the lambright devices

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:53 am

an email; Hi, Dave,

I finally got the tools and a galvanized pole. I cut the pole and bent the pieces to fit around my circle of plastic counter top material. I was wondering how much contact each piece needed. Right now some have contact the entire length from top to bottom and others vary. For instance, one section the pieces only contact at the top. The device will still energize like a pmh should but i fear that i dont have enough contacts to create a good working model. Please give me your opinion. I would really hate to take it apart unnecessarily. This project was very work intensive for me. When I was experimenting with it and recording, I used a large calcite crystal I had found a few years back. It seems as though the aura had a stream coming from the stone in kind of a whirling motion towards the generator. I can describe the aura itself as the same as if i let the gas out of a lighter, in that, it was a very subtle and translucent and it distorted the light reflecting through it in the same way the gas does. This made it impossible for my camera to record and for me to view later. I tried putting a window screen in front of the point of view of the camera as well and my camera simply isn't high quality enough coupled with an old tube television I have to review my videos. I thing that a new flat screen would actually clear up some of the distortions caused by this old T.V. Thanks for your inspiration Dave McTavish
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:20 pm

suggestions?
i am trying to find someone in my area, with a gas finder series FLIR camera. they cost in the 10s of thousands, i just need to image my device first, if there is anything interesting, get a recording of it. i would like any suggestions....thanks, david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby Osmosis » Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:08 am

Hi David,
I read of some video or digital cameras that have had the IR filters removed. This may allow one to see the IR emission better.
Good hunting!
Osmosis
Osmosis
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: San Jose, California

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:04 am

ferro fluid + magnet + saturation
if i suspend a 1/2" cylinder neo magnet by a string and dip it into ferro fluid, i can saturate it to the point that it will not hold any more. add a drop and a drop will fall off, gravity having full effect. OK, now if i add a stack of 10 -1/8" cylinder neo magnets, it is like having a stream, leading to a pond. the small magnets allow the fluid to flow UP to the larger one. the same saturation occurs, if i add a drop, a drop flows off, AND if i use an eye dropper, and pull a drop off, a drop will flow up to replace it. because of this fact, a siphon CAN be started and a continuous flow will take place in the tube. a porous material like earth will do the same thing with water. if you had a large container with a cone shaped island, with water in it, added water till there is some standing in the low end, you could make a well at the highest point. the water level in the well will be higher than at the outer water level, so a slow siphon could be made there too. a valve could be used to adjust the flow out so as not to exceed the wells refill rate, making a continuous flow. this does not bother any physical laws, but rather embraces them. this would mean in a closed system [no evaporation], this system should keep a constant flow forever, gravity being the engine. a continuous flow of water through a tube. natures wheelwork. we know how a water table will raise water, and the physics of a siphon to make it flow in a tube, downward. the only thing is there must be a starting action, but it will flow as long as there is water in system....david.
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:30 pm

expirement
i had a limited amount of ferro fluid but was able to achieve constant flow. the way i did this was to submerge the siphon tube, then carefully keeping both ends in the fluid, bring the inlet of the tube to the top of the magnet/ferro fluid. by keeping the outlet in the fluid, it does not matter if the inlet gets too close to the magnet. then i carefully raised the inlet to the surface of the fluid and absolutely got a constant flow of FF through the tube. if i narrowed the inlet it would help, but it worked! if it were not so messy i would try to film it. i ask that anyone trying these experiments use ALL safety precautions/protection. but it did work!........david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:52 pm

this is a diagram of an experiment i did. if you imagine a flat rubber sheet and the magnets as being dents that allow the ferro fluid to puddle. any place on the surface of the FF around the neo magnets, is EXACTLY like the level of a pond or lake. the small magnets are like a trough leading to a large pool, [big magnet] all of it having the same level, the pool being deeper and wider. there are only 2 forces, attraction/repulsion. i DID this experiment and it absolutely works. a constant flow machine. this flow must be started, not self starting. the ferro fluid will easily climb 2, 5, 10 feet, up a neo magnet chain....david http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format ... usflow.png
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:03 pm

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us could this be how Ed was able to collect this energy??...david a note::::this shape was posted by someone else previously at another forum....thanks
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:07 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ges-FQmYrk another video trying to show the flow of this energy and a brief explanation...thanks, david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:48 pm

temperature
if you think of this like temperature, imagine a room, and ambient [neutral] temperature is a plane [horiz] in the middle of the room. one inch equals one degree difference, up or down. when temperature of an object is higher than the surrounding air, it will radiate an upflowing convection current that distorts the image [like a mirage does]until the temp is neutral again .one inch/degree is not much, but if there is a large temp difference, there will be a large flow. with these devices, the energy flows this same way. the farther away from neutral, the more flow can be made. when these devices are spinning, they can throw off extra G energy, and push up extra L [levity] energy. if i use the same neutral point for gravity, i can make an analogy. at earths surface, an object has more of the G in it, giving it "weight". if some of the G is removed, L will be added, and if i get enough G out and L in, i can get an object to be neutral [buoyant]. this energy permeates everything and is what fluidity really is. i held a small chain at the N pole and at ONE single spot above [off axis], there was enough L energy to lift the end link up just a tiny bit. if i place the wire hook at that same place, and put a magnet on the ground rod [tube] at the equator, i get a small flow happening, up the wire into the chain and back into the air. this is visible and distorts the visual like a mirage does. just like heat does, except no heat. although there is a "warm" sensation where the L upflow is happening.......more soon, david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:44 pm

david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:12 am

Ed Leedskalnin said he figured out how the ancient stone masons cut and moved HUGE blocks of stone. places like puma-punku, balbek in lebanon etc. i believe him. working with variations of his PMH and the generator at coral castle, i found that these devices generate a visible radiation field around them. i posted videos on how to build these devices on my youtube channel, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjh5OE6yerk. replicators built copies and verified my findings. what i see is a field around the devices that looks like a mirage or the "heat" coming off a hot object. this distortion is usually seen where there is energy moving upwards, like convection, away from gravity. it has been seen above electrical devices that produce large magnetic fields. it seems that where this distortion is, there is energy associated with it. i believe that Edward Leedskalnin's generator was able to make a flow of what he coined "magnetic current". not electricity, but a flow of magnetic energy. Fran De Aquino, has shown that there are different ways to achieve gravity control. i believe that John Hutchinson's effect uses the same energy as Aquino and this is the same energy Leedskalnin used with his devices. in my videos, i have a 14 pound quartz geode that i can spin with just two fingers when held near my device. i have tried to capture this energy on video but it is very subtle. Hutchinson has made metals do strange things, like get soft, come apart and levitate. i believe that Leedskalnin was able to use these currents to "soften" the stone before he cut it. some of the marks left on the stones he cut look like they were "melted". because the energy field i re-discovered is visible, is very important since the meters we have today have a hard time detecting these current flows. Aquino stated; "From the technical point of view, there are several applications for this discovery; possibly it will change the paradigms of energy generation, transportation and telecommunications." i believe this to be true. i believe that Leedskalnin's device is able to make a PURER flow of energy, made without the use electricity, using centrifugal force to start a flow of magnetic current. i believe he was able to make this energy flow in a wire, so he could use it at a remote location. a flame burns away from gravity, artificial or natural. a flame on a centrifuge burns towards the center axis. i am searching for the energy we see in rising heat,[convection?]. i believe that energy in heat is a separate thing and can be made separately. i also believe that this energy is all around us, is what every thing is made of, and very very strong. every day more and more evidence is coming to light to prove this. i am not very smart, but i am very curious and there are so many things we know nothing about. i just hope that what i have found/seen in my experiments will help us all to understand gravity/magnetism a little better. thanks, david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:12 am

the only way Ed could have did the things he did is if his generator was really a gravitational dipole generator. reading Jeongs stuff, it makes sense. the center of mass shift has to be what he was after. the way he describes dipolar magnetic current, N repelsN, attracts S, so dipole gravity follows the same rules as magnetism? Eds photo of him w/ his hand on the generator, he is collecting energy from the equator and at the poles. that way there is a differential he could now utilize. like linear and radial energy being N and S poles of the same field. a PMH holds a force, everybody knows this. it is di polar and bi directional, existing in the metal of a PMH. analogy; from a point a line becomes a circle. it seems that the metal he used allowed near superfluid velocities of flow. i believe this is why there is optical distortion around these devices. he separated the poles with a centrifuge, [he only needed to achieve over 1 G to fully divide the poles] and really make dipole gravity. an iron wire will hold this energy. by limiting either one of the poles, using a single wire ran through a bottle wound with wire, the surface areas being different was able to achieve directional flow of energy at remote locations. [i hope this makes some kind of sense]. he could use either pole, like he could control which pole was flowing from a wire. like water in a hose , polarized energy, flowing from the wire, either more N or more S flowing back to the earths field. lets say that S is the pole and N the equator. they ARE the same energy, one being a line, the other a spinning disc. there is a point where these are equal in energy. an infinite point on a scale. adding either pole would tip the balance.a cut stone; adding more N attracts more S into the stone. N being the heavier end of the scale attracts more S. S being the other side of the scale pushes against gravity. think about how heat "rises". we see energy dissipating like a mirage from a heat source, always rising. adding more N would reverse this until the "dissipating energy" would flow from the opposite side of the stone AGAINST earths gravity. this is why i saw what looked like "heat" distortion UNDER the stone in one of his photos. there must be a universal field, there also must exist an infinite place, from which every thing we are and know arises. a zero point that is as deep as the universe is vast.
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:48 pm

just wanted to say that lizze had all this figured out a long time ago, lizzie thank you
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:58 am

hi
Comment on your video: MAGNETIC LEAD !
"I was able to magnetize bismuth and zinc. I will post video soon!! I wasn't able to see the dimension of the toroid P.M.H. that you used so I guessed and had a local fabrication shop roll a 7' by 5/8" thick steel bar for me and it has a little more than a two foot inner circumference. It will lock with a 12v low amps tap but I used a car battery to do my experiments for the amperage" ...; this was posted by coffinboxman on my youtube channel. i apologize for not getting the experiments you all have requested on video, it is not as easy as seems. i would love nothing more than to have PROOF on video of my claims, but here's the thing, i am not trying to prove that this energy is REAL, i am trying to show how different this energy field is from ANYTHING i have seen before. bear with me please, i know there is lots of interest in this, but if this energy was easy to see or measure or capture an image of, it would have been done long ago. there should not be any question as to whether or not it is real, enough people have seen it or have replicated these devices and seen and felt the things i describe, for themselves, to answer that question. i have said form the beginning how subtle and difficult it is to see, [a flowing energy field], let alone to capture images of. i really believe that there must be some frame dragging happening at the center of my device. the optical illusion created when it is rotated VERY slowly and then stopped, i am talking a single revolution here, distorts the view too much for too long to be explained away as moot. i will try something. rather than trying to image what i see and then try to point it out to you, i have drawn some diagrams that i will video, in the hope to better illustrate what i am seeing. i am also hoping that you will let me know if this helps at all. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUvLir6eO2M
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Mon May 28, 2012 4:58 am

david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

PreviousNext

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest