not a component in.

Differing levels of rusting from one beam to another is also not that uncommon as the exact composition of the steel varies among 'batches' of ore at the mill and among different mills, and usually numerous mills contribute to a large job like such a building is to construct. Variations in the composition of the steel can affect oxidation quite significantly as I understand it.

And on the job site there are various chemicals and water and other materials present usually that can effect oxidation in various ways that can easily differ from one beam to another as well.

Although I don't know the science behind it I have seen first-hand evidence to suggest fire can cause rapid extreme oxidation as well - a building I was working on once was torched by arsonists over a weekend and due to it's rural location it burnt itself out without any fire response and no water or rain was ever involved and yet when I saw it 2 days later brand-new beams that had no visible rusting on Friday were in various stages of (in some cases extreme) rusting on Sunday afternoon.

But an accelerant of some kind was used in that case that could also have effected the oxidation process so again it's hard to say anything conclusively.

I can't dispute any of your or Judy Wood's claims in regards to the rusting patterns and such being related to DEW use scientifically as I honestly have no idea how many hundreds or thousands of different factors can contribute to extreme oxidation such as that and as I already said I haven't really looked into the science behind it all beyond the basics.

But in my honest opinion this is an area that detracts from the rest of the case she makes which does contain valuable information, she clearly does not have personal experience with steel working or construction in general or in the science behind rusting, and we don't know enough about the factors involved in any specific case to say that any rusting patterns we see are actually unusual.

The whole rust issue is a matter of conjecture, without knowing the details of all the factors involved we can't conclude scientifically that the rust is either natural or unnatural. To use it as proof of DEW use is not very scientific honest in my view .

Placing too much focus on the rusting matter(and one or two other areas of high levels of conjecture) may be hurting the rest of her otherwise pretty good case in my opinion.

Anyways, I hope I'm not coming across too strongly or arrogantly here or seeming like I am dismissing the whole issue as I am well aware of the many "quirks" of 9/11 that need answering and currently Judy Wood's theories in many cases are the most plausible ones I have come across(or in many cases she has the only theories that address those issues at all).

And again I have little to no understanding of the science behind rusting at this time and am basing my views entirely on personal experiences, so take that as you may.

Also I'm a bit tired at the moment so you'll have to excuse any grammar or spelling errors on my part.

Jonny

[mathew]

Hello Johnny,
Here are some more rustification pictures,
that are clearly of a "stepped up nature".
When considered w/ the pics and story behind the 'fixing'
and deconstruction of the bankers trust bldg,
a more coherent picture emerges.

New structure of Path train complex, w/ new, rusty beams:


The 'meteorite' - fused material, now very rusty.


And most importantly- the Pepsi Truck
with the Amazing "rust splash'

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/dirt ... 004_NR.jpg

I also understand how you feel when you say:

I can't dispute any of your or Judy Wood's claims in regards to the rusting patterns and such being related to DEW use scientifically as I honestly have no idea how many hundreds or thousands of different factors can contribute to extreme oxidation such as that and as I already said I haven't really looked into the science behind it all beyond the basics.

This is how I felt when I first came across Dr. Judy Woods work, (over two years ago) -
that is precisely why I feel it is important to discuss this topic. Even here at thunderbolts,
where people posting are as open minded and forward thinking as anywhere I can find on the web,
people tend to go with what they know, and relate to personal experience. 9-11 was beyond
the realm of personal experience for any of us who are not familiar with such exotic tech. Add to that
the fact that John Hutchison has been repeatedly marginalized and disregarded and labeled a fraud,
and It is easy to see how most people would be detracted. Also, thank you for being candid and admitting
that you 'don't know'; that is hard for most. I don't know either, but as I have said before, DEW is the ONLY
theory that can account for the many anomalies seen (and felt by first responder witness testimony). Anyone who is remotely interested in this topic really should buy the book. (or spend some QT at drjudywood.com) $45 dollars is a small price to pay for such a quality textbook with all the pictures and witness testimony contained therein.

"Conventional people are roused to fury by departures from convention, because they see it as an attack on themselves and their beliefs."

This is Why it is so important to think, not believe. A thinking mind is open, a mind that believes is confined
the framework of Beliefs.

I would like to respectfully request that you and any others who are eyeballing this thread,
take some time and read the information surrounding this event. The more we know,
the deeper our discussions can go!

Andrew Johnson Has Prepared a great intro to this directed energy rabbithole.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/9-1 ... h-erin.pdf

also the court documents are VERY IMPORTANT:

http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201.pdf
http://ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProgr ... D01_002619

[mathew]

Hello Jonny-
Sorry about misspelling your name,
I tend to rush my posts.



Here's a hard to find picture. Seems to be frozen mid-process. Jellification? Transformation? Rustification?
Might you consider that the 'rusting' is an integral part of the bigger picture being laid out here? That picture being the understanding that molecular change was/is taking place. This rusting appears to be
in the same general category as the fuming and the dustification. They all appear to be different levels, or stages, of the process(es) that were initiated, or triggered during this event... Check out this picture:


This is from FEMA's Limited Metallurgical Study, found in their World Trade Center Building Performance Study: http://www.civil.columbia.edu/ce4210/FE ... 03_apc.pdf (Lots of goodies to find in there.)

This is essentially a type of alchemy, isn't it? The reaction appears ongoing, even after the 'weapon' or 'device' or 'field' is turned off. John Hutchison explains it as: the materials "seem to be accelerated ahead in time." So then there's the question of the crazy Bankers Trust. And how the space itself may be involved in the molecular dissociation and transmutation of materials and causing severe accelerated rusting of the newly installed beams. There are apparently similarly occurring reactions at other structures around the site... That's not normal is it? Severe 'rusting'? Is it the new normal? That the 'empty' space could be 'infected' to a degree that an ongoing resonation could cause a reaction and affect the materials that are placed into that space in the future?

Jonny said:

she clearly does not have personal experience with steel working or construction in general or in the science behind rusting

She may not be in the construction business, but she is in the materials science business:

Dr. Wood is an expert in the use of moire interferometry, a full field optical method that is used in stress analysis, as well as materials characterization and other types of interference. She hols a B.S. in Civil Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science. Her M.S. thesis
involved the development of a Fizeau interferometer to study the effects of material defects on the thermal expansion behavior of composite materials.

She appears uniquely qualified!


What? How? Where? What? How?

H/T to a little bird for help with putting this post together.

[mathew]

Continuing along with extreme degradation (molecularly), in these photos
we clearly see the 'effervescent' quality of the material as it falls through the air.


The 'Spire' - core columns of the north tower.


Now, if these columns did not 'dustify' or 'disintegrate', then where did they go?


Being well over forty stories high, such
wreckage should be easily discernible on the ground.


Remaining base of North Tower.



Ground Zero at the WTC building outlines

This is as large as I could find- for a large Hi-res pic:
http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/HTR/web-co ... HiRes.html

I have said in the past, nine (9) buildings were destroyed
that day to the point of being demolished. In other words nine
buildings were either completely demolished or damaged to the point
of not being salvageable; thus they were later demolished in the instances
that they were not totally destroyed. Well that number is apparently growing.
As of today, WTC buildings 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 are among that number. On Sept.
11, 2001 the Greek orthodox Church was among the buildings destroyed as well (actually,
there was almost nothing left of the church). Then we must count the Bankers Trust
among the buildings demolished as a direct result of 9-11. That makes nine buildings.
Those are all confirmed. Additionally unconfirmed as either deconstructing or slated
for deconstruction by myself but verified by at least two internet sources, are
Fiterman Hall (30 West Broadway), 4 Albany Street, 130 Cedar Street,
133-135 Greenwich Street, 21-23 Thames Street, and possibly 90 West St.

To review-
North Tower (WTC1)
South Tower (WTC2)
Marriott Hotel (WTC3)
WTC4
WTC5
US Customs House (WTC6)
WTC7
St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church
Deutsche Bank Building (130 Liberty Street)
Fiterman Hall (30 West Broadway)
4 Albany Street
130 Cedar Street
133-135 Greenwich Street
21-23 Thames Street
?90 West St.

Any one who can confirm or refute the
Last Six on the list please let me know.
Either way, that's alotta buildings!
If adjacent buildings to ground zero
were affected by collateral effects
of demo- it would be a simple matter
of repairing the damaged parts.
The Stats as per fema map: on 9-11:

full collapse = 6
partial collapse = 3
major damage = 9
moderate damage = 36

[mathew]

Today I would like to look at evidence of "Fuming"

Anyone who has sat around the campfire knows that these people
could not function as we see here if this was smoke.

This lack of smoke is confirmed by first responder and survivor reports that
state over and over that folks had dust and soot in their eyes, ears,
mouth, ect., but no injuries from smoke inhalation were reported.

Fuming: no fires- the materials are continuing to loose mass

Here we see building 7 Fuming. Notice the strange effects on
the corner of the building.

60 Minutes Dust Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8rgr7pY3uQ
@ 2:25 They report that 1 million Tons of material
were 'pulverized into dust'!!
They ain't Lying!

First Responders are dying from the dust:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/03/02/ne ... index.html

A 2009 study published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine suggested a link between the type of cancer Wiebicke had and exposure to the toxic dust at ground zero. "We found a predominance of multiple myeloma in younger folks than we would have expected," said Dr. Jacqueline Moline, the study's author. Multiple myeloma is a type of blood cancer that affects blood plasma cells in the bone marrow, typically in folks over 70.

Hutchison Iron Bar Experiment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-YwbgXpnkA
@ 0:27 you can see it fuming. also-
notice the twisting effect~ this
is key as we will see...

[mathew]

IMHO Dr. Judy Wood Has Made a solid case for "Field Effects"
of some kind being employed in the destruction of the WTC.
Now, after 9& 1/2 Years, against all odds, she has completed
her incredible, ground breaking, and ONLY forensic analysis of
what actually happened on that day. I hope that many people
share this information, for now that the "what happened" has
been addressed, in a scientific manner, we can begin to Focus
on the "who" aspect of this incredible mystery.

Google:
The Psychological Operation Aspect of 9-11

[mathew]

I thought it important to post these book reviews since they are not available
at Amazon because they have no page for this book any more. (wonder why)

Where Did the Towers Go?
By Dr. Judy Wood
Amazon book reviews before the page was removed-


5.0 out of 5 stars

The most compelling forensic study I have ever encountered

By
SapphicTwist

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

Where Did the Towers Go? settles the longstanding dispute over what happened in NYC on 9/11, and not enough can be said about the tireless forensic work performed by Judy Wood to get us to this point. While the ultimate impact of this book is as uncertain as the impact of any truth-telling in our times, it is interesting already how much the existence of WDTTG? changes the "rules of engagement" between those who have looked carefully at the 9/11 evidence, and those who have not.

Up until now, those who have been familiar with 9/11 anomalies (largely through Judy's work) have been in the unenviable position of having to translate a massive amount of data into sound-bite fragments to get our points across to others. Judy's website, as remarkable as it is, has never been a user-friendly reference for people who are new to the subject of 9/11 forensic research, a limitation that has left the burden of translation largely in our hands.

But now, with so much of the compelling 9/11 evidence contained within this one book, we are finally unburdened of the need to repackage Judy's work for dissemination; already I have handed two copies of WDTTG? off to friends, and the reactions have been IMMEDIATE.

WDTTG? is a forensic study, pure and simple. That means that anyone with an interest in 9/11 (and who is not in that category?) is a part of the potential readership for this book. My advice is, buy as many copies of this book as you can afford, and spread them as far and wide as possible...


------------------------


5.0 out of 5 stars

Dr. Judy Wood was born to show the actualities of 9/11! not theories, not hypotheticals, not conspiracy

By
J. Moore "Yogi"

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Dr. Judy Wood WINS! This woman of iron-clad intellect has unraveled the mystery of the iron unraveling!
Dr. Judy Wood, a most qualified guide, balances the scientific reality of 9/11 with the sensitivity of her
oceanic heart. Both head and heart are wed in this work of painstaking genius. With a background in Applied
Physics, Interferometry, and Materials Engineering Science, Dr. Judy Wood seems to have been born
specifically for this historic World Trade Center investigation. What many of us have only guessed at--
"Isn't that debris pile too small?!"--the brilliant Dr. Wood proves beyond a shadow of doubt: The Twin
Towers never hit the ground!

In her elegant 500-page text book, Dr. Judy Wood guides us through all anomalous phenomena of the WTC complex, focusing solely on "what happened" that morning, in a careful consideration of all observable physical/photographic evidence--after effects including seismic signals, magnetometer readings, unto the virtually unknown Category 3 hurricane off the eastern seaboard that very morning. She shows us the direct correlation of this startling evidence as it mirrors The Hutchison Effect--energy-field effects born out of the early 20th century scientist Nikola Tesla's experiments and inventions--discoveries of a free-energy, not kinetic, activated via interferometry: the interference of various beams, energy fields, or electromagnetic waves. Dr. Wood resurrects to his rightful place Nikola Tesla, the true father of alternating current, wireless communication, and the rotating magnetic field. Though Dr. Wood does not name the exact device responsible as the mechanism of destruction on 9/11, she expertly delineates "the extraordinary effects that can result from electromagnetic interference."

The attractive text is beautiful to look upon--high quality photos, graphs, and easy-to-understand language.
A unique accompanying bookmark helps us keep our own bearings, serving not only as a map of the WTC complex; I daresay, the bookmark reminds me of a "prayer card" given at memorial services, in honor of the dead. But of course, it is the Towers themselves that are being memorialized herein.

It isn't every day that tears roll down one's cheeks while studying a science text book. In this case, the tears are a two-fold intermixture: Firstly, there are tears triggered by sorrow for the loss of life, perpetrated through a crime of monumental proportions, via a sinister new weapon; and secondly, tears of absolute wonder and delight are shed for definite evidence of a revolutionary new free-energy technology, destined to positively change and improve the lives of every soul born on this planet for ages to come--and not just change mankind a little but revolutionize the progressive evolution of each and every individual.

We might also shed a tear for Dr. Judy Wood herself--she who lost her job as a result of pursuing 9/11 research; she who has been severely maligned by several "good ol' boys clubs" expert in disinformation and deception; she who had a student and friend murdered within the course of research; and she, who has met with mammoth resistance in the publication of this first groundbreaking tome. Dr. Wood is of an entirely different caliber--an intrepid soul, full of zest, purity of thought, and a sacred perseverance-- possessing qualities few exercise today, but for which she will be remembered always.

Dr. Judy Wood makes demands of us, her readers and students: Keep looking. Keep asking. Look again! "Listen to the [actual] evidence. ALL of it." She begs us to awaken our own childlike sense of wonder and to have greater courage. Dr. Judy Wood does not let us turn away from stark reality. "Where Did the Towers Go?" will indeed strike a fearsome awe in your heart for its fascinating yet terrible truths. It is, at once, a solid scientific treatise and a memorial to those who perished; it is also a grateful acknowledgment of those who have continued suffering and losing their lives up to this very day.

9/11 was not our country's purportedly historic watershed moment: Dr. Wood respectfully educates us to the really-ignored game- changer, scientist and inventor, Nikola Tesla. In tracing 9/11 after-effects back to their true cause, Dr. Wood ingeniously shines the spotlight on Canadian researcher John Hutchison and his own Tesla-like experiments; and in so doing, the sleight-of-hand that has become the "official story" of 9/11 is brought into sharp relief.

The world will owe Dr. Judy Wood a great debt for her efforts, and I cannot thank her enough. Dr. Wood aptly quotes Mahatma Gandhi within her text: "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." I predict many will "see" for the first time under Dr. Judy Wood's loving care.


------------------


5.0 out of 5 stars

Thank You Dr. Judy Wood

By
Matthew Goddard
& Tenasee Love

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

Just received the book this week, and have been reading and reading and reading… We agree: Judy Wins!!! Even if you are one who has spent hours studying at drjudywood.com, and have heard lots of Dr. Wood’s lectures and interviews, you are going to be amazed at how much more there is to learn in this book.

This book presents a case that is beyond damning. It’s a text book, professional, and hard to put down.

It’s also a journey of discovery. Dr. Wood can’t tell us Exactly what the weapon used that day was. But she can take us on an extensive tour of the evidence. She leads us into the correct ballpark, wherein, we can grasp the basics of the science that lies behind the bizarre phenomena which we see. And then, once the dots start connecting in our minds, and we do a bit of research, we can pretty much figure out what the game being played is, and who may be playing it.

Taking a good look at Dr. Wood’s lawsuits is more than recommended.
Learning about the defendants is absolutely essential.

We all know we were lied to that day.
We all saw those buildings turn to dust.
Dr. Wood reveals to us the deepest, darkest secret of that day.
The one that we, at all costs, are not supposed to learn.
And that’s the connection to Nikola Tesla, and Free-Energy Technology.

Dr. Wood peels away the layers of dis-info and psyop in a way that is candid, personal, and endearing. You will laugh, and cry, but most of all, you will learn, “through the eyes of a child, with wonder and amazement.”

Thank you Judy Wood for this Work you have done. You have done us all a great service in getting this Book, and your Lawsuits, (and website(s)) on the Public Record.

Dr. Judy Wood deserves our support. We are beyond thankful to be able to write a review for such a book. The fact that this book exists, in these times, is an amazing accomplishment in itself. We are so lucky to have amongst us this brave woman, who does not give up, who got this book published.

Do yourself a favor, if you are able to, and buy this book. And by all means, if you haven’t already, study the evidence at her (other) voluminous website (as well): drjudywood.com. Dr. Wood provides us with a wealth of information, via pictorial (and other revealing) evidence, that you will not see many other places. And most definitely, you will not likely be seeing these types of images out there with any sort of good explanation attached to them. (That’s what Dr. Judy Wood is here for. :<)

Libraries, (if there are lucky, in these times), have allotment funds for the purchasing of books, that we, the patrons, may request. If you are able, please request that your libraries obtain this book, or perhaps, you may be in a position to do some donating. We can talk to our local booksellers, as well. Per our experience, the reactions have been quite impressive. This book, with it's outrageous cover, is quite the eye-catching teaching piece, very effective in capturing people's attention. It's amazing how many have never even seen this 'reality'-defying picture.

It's up to us, once we 'get it', to see to it that many more see this for what it is. And help them to understand the reverse potential of this secreted-away technology, and why we should all be interested in, and caring about, this issue, which affects us all.

~ Wondering if that very brave 'insider' will ever come on out and talk to us all. Will you step up, use your heart, and talk to us about this technology? The cat's already way out of the bag… Judy's gone and coaxed it out here into the bright light of today. Where are you, brave blower of whistles? We, and those who disappeared on that day, and since, are waiting.


-----------------


5.0 out of 5 stars

The Most Important Book You Will EVER Read Regarding 9/11

By
Abraham Rodriguez

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

This is literally the single most evidence-packed book regarding 9/11 to be published since it happened.
It is neither based on theory nor speculation; rather, it is simply based on easily-verifiable well-referenced
physical evidence, analysis and discussion of that evidence, and the inescapable conclusions that are drawn
from that evidence. This book is a must-read for any person who wishes to understand the true implications
of the 9/11 attacks, and why there has been such an obvious, extensive, and relentless attempt to confuse
people and divert our attention away from this overwhelming sum of important evidence. The truth has been
out for a long time thanks to the selfless efforts of Dr. Judy Wood and the online database she has compiled
at drjudywood.com, and now it has taken a new form. THANK YOU SO MUCH Dr. Wood!

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology


---------------


5.0 out of 5 stars

A new look at what really happened

By
E. Wachsman

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

Have you ever had doubts about the official accounting of the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings
on 9/11/01? Have you followed the many players, developments and theories within the 911 Truth Movement
and wondered just where the truth really is? In Where Did the Towers Go, Dr. Judy Wood expertly presents
real answers that may surprise and disturb you.

In her long awaited book, Dr. Wood methodically deconstructs both the official story and popular alternative
theories about the physical demise of the buildings. Using basic principles of physics and engineering, she clearly
demonstrates why the mainstream and alternative versions could not have happened as presented.

Dr. Wood recognized early on that new, unbiased words had to be used to accurately describe the unusual phenomena that were observed on 9/11. For example, she introduces us to the term, "Dustification", and explains how it is uniquely different from "Vaporization" or "Pulverization". Using a combination of witness testimony, observed phenomena and materials analysis, she goes on to offer compelling evidence of the use of a new kind of weapons technology on 9/11/01: Directed Energy. This is not a who-dunnit. Dr. Wood eschews finger pointing in favor of the primary task of scientifically assessing the evidence to determine what happened and how.

The hardcover book itself is substantial and well designed, generously filled with exceptionally clear multi-color charts and tables as well as crisp color plates, glossary and footnotes. Anyone who has ever purchased a highly valued reference book will immediately recognize the $39.95 price as a bargain and the information contained in the book, priceless. It is available at Dr. Wood's website.


-----------------------------


5.0 out of 5 stars

Brilliant and Insightful Research

By
D. Patrick

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

Dr. Wood takes a fresh look and a studied approach to what really happened to the towers.
I find her reasoning sound and her evidence compelling.


---------------------------


5.0 out of 5 stars

The most important and accurate book about 9/11

By
Andrew Johnson

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

This book is based on primary evidence - a forensic study of 9/11. It has been a real battle to bring to fruition -
for so many reasons.

Dr Wood has made a considerable sacrifice - and others have worked hard to support the effort to bring this information to the world. This book will cast down a number of challenging sets of evidence and it has certainly lead me to some difficult to accept conclusions. Please help to raise awareness of the book itself, and the evidence it contains.

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/


---------------------------------


5.0 out of 5 stars

Where Did The Book Go?

By
Morley Evans

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

Where Did The Towers Go? by Dr. Judy Wood provides the answer: The twin towers and the other buildings of the World Trade Center were turned into dust. You saw that with your own eyes, didn't you? Dr. Judy makes her case and points to a currently secret technology which will revolutionize energy supply and open a bright future for everyone. Too bad the people who destroyed the World Trade Center would deny that future to mankind. This important book is currently unavailable, but you can visit her website to get a preview. Write to Dr. Judy Wood. Encourage her to release her book and continue her work.

[mathew]

Here are a few more reviews that have not
yet gone away on amazon.uk & amazon.ca

5.0 out of 5 stars

How the Towers Turned to Dust

by
Alan S. Glassman

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go? : The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

I am delighted to finally see Dr. Judy Wood's book about the disintegration of New York's World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, appear in print. It has been a long time coming but well worth the wait.

Based in large part on her website and on the research she's been doing for over eight years, "Where Did the Towers Go?" is an exhaustive study of what happened to those two, quarter mile high, 110-storey skyscrapers on that horrible day and how they literally disappeared to dust. A structural engineering firm involved in building the Trade Center estimated there should have been almost 1.2 million tons of rubble. But, because we see mostly dust and unburned paper on the ground and a minimum of debris in the basements, Dr. Wood asks, "Where did it all go?"

With over 500 excellent color photographs, many charts and graphs, and solid calculations from an expert in mechanical and materials engineering, Professor Wood challenges the official story of 9/11 with compelling evidence that cannot be denied. Her study should convince anyone still skeptical of any alternative explanation as to what happened to the Towers that day that the generally accepted media and government explanation is utter nonsense.

Step by step, Dr. Wood takes us for an in-depth look at what really happened. She suggests that we have been brainwashed from the very beginning moments of the tragedy into believing the story we were being told on television. She shows us that we did not see what we thought we saw. In fact, she shows us clearly that we have been carefully deceived.

Dr. Wood starts by examining the free-fall speed at which the buildings began to plummet, but also graphically explains that very little of the huge structures actually ended up hitting the ground. In fact, the seismic data and the very limited ground penetration and destruction proves an overwhelming amount of material of the Towers was quickly turned to a very fine dust that spread both horizontally outward and vertically upward to form large plumes that finally settled on the streets of lower Manhattan and out into the rivers. One by one, Wood dismisses the official explanation as well as some of the alternate explanations from various 9/11 truth movements.

For me, the lack of a debris pile is the most convincing evidence that the Towers did not topple but were disintegrated on the spot in about 10 seconds each. It does not appear to be action of pulverization but more of what Dr. Wood calls "dustification".

She invents new and clever terms to describe what we saw that day and now see in the recorded photos. She does this in order to erase any pre-conceived ideas of what happened, telling us that the human mind always looks for answers by relating what it experiences to events it has observed before and to what is familiar to it. When the brain sees something totally new, it attempts to explain the phenomenon using what is in its memory. For this particular event, we must guard against that tendency, and descriptions using a new vocabulary help us do that. We begin to see what we thought we saw and what we were told to believe we saw in a different way. Only then can we begin to glimpse the truth of what took place.

Addressed in the book are many unpleasant subjects that most of us do not want to remember. We start to see the people who jumped to their deaths from a new angle. We see vertical circular holes in adjacent World Trade Center buildings that we were never shown before. We see cars blocks away that were "toasted" or flipped over. We see large steel beams and columns bent, twisted, thinned and rusted in peculiar ways that heat cannot cause. We see weird fires and fuming dirt on the ground for blocks...fuming that continues for months. We see WTC Building 7 completely destroyed after 5 pm that afternoon, never having been shown to be hit by an airplane. We see steel turned to "jelly", metal peeled, fusion of dissimilar materials, strange rounded holes in glass, and thinning and extremely rapid aging of materials in just a matter of hours. And, we read the recorded and documented testimony of dozens of first responders such as firefighters and emergency rescue workers that the debris from two 500,000+ ton Towers was almost non-existent.

Dr. Wood goes on in the latter chapters of the book to acquaint us with something she calls the "Tesla-Hutchison Effect" and its similarities to what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. She makes a good case for the use of a directed energy weapon based on that method. It involves setting up what's called a field effect by the interference of different types of energies concentrated on a particular target. There really is nothing new here: genius inventor Nikola Tesla demonstrated such effect a hundred years ago.

As with Judy Wood, I, too, thought it was very strange that the Towers "came down" on 9/11, but I couldn't put my finger on what could have really caused their demise. Now, with the release of this groundbreaking volume of work I am beginning to see the truth. I am beginning to see what I did not see before or what I was not permitted to see because of the power of immediate and incessant suggestion by the media and the government.

I highly recommend purchasing and reading "Where Did the Towers Go?" if you dare to get a glimpse of what really happened on a day that shaped the current history of our world for at least the first decade of the 21st century.


----------------------------


1.0 out of 5 stars

Do not waste your time

By
Jason M. Wood

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

Dr. Wood fails to explain how the perpetrators came up with the 5.7 x 10^13 watts of energy required to vapourize the steel in the World Trade Center. That's over 5 times the total energy output of the entire earth, and it assumes 100% efficiency. The actual requirement would likely be thousands of times the earth's total energy output.

So this is just a ridiculous claim, plain and simple, and we don't even need to look at Dr. Wood's other silly arguments.

-----------------------------

5.0 of 5 stars

The Evidence Speaks

By
Matthew Goddard

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go?: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

This is the only book on 911 that deals with Evidence.
If, you have been waiting for a real investigation on what
actually happened at the WTC site on Sept. 11, 2001,
than this is the book for you.

Dr. Judy Wood has done the United States of America and
the entire world a service by getting this information out.

Do not waste your time indeed if you want to continue to
believe the lies being peddled by the media and our leaders.

This book deals with evidence and will overturn all of what
you think you know about 911.

This book is not an easy read, but for those with the courage
to look at the evidence, it will be seen for what it is...a monumental accomplishment.

Thank you Judy Wood for your professionalism, integrity, and
courage. May everyone find the courage to look at the evidence.

[mathew]

"Nothing is so easy to ignore as something that does not yield freely to understanding"
Giorgio de Santillana- 'Hamlet's Mill'

Most Relevant Information Links:




NISTNCSTAR1-
Final Reports on the Investigation into the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, conducted under the National Construction Safety team Act:
http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/
http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201.pdf
http://www.amazon.com/Final-Report-Coll ... 323&sr=1-1




FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study:
Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations
http://www.civil.columbia.edu/ce4210/FE ... l/open.htm
http://www.amazon.com/World-Trade-Cente ... =8-1-spell




Request For Change Documents-
http://ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProgr ... D01_002619




Evidence and Court Documents
http://drjudywood.com/
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST ... Wood.shtml

[mathew]

Here is a photo from Sept. 10th 2001. We can see the High Pressure Front Pushing the
Clouds Along the Eastern Seaboard (H) and Hurricane Erin Offshore (L) the two together
present a pattern of H ( \ ) L


Here We See The Discharge Pattern of The
Valle Marinaris. Again, Same Pattern-
Pos. \ Neg. or P ( \ ) N


Notice the Configuration of the Towers- NT \ ST -coincidence?
NT ( \ ) ST

http://www.lagunajournal.com/wtc_North_Tower.jpg

Now we see the remains of the North Tower (North and East Walls)
and the South Tower (South and West Walls) ( \ )

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/49/13210 ... 206f89.jpg

North Tower- remains of the North & East North Tower Walls


http://patdollard.com/wp-content/upload ... _right.jpg

South Tower- remains of the South & West Tower Walls

http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/200 ... .large.jpg

To review:

( \ )

Any Questions?

[mathew]

This illustration, from pg. 216 of Where Did The Towers Go? provides
the first ever (to my knowledge) overview of the locations of toasted
cars. We see the same general diagonal pattern ( \ ) when we take into
account the dust rollout surrounding the wtc site.


North West Corner Car Park.

http://image03.webshots.com/3/7/89/52/2 ... zmf_ph.jpg

South East Corner FDR Drive

http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/9-1 ... 5B1%5D.jpg

Speaking of toasted cars, here is some visual food for thought:
Think about Waves and Holes and Energy Flows

[mathew]

I see waves

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h176/ ... burned.jpg

Holes

http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/index ... 1_1328.jpg

Waves

http://www.darleenclick.com/weblog/arch ... _ruins.jpg

Waves and Twists

http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/200 ... c2.583.jpg

Looks like a crashing wave

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h176/ ... age165.jpg

Holes and Waves

http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/ ... esized.jpg

Con Ed Wave Truck
http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/JellyTruck.jpg

[mathew]

The "Deep Mystery" of Melted Steel

There is no indication that any of the fires in the World Trade Center buildings were hot enough to melt the steel framework. Jonathan Barnett, professor of fire protection engineering, has repeatedly reminded the public that steel--which has a melting point of 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit--may weaken and bend, but does not melt during an ordinary office fire. Yet metallurgical studies on WTC steel brought back to WPI reveal that a novel phenomenon--called a eutectic reaction--occurred at the surface, causing intergranular melting capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese.

Materials science professors Ronald R. Biederman and Richard D. Sisson Jr. confirmed the presence of eutectic formations by examining steel samples under optical and scanning electron microscopes. A preliminary report was published in JOM, the journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society. A more detailed analysis comprises Appendix C of the FEMA report. The New York Times called these findings "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation." The significance of the work on a sample from Building 7 and a structural column from one of the twin towers becomes apparent only when one sees these heavy chunks of damaged metal.

A one-inch column has been reduced to half-inch thickness. Its edges--which are curled like a paper scroll--have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes--some larger than a silver dollar--let light shine through a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see distortion and bending--but not holes.

A eutectic compound is a mixture of two or more substances that melts at the lowest temperature of any mixture of its components. Blacksmiths took advantage of this property by welding over fires of sulfur-rich charcoal, which lowers the melting point of iron. In the World Trade Center fire, the presence of oxygen, sulfur and heat caused iron oxide and iron sulfide to form at the surface of structural steel members. This liquid slag corroded through intergranular channels into the body of the metal, causing severe erosion and a loss of structural integrity.

"The important questions," says Biederman, "are how much sulfur do you need, and where did it come from? The answer could be as simple--and this is scary- as acid rain."

Have environmental pollutants increased the potential for eutectic reactions? "We may have just the inherent conditions in the atmosphere so that a lot of water on a burning building will form sulfuric acid, hydrogen sulfide or hydroxides, and start the eutectic process as the steel heats up," Biederman says. He notes that the sulfur could also have come from contents of the burning buildings, such as rubber or plastics. Another possible culprit is ocean salts, such as sodium sulfate, which is known to catalyze sulfidation reactions on turbine blades of jet engines. "All of these things have to be explored," he says.

From a building-safety point of view, the critical question is: Did the eutectic mixture form before the buildings collapsed, or later, as the remains smoldered on the ground. "We have no idea," admits Sisson. "To answer that, we would need to recreate those fires in the FPE labs, and burn fresh steel of known composition for the right time period, with the right environment." He hopes to have the opportunity to collaborate on thermodynamically controlled studies, and to observe the effects of adding sulfur, copper and other elements. The most important lesson, Sisson and Biederman stress, is that fail-safe sprinkler systems are essential to prevent steel from reaching even 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, because phase changes at the 1,300-degree mark compromise a structure's load-bearing capacity.

The FEMA report calls for further metallurgic investigations, and Barnett, Biederman and Sisson hope that WPI will obtain NIST funding and access to more samples. They are continuing their microscopic studies on the samples prepared by graduate student Jeremy Bernier and Marco Fontecchio, the 2001–02 Helen E. Stoddard Materials Science and Engineering Fellow. (Next year's Stoddard Fellow, Erin Sullivan, will take up this work as part of her graduate studies.) Publication of their results may clear up some mysteries that have confounded the scientific community.

http://www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations ... steel.html

[mathew]

The Book is Now Available on Amazon-

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/061541 ... e=&seller=



About the Publisher-
The New Investigation

The New Investigation was organized to distribute the research efforts of Dr. Judy Wood, BS, MS, PhD. Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 is the beginning of that effort. The name of the company was derived from the constant howls of the faux 9/11 Truth Movement by its leaders to have a "New Investigation" by the same people that they claim committed fraud in the first investigation which never truly was an investigation. While this movement claims to want a New Investigation, Dr. Judy Wood is the only researcher to actually conduct such an investigation. This would include the investigations by the NIST in their NCSTAR reports of the destruction of the World Trade Center.


If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today is your lucky day! This is not only The New Investigation, it is the only comprehensive investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person ie. myself, Dr. Judy Wood has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine what happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.


This book is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in my federal qui tam case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the collapse. The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final. Sadly, this case had no support from the Truth movement, leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).


This book contains physical evidence, not theories or speculation, but physical evidence that is overwhelming and conclusive as to what happened. But for the record, I do not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor do I believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.


This is not a case of belief. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.


The order of crime solving is to determine


1) WHAT happened, then

2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then

3) WHO did it. And only then can we address

4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).


Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.


Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.


My own research is not speculation. It is a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01. I don't address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now. Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.


By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind. The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to my research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.


Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, 9/11 was an inside job, is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that 19 bad guys with box cutters did it. Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.


What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened.


If you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will speak to you and tell you exactly what happened.If you don't know what happened, keep listening to the evidence until you do.The evidence always tells the truth.The key is not to allow yourself to be distracted away from seeing what the evidence is telling you.