On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:32 pm

Supernova
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/13Mar41.html
In our Milky Way galaxy, about 800 light years away and about 11,400 years ago, a supernova exploded in the constellation Vela.

According to Johnston, van Straten, Kramer, and Bailes in their paper “High time-resolution observations of the Vela pulsar”, they say the Vela supernova pulsar may have had a binary companion neutron star that is now ploughing a channel through the supernova remnant cloud, creating an X-ray feature that is asymmetric with respect to the supernova remnant cloud.

The neutron star binary companion to the Vela supernova pulsar may, as it is a neutron star, be the remnant neutron star of the supernova of about 3 to 10 million years ago that formed the Gum Nebula, which now from Earth looks like a shell with radius about 20 degrees. In comparison (see Kaufmann - Universe (4th ed) - Freeman 1994), the sun and moon each cover about half a degree.

Now, the Vela supernova remnant is expanding into the old remnant of the Gum supernova.

According to Timothy Ferris (Coming of age in the Milky Way, William Morrow & Co. 1988) the Sumerians, who were living on the plains of the Tigris-Euphrates, identified the supernova with their god Ea, who invented writing and agriculture, and the Egyptians identified it with their goddess Seshat, the principal wife of Thoth, and may have represented it by the Great Pyramid at Giza.

The Vela X supernova may have roughly coincided with the primary breakup of a large parent comet of Comet Encke and the Taurid meteors. Could radiation from the Vela X supernova have heated the dark surface of comets in the Oort cloud, creating jets of gas and dust, so perturbing the orbits of the comets, and causing the large Encke/Taurid parent comet to enter the inner solar system and break up when it encountered more intense solar radiation?

If Sitchin's Sumerian Solar System body Nibiru, with period (as known to the Sumerians) of roughly 3600 years, were a Comet, then maybe it could have been Comet Hale-Bopp (a conjecture that came from e-mail discussion with Ron Nye).

Since the last period of Comet Hale-Bopp was about 4200 years, if its preceding two periods were each about 3600 years, then Hale-Bopp would have had a perihelion about 11,400 years ago, which is about the time of the Vela X supernova. Therefore, it is possible that Comet Hale-Bopp could have been affected by supernova Vela X.

Could radiation from the Vela X supernova, particularly neutrinos, have changed rates of Solar nuclear reactions involving nuetrinos and so have increased the Sun's luminosity?

Could such increased Solar luminosity have perturbed the comets in the Oort cloud?

Could Vela X, by either dust or impacts from comet/meteor fragments of the Encke/Taurid parent comet, or altered Solar luminosity, have affected the Earth's climate
contributing to the melting of the glaciers at the beginning of the Holocene Age?
Comet Ekcke
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/encke.html#Encke
Given the incompleteness and uncertainties of observations, and uncertainties of calculations, and the rough estimate nature of the scales of time that I use, I take the size of the parent comet to be roughly 100 km, roughly the size of Hale-Bopp or Sarabat, and the initial breakup of Comet Encke to be about 12,000 years ago, roughly coincident with the Vela X Supernova and with the end of the Ice Age, and secondary breakups to have occurred about 4,500 years ago and about 1,500 years ago.

Observers on Earth see the Taurids as appearing to come from a radiant point in Taurus near the Pleiades.

12,000 years ago, when the Ice Age ended, they might have seen a spectacular cometary display near the Pleiades, as the Earth could have encountered a lot of comet dust that might have affected its climate, all with the Vela X supernova appearing in the south.

In his book Rogue Asteroids and Doomsday Comets (John Wiley, 1995), Duncan Steel says a majority view of the consequences to Earth of major comet/meteor impact is that:

9,000 years ago, after one 3,000 year period, and after 3000 years of greenhouse effect, the Earth entered a 3,000 year period of good climate. Then there might have been another encounter.

6,000 years ago, when the good climate ended, perhaps due to a severe encounter with the 3000 year periodicity.

There may have been a thousand years or so of greenhouse effect before the Earth's climate stabilized at the beginning of recorded human history about 5,000 years ago.

3,000 years ago when the Iron Age began, the Zhou defeated the Shang in China, the short-lived monotheistic reign of Akhenaton ended in Egypt, and Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt, the Chinese recorded that a comet (perhaps this comet) appeared.

The Tunguska Impact of 30 June 1908 may have been due to an Encke fragment associated with the Beta Taurid meteors.

Now Comet Hale-Bopp is appearing, with a 3,000 year period (give or take 1,000 years or so).


Capricorn Mythology, What is it about?
http://www.serendipity-astrolovers.com/ ... ology.html
Capricorn Mythology in ancient Sumeria was associated with the planet Saturn and the Mesopotamian god Enki.
Speculative Cosmologies
http://saturniancosmology.org/other.php
Following are some alternative cosmologies which do not explain or do not hold together, even though many are well researched. I have added my comments only as needed. Most are not so much complete cosmologies as they are explications of catastrophic events in the era from 10,000 BC to the 7th century BC. Most take for granted the current state of the Solar System and the handed-down narratives of its genesis.

From an article in Atlantis Rising Magazine describing the work of Zecharia Sitchin, "The 12th Planet" (1976) and additional books, "The Stairway to Heaven" (1980), "The Wars of Gods and Men" (1985), "The Lost Realms" (1990), "When Time Began" (1993).

"This planet, claims Sitchin, has a very eccentric orbit traveling from far beyond Pluto, cutting across the orbits of the rest of the planets, and then half-circling the Sun between Mars and Jupiter, taking 3,600 Earth years in the process."

Nothing, of course, has ever been sighted of a 10th planet. Notice that Sitchin lacks the imagination to extend the wonders of the past beyond the objects, desires, and thinking of his own milieu.

Planet X, or alternately 'Nemeses', or 'Nibiru' after Sitchin, or some such interloper, is the topic at Andy Lloyd's website, to be followed by a book titled "The Dark Star."

Following is a brief quote from the opening page of the website.

".. the potential for a small brown dwarf to be found orbiting the Sun is not only scientifically plausible, but would enable us to tie up a great number of loose ends in ancient religion and mythology."

"The recent discovery of the minor planet Sedna lends credence to this claim on a number of levels.
As I have pointed out, the small brown dwarf was Saturn. Sedna is a very small rock which will hardly answer to the requirements. A more likely 'companion' to the Sun is the star Sirius, but way too far away to have any effect.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:41 am

Sirius C could be a red/brown dwarf that flares; such “flaring” resembles a pulsar. However, pulsars usually have a massive white dwarf companion. Is Sirius B such a star? If so, is Sirius B a magnetar, a “magnetic white dwarf” or “neutron star” with Sirius A as its primary companion?

Did the implosion of Sirius B cause the Vela supernova?

http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 525#p39707

Electric Cosmos
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/hrdiagr.htm
In the ES model the important variable is: current density (Amps/sq m) at the star's photospheric surface. If a star's current density increases, the arc discharges on its surface (photospheric granules) get hotter, change color (away from red, toward blue-white), and get brighter. The absolute luminosity of a star, therefore, depends on two main variables: current density at its effective surface, and its size (the star's diameter).

The first region on the lower right of the diagram is where the current density has such a low value that double layers (DLs) (photospheric granules) are not needed by the plasma surrounding the (anode) star. This is the region of the brown and red "dwarfs" and giant gas planets. Recent discoveries of extremely cool L - Type and T - Type dwarfs has required the original diagram to be extended to the lower right. These 'stars' have extremely low absolute luminosity and temperature.

Continuing toward the left, beyond the "knee of the curve", all these stars (K through B) are completely covered with tufts (have complete photospheres), their luminosity no longer grows as rapidly as before. But, the farther to the left we go (the higher the current density), the brighter the tufts become, and so the stars' luminosities do continue to increase. The situation is analogous to turning up the current in an electric arc welding machine. The increased brightness of the arcs accounts for the upward slope of the line toward the left.

When we get to the upper left end of the main sequence, what kind of stars are these? This is the region of O type, blue-white, high temperature (35,000+ K) stars. As we approach the far upper-left of the HR diagram (region of highest current density), the stars are under extreme electrical stress - too many Amps per sq. meter. Their absolute luminosities approach 100,000 times the Sun's. Even farther out to the upper left is the region of Wolf-Rayet stars. Extreme electrical stress can lead to such a star's splitting into parts, perhaps explosively. Such explosions are called novae. The splitting process is called fissioning. A characteristic of Wolf-Rayet stars is that they are losing mass rapidly.

If a sphere of fixed volume splits into two smaller (equal sized) spheres, the total surface area of the newly formed pair will be about 26% larger than the area of the original sphere. So, to reduce the current density it is experiencing, an electrically stressed, blue-white star may explosively fission into two or more stars. This provides an increase in total surface area and so results in a reduced level of current density on the (new) stars' surfaces.

The final distribution of mass and current density is sensitive to the mechanics of the splitting process. Such a process can only be violent - possibly resulting in a nova eruption. Some mass may be lost to the plasma cloud that later can appear as a planetary nebula or nova-remnant that surrounds the binary pair.
Star Summary
http://www.bookrags.com/eb/star-eb/
The table lists data pertaining to the 20 brightest stars, or, more precisely, stellar systems, since some of them are double (binary stars) or even triple stars. All the primary stars (designated as the A component in the table) are intrinsically as bright as or brighter than the Sun; some of the companion stars are fainter.

The table lists information about the 20 nearest known stars. Only three stars, Alpha Centauri, Procyon, and Sirius, appear both in this table and in the table of the 20 brightest stars. Ironically, most of the relatively nearby stars are dimmer than the Sun and are invisible without the aid of a telescope.

The stars listed fall roughly into three categories: (1) giant stars and supergiant stars having sizes of tens or even hundreds of solar radii and extremely low average densities; (2) dwarf stars having sizes ranging from 0.1 to 5 solar radii and masses from 0.1 to about 10 solar masses; and (3) white dwarf stars having masses comparable to that of the Sun but dimensions appropriate to planets, meaning that their average densities are hundreds of thousands of times greater than that of water.

The second category is identified with what is called the main sequence and includes stars that emit energy mainly by converting hydrogen into helium in their cores. The first category comprises stars that have exhausted the hydrogen in their cores and are burning hydrogen within a shell surrounding the core. The white dwarfs represent the final stage in the life of a typical star, when most available sources of energy have been exhausted and the star has become relatively dim.
Red dwarf stars within 10 parsecs
http://www.solstation.com/stars/pc10rds.htm
Many dim, red (M) dwarf stars exhibit unusually violent flare activity for their size and brightness. These flare stars are actually common because red dwarfs appear to make up more than two-thirds of all stars in our galaxy.
Are Jupiter and Saturn Brown Dwarfs, Not Planets?
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/sc ... anets/5140
Another remarkable feature of brown dwarfs is their constant radius; they are all about the same diameter as Jupiter. The heaviest brown dwarfs are not larger than the smallest, massive planets, only much denser and therefore much heavier.

Distinguishing them from huge planets is difficult because the diameter of all brown dwarfs is about the same. Anything more than 10X the mass of Jupiter is very unlikely to be a planet.

The strongest spectral emission of brown dwarfs is in the infrared and that is how present day astronomers study them. Old brown dwarfs will accumulate methane in their atmosphere, a compound often taken to indicate active organic molecule kinetics. Atmospheric temperatures of brown dwarfs range from 2500K to 750K.
Brown Dwarves
http://www.daviddarling.info/encycloped ... dwarf.html
A sub-stellar object – one that is intermediate in mass between a star and a planet; brown dwarfs (which are not really brown but a very dull red) are sometimes described as "failed stars" because they are not massive enough to have initiated hydrogen in their cores. They are also commonly referred to as "missing links" between gas giants, such as Jupiter, and red dwarfs, which are the smallest, lowest-mass true stars.
Brown Dwarves
http://members.fortunecity.com/oerlicon ... Dwarf.html
M dwarf systems often have multiple components which include spectroscopic as well as wide binaries. Since brighter substellar companions are expected in younger systems, they should be associated with Me (hydrogen emission) dwarfs and flare stars which display coronal activity.

The discovery of four field methane ("T''-type) brown dwarfs using Two Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) data has provided new and useful information. One additional methane dwarf, previously discovered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, was also identified. Near-infrared spectra clearly show the 1.6 and 2.2 mm CH4 absorption bands characteristic of objects with Teff<~1300 K as well as broadened H2O bands at 1.4 and 1.9 mm.
Finally, an Image of an Extra-Solar Planet
http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/stu/archive_ ... _2005.html
On April 30, an international team of astronomers reported confirmation of the discovery of a giant planet, approximately five times the mass of Jupiter that is gravitationally bound to a young brown dwarf. This puts an end to a year-long discussion on the nature of this object, which started with the detection of a red object close to the brown dwarf.

In February and March of this year, the astronomers took new images of the young brown dwarf and its giant planet companion with the NACO instrument on ESO's Very Large Telescope in northern Chile. The planet is near the southern constellation of Hydra and approximately 200 light-years from Earth.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 825#p21837
Brown dwarfs, thought just a few years ago to be incapable of emitting any significant amounts of radio waves, have been discovered putting out extremely bright "lighthouse beams" of radio waves, much like pulsars. These beams rotate with the brown dwarf, and we see them when the beam passes over the Earth. This is the same way we see pulses from pulsars," said Gregg Hallinan of the National University of Ireland Galway. "We now think brown dwarfs may be a missing link between pulsars and planets in our own Solar System, which also emit, but more weakly," he added.
The energy emitted in the brown dwarf flare was comparable to a small solar flare, and was a billion times greater than observed X-ray flares from Jupiter. The flaring energy is believed to come from a twisted magnetic field. "This is the strongest evidence yet that brown dwarfs and possibly young giant planets have magnetic fields, and that a large amount of energy can be released in a flare," said Dr. Eduardo Martin, also of Caltech and a member of the team.
Electric Cosmos
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/hrdiagr.htm
Although pulsars do not occupy a specific place in the HR diagram, it is worth noting that they, too, have characteristics that are most comfortably explained via the ES model. Pulsars are stars that have extremely short periods of variability in their production of EM radiation (both light and radio frequency emissions). When they were first discovered it was thought that they rotated rapidly like lighthouses. When the observed rate of "rotation" got up to about once per second for certain pulsars, despite their having masses exceeding that of the sun, the official explanation became untenable.

Instead, the concept of the "neutron star" was invented. It was proposed that only such a dense material could make up a star that could stand those rotation speeds. But, one of the basic rules of nuclear chemistry is the 'zone of stability'. This is the observation that if we add neutrons to the nucleus of any atom, we need to add an almost proportional number of protons (and their accompanying electrons) to maintain a stable nucleus. In fact, it seems that when we consider all the natural elements (and the heavy man made elements as well), there is a requirement that in order to hold a group of neutrons together in a nucleus, a certain number of proton-electron pairs are required. The stable nuclei of the lighter elements contain approximately equal numbers of neutrons and protons, a neutron/proton ratio of 1. The heavier nuclei contain a few more neutrons than protons, but the limit seems to be 1.5 neutrons per proton. Nuclei that differ significantly from this ratio spontaneously undergo radioactive transformations that tend to bring their compositions into or closer to this ratio.

Some pulsars oscillate with periods in the millisecond range. Their radio pulse characteristics are: the 'duty cycle' is typically 5% (i.e., the pulsar flashes like a strobe light - the duration of each output pulse is much shorter than the length of time between pulses); some individual pulses are quite variable in intensity; the polarization of the pulse implies the origin has a strong magnetic field; magnetic fields require electrical currents. These characteristics are consistent with an electrical arc (lightning) interaction between two closely spaced binary stars.

On August 6, 2000, and October 15, 2000, the orbiting X-ray telescope Chandra discovered a pulsar at the geometric center of the supernova remnant known as G11.2-0.3. This observation provides strong evidence that the pulsar was formed in the supernova of 386 AD, which was also witnessed by Chinese astronomers. The official description of the image included the words:

Upon examination, the image of the central star reveals that it is at the center of a 'cigar shaped' plasma discharge, not a 'bizarre wind nebula'. Although no binary companion has (yet) been found, the presence of the observed plasma discharge makes one suspect it is only a matter of time.

Each new discovery of a binary pair of stars, one of which is either a variable star or pulsar, at the center of a nova remnant, is one more piece of evidence that Juergens' electric star model and Thornhill's theory of the fissioning of those electric stars are both valid.
Pulsar
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/P/pulsar.html
Although most pulsars are thought to form during supernovae, mounting evidence suggests that some originate as white dwarfs. Matter transfer is again the underlying phenomenon at work. If a white dwarf acquires enough mass from a close companion and doesn't somehow manage to get rid of it, as in a nova outburst, for example, it will eventually collapse to become a neutron star and may be seen as a pulsar.
Vela Pulsar
http://www.daviddarling.info/encycloped ... ulsar.html
A pulsar is associated with the Vela Supernova Remnant and lying at a distance of about 815 light-years in the constellation Vela. It is one of the youngest pulsars known and one of the few that has been detected at visible wavelengths. The lengthening of its short period of 89 milliseconds by 10.7 nanoseconds per day gives a maximum age of some 11,000 years. In 1977, nine years of its discovery, it was seen to be flashing at visible wavelengths and thus became the second optical pulsar on record, after the Crab Pulsar. It is also one of the strongest radio pulsars, the strongest gamma-ray source in the sky, and a powerful X-ray source associated with Vela X-2.
Pulsar Planets
http://www.daviddarling.info/encycloped ... rplan.html
The discoveries of several other planets around millisecond pulsars, made using the pulsar timing method, have since been announced, though in most cases these are awaiting confirmation. Millisecond pulsars are believed to spin so fast because they have acquired material from a companion star. Planets could condense from some of this material as it entered an accretion disk in orbit around the pulsar.
Electric Magnetars
http://www.the-electric-universe.info/S ... etars.html
All magnetic fields are produced electrically, also the field of magnetars. The new model is based on the positive charge which is collected in the presupernova´s core via the different masses and sizes of proton and electron.

The supernova implosion produces neutrons but only from proton-electron pairs. The protons in overbalance will be fixed on the surface of the neutron body and create a magnetic field and a synchrotron-radiation via rotation. The enclosed proton-bubbles swim upwards. The biggest proton-bubble surfaces first and explodes into space. This "proton-volcano" kicks the neutron star from the center of the SNR. The later proton-explosions produce only proton-jets.

Magnetic and rotational axes are identical, but the pulsar pulses. This old model cannot explain this identity and also the non-axial jet.

The proton has a 1836 times larger mass than the electron. Because of this asymmetry, the protons have a 43 times lower velocity than the electrons of the same temperature due to the Boltzmann-equation. The core will be positively charged since more electrons than protons leave the core.

The electric current of a neutron star is in order of 1020 A which does not flow in the body but it rotates with the body in this model. Therefore, this star does not need power for sustaining its magnetic field. Only the rotation of the protons emits synchrotron radiation which calculably consumes the rotational energy very slowly and very evenly. This spin down due to the synchrotron radiation is well known.

What is the difference between pulsars and magnetars?

Pulsars contain fewer protons.

Why is the burst of a magnetar invisible?

Because it is cold. The eruption of protons causes filaments due to the rule that parallel currents attract each other. No collision among protons is possible. Therefore the HST does not see the X ray-jets of the Crab pulsar!
Magnetars
http://solomon.as.utexas.edu/~duncan/magnetar.html
Soft gamma repeaters ("SGRs") are X-ray stars that emit bright, repeating flashes of soft (i.e. low-energy) gamma rays. The physical nature of these stars was a mystery for many years. In 1992, it was proposed that SGRs are magnetically-powered neutron stars, or magnetars. Subsequent observational studies lent support to this hypothesis. Astronomers now think that all emissions detected from SGRs and from a related class of stars known as anomalous X-ray pulsars ("AXPs") are powered by magnetic field decay. Here I will explain how these strange, physically-extreme stars form, and why they emit steadily pulsating X-rays with sporadic, bright outbursts. I will also tell the story of their discovery and of the theoretical efforts which helped to reveal their bizarre nature.
A MASSIVE WHITE DWARF COMPANION TO THE ECCENTRIC BINARY PULSAR SYSTEM PSR B2303146
http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-4357/516 ... _1_L25.pdf
Pulsars in close eccentric binary systems are usually assumed to have another neutron star as a companion.

We present deep B, V, and R images of the field containing the eccentric binary pulsar system PSR B2303146. We find a faint, blue object [B 526.6050.09; (B2R) 5 20.450.2] coincident with the timing position. We suggest that this object is the 0optical counterpart to the PSR B2303146 system. The counterpart is too bright to reflect emission from the pulsar or a neutron star companion. Most likely, the companion of PSR B2303146 is not a neutron star but a massive white dwarf.
Mass-Radius Relation for Magnetic White Dwarfs
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/530/2/949/fulltext
Recently, several white dwarfs with very strong surface magnetic fields have been observed. In this paper we explore the possibility that such stars could have sufficiently strong internal fields to alter their structure. We obtain a revised white dwarf mass-radius relation in the presence of strong internal magnetic fields.

As relics of stellar interiors, the study of the magnetic fields in and around degenerate stars should give important information on the role such fields play in star formation and stellar evolution. However, the origin and evolution of stellar magnetic fields remains obscure.

Although white dwarfs in binaries with well-determined masses do not appear to have surface magnetic fields larger than 105 G, internal fields of order 1012 G could be well hidden below the surface.
Origin of Key Cosmic Explosions Still a Mystery
http://www.physorg.com/news198169743.html
Astronomers have very strong evidence that Type Ia supernovae come from exploding stellar remnants called white dwarfs. To detonate, the white dwarf must gain mass until it reaches a tipping point and can no longer support itself.

There are two leading scenarios for the intermediate step from stable white dwarf to supernova, both of which require a companion star. In the first possibility, a white dwarf swallows gas blowing from a neighboring giant star. In the second possibility, two white dwarfs collide and merge. To establish which option is correct (or at least more common), astronomers look for evidence of these binary systems.

That conclusion relies on the assumption that accreting white dwarfs will appear as super-soft X-ray sources when the incoming matter experiences nuclear fusion.
Mass of Sirius' Companion is Measured
http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/stu/archive_ ... _2005.html
For astronomers, it has always been a source of frustration that the nearest white dwarf star is buried in the glow of the brightest star in the nighttime sky. This burned-out stellar remnant is a faint companion of the brilliant blue-white Dog Star, Sirius, located in the winter constellation Canis Major. Now, an international team of astronomers has used the keen eye of NASA's Hubble Space Telescope to isolate the light from the white dwarf, Sirius B.

The new results allow them to measure precisely the white dwarf's mass based on how its intense gravitational field alters the wavelengths of light emitted by the star. Such spectroscopic measurements of Sirius B taken with a telescope looking through the Earth's atmosphere have been severely contaminated by scattered light from the very bright Sirius.

Sirius B has a diameter of 7,500 miles, less than the size of Earth, but it is much more dense. Its powerful gravitational field is 350,000 times greater than Earth's, meaning that a 150-pound person would weigh 50 million pounds standing on its surface. Light from the surface of the hot white dwarf has to climb out of this gravitational field and is stretched to longer, redder wavelengths of light in the process.

Based on the Hubble measurements of the redshift, made with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph in February 2004, the team found that Sirius B has a mass that is 98% that of the sun. Sirius itself has a mass of two times that of the sun and a diameter of 1.5 million miles. The Hubble observations have also refined the measurement of Sirius B's surface temperature to be 44,900° Fahrenheit. Sirius itself has a surface temperature of 18,000° Fahrenheit.
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable
http://groups.google.ci/group/alt.astro ... c?lnk=raot
With Sirius we may never get any closer than one light year, although previous encounters of 0.1 ly and possibly even 0.086 ly might have been the norm back 250<500 MY when there was originally so much extra gravity influence (<25e30 kg) to work with; and it’s otherwise exactly as though the Sirius star system had lost or rather blown away considerable mass a couple of times (possibly including the loss of Sirius C); and perhaps it’ll happen once more as Sirius (B) eventually rebuilds itself <1.4+ solar mass and once again goes crazy on us; plus Sirius (A) should start becoming a red giant, and obviously this nearby stellar outcome only gets a whole lot worse for us if Sirius (B) merges with Sirius (A). Also, imagine how much extra bluish vibrant Sirius (B) of <8.5 Ms had to have been long before becoming that red supergiant which only somewhat recently (64<128 MYBP) terminated into becoming a white dwarf.

Our current elliptical closing velocity with Sirius is only 7.6 km/s (roughly 7 fold faster than Sedna), of perhaps an increasing orbital period of 105,000 ~ 110,000 years, as well as that of our predictably speeding up as we get closer. In other words, it’s technically impossible for us to not be gravitationally linked by those substantial tidal forces imposed by the still massive Sirius star/solar system, and this should be especially obvious since we’re clearly headed back towards Sirius. The only ones objecting to this interpretation are of course the most devout ZNRs and their mainstream army of brown-nosed minions that continually topic/author stalk and bash all other interpretations for sport.
SIRIUS THE DOG STAR - THE LOST AND MISSING STAR
http://www.greatdreams.com/dogstar.htm
The more massive star (A) of a binary is called the primary, and the less massive (B) is called the secondary; e.g., Sirius A and Sirius B are the primary and secondary components of the Sirius system.

Although most binary stars have distance between them, the components of W Ursae Majoris binaries are actually in contact with each other, their mutual gravity distorting their shapes into teardrops. There are binary systems in which one member is a pulsar: PSR 1913+16, for example, has an orbital period of 7 hr 45 min; in this case the other star is also a neutron star. The orbit period decreases as the system loses energy in the form of gravitational waves.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:05 am

Was Sirius B the original Saturn?

Did the implosion of Sirius B cause the Vela supernova? Is Sirius B the “neutron star" binary companion to the “Vela supernova pulsar? Is Sirius C the Vela supernova pulsar?

Or could Sirius C really be our sun? Or is Sirius C a brown dwarf sun? If the planet Saturn was originally a brown dwarf sun, then is Saturn really Sirius C?
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 540#p39939
Given the incompleteness and uncertainties of observations, and uncertainties of calculations, and the rough estimate nature of the scales of time that I use, I take the size of the parent comet to be roughly 100 km, roughly the size of Hale-Bopp or Sarabat, and the initial breakup of Comet Encke to be about 12,000 years ago, roughly coincident with the Vela X Supernova and with the end of the Ice Age, and secondary breakups to have occurred about 4,500 years ago and about 1,500 years ago.
Capricorn Mythology in ancient Sumeria was associated with the planet Saturn and the Mesopotamian god Enki.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 240#p34986
The name 'Sothis' seems to naturally fit the intents and the magical inclinations of the Lodge: Sothis/Sirius B is the dark star of Set, the ancient stellar body mysteriously 'discovered' more than 5000 years ago by the Dogons of Mali, and from which the darkest currents of magic emanate. Sothis is connected to Emme Ya (Sirius C), a bizarre star that constitutes the closest astronomical match to the concept of Black Sun, and from which Atlantean Lore says that many of the entities and intelligences today known in Pantheons sprang from. So, Sothis stands as the stellar, pulsating centre of the Draconian Current and of the energies that move the opposite side of creation - Sothis as 'Astrum Nigrum' (Black Star), soul of Black Isis and cosmic vehicle of Set.
In Hecate's Fountain, Kenneth Grant speaks of the planet Emme Ya in the Sirius star-system as the origin of the Loa—Voudoo goddesses and gods, the Orisha in Yoruba tradition. The Dogon know Emme Ya—Star of Women—as the planet of the primal goddess, the Orisha Yemoja. Mother of all African goddesses and gods, Her name—Mother of Fish—recalls ancient tales of the amphibious Nommos, powerful beings of god-like stature who brought civilization to earth from the star system of Sirius, and whom the Babylonians knew as the Musari.
Lucifer is the goddess of the Black Sun which is truly the great dragon Typhon the mother of all creation and of humanity. Typhon’s self begotten son was Sut the ancient Egyptian god which was Sothis or Sirius. Which in later reckonings Sut was then named after the planet Saturn which was called in earlier times in history concerning Christianity Satan, or Lucifer. Lucifer is not just female or male Lucifer is androgynous, meaning that this very ancient creator is both female and male.
Bizarre Hexagon Spotted On Saturn
http://www.christian-forum.net/index.ph ... opic=10415
The name "Saturn", who is also Kronos “the horned one” (Chronus: the “god of time”)--- the god who comes to devour his children by fire, is in the Chaldean Mysteries of ancient Mesopotamia pronounced "Satũr" but, as every Chaldean scholar knows, consists only of four letters, thus it is spelled “Stũr”. He is called the “Hidden God”, for his identity is hidden to the uninitiated, but to the inner circle of the Chaldean Mysteries, he is known, thus the inner circle of the Masonic Lodge, the Freemasons, know the Hidden God as “Satan”. This name equates to the numeric triad “666”, the number of the “Beast”:

Though one may interpret this sign in application to world events and the soon appearance of the “man of lawlessness” and that the emergence of the “Beast” is at hand, simultaneously, it deals with actual celestial phenomenon, astrophysics, and the effects of the approaching binary star system “Wormwood” (the “Dragon Tree”), being Sirius, which is the missing half of our Solar System formerly a Trinary System that originally contained 14 celestial members, 3 stars and 11 planets. This is the “Great Mystery of Ages”.

Technically, the god Saturn (Cronus, Osiris) is the star Sirius B, which was our original paternal star, and the hexagonal construct on the planet Saturn is caused by an electromagnetic stellar arc influence from the approaching binary star system Sirius that was formerly unified with our Solar System. Sirius consists of Sirius B and Sirius A (the goddess star), these stars where originally within our former Osirian (Cronian) Stellar System and were “personified” into deities and worshipped by past human civilization as gods. Sirius A was the outer “encompassing” star that orbited the “body” of the whole system, and thusly so, “she” was considered the “head” of the “body”. She was the “Queen of Heaven” seen in the night sky and in the morning, being the “Morning Star”. Jeremiah warned the Israelites not to worship the Queen of Heaven (Jeremiah 7:18).

The children of Saturn, Sirius B, are the Sun (technically Sirius C: “Horus/Zeus”), which is technically Sirius C and the 10 planets. Whereas, Sirius A is the “Great Mother Goddess of the Gods”, e.g. mother of these 11 celestial members, called the “Brood of Tiamat”. Hence, Saturn/Kronos, the Hidden God, comes to devour the planets and our Sun (his children) by fire. Sirius B is the “Hidden God” because it is a White Dwarf Star that is virtually non-ocular (invisible). This coming extinction level event which I have identified as the “Sirian-Solar Reconvergence” (a 12,000-year recurrent event) is conveyed in the Bowl Judgments of Revelation. Sirius will pass between our Sun and the Earth and escalate the mean surface temperature of the Earth from 59º to 3,500º. The planet Venus will actually have its entire surface re-moltenized into a pan-magmatic sea, and it will shine bright as the full moon. All drinkable water on Earth will evaporate into a suspended perpetual dense cloud cover, making Earth a desert planet with 500 to 1,500 mph hypercyclonic winds; people will be forced to live underground. The food chain will collapse and famine will be a global pandemic.

Now, a hexagon is composed of six equilateral triangles of which each of the triangles have sides of equal lengths. A tetrahedron is a four-sided polyhedron where all the sides are equilateral triangles. When a tetrahedron is placed within a transparent sphere with latitude lines in which the apex summit of the tetrahedron touches the north axial point or pole (or even the south axial point or pole, upside down), then the 3 other corners to the tetrahedron will always touch at the 19.5º latitude. This I have identified as the 19.5º Caniculan Effect which is associated with Sirius, because the electromagnetic stellar arcing between Sirius and our Sun comes into our Solar System on the 19.5º latitude to our system’s ecliptic plane, assumed as the equator of our Solar System. The name “Caniculan” is from “Canis Major”, the “Great Dog Star”, being the Sirian constellation construct, and is in reference to Sirius A, the massive white-blue star having a mass 2.42 times the mass of our Sun and with about 40 times the intensity. When Sirius passes between the Earth and the Sun during the 7-day critical vertex crossing of the Sirian-Solar Reconvergence it will be equal to 80 of our Suns in the sky.

Additionally, the 19.5º Caniculan Effect is the causing agent of disruptions in our Solar System. If you will note all the peculiar anomalies are found on the 19.5º latitudes: sunspots, CME’s (coronal mass ejectas), Jupiter’s Red Spot (a 300-year old storm), Neptune’s Dark Spot, Mars’s Olympus Mons (the largest volcano in the Solar System), Earth’s hurricanes form on this latitude, and Earth’s most active volcano, Kilauea, is located on this latitude.

Now, when the tetrahedron is opened up and flattened out into a mega-triangle, contained within the center of this configuration is a four-sided parallelogram (a diamond shape), which is composed of two equilateral triangles connected along one mutual tangent side. I identify this parallelogram as “Parallelogram Orionis”. This image along with the 19.5º geometric angle and various versions and adaptations of it are impregnated into “Sacred Geometry” from Stonehenge, the Great Pyramid of Giza, Teotihuacán Pyramid Complex of Mexico, and other endeavors throughout the world, e.g. the Vicis Pisces and the Star of David, being a pagan hexagram symbol. The Star of David is merely the two equilateral triangles of the Parallelogram Orionis separated and superimposed over each other.

These two triangles, “Trigon Orionis” and “Trigon Antorionis”, represent the “approach” and the “departure” of the Sirian-Solar Reconvergence. The outer parameter lines on the two sides of the Parallelogram Orionis represent the “pathway” of each stellar system, and the end-points represent the point of “crossing”. Hence, the widest portion of the parallelogram is the point at which both systems are at their greatest extent from each other, the “apogee”, being the approximate point where the two systems turn back towards each other and head towards Reconvergence; the full cycle of travel is 12,000 years. The triangular sector “before” Reconvergence is Trigon Orionis, and the triangular sector “after” Reconvergence is Trigon Antorionis.

The two systems are gravitationally interlocked, and this pattern (symbolized by the diamond-shaped “lozenge” in primordial artwork and carvings) was created when Sirius B at the end of its Red Giant stellar phase exploded into a Nebula that created the celestial dynamics that split our former Osirian trinary Stellar System in half. According to the Babylonian creation epics, our Sun (Mummu/Marduk) was catapulted by the shock waves from its binary partner, Sirius B, at the core of the system onto a collision course with the outer star, Sirius A. The immense gravity of Sirius A caught our Sun and almost tore it in half, appearing to have two heads, but the solar mass re-conjoined, and the gravity of Sirius A sent our Sun into “gravitational boosting”. This is a process employed by NASA to send probes out of our Solar System… the object is sent on a collision course with Jupiter, and the gravity of Jupiter catches the objects and then hurls the probe at a 60º angle to the radial projection line of the object, and thus it is catapulted out of the system. This is what occurred with our Sun; it was catapulted out of the original system by the gravitation boosting from Sirius A, sending our Sun outwardly on a 60º angle to the radial direction of the Sun while the concentric shock waves from the Nebula explosion drove our Sun and Sirius A away from each other. Hence, the initial 60º angular sector of the equilateral Trigon Antorionis formed between both systems.

Meanwhile, the new shrunken star (Sirius B as a White Dwarf formed by the collapse of its mass by its own gravity) was towed behind Sirius A as the nebula shock wave drove Sirius A outwardly, which explains Sirius B's extremely elongated and elliptical orbit having a 1:2.5 ratio. This event was mythologized as the god of Hades, Pluto, Sirius B, kidnapping the daughter of Mother Earth, Persephone (Sirius A) to become his wife of Hell. This was also Osiris, Sirius B and Isis (Sirius A) going off to the Duat (the Underworld). The split of our former Osirian Trinary Stellar System is also retold in the account of the death and dismemberment of Osiris (Nimrod) whose body was dismembered into 14 pieces that were scattered; of course being the 14 celestial members of the system that formed the body of our former system that became split and dismembered by the Osirian Nebula Discontinuity Event.
Supernova
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/13Mar41.html
In our Milky Way galaxy, about 800 light years away and about 11,400 years ago, a supernova exploded in the constellation Vela.

People on earth saw the explosion about 11,000 years ago as a star of magnitude -10, as bright as a 7-day old Moon.

The neutron star binary companion to the Vela supernova pulsar may, as it is a neutron star, be the remnant neutron star of the supernova of about 3 to 10 million years ago that formed the Gum Nebula, which now from Earth looks like a shell with radius about 20 degrees. In comparison (see Kaufmann - Universe (4th ed) - Freeman 1994), the sun and moon each cover about half a degree.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:55 am

If Sirius C is not our sun, then it could be the Sun’s dark (red/brown dwarf) twin. Perhaps that is why it is often referred to as a “black sun.” Normally it is undetectable because it is visible only in the infrared spectrum. Sirius B could be a magnetar (magnetic white dwarf) and Sirius C is a red/brown dwarf that can “flare” like a pulsar. If Sirius C is really Saturn, then Saturn was once the Sun’s “dark twin.”
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 240#p34986

The name 'Sothis' seems to naturally fit the intents and the magical inclinations of the Lodge: Sothis/Sirius B is the dark star of Set, the ancient stellar body mysteriously 'discovered' more than 5000 years ago by the Dogons of Mali, and from which the darkest currents of magic emanate. Sothis (Sirius B) is connected to Emme Ya (Sirius C), a bizarre star that constitutes the closest astronomical match to the concept of Black Sun. So, Sothis (Sirius B) stands as the stellar, pulsating centre of the Draconian Current and of the energies that move the opposite side of creation - Sothis as 'Astrum Nigrum' (Black Star), soul of Black Isis and cosmic vehicle of Set.
One source believes Sirius C is our sun; another source says that there is a both a Sirius C and D (our Sun).
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 135#p36044
This far more ancient message in stone pointing to the three stars in Orion’s Belt further substantiates my observation and research that our Solar System was formerly the “Osirian Trinary Stellar System” containing the three stars Sirius B, Sirius C (our Sun) and the outer star Sirius A.
The ancient Hebrew Kabbalists spoke of “The Four Seraphim”. The Seraphim are the four heavenly luminaries comprising the multiple or binary star system of which we belong. Originating with Sirius B, Dark Star or nearly invisible point of light, this tiny cosmic nucleus was called “Sifr” (ar. ‘zero’) the secret ‘cipher’ of our local universe or (gk) “Oion”. The trinitary stellar Seraphim, Stars Sirius A, Sirius C and Sirius D (our Sun) were called in Hebrew “Saphar”, “Sepher” and “Siphur”.

These Archangels of Cosmic Fire were named by the Assyrians the “Sara’pu” and by the Hebrews the “Saraph” or “Seraph”. Their radiance was seen as a ‘divine fiery serpent’. The ancient Egyptians knew them as the “Serref”.

The ‘ever-watchful’ “Sephirah” ‘circle’ in great ‘cycles’. “Saphar” means to ‘dance in a circle’, ‘to revolve and turn oneself around’. Revolving upon their own axis the triune Seraphim orbit, dancing round the zero point in deep space focalized by “Sifr”, Star Sirius B, the weighty center of centers.

Our invisible or Black Sun, our Central Sun was to the mystic Kabbalists “the centre of Rest; the centre to which all motion was to be ultimately referred.

Round this central sun ‘the first of three systemic suns revolved on a polar plane; the second, on an equatorial plane’ and the third only was our visible sun.

The celestial Seraphim are ever–filling the aethers with their stellar energy. They roar cosmic decibels through deep space in plosive tones beyond our hearing, communicate with one another in cosmic harmonies beyond our understanding and intoning the Cosmic Laws of Life, celebrate “The Laws of the ‘Sepher’ “in exultation beyond our capacity.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:28 pm

Magnetars, magnetic flux tubes and the single universal magnetohydrodynamic pumping process (Z pinch)

Mass-Radius Relation for Magnetic White Dwarfs
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/530/2/949/fulltext
Recently, several white dwarfs with very strong surface magnetic fields have been observed. In this paper we explore the possibility that such stars could have sufficiently strong internal fields to alter their structure. We obtain a revised white dwarf mass-radius relation in the presence of strong internal magnetic fields. We first derive the equation of state for a fully degenerate ideal electron gas in a magnetic field using an Euler-MacLaurin expansion. We use this to obtain the mass-radius relation for magnetic 4He, 12C, and 56Fe white dwarfs of uniform composition.

A number of white dwarfs with strong magnetic fields have been discovered and extensively studied; Surface magnetic fields ranging from about 105 to 109 G have been detected in about 50 (2%) of the 2100 known white. As relics of stellar interiors, the study of the magnetic fields in and around degenerate stars should give important information on the role such fields play in star formation and stellar evolution.

As early as 1964 it was proposed that the magnetic flux ( B BR2) of a star is conserved during its evolution and subsequent collapse to form a remnant white dwarf or neutron star. A main-sequence star with radius on the order of R 1011 cm and surface magnetic field B 10 104 G would thus collapse to form a white dwarf with R 109 cm and B 105 108 G, or a neutron star with R 106 cm and B 1011 1014 G. Indeed, shortly after their discovery pulsars were identified as rotating neutron stars with magnetic fields B 1011 1013 G consistent with magnetic field amplification by flux conservation. In addition, neutron stars with surface magnetic fields exceeding 1014 G (so-called magnetars) have been recently suggested as the source of soft gamma-ray repeaters.
Neutron Star Magnetic Fields
http://solomon.as.utexas.edu/magnetar.h ... tic_Fields
The "magnetar" theory of SGRs came about from an attempt to understand a completely different issue, namely: the origin of magnetic fields in radio pulsars. Radio pulsars are "garden variety" neutron stars. They emit beams of radio waves which sweep through space as the stars rotate, like lighthouse beams, thus from afar pulsars seem to flicker or pulsate at their rotation periods.

Careful measurements have shown that pulsar periods increase over time, implying that the stars are gradually spinning down. This is attributed to their magnetic fields. The field lines are anchored to the neutron star surface, because they are generated by circulating electric currents inside the star. Thus as the star turns, the field also must turn. This drives magnetic waves outward, along with diffuse winds of charged particles (which emit the radio beams from just above the magnetic poles), carrying off energy and causing the star to gradually spin down. The measured rate of spin-down allows the magnetic field to be estimated.

Neutron stars are very hot when they first form. The computer models showed that the dense fluid of neutrons inside a nascent neutron star roils and churns to help carry out heat, a little like water boiling in a pot. Such circulation is called "convection." It happens because hot parcels of fluid rise, while cool ones sink.

(In a hot nuclear fluid, the density of electrons also affects fluid buoyancy and helps drive mixing.) We found that the hot, ultra-dense neutron star fluid also can conduct electricity very well, because it contains some free electrons and protons along with the more abundant neutrons. These charged particles readily carry currents. This means that any magnetic field lines caught in the fluid initially are swept along by the convective motions; they cannot just "ignore" the moving fluid because the fluid is an electrical conductor.

If the star is born rotating fast enough, the combined effects of rotation and convection, which both drag field lines through the star, can build up the star's overall magnetic field, via a complicated process known as "dynamo action." Dynamos operate in the interior of the Earth and the Sun, giving them their magnetic fields.

If a dynamo worked with ideal efficiency in a hot, newborn neutron star, it would generate a field of about 1016 Gauss: 10,000 times stronger than was actually found in pulsars! As the star cools, convection and dynamo action cease. This happens after only about 10 or 20 seconds in a neutron star, but 10 seconds is enough time for a very strong field to build up. After that, the field can remain trapped by the heavy, stratified liquid of neutrons and protons inside the neutron star. This led us to conclude that the familiar radio pulsars were neutron stars in which large-scale dynamos had essentially failed to operate, probably because they were not born rotating fast enough.
The spin period of the Crab pulsar at birth was about 20 milliseconds; we found that it needed to be considerably less than that for a dynamo to work. The question of why a pulsar field was 1012 Gauss thus turned out to involve some subtle details of the residues of magnetism left over after a large-scale dynamo fails. We estimated that, at the pole of a dynamo-active young neutron star, the magnetic field could realistically reach 1014 - 1015 Gauss---100 to 1000 times stronger than in ordinary pulsars.

Although it is born spinning somewhat faster than a pulsar, a magnetar spins down much more quickly, because the magnetic waves (and the related, diffuse winds of charged particles) which carry off the star's rotational energy are very efficient when the field is strong. This means that magnetars rarely send out widely-sweeping radio "lighthouse" beams as do radio pulsars. Except in a fleeting interval just after it is formed, a magnetar spins so slowly that its spindown-powered beams are exceedingly narrow or completely turned-off. (Recall that the radio beams in an ordinary pulsar come from a rotation-driven outflow of charged particles above the magnetic poles. When the rotation rate drops this ceases.)

To put it a different way: all of the observed emissions of ordinary radio pulsars (except for a faint X-ray glow from its tiny, hot surface) are powered by a slow loss of the rotational energy that the star is born with. A radio pulsar's magnetic field is essentially stable; its main role is to passively facilitate the loss of rotational energy. In a magnetar, on the other hand, the rotational energy quickly becomes negligible. However, we realized that the magnetic field itself can provide an energy source for potentially observable emissions. A magnetar's field is strong enough to push material around in the star's interior and crust, leading to the dissipation of a significant amount of magnetic energy during the first ten thousand years.
Magnetar corona
http://www.springerlink.com/content/tu556022026u1379/
Persistent high-energy emission of magnetars is produced by a plasma corona around the neutron star, with total energy output of ∼1036 erg/s. The corona forms as a result of sporadic starquakes that twist the external magnetic field of the star and induce electric currents in the closed magnetosphere. Once twisted, the magnetosphere cannot untwist immediately because of its self-induction. The self-induction electric field lifts particles from the stellar surface, accelerates them, and initiates avalanches of pair creation in the magnetosphere. The created plasma corona maintains the electric current demanded by curl B and regulates the self-induction e.m.f. by screening. This corona persists in dynamic equilibrium: it is continually lost to the stellar surface on the light-crossing time ∼10−4 s and replenished with new particles. In essence, the twisted magnetosphere acts as an accelerator that converts the toroidal field energy to particle kinetic energy. The voltage along the magnetic field lines is maintained near threshold for ignition of pair production, in the regime of self-organized criticality. The voltage is found to be about ∼1 GeV which is in agreement with the observed dissipation rate ∼1036 erg/s. The coronal particles impact the solid crust, knock out protons, and regulate the column density of the hydrostatic atmosphere of the star. The transition layer between the atmosphere and the corona is the likely source of the observed 100 keV emission. The corona also emits curvature radiation up to 1014 Hz and can supply the observed IR-optical luminosity.
A Magnetic Flux Tube Oscillation Model for QPOs in SGR Giant Flares http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/686/1/492
Giant flares from soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are one of the most violent phenomena in neutron stars. Quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) with frequencies ranging from 18 to 1840 Hz have been discovered in the tails of giant flares from two SGRs and were ascribed to seismic vibrations or torsional oscillations of magnetars. Here we propose an alternative explanation for the QPOs in terms of standing sausage mode oscillations of flux tubes in the magnetar coronae. We show that most of the QPOs observed in SGR giant flares could be well accounted for except for those with very high frequencies (625 and 1840 Hz).
Magnetar Birth and Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts
http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~bmetzge ... _UIowa.pdf

Magnetic Portals Connect Sun and Earth
http://www.physorg.com/news144677133.html
During the time it takes you to read this article, something will happen high overhead that until recently many scientists didn't believe in. A magnetic portal will open, linking Earth to the sun 93 million miles away. Tons of high-energy particles may flow through the opening before it closes again, around the time you reach the end of the page.

"It's called a flux transfer event or 'FTE,'" says space physicist David Sibeck of the Goddard Space Flight Center. "Ten years ago I was pretty sure they didn't exist, but now the evidence is incontrovertible."

Indeed, today Sibeck is telling an international assembly of space physicists at the 2008 Plasma Workshop in Huntsville, Alabama, that FTEs are not just common, but possibly twice as common as anyone had ever imagined.
Researchers have long known that the Earth and sun must be connected. Earth's magnetosphere (the magnetic bubble that surrounds our planet) is filled with particles from the sun that arrive via the solar wind and penetrate the planet's magnetic defenses. They enter by following magnetic field lines that can be traced from terra firma all the way back to the sun's atmosphere.

"We used to think the connection was permanent and that solar wind could trickle into the near-Earth environment anytime the wind was active," says Sibeck. "We were wrong. The connections are not steady at all. They are often brief, bursty and very dynamic."

Several speakers at the Workshop have outlined how FTEs form: On the dayside of Earth (the side closest to the sun), Earth's magnetic field presses against the sun's magnetic field. Approximately every eight minutes, the two fields briefly merge or "reconnect," forming a portal through which particles can flow. The portal takes the form of a magnetic cylinder about as wide as Earth.

He told his colleagues that the cylindrical portals tend to form above Earth's equator and then roll over Earth's winter pole. In December, FTEs roll over the north pole; in July they roll over the south pole.

Sibeck believes this is happening twice as often as previously thought. "I think there are two varieties of FTEs: active and passive." Active FTEs are magnetic cylinders that allow particles to flow through rather easily; they are important conduits of energy for Earth's magnetosphere. Passive FTEs are magnetic cylinders that offer more resistance; their internal structure does not admit such an easy flow of particles and fields. (For experts: Active FTEs form at equatorial latitudes when the IMF tips south; passive FTEs form at higher latitudes when the IMF tips north.)
Buoyant magnetic flux tubes enhance radiation in Z pinches
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11019081
In numerous experiments, magnetic energy coupled to strongly radiating Z-pinch plasmas exceeds the thermalized kinetic energy, sometimes by a factor of 2-3. We demonstrate that the enhanced energy coupling may be due to the buoyancy rise of toroidal magnetic flux tubes converging to the axis through the unstable pinch plasma. We derive an explicit formula for the enhanced dissipation rate and apply this formula to reconsider an old problem of power balance in a steady-state Z pinch, and then to analyze a new challenge of producing K-shell 3 to 10 keV radiation in long-pulse Z-pinch implosions.
Dynamic and Stagnating Plasma Flow Leading to Magnetic-Flux-Tube Collimation
http://authors.library.caltech.edu/7372/1/YOUprl05.pdf
Highly collimated, plasma-filled magnetic-flux tubes are frequently observed on galactic, stellar and laboratory scales. We propose that a single, universal magnetohydrodynamic pumping process explains why such collimated, plasma-filled magnetic-flux tubes are ubiquitous. Experimental evidence from carefully diagnosed laboratory simulations of astrophysical jets confirms this assertion and is reported here. The magnetohydrodynamic process pumps plasma into a magnetic-flux tube and the stagnation of the resulting flow causes this flux tube to become collimated.

The extreme collimation of astrophysical jets and the solar corona heating mechanism are two seemingly unrelated astrophysical mysteries, yet both involve collimation of magnetic-flux tubes. Astrophysical observations and simulations indicate that bipolar plasma outflows (jets) are natural features of young stellar objects, black holes, active galactic nuclei, and even aspherical planetary nebula.

Although it has long been presumed that astrophysical jets are magnetohydrodynamically driven, the standard models do not agree on a single collimation process. A similar issue exists in solar physics: solar spicules, prominences, and coronal loops are considered to be plasma-filled filamentary magnetic-flux tubes; coronal heating models then invoke magnetic reconnection and plasma flow within such filamentary loops. However, the models explain neither the origin of the observed flows nor the extreme collimation (filamentary nature) of the observed structures.

We propose that the collimation of any, initially flared, current-carrying magnetic-flux tube is due to the following process: a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) force resulting from the flared current profile drives axial plasma flows along the flux tube; the flows convect frozen-in magnetic flux from strong magnetic field regions to weak magnetic field regions; flow stagnation then piles up this embedded magnetic flux, increasing the local magnetic field and collimating the flux tube via the pinch effect. Thus, the flux tube fills with ingested plasma and simultaneously becomes collimated. This Letter presents direct experimental evidence for this process. We use ultrahigh-speed imaging and Doppler measurements of the fast plasma flows, combined with direct density measurements before and after the filling of the flux tube.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:52 pm

And speaking of dark stars, magnetars and magnetic flux tubes...

So where is all of this leading? Is there a "step down" process of interconnecting magnetic flux tubes in the Universe starting with the galactic center?

Here is a very interesting blog. I wonder if sickscent is a closet member of thunderbolts? ;)

The Coming
http://sickscent.blogspot.com/
It is important to understand that these posts are all related. I am putting information out like this in order to show that legitimate SCIENTIFIC STUDIES and MODELS show that this event is not only likely, but is being studied by many, many people in an attempt to decipher its secrets.

Nearly every study I come across - in relation to this celestial system that is here and interacting with our solar system - the scientists state that these current strings of discoveries are utterly and completely rewriting science on how our solar system evolves and moves through interstellar space. It is that far beyond current scientific understanding.

This is a monumental event.

I have exhausted much of the relevant scientific connections to the coming celestial events...It is kind of getting a little redundant. Although there is in unending amount of information that can be gathered to continue proving this phenomena, I will begin putting relevant ancient 'histories' to tie in to this event, as ALL ancient civilizations point to this place in space as being significant to the human condition.

This doesn't mean I will stop with science articles, just means I am going to start including other connections.
The Coming: A Boeing Whistleblower’s Warning
Will a Massive Celestial System Change Our Solar System?
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archi ... lowers.pdf
This clue leads us to suspect an incoming celestial “body” of some sort. But, I remembered I did some research on our heliosphere and when the OP said, “we may not see yet - or - may think we see but aren't sure of the mass or composition,” well, that told me it wasn’t necessarily an asteroid or planet, but possibly the “Fluff” cloud that was held together by magnetics. The first discovery of this anomaly was discovered by NASA around October 15, 2009.

Now, I remember reading these articles from a year or two ago, so I went out on a limb and asked the OP: “So, this 'ribbon' of magnetism we are heading into, could it be the 'Wave' that has been mentioned before. The Wave is supposed to be an area of increased energy that the solar system is supposed to fly through. but what if the actual Wave isn't increased 'energy', but this magnetism, and as our heliosphere and the various gravity fields of our system interact with the 'ribbon of magnetism' (NASA); it causes unkown energy exchanges that can be very dynamic.

Directly after this statement, someone posts: EMP.

His Response: Electro Magnetic Pulse - that's a big concern and now I really have to go.

Bingo! Now, this answer is really backing up what I proposed about Fluff and the Magnetic Ribbon! Something that wouldn’t directly affect Earth, but NASA was concerned about affects to the Sun. Why? Because, according to OP, something is going to cause a massive EMP that could possibly affect the entire globe! Something is going to cause a disturbance on the Sun that will result in solar storms damaging enough to affect the entire Earth! This at a time when Solar Cycle 24 is heading towards MAX!

As I understand it two things are occurring. First, something external is affecting our solar system, potentially starting up the sun's solar capacitor and secondly the sun is entering a solar cycle maximum, part of its natural cycle. These two factors could cause EMP type effects, especially when you consider that the earth's magnetosphere has been exhibiting "holes" or breaches in the shield.

A lot of this has been summarized by several scientists and researchers, some from the University of Colorado. That is publicly available information; however the first factor of an external influence affecting our solar system is not. But when you look at circumstantial evidence, like a ban on information on asteroids and objects entering earth's atmosphere and government agencies re-locating offices to higher elevations (CIA moving branches to Denver Colorado) one can get an overall "picture".

Next, OP confirms that it is not something that is going to “hit” the Earth. An AC asks:

This isn't about something hitting earth, it's about the potential of something hitting the sun and what affect that might have on the GRB that will already be high from the solar maximum?

This makes sense! So I ask: Perhaps this is why OP states that what they are viewing they are not sure if it is 'real' or not. They are viewing a black dwarf (cold dwarf) that messes up all their theories.

And the cold dwarf is interacting with the sun. I bet if we look at the filaments and where they started on the sun, we could triangulate to the vicinity in space where the cold dwarf' is. It is pulling the magnetics out from the sun, creating the filaments. That might be why we are seeing so many filaments at this time also... also, the biggest filament ever seen by a gigantic magnitude.

Then, an AC posts this curiosity: This is the key. I cannot say who I am but you need to put two things together. An excitable sun + this: Voyager Makes an Interstellar Discovery December 23, 2009: The solar system is passing through an interstellar cloud that physics says should not exist. My forte is Plasma Deposition.

Which makes me ask: The Interstellar cloud we are entering (as a solar system) changes a simple model CME discharge event into a more continuous process. The CME will act as a trigger or switch. The Intertellar (magnetic cloud) can support a continuous ion flow between "connected" bodies; this phenomena would be orders of magnitude beyond a simple CME discharge. The magnetic flow (cloud) will make the 'ether' much more conductive, so energy will be flowing like crazy, instead of just merely on the normal currents it flows through now. So it makes the EMP effect, not only massive, but pretty much all consuming. And, due to the solar system being submerged in this magnetic could, it will make the EMPs somewhat continuous. It will be a sustained process as opposed to a CME event.

MAGNETIC PORTALS CONNECTING THE EARTH and SUN - aka MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES

Oct. 30, 2008: During the time it takes you to read this article, something will happen high overhead that until recently many scientists didn't believe in. A magnetic portal will open, linking Earth to the sun 93 million miles away

"It's called a flux transfer event or 'FTE,'" says space physicist David Sibeck of the Goddard Space Flight Center. "Ten years ago I was pretty sure they didn't exist, but now the evidence is incontrovertible."

One important clue: The ribbon runs perpendicular to the direction of the galactic magnetic field just outside the heliosphere

"That cannot be a coincidence," says McComas. But what does it mean? No one knows. "We're missing some fundamental aspect of the interaction between the heliosphere and the rest of the galaxy.

Scientists announced Wednesday the discovery of a previously unidentified nearby source of high-energy cosmic rays. The finding was made with a NASA-funded balloon-borne instrument high over Antarctica.

"This electron excess cannot be explained by the standard model of cosmic ray origin," said John P. Wefel, ATIC project principal investigator and a professor at Louisiana State. "There must be another source relatively near us that is producing these additional particles."

According to the research, this source would need to be within about 3,000 light years of the sun. It could be an exotic object such as a pulsar, mini-quasar, supernova remnant or an intermediate mass black hole.

Immense flows of charged particles discovered between the stars

According to Anthony Peratt, Scientific Advisor to the United States Department of Energy and a plasma researcher at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, the discovery was made by computer analyzing large amounts of data gathered by radio telescopes from regions in space known to be occupied by 'neutral clouds of hydrogen.' The data was processed and the results obtained by radio astronomer Gerrit Verschuur, Physics Department, University of Memphis. Verschuur found that the 'neutral hydrogen clouds' were not completely a neutral gas of hydrogen and other elements, but rather consisted of charged particles of electrons and ions, called 'plasma.'

Peratt said that the filaments between the stars are not visible themselves but are observable with radio telescopes that can observe space at much longer wavelengths than are visible to the human eye. Prof. Per Carlqvist, a researcher at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, estimated that the interstellar filaments found by Verschuur conducted electricity with currents as high as ten-thousand billion amperes.

"The individual filaments in space are often called Z-pinches. These Z-pinches occur when current-carrying plasma 'pinches' itself into a filament by a magnetic field the current produces around the plasma. Z-pinches, such as those produced on the Sandia National Laboratories 'Z' machine, are among the most prolific producers of X-rays known, cited Peratt.

I have a lot of information to share, but most of it is already on my other threads, I will keep things to just plasma here. The night before the Norway spiral I came across this;

Dr. Anthony L. Perrat's paper regarding auroral events and ancient humans:

On the day of the spiral in Norway, I emailed him, not really expecting an answer. These are the replies I got.

I sent an email reply from Dr. Perrat regarding plasma/aurora phenomena over Norway.

“Hi, just a couple of days ago I came across your paper on the Characteristics for the Occurrence of a HighCurrent ZPinch Aurora as Recorded in Antiquity, it was fascinating and I was just wondering if that was indeed one of the plasma phenomena as seen in the petroglyphs found all over the world. The timing of such an event could not have been any weirder, since I had only just found your paper. I would also like to know if you think this was natural or man made? I am curious to see if this "anomaly" was due to EISCAT research centre or if indeed it is caused by cosmic ray flux or some other kind of space event.”

This event was natural and occurs when two Birkeland currents interact, usually around 300 -500 km above Earth. Birkeland currents most often occur in pairs because of the 1/r attractive force between them. This is not an EISCAT heating phenomena.

A tube-like thing like discussed before such as the sun and the earth connects magnetically could also be the fact connecting earth to the centre of the galaxy.

A singularity is a still-point in the sense of working forces; the singularity is the end/the result of perfection indeed, and like the middle of the tornado pure stillness. Balance like we know it is the tension between at least 2 forces and therefore active and in motion, moving. Yin and yang is both;

Yes galactic center contains a singularity

But, is there a type of massive magnetic flux tube connecting the heliosphere to the singularity? (The Serpent) just like the magnetic flux tubes that connect the earth to the sun. This phenomenon happens maybe as much as twice a day and lets in more sun particles through the tube into earth's atmosphere.

What I am proposing is that this happens on a galactic scale as well. Through these recent articles, it looks like that is a strong possibility. So, when a massive type of 'magnetic flux tube' connects between our heliosphere and galactic center, the solar system is injected with massive amounts of energy from the galactic center. The tube would allow this energy to bypass the heliosheath, just like the flux tubes allow the sun's energy to bypass our magnetosphere.

Thus all the connections made by the ancients of a 'Rope' or Serpent connecting us to Galactic Center could be a 'gate' or a 'portal'.

My proposed theory:

The solar system is entering the interstellar cloud causing the slowing of the sun’s conveyor leading to increased CME activity initiating a sustained ion exchange flow to the planets via amplified flux transfer events.

Sirius was the most important star in the sky to the ancient Egyptians. The ancient Egyptian calendar was based on the rising of Sirius. It is established for certain that Sirius was sometimes identified by the ancient Egyptians with their chief goddess Isis.

The companion of Isis was Osiris, the chief Egyptian god. The 'companion' of the constellation of the Great Dog (which includes Sirius) was the constellation of Orion. Since Isis is equated with Sirius, the companion of Isis must be equated, equally, with the companion of Sirius. Osiris is thus equated on occasion with the constellation Orion.

'The oldest and simplest form of the name' of Osiris, we are told, is a hieroglyph of a throne and an eye. The 'eye' aspect of Osiris is thus fundamental. The Bozo tribe of Mali, who are related to the Dogon, call Sirius B 'the eye star'. Since Osiris is represented by an eye and is sometimes considered 'the companion of Sirius', this is equivalent to saying that Osiris is 'the eye star', provided only that one grants the premise that the existence of Sirius B really was known to the ancient Egyptians and that 'the companion of Sirius' therefore could ultimately refer to it.

'The Dog Star' is a common designation of Sirius throughout known history. The ancient god Anubis was a 'dog god', that is, he had a man's body and a dog's head.

In discussing Egyptian beliefs, Plutarch says that Anubis was really the son of Nephthys, sister to Isis, although he was said to be the son of Isis. Nephthys was 'invisible' - a DARK STAR!

Plutarch said that Anubis was a 'horizontal circle, which divides the invisible part which they call Nephthys, from the visible, to which they give the name Isis; and as this circle equally touches upon the confines of both light and darkness, it may be looked upon as common to them both.'

This is as clear an ancient description as one could expect of a circular orbit (called 'Anubis') of a dark and invisible star (called 'Nephthys') around its 'sister', a light and visible star (called 'Isis) and we know Isis to have been equated with Sirius.

Isis-as-Sirius was customarily portrayed by the ancient Egyptians in their paintings as traveling with two companions in the same celestial boat. And as we know, Sirius does, according to some astronomers, have two companions, Sirius B and Sirius C.

Maybe they were not talking about SIRIUS and SIRIUS B, but were they referring to the SUN and her DARK dwarf companion?

To the Arabs, a companion-star to Sirius (in the same constellation of the Great Dog) was named 'Weight' and was supposed to be extremely heavy -- almost too heavy to rise over the horizon. 'Ideler calls this an astonishing star-name', we are told, not surprisingly.

The true companion-star of Sirius, Sirius B, is made of super-dense matter which is heavier than any normal matter in the universe and the weight of this tiny star is the same as that of a gigantic normal star.

No, the cosmic flux will not change anything but dense plasma entering the solar system, as is now happening, will.

Andy Lloyd’s Dark Star itself does not actually enter the boundaries of the other planets. However, its "Seventh Moon" (Sitchin’s Nibiru, or "Planet of the Crossing") does "cross over" into that part of the Solar System between Neptune and Pluto, close enough and bright enough to be visible to people on Earth, at least for such a sufficiently lengthy time that cosmic legends could be born and later develop around it. In Cosmic Tree Theory, of course, Planet X Nibiru is coming as close to the Earth as about 60,000 miles (about 100,000 kilometers) and then stationing itself to our North Pole by an electromagnetic "tether" beam.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:37 pm

Could Sirius C be a dM-type Red dwarf?

The "Living with a Red Dwarf" Program
http://astronomy.villanova.edu/lward/index-old.htm
Red dwarf (dM-type) stars are small, cool stars that evolve slowly over time. Their masses are generally 0.5 to 0.08 solar masses, and their luminosities can be as low as 1/10,000th that of the Sun. dM stars are theorized to be "fully convective" which means that the entire mass of Hydrogen throughout the star is available for fusion. This relative abundance of fuel, coupled with the slow fusion rates of dM stars because of their low masses, allows them to have extremely long main sequence lifetimes - possibly trillions of years for the coolest and lightest of them. Also, dM stars are the most numerous stars in the local neighborhood and, most likely, in the entire Milky Way. They make up >75% of local stars. Their abundance and long main sequence lifetimes make them favorable targets to search for planetary companions.
The Living with a Red Dwarf Program: Understanding the Magnetic Evolution of dM Stars and Their Suitability to Host Life-Bearing Planets
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AAS...21542412E
The ability to accurately estimate the age of a red dwarf is of critical importance and, due to their long nuclear lifetimes (> 50 Gyr), it can best be done through observations of the aforementioned "magnetic tracers.” The Living with a Red Dwarf Program's database of dM stars with photometrically determined rotation rates (from starspot modulations) continues to expand, as does the inventory of archival XUV observations. When combined with cluster/population memberships and kinematics, the determination of Age-Activity-Rotation relationships is possible. Such relationships have broad impacts on not only the studies of Magnetic Dynamo Theory and Angular Momentum Loss on low-mass stars with deep convective zones, but also the suitability of planets around red dwarfs to sustain life. The relationships will also permit the age of a field red dwarf to be determined through measures of either its rotation period or XUV activity level.
The Effect of a Strong Stellar Flare on the Atmospheric Chemistry of an Earth-like Planet Orbiting an M dwarf
http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0022
Main sequence M stars pose an interesting problem for astrobiology: their abundance in our galaxy makes them likely targets in the hunt for habitable planets, but their strong chromospheric activity produces high energy radiation and charged particles that may be detrimental to life. We studied the impact of the 1985 April 12 flare from the M dwarf, AD Leonis (AD Leo), simulating the effects from both UV radiation and protons on the atmospheric chemistry of a hypothetical, Earth-like planet located within its habitable zone.
Living with a Red Dwarf
http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/3088/ ... -red-dwarf
Roughly three quarters of the stars in the galaxy are red dwarfs. Planet searches have typically passed over these tiny faint stars because they were thought to be unfriendly to potential life forms. Preliminary results from a dedicated research program have shown that planets around red dwarfs could be habitable if they can maintain a magnetic field for a few billion years.

Red dwarfs - also called M dwarfs - are between 7 and 60 percent as massive as our sun. Their lower mass means they don’t burn as hot or as brightly, emitting less than 5 percent as much light as the sun. However, they have strong magnetic activity, which makes them relatively bright in X-rays and UV radiation and causes them to flare frequently.

Because they are so faint, the habitable zone — the distance from a star where liquid water can exist — is in many cases closer than the orbital distance between Mercury and our sun. When a planet orbits a star this closely, the gravitational pull of the star may cause the planet to become tidally locked with the same side always facing the star (similar to the Moon's fixed gaze on the Earth).

The data show that a red dwarf is born spinning rapidly, and it exhibits the corresponding magnetic activity. However, the magnetic field also creates strong winds that carry away angular momentum, and thus slow the star down with time.

A planet with a substantial magnetic field, like Earth's, can deflect stellar winds and thereby avoid having its atmosphere stripped away.

The fact that potentially habitable planets around a red dwarf are tidally locked implies they are rotating slowly around their axis. By the same physics that applies to stars, slow rotation will mean a weak magnetic field that could shut down completely.

To avoid this fate around a red dwarf, Guinan speculates that a planet might need to be more massive than Earth. The large liquid iron core inside a super Earth (with a mass between 2 and 10 times Earth's) could perhaps maintain a magnetic field in spite of the slower rotation rate.

Interestingly, three of the two dozen planets detected so far around red dwarfs are super Earths. More will presumably be found in future searches: The MEarth Project is a planned survey of 2000 M stars using ground-based telescopes, and the Kepler spacecraft that launched in March has added more red dwarfs to its target list.

"M dwarf stars were overlooked in the past, but they have become more popular as people realize that life could potentially arise around them," Guinan says.
Encouraging News re Red Dwarf Planets
http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=13153
In recent times the rap against M-dwarf planets has been that their stars are prone to violent convulsions that launch potentially lethal flares into their planetary systems. Many M-dwarfs produce high energy charged particles and short-wavelength radiation from X-rays to ultraviolet. All of this activity can also affect a planet’s atmosphere, so that a key question becomes whether a planet in an M-dwarf’s habitable zone can retain its atmosphere, or whether terrestrial worlds would lose hydrogen and helium and gas giants would erode into Neptune-mass cores.

A new study demonstrates that red dwarf planets may be shielded from these flares after all. As is standard practice in these matters, Antigona Sugura (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) and team went to work with computer models, simulating how a 1985 flare from the star AD Leonis would have affected an Earth-like planet orbiting it at 0.16 AU. AD Leonis is an M-dwarf about 16 light years from Earth, and 0.16 AU, about half Mercury’s distance from the Sun, is in the zone where liquid water could exist at the surface.

The results are promising. It turns out that in the simulation, bursts of UV radiation hitting an Earth-like atmosphere produced a thicker ozone layer, protecting the surface. From the preprint:

For an oxygen-rich, Earth-like planet in the habitable zone of an active M dwarf, stellar flares do not necessarily present a problem for habitability. Much of the potentially life-damaging UV radiation goes into photolyzing ozone in the stratosphere, preventing it from reaching the planetary surface. Ozone variations cause temperature fluctuations in the upper atmosphere, but these fluctuations are small, and the climate at the surface is unaffected.
“Throughout most of the flare, the surface of our model Earth-like planet experienced no more radiation than is typical on a sunny day here on Earth.”

Ionizing particles emitted during a flare may be more dangerous depending on how much of the particle flux strikes the planet. The additive effects of repeated flares over the duration of the planet’s lifetime are not well understood– as M dwarfs can be active on timescales of days to weeks, the atmosphere may not return to equilibrium before another flare occurs.

But the coronal mass ejections and dangerous flares that characterize younger M-dwarfs don’t necessarily rule out life in the system, based on this work, and it’s also true that as these stars age, they offer lengthy lifetimes of up to 100 billion years (compared to a G-class star like the Sun, whose life will be around 10 billion years) during which life processes can emerge. That long, slow maturation is often accompanied by a decrease in problematic stellar activity.
THE ELECTRIC UNIVERSE MODEL:

Electric Cosmology
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/hrdiagr.htm
Red and Brown Dwarfs

The first region on the lower right of the diagram is where the current density has such a low value that double layers (DLs) (photospheric granules) are not needed by the plasma surrounding the (anode) star. This is the region of the brown and red "dwarfs" and giant gas planets. Recent discoveries of extremely cool L - Type and T - Type dwarfs has required the original diagram to be extended to the lower right (See below). These 'stars' have extremely low absolute luminosity and temperature.

Notice that the surface temperature of the T - Type dwarfs is in the range of 1000 K or less! For comparison purposes recall that some points on the surface of Venus are in the range of 900 K. T - Type spectra have features due mostly to Methane - they resemble Jupiter's spectrum. The plasma that constitutes a star of this type is in its 'normal glow' range - or perhaps, even the 'dark current' range. If all stars are indeed powered by a nuclear fusion reaction as is claimed, with the T dwarfs we must be in the 'cold fusion' range! Indeed, for fusion reactions to occur, standard theory requires that the temperature in a star's core must reach at least three million K. And because, in the accepted model, core temperature rises with gravitational pressure, the star must have a minimum mass of about 75 times the mass of the planet Jupiter, or about 7 percent of the mass of our sun. Many of the dwarfs do not meet these requirements. One mainstream astrophysicist, realizing this, has said that these dwarfs must be powered by 'gravitational collapse'.

The orbiting X-ray telescope, Chandra, recently discovered an X-ray flare being emitted by a brown dwarf (spectral class M9). This poses an additional problem for the advocates of the stellar fusion model. A star this cool should not be capable of X-ray flare production.

However, in the ES model, there are no minimum temperature or mass requirements because the star is inherently electrical to start with. In the ES model (if a brown/red dwarf is operating near the upper boundary of the dark current mode), a slight increase in the level of total current impinging on that star will move it into the normal glow mode. This transition will be accompanied by a rapid change in the voltage rise across the plasma of the star's atmosphere. Maxwell's equations tell us that such a change in voltage can produce a strong dynamic E-field and a strong dynamic magnetic field. If they are strong enough, dynamic EM fields can produce X-rays. Another similar phenomenon can occur if a star makes the transition from normal glow to arc mode.

As we progress leftward in the HR diagram, at first the plotted points move steeply upward; we enter the spectral M range where some arc tufting becomes necessary to sustain the star's electrical discharge.

As current density increases, tufts (plasma in the arc discharge mode) cover more and more of the surface of each star, and its luminosity increases sharply – plasma arcs are extremely bright compared to plasma in its normal glow mode. You can look directly at neon signs but not at electric arc welders. This accounts for the steepness of the HR curve in the M region – a slight increase in current density produces a large increase in luminosity. As we move upward and toward the left in the diagram, stars have more and more complete coats of photospheric arcs (tufting).

A case in point – NASA recently discovered a star, half of whose surface was "covered by a sunspot". A more informative way to say this would have been that "Half of this star's surface is covered by photospheric arcing." The present controversy about what the difference is between a giant gas planet and a brown dwarf is baseless. They are members of a continuum – it is simply a matter of what the level of current density is at their surfaces. NASA's discovery supplies the missing link between the giant gas planets and the fully tufted stars. In fact, the term "proto-star" may be more descriptive than "giant gas planet"
Twinkle, twinkle electric star
http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=x49g6gsf
Ken Croswell noted in New Scientist, January 27, 2001: "It was always thought that any planet orbiting a red dwarf would be an extremely unlikely place to find life. But it now looks as though these dim red suns could harbour most of the Galaxy's life-bearing worlds." Such phase-locked worlds would, however, have one hemisphere roasted and the other frozen.

Electric stars offer radically new ideas about life on other worlds and the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence. A galactic source of electrical energy provides more possibilities for sustaining life in the universe than the lottery of finding an Earth-like planet orbiting in a narrow ‘habitable zone’ about a bright star like the Sun. The probability of the latter occurrence is very low. But with electric stars, we can turn to the most numerous stars in the galaxy as likely incubators of life — the brown ‘dwarfs’ —which are actually red in color. They could be described as ‘cosmic plasma eggs.’ This picture is much more encouraging than conventional thinking on such dwarf stars.

Imagine giant Jupiter and its moons floating independently in deep space. Outside the Sun’s dominating electrical influence, Jupiter would become a dim electric star enclosed in the huge radiant red plasma shell of its ‘anode glow’ — a brown dwarf. Inside the glowing sheath is the most hospitable environment in the universe for life because the radiant energy received by each satellite is evenly distributed over its entire surface. There are no seasons, no tropics and no ice caps.

The radiant energy from the plasma cell of a brown dwarf star is strongest at the blue and red ends of the spectrum. Photosynthesis relies on red light. L-type brown dwarfs have water as a dominant molecule in their spectra, along with many other biologically important molecules and elements. Satellites would accumulate atmospheres from the brown dwarf and water would mist down. Regardless of its spin and axial tilt, a satellite orbiting inside the sheath of a brown dwarf could experience an ideal environment for life.

It is instructive to note the icy nature of the moons of our gas giant planets. Those planets may be electrically captured brown dwarf stars. That would explain their odd axial tilts, excess heat, and remnants of expulsion disks or rings.

However, the brown dwarf ‘Garden of Eden’ comes with a caveat. Stars off the main sequence do not have the self-regulating photospheric discharge to smooth out variations in electrical power input. Consequently, brown dwarfs are subject to sudden outbursts, or ‘flaring,’ when they encounter a surge in the circuit that powers them. These flares could cause sparking to and between the satellites orbiting inside the sheath and lead to sudden extinction events, vast fallout deposits and fossilization. There is much food for new thoughts!

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:15 pm

On the Aether or Superlight, magnetic flux tubes, and “tubes of force”

The Bridge of Aether
http://www.lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-L ... Aether.pdf
Many will recognize that the four elements of ancient Western thought (earth, air, fire, and water) still direct our daily outlook and lives in a subtle way. Far fewer, however, recognize that in hermetic tradition and alchemy, there was a fifth element, said to permeate and bind the four other essences into perfect balance. This fifth essence was spirit, or aether, sometimes also known as the Quintessence.

This Bridge will tell of our explorations in the realm of subtle energies and forces that would seem to be expressions of the fabled quintessence. It is not a Bridge trodden by many, for the study of these principles at their core is a call that is only answered by those of a certain cut or intellectual warp. It requires a thirst for mathematics and physical laws, and tools and instruments of a decidedly arcane nature. The archetype of the wild-haired mad scientist appears again and again here! The pursuit of this Bridge taxes the left brain / Yang nature, and we find historically that the majority of research into the aether and its manifestations has been by males. However, like all Bridges, it is congruent and tangential to each of the others in its turn, and contains fabulous secrets and great promise for the world. It lies open to all, and bars none. The aether underlies all of our existence, flowing and weaving a matrix of reality.

The study of gravity and strange energy effects is here, as are the principles of radionics and radiesthesia, and life energy in its many descriptions and names. The portraits of many revered pioneers are suspended on this Bridge, brave men and women like Reich, Tesla, Townsend Brown, and Mme. Blavatsky -- seekers all, after the fundamental powers and forces of our world, desiring to beat them into plowshares for the common man.
The Burial of Tesla and Rebirth of His Discoveries
http://www.whale.to/b/lyne_tesla.html
To Tesla, so-called "atomic energy" was in fact the result of "environmental energy" emanating from the cosmos, and made known to us via "radioactive" matter, which he said had the peculiar property of resonating and reacting with ubiquitous "cosmic radiation" a term used by Tesla before 1900 which he called "Primary Solar Rays."

The "cosmic radiation" of which Tesla spoke was of much higher frequency than what we call "radioactive emanations", which to Tesla were the result of a 'step-down' process, in which certain peculiar matter reacts to and converts the ubiquitous, omnidirectional cosmic radiation which today we call "zero point radiation" ("ZPR") from higher frequencies, to lower, more useful and appropriate frequencies, such as gamma, x-ray, ultraviolet, visible, infrared radiation, as well as magnetism and even electrical current. These step-down frequencies are much easier to detect and measure than the ZPR. Relativists deny the Primary Solar Rays exist.

According to Tesla, the ether is not an "energy source", since it is composed of tiny independent "carriers immersed in an insulating fluid". The ether, therefore, is a "medium" through which energetic transferences and transmutations can be effected, and electric and magnetic "tubes of force" can be created and carried into a body from space, giving it momentum to propel it. "Cosmic radiation" is not the ether, but "starlight" what Tesla called the "Primary Solar Rays". This extremely high frequency light of much tinier wavelength than visible light, U.V., X-rays, and gamma rays (also emitted by our sun and other stars) is the ZPR. Tesla stated that the Zero Point Radiation gives rise to secondary radiations through impact with the cosmic dust of space, which are commonly called "cosmic rays" today.

In 1935 Tesla objected to the observations of the German radiologist, Dr. Werner Kolhoester, saying his observations were another confirmation of his own theory of cosmic rays originally advanced in l896, but asserted that Kolhoester's 1935 theory was erroneous, because light is a wave motion of definite velocity (C), determined by the elastic force and density of the "medium", while cosmic rays are "...particles with velocities determined by the propelling force...", which therefore could be much slower or faster than that of light. Since the velocities of the two radiations would not (and could not) coincide, Kolhoester's observations which coincided with the light observed, would not be accurate. Here, Tesla distinguished between the "cosmic radiation" he proposed in 1896, which was particles, which were propelled by ultra-high frequency "primary solar radiation", which I equate to the ZPR, which are light rays traveling at C. Because of their extremely high voltages levels and frequencies, they can propel "cosmic dust" articles faster than C, when of sufficiently high voltage levels and frequency.
Superlight
http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/milewski.htm
SuperLight is magnetic light; it is magneto–electric radiation.

Regular light is electric light or electro–magnetic radiation. There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not light?

Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all things except light. They are wrong. There is parity in light as well!

SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of years. It has been given different names by different cultures for thousands of years. A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy, Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception know it is real.

SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when James Clerk Maxwell solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was invented by Nikola Tesla, and theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc.

What his equation also explains 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that comes from the use of negative numbers, "this second solution" was ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root of –1) because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have changed and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and it is SuperLight.

In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."{1}

To understand this second solution, we must first review what the first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point source (the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees to the electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation.

The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite structure. It explains that from infinity traveling toward the point source from all directions radiates SuperLight. This new radiation is composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the equations are looked at more closely, one finds that "SuperLight" travels at the speed of light squared! 1020 meters per second, or 10 billion times faster than light.

It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding, shorter wavelength. It therefore has a higher energy density.

The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?" Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10–8 nano–meters, or 4 x 10–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes through everything as though the substance was nearly completely transparent (like glass).

We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative size, will be given later.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:05 pm

Ormus is a gas
http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/hudson/ormusgas.htm
In the 80's and 90's David Hudson coined the acronym ORMEs. This is a name for what he defined as a new state of matter. ORMEs is an acronym for "Orbitally Rearranged Monatomic Elements". He demonstrated, through his very detailed experiments and multiple testing, that at least 13 of the transition elements (Co, Ni, Cu, Ru, Rh, Pd Ag, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg.), which are in the center of the periodic table, can exist in a heretofore-unidentified state of matter. He claimed that this occurs when they are in a monatomic state.

He found that in this state they are very chemically inert. In conventional chemistry it is believed that all chemical reactions between elements take place because of the action of their outer electrons. Now, what David Hudson deduced, was that when these transition elements exist in a monatomic state and are not sharing or swapping their electrons with their near neighbors in a material structure like a crystal lattice, they become ORME elements.
At this stage the outer electrons of these elements form cooper pairs and become whirlwinds of light rotating at super speeds around the atom. Again, as a result of this change they lose all conventional chemical reactivity.

Another important change that takes place is that the whirling electrons that have become light set up a Meissner antimagnetic field. This antimagnetic field causes a levitating force against the earth’s magnetic field and the element effectively loses 4/9's of its weight. According to Hudson, at this same time the nucleus becomes high spin and shrinks to about 1/3 of its original size and distorts to an oblong shape. When in this state as a single atom it should be a very small and a very chemically inert atomic gas.

We are postulating that the free atom Ormus form of these 13 transition atoms is a very chemically inert gas. We also postulate that they are very small in relation to their masses and are surrounded by a very strong antimagnetic field. As a result of these properties we suspect that our atmosphere contains a significant amount of these gases. If this is true we would expect them to blend into our atmosphere and be easily mistaken for other gases such as argon, nitrogen and CO2, which might have similar weight and vapor pressure.

In addition to existing as a gas and because of their small size and chemical inertness they would easily diffuse into matter both liquids and solids. It has been suggested that they are captured in water structures and in most crystal structures such as quartz, magnetite and marble just to name a few. We think that their antimagnetic field helps them stay centered in the electric and magnetic fields found in the lattice structure.

I believe that the atmosphere is the source of the white powder and that it grows on rocks, to which it is attracted, by some force within the rocks. I presume that this force comes from the Ormus glass in the lava rocks that cause such heavy coatings and that the other variety of rocks like the granites, sandstones, etc. must have a paramagnetic like nature that causes the attraction. The coating material comes from the air and even more so when there is a light rain like we get here in the desert. The rain captures the Ormes on the way down and deposits them on the rocks where some of it is attracted to stay. If there is not too much or too heavy of a rain it does not wash away and after drying up it hardens into a permanent coating of white powder.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:49 pm

Could portals be magnetic flux tubes? :D
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 11b#p39710

Knowledge of the Earth Grid or "crystalline Earth" is very ancient and has been utilized by a number of civilizations. The pyramids and ley lines are on the power transfer lines of the natural Earth gravity Grid all over the world. The Earth Grid is comprised of the geometrical flow lines of gravity energy in the structure of the Earth itself.
Vortexes
http://www.visionsmagazineonline.com/Pa ... ortex.html
We have long suspected that there are fixed doorways or "portals" in certain areas that may allow entities to travel from their domain into our universe. These entities may be spirits, demons, extraterrestrials, or something we have never even imagined.

Evidence seems to indicate that many portals are at fixed places all over the world, and that they remain constant. Controlled experiments performed around some of these suspected portals have shown that there are definite unexplained temperature fluctuations, increased low frequency spontaneous EMF readings, increases in negative and or positive ion counts (in some cases like pulses or waves), transient spikes in alpha, beta and gamma radiation, increased background static electricity, and increased electrical as well as magnetic fields.

For our purposes, however, we will concentrate on what I will call the dynamic portal; the opening that appears for a specific time then disappears. This blinking in and out indicates that the portal is in a state of flux, most likely due to dimension shifting or adjacent universe overlap.

Many of these portals are incomplete, meaning they do not fully open between two dimensions or universes, but rather partially open, allowing information to flow back and forth, but limiting the type of information that can pass, much like a filter. Electrical or magnetic waves may pass, but physical matter may not. More commonly metaphysical matter may cross over. Metaphysical matter is a term I use to describe partial manifestations. Plasma, mist, fog, shadows, shimmering apparitions, all I consider to be metaphysical matter.

I postulate that a portal occurs when two or more dimensions or universes begin to overlap physically. What this means is, in the case for a dimensional overlap, two branes begin to merge, and instead of creating a big bang when they touch, they superimpose, at least in a limited spatial position. This is possible due to both brane frequencies being compatible, or sharing a harmonic frequency with each other, allowing them to partially resonate without a phase differential. When the resonance occurs, we may have a partial or in some rare occasions, a full opening between the worlds.


Ionic Energy
http://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/11/ ... d-physics/
Most scientists before now have noted 11 Dimensions. In fact the dimensions are essentially unlimited. Some Dimensions contain physical matter and others contain formless form (antimatter).

Zero Point is an energy flux running through space and that is where interdimensional and multidimensional travel begins.
Are portals a series of interconnecting phase conjugate magnetic flux tubes? Is there a Z-pinch at the center of the galaxy? Did the Universe begin with a “Big Pinch”? :?
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... =15#p38276

It seems to be a bright plasmoid, probably functioning as a current generator along the principles of non linear physics of phase conjugation, transmitting longitudinal current to the stars, via a tesla wireless process.

The effects of charge seperation, double layers, torsion and angular momentum physics, all integrate at the heart of each galaxy, to form a focal point for these forces to accumulate and to express themself in physics that few men could explain, save Dollard, Tesla, Birkeland, and modern day heroes like Wal and the plasma camp.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 4da#p25308

There has to be a process that makes the Birkeland Current. There has to be a process that makes matter.

The EU thinks and postulates that in fact new matter is created via massive galactic Z pinch functions at the heart of the galaxy. Process theory, or systems theory, that incorporates Richard Feynmen’s and Carver Mead’s four areas of physics.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... =60#p30426

I still say the physics of Phase Conjugation are very clearly laid out in this diagram from the EU itself. That is clearly a four wave mixer.
Magnetic Portals Connect Sun and Earth
http://www.physorg.com/news144677133.html
During the time it takes you to read this article, something will happen high overhead that until recently many scientists didn't believe in. A magnetic portal will open, linking Earth to the sun 93 million miles away. Tons of high-energy particles may flow through the opening before it closes again, around the time you reach the end of the page.

It's called a flux transfer event or 'FTE,'" says space physicist David Sibeck of the Goddard Space Flight Center

Researchers have long known that the Earth and sun must be connected. Earth's magnetosphere (the magnetic bubble that surrounds our planet) is filled with particles from the sun that arrive via the solar wind and penetrate the planet's magnetic defenses. They enter by following magnetic field lines that can be traced from terra firma all the way back to the sun's atmosphere.
Solar magnetic fields and the dynamo theory
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_o ... archtype=a
According to widely accepted present concepts, the large-scale solar dynamo is of flux-transport type, which involves three basic processes: (i) generation of toroidal fields by shearing the pre-existing poloidal fields by differential rotation (the Ω-effect); (ii) re-generation of poloidal fields by lifting and twisting the toroidal fluxtubes (the α-effect); (iii) flux transport by meridional circulation. This class of dynamos has been successful in explaining many large-scale solar cycle features, including a particularly difficult one – the correct phase relationship between the equatorward-migrating sunspot belt and the poleward drifting large-scale, diffuse fields. The dynamo cycle period in such models is primarily governed by the meridional flow speed near the bottom of the convection zone. After briefly reviewing the historical background, we will present the successes of flux-transport dynamos, including their predictive capability.
Brillouin-Enhanced Four-Wave Mixing and Phase Conjugation
http://tempest.das.ucdavis.edu/mpi/phase/phase.html
Four-wave mixing (FWM), in its simplest form, can be modeled as a pair of simultaneous three-wave mixing processes. In the first (optical mixing) process, a strong pump wave mixes with a weak signal wave in a nonlinear medium (such as a plasma) to generate a density modulation or "grating" in the medium. In the second (scattering) process, another strong pump wave scatters off this grating to generate a fourth wave. If the two pump waves are antiparallel, the fourth wave is then phase conjugate to the signal wave, i.e. its wavefronts coincide everywhere with the signal wave and are counterpropagating.

Brillouin-enhanced four-wave mixing in an unmagnetized plasma has been clearly demonstrated. The detailed measurements have proven the validity, under low gain (i.e. low power and low density) conditions, of two fluid plasma theory. High power, high density operation is seen to deviate strongly from theory; evidence has been gathered to support the hypothesis that much of the deviation can be attributed to ponderomotive whole-beam self focusing of the high power pump waves.
Two-fluid theory of collisionless magnetic reconnection
http://www.imamu.edu.sa/Scientific_sele ... ection.pdf
Observations in laboratory and space clearly indicate that fast magnetic reconnection processes occur in nearly collisionless plasmas. For instance, the time scales of the collapse phase in the so-called sawtooth oscillation, a relaxation oscillation in the core of a tokamak discharge, which necessarily involves reconnection, is much shorter than could be accounted for by the collisional effects in Ohm’s law, resistivity and electron viscosity.1 Even more stunning are various types of magnetic processes observed in the extraterrestrial environment, notably magnetospheric substorms which seem to be caused by reconnection in the earth’s magnetotail,2 and solar flares, where reconnection occurs in the solar corona,3 both plasmas being almost collisionless.
Two-fluid theory of acoustic-gravity waves in a plasma
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PhPl...10.1164W
The dispersion relation for acoustic-gravity waves in a plasma atmosphere with different electron and ion temperatures is derived from a two-fluid description of the plasma. The electrons are assumed to satisfy an isothermal equation of state and the ions an adiabatic equation of state. This model together with the quasi-neutrality condition is shown to reproduce the one-fluid hydrodynamic dispersion relation for acoustic-gravity waves, provided that both the acoustic cut-off frequency and the Brunt-Väisälä frequency are properly expressed in terms of the ion-sound velocity, including the contribution from the ion temperature.
Research on High-Beta Plasmas Based on Two-Fluid Relaxation Theory
http://www.jspf.or.jp/JPFRS/PDF/Vol5/jp ... 05-100.pdf
Relaxation phenomena have been observed in many plasma experiments, and some theoretical explanations have been presented. Recently Mahajan-Yoshida has discovered a new relaxation state based on two-fluid plasma theory, and proposed a possibility for confining high-beta plasmas. In this theory two fluids (electron and ion) should relax to the conditions; V - VxB = aB,B + VxV = FV, resulting in a relation given by B + (VlV)2 = constant. This is called Beltrami/ (generalized) Bernoulli condition. To explore this new relaxation state experimentally, a toroidal device with an internal coil is suitable, where strong plasma flow in the toroidal direction is induced by E x B drift by introducing a radial electric field. Since the E x B flow velocity increases as the minor radius is increased, a high-beta plasma could be confined in the core region. A torus device called S-RT is planned with a floating superconductor coil. This paper describes its engineering design and discusses expected plasma parameters. At present, a device with a normal conductor, called Proto-RT, has been constructed, and experiments of electron injection have been carried out. In addition, a small-scale torus device with a superconductor coil, called Mini-RT, are under construction, where a high-temperature superconductor (HTS) made of Bi-2223 tape is employed as a floating coil. This is the first challenge to explore the feasibility of HTS coils for fusion plasma devices.
Tesla Advanced Electromagnetics
http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/Forum.asp ... omagnetics
The unique properties of the toroid geometry have been studied by several investigators. Jennison, for example, has characterized the properties of radiation trapped in phase-locked cavities similar to a toroid (Jennison, 1978). Application of an external EM field to such a system accelerates it so its velocity increases in a non-linear "staircase" manner. Even more unusual is the observation that the velocity continues to increase even after the stimulus has been removed. This relativistic effect was mathematically accounted for by the presence of two orthogonal standing waves. The interaction of these fields was further shown to be dependent on the toroid configuration and on the distribution of the fields trapped in the cavity. Similar field dynamics may be occurring with toroid resistors which also trap magnetic fields.

The presence of such a non-Hertzian field has been predicted by Seike who used the quantum field theory to characterize the field dynamics in mobius antennae (Seiki, 1990). This type of analysis is referred to as Topological Electronics. Using the magnetic flux associated with a mobius and the electrical potential across a resistor, Seike has solved Maxwell's equations and obtained a solution which describes the imaginary component of the electrostatic scalar potential and the imaginary component of the corresponding magnetic field. The ohmic loss of resistance is calculated to be a negative value indicating that the imaginary current absorbs (rather than emits) heat and is associated with the presence of negative energy. This conclusion is consistent with the negative energy associated with an electron derived from the Dirac equation (Dirac, 1928). Using special relativity theory, Seike further derives a description of the resultant imaginary electric field emitted by a mobius resistor and the real magnetic field contained within it. The equations predict the interchange of energy between these two fields will generate an imaginary magnetic field.

An entirely different method for generating non-Hertzian fields, which doesn't involve self-cancelling coils, is used in non-linear optics by using four-wave mixing and phase conjugation. In four-wave mixing experiments, an EM field is introduced into a vector canceled space, thereby generating a non-Hertzian wave with a greater amplitude than that of the EM field that triggered the reaction (Abrams, 1978). This approach, therefore, is capable of generating high-powered non-Hertzian waves. In phase conjugation experiments, an EM field is reflected off of a non-linear mirror (Pepper, 1982). This generates a non-Hertzian field that is referred to as a phase conjugate replica of the original EM vector. The replica travels backward in time and retraces the path taken by the EM vector. This technique was first used by Raymond Rife in the 1930's when he built the high powered Rife microscope. The microscope utilized the convergence property of phase-conjugate waves, thereby minimizing distortion normally associated with conventional EM fields which diverge as they move away from their source.

Another method for generating non-Hertzian waves, which is commonly used in non-linear plasma physics, is to abruptly pulse a plasma (Wells, 1970). Plasmas are complex macroscopic structures composed of several types of EM fields and non-Hertzian fields including light, circularly polarized Alfven waves, and ion acoustic waves. Plasma theory has described well the complex non-linear interaction among these plasma waves and their non-linear propagation via a self focusing mechanism. Vortex ring structures associated with plasmas have been observed experimentally (Bostick, 1957). The non-Hertzian emissions from plasma tubes are the basis of Priore's cancer- curing machine and Rife's beam ray tube. Finally, some radionic devices may generate non-Hertzians fields by using psychotronic generators.
MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS OF PLASMA RELAXATION
http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/1564.html
This book gives a concise description of the phenomenon of plasma relaxation from the point of view of resistive magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) theory. Magnetized plasmas relax when they seek their natural state of lowest energy subject to certain topological constraints imposed by the magnetic field. Relaxation may be fast and dynamic or slow and gradual depending on the external environment in which the magnetoplasma system evolves. Relaxation occurs throughout the universe and may describe such diverse phenomena as dynamos, solar flares, and the operation of magnetic fusion energy experiments. This book concentrates on the dynamic, rather than variational aspects of relaxation. While the processes described are general, the book focuses on the reversed-field pinch experiment as a paradigm for plasma relaxation and dynamo action. Examples from other branches of plasma physics are also discussed. The authors draw upon their extensive experience in numerical and experimental studies of relaxation.
Magnetohydrostatic Equilibrium for Plasma in a Torus Tube
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959JPSJ...14.1397K
A solution of the magnetohydrostatic problem of finding the equilibrium configuration of a plasma in a slightly bending torus tube with circular cross section is reported. Both the plasma and the tube wall are assumed to be perfectly conducting. The ratio of the tube radius to the radius of curvature, R, of the tube axis is assumed to be so small that its square is negligible. The method is an application of a perturbed cylindrical coordinate system, in which the line element ds is given by ds2{=}(1-ξ R-1r\cosθ)2dr2+(1-η R-1r\cosθ)2r2dθ2+(1+R-1r\cosθ)2dz2, ξ and η being functions of γ satisfying ξ{=}d(rη)/dr. A result is the following. If an axially symmetric plasma cylinder with the material pressure monotonically decreasing towards the plasma surface is slightly bent into a torus, then two isobaric surfaces are closer in the more distant part from the torus axis than in the less distant part.
Visualization of MHD Phenomena in Tokamaks and Stellarators
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/fed/mhd/mhd.html
MHD (Magneto-Hydrodynamics) models are extensively used in the analysis of magnetic fusion devices, industrial processing plasmas, and ionospheric/astrophysical plasmas. MHD is the extension of fluid dynamics to ionized gases, including the effects of electric and magnetic fields. Time-independent MHD equilibria also form the basis for more advanced kinetic and particle-based models of plasma behavior.

This web-page contains a collection of "virtual" MHD plasma images. These are all based upon data arising from computer simulations of toroidal plasmas which have been visualized in various ways. We have employed false color and artificial shadings to highlight a variety of phenomena and theoretical idealizations (e.g., magnetic field lines and flux surfaces) which are not visible in real experimental plasmas. Visualization techniques are very useful for mining large data sets (these can arise either from theoretical simulations or from experimental data). They help scientists to more quickly develop intuitive underestandings, identify new phenomena, present their data to others, and rapidly identify errors in the data and models.
Antigravity
http://www.esotericscience.com/Antigravity.aspx
According to the aether model presented here rotation generates an aether vortex into the 4th dimension. Given that gravity according to this model is essentially a 4D wave phenomenon it suggests that left/right spin difference is a 4th dimensional effect.

The most obvious variable of the 4th dimension is the direction of aether flow, negative to positive or vice versa along the 4D axis.

Therefore it is plausible that a clockwise rotation makes the aether flow in one direction along 4D and anti-clockwise in the opposite direction along 4D thereby producing opposite effects for the two spin directions.
Basic Four Constants (B4C) Circle Expansion/Contraction Ratio Coordination
http://www.wiolawapress.com/b4c.htm
The inexact but close coordination of the circle expansion /contraction ratios for the basic four (real domain) math constants that form a group from several different perspectives illustrate an example of a Gurdjieffian TI-DO shock or bridging energy in an octave process.
Phase Conjugate Magnets!
http://www.evolver.net/user/pod4/blog/p ... te_magnets
The Imploder is based on phase conjugate hydrodynamics (liquid implosion combined with phase conjugate magnetics where the like or similar poles of the Magnets attract each other:

The angle of the 2 like magnetic poles when precise and octahedral across correct permissivity creates the attraction of like poles.

The extreme converging magnetic flux lines create the centripetal inertia at the liquid molecular level which creates the spin cycle sorting by mass. Resulting in the increase molecular order and spin density.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:43 pm

Sonoluminescence, acoustic cavitation, pyroelectric fusion and the ferromagnetic sun

Nuclear Fusion
https://fusion.gat.com/icf/concept/
Fusion is the nuclear reaction that powers the sun and stars. Atoms of light elements such as hydrogen are squeezed together under very high pressure and temperature, and fuse together to form heavier elements such as helium, liberating energy in the process.
Inertial Confinement Fusion
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hb ... inert.html
While magnetic confinement seeks to extend the time that ions spend close to each other in order to facilitate fusion, the inertial confinement strategy seeks to fuse nuclei so fast that they don't have time to move apart. The two approaches to inertial confinement have been laser fusion and ion-beam fusion.
The Z-pinch approach to fusion
http://dorland.pp.ph.ic.ac.uk/magpie/re ... WMAY00.pdf
In a fusion reaction, two light nuclei are squeezed together until they react to form a single heavier nucleus. However, in order to get close enough together to fuse, the nuclei must have sufficient kinetic energy to overcome their mutual electrostatic repulsion. In both stars and the laboratory this is achieved by heating the hydrogen “fuel” until it becomes an ionized gas or plasma with a temperature of 10–100 million degrees. The key to controllable fusion power is to confine this high-temperature plasma for long enough to extract an appreciable amount of energy.
On the Production of Aetheric Stress Waves Utilizing Sound Vibration"
http://keelynet.com/davidson/sound1.htm
The wavelength of sound: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) rattles the nucleus with microwaves and lasers do it with light, but these are all electromagnetic in nature and their wavelengths are on the order of nuclear particles. So, how can sound shake the nucleus in other than as a mass aggregate mode (i.e., the entire block of material) as a sonic resonator? If one examines the wavelengths of sound in various substances one comes to the amazing conclusion that they can be on the order of the nuclear magnetic resonance wavelengths (NMR). NMR is based on the proton spin which produces a small magnetic moment. The thing which makes this so is the fact that the speed of sound is much slower that EM so a relatively low frequency (i.e., compared with microwaves or lightwaves) doesn't travel very far before it has gone through a complete cycle and that distance is on the order of the proton spin resonance frequency. Thus, it is easy to see that sound can also resonate with the atomic level insofar as frequency is concerned.

The nucleus and the aether - It is now fairly well established that the zero point energy (ZPE) is in a wild interchange with the nucleus. The nucleus is directly connected to the aetheric field. The aether is flowing into and out of the nucleus all time. The nucleus has a wonderful little dance going on vibrating and rotating and sucking and shooting out the local adjacent aether.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 095#p26773
Energy streams feeding matter again consist of three currents of force coded according to the triple vibratory scheme; where these triple currents meet they form a center of force and are maintained in a state of mutual attraction. This attractive force is gravity. The focal point of this force is defined as a "neutral center".

The total number of possible forms of atomic subdivision from the basic triple stream are found by simple combinatorial mathematics; namely, 1 x 2 x 3 = 6. Within each of these levels were even finer modes of energy vibration. His final energy liberator was able to dissociate 27 levels of matter. Dissociation does not take place until the atom reaches 2/3 of its diameter. This is done by controlling the radiating current (enharmonic (+)
Sonofusion
http://home.fuse.net/clymer/snf/
Sonoluminescence occurs when sonic pressure waves cause the growth and subsequent collapse of microscopic bubbles. Due to the high pressures released during the collapse of the bubbles, energy can be emitted in the form of light, hence sonoluminescence. If the energy is great enough, it is thought that fusion reactions can be initiated, or sonofusion. Sonofusion or bubble cavitation is thought to be more correctly termed acoustic inertial confinement fusion (acoustic ICF).
Acoustic ICF Technology Overview
http://www.impulsedevices.com/location
When hydrogen (or deuterium, also known as heavy hydrogen) is heated to extremely high temperatures, the nuclei of the hydrogen atoms collide and some fuse together, producing helium and a large amount of energy. The reaction yields over a million times more energy than the energy required to separate the hydrogen from water. A small part of the mass is lost when the atoms combine, or fuse, to make helium, and the small loss in mass is converted into large amounts of energy. However, a cost effective fusion technology is challenging because extremely high temperatures and pressures are required for fusion to occur.
FLASHES MIGHT YIELD CLUES ABOUT FUSION - 1991
http://keelynet.com/keely/sonolum1.txt
When sound waves are transmitted through a liquid, they create a trail of microscopic bubbles. As early as 1929, scientists reported that at unpredictable times they would occasionally see mysterious flashes of blue light, called sonoluminescence when the tiny bubbles collapsed.

This split-second concentration of energy in the collapsing bubbles may be producing the temperatures and pressures needed for the thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen atoms, the nuclear reaction that powers the sun. If scientists could understand sonoluminescence, they might have clues to new ways to trigger thermonuclear fusion, he suggests.

According to Keely, water could be dissociated to a wide range of products depending on what set of frequencies were applied. In one case, we find mention of what appears to be a plasma since it is termed a "luminiferous" gas. The visible flashes as mentioned in the preceding article confirm Keely's statements regarding the "Luminiferous Aether" he found when applying various sonic harmonies to fluids and gases.

Cavitation refers to small "bubbles" which are produced in liquid mediums subjected to pressure displacements. These bubbles are easily noticed in ultrasonic cleaning tanks containing water or other fluids. When the high intensity ultrasonic waves pound the water in a reciprocal motion, the bubbles form on the return stroke of the wave.

Keely also mentions the specific frequencies of 620, 630 and 12,000 CPS as releasing finer forces (greater pressures) held in bondage in the water molecule. The 620 disrupted the molecule; the 630 disrupted the atoms comprising the molecule and the 12,000 disrupted the inter-atomic structure of those atoms. Modern discoveries have termed the components which comprise the atom as "quarks."
Temperature Inside Collapsing Bubble Four Times That of the Sun
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/stellar- ... y-05h.html
"Nobody has been able to measure the temperature inside a single collapsing bubble before. The temperature we measured - about 20,000 degrees Kelvin - is four times hotter than the surface of our sun."

Sonoluminescence arises from acoustic cavitation - the formation, growth and implosion of small gas bubbles in a liquid blasted with sound waves above 18,000 cycles per second.
Sonoluminescence: How Bubbles Turn Sound into Light
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/ ... d.32.1.445
Sonoluminescence, the transduction of sound into light, is a phenomenon that pushes fluid mechanics beyond its limit. An initial state with long wavelength and low Mach number, such as is realized for a gas bubble driven by an audible sound field, spontaneously focuses the energy density so as to generate supersonic motion and a different phase of matter, from which are then emitted picosecond flashes of broad-band UV light. Although the most rational picture of sonoluminescence involves the creation of a “cold” dense plasma by an imploding shock wave, neither the imploding shock nor the plasma has been directly observed. Attempts to attack sonoluminescence from the perspective of continuum mechanics have led to interesting issues related to bubble shape oscillations, shock shape instabilities, and shock propagation through nonideal media, and chemical hydrodynamics. The limits of energy focusing that can be achieved from collapsing bubbles in the far-off equilibrium motion of fluids have yet to be determined either experimentally or theoretically.
SONOLUMINESCENCE AND ACOUSTIC INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION
http://home.fuse.net/clymer/snf/crum.pdf
Sonoluminescence (SL) is a remarkable consequence of acoustic cavitation: Generating light from sound has an intrinsic appeal that extends beyond that of science. Indeed, many of us are aware of the movie Chain Reaction, in which the forces of evil were attempting to take over the world with their newly discovered knowledge of sonoluminescence.

The central premise for acoustic ICF involves the ability for a bubble to concentrate energy during its collapse. The simplest form of this remarkable energy concentration is found in single bubble sonoluminescence (SBSL), in which a single bubble is acoustically levitated in a liquid due to the radiation pressure forces exerted on the bubble. Under the appropriate conditions, these acoustic radiation pressure forces exactly balance the buoyancy forces exerted by gravity and the bubble remains at a fixed position with respect to the container that contains the standing wave sound field. Consequently, this levitated bubble is driven into radial oscillations by the sound field. Again, under certain relatively restricted conditions of acoustic pressure amplitude and frequency, and with a considerable amount of gas removed from the liquid, the bubble gives off a steady glow of light; hence the term sonoluminescence.
PINCHED CAVITATION JETS AND FUSION EVENTS
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/String ... hedcav.pdf
The collapse of a transient cavitation bubble in deuteriumoxide produces a high density plasma jet containing 109 deuterons. The inertial compression of a jet via an electron induced magnetic field pinch effect on its plasma contents produces high to even higher deuteron densities in the order of 1025 gm/cc before implanting into a foil target. This model is parallel to the systems found in the hot plasmas of inertial systems.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 095#p26750

Dwarfs are 'Black stars' in that they have low luminosity. They do emit considerable UV radiation, however. Their primary energy is not thermonuclear, but piezoelectric (ionic energy due to gravitational pressure) (pyroelectric fusion).
Use of Atomic Fuels for Rocket-Powered Launch Vehicles Analyzed.
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT1998/5000 ... ewski.html
I have read your article on the Joe cell Orgone accumulator where you describe the three different gases. The third gas, the one that burns with the loudest explosion, may be nascent hydrogen, a.k.a. monatomic hydrogen H1.

It is believed that the energy required to convert H2 into H1 is much lower than the energy released when H1 recombines into H2. It is possible that orgone energy turns H2 into H1 and when ignited releases a tremendous "implosion" (as H1 occupies more room than H2).
Hydrogen Bonding
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/top ... en-bonding
Hydrogen bonding is important in a few crystals, notably in ice. With its lone electron, a hydrogen atom usually forms a single covalent bond with an electronegative atom. In the hydrogen bond the atom is ionized to a proton. The proton sits between two anions and joins them. Hydrogen bonding occurs with only the most electronegative ions: nitrogen, oxygen, and fluorine. In water the hydrogen links pairs of oxygen ions. Water is found in many different crystal structures, but they all have the feature that the hydrogen atoms sit between pairs of oxygen.
Metallic hydrogen
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-metallic-hydrogen.htm
Metallic hydrogen is a sort of super-compressed hydrogen found in the cores of gas giants and stars. As hydrogen tops the Periodic Table's alkali metal column, it has been known for a while that it has the potential to be a metal, but only under extreme pressures. Metallic hydrogen is crushed so closely that the atomic nuclei are separated only by a dense electron soup which flows between them. It is significantly less dense than neutronium, however, where the electrons merge together with the protons in hydrogen to make neutrons. Like all metals, metallic hydrogen is conductive and requires an electrical current to measure the presence of metallization.

Although the metallic hydrogen produced at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory was solid, it has been theorized that it may be possible to create liquid metallic hydrogen, if even greater pressures, around 4 million atmospheres, are used. Calculations have also determined that metallic hydrogen might be a superconductor at room temperature.
Cold Fusion Rocket Engine
http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Cold_20F ... t_20Engine
Did you ever hear of "metallic hydrogen" before?

This is an "allotrope" of hydrogen (a unique way in which atoms of just one element can connect to each other, the way ozone is an allotrope of oxygen), and theorists are quite certain that it can exist, especially in places like the interior of Jupiter, although it is difficult to say for sure that any has been created here on Earth (an implosion-squeeze is typically used, which is naturally followed very quickly by sample-destroying explosive expansion).

That process, of trying to create metallic hydrogen, reminds me of a research effort known as "Inertial Confinement Fusion". The idea there is to squeeze the sample of hydrogen (a deuterium/tritium mixture) until it exceeds the kind of temperature and pressure found in the cores of stars, at which point a small nuclear fusion explosion occurs.


Polyatomic allotropes of hydrogen, nuclear fusion
http://www.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel/preprint ... 0_0639.pdf
The author predicts that polyatomic allotropes of hydrogen such as triatomic deuterium and quadratomic deuterium are formed inside the core of the sun.

The author proposes a chemical bond called "single electron sharing" between two atoms to explain the theoretical existence of a triatomic deuterium molecule, quadratomic deuterium molecule and higher polyatomic hydrogen molecules. This bond that is based on a "single electron sharing" is called "mono-electron bond" or "alpha bond". A hydrogen bond between water molecules is a good example of an alpha bond or mono-electron bond.

The author gives the illustrations of the allotropes of Hydrogen namely, monatomic hydrogen, diatomic hydrogen, triatomic hydrogen and quadratomic hydrogen.

The author's theory of chemical bond of "single electron sharing" called "alpha bond or mono-electron bond" can account the existence of new polyatomic allotropes of Hydrogen (such as D*3, D*4, D*5, etc.).
Pyroelectric fusion
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... 885#p22882

Pyroelectric fusion refers to the technique of using pyroelectric crystals to generate high strength electrostatic fields to accelerate deuterium ions (tritium might also be used someday) into a metal hydride target also containing deuterium (or tritium) with sufficient kinetic energy to cause these ions to undergo nuclear fusion.
Pyroelectricity
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary. ... ric+effect
Pyroelectricity is the property of certain crystals to produce a state of electric polarity by a change of temperature. Certain dielectric (electrically nonconducting) crystals develop an electric polarization (dipole moment per unit volume) when they are subjected to a uniform temperature change. This pyroelectric effect occurs only in crystals which lack a center of symmetry and also have polar directions (that is, a polar axis). These conditions are fulfilled for 10 of the 32 crystal classes. Typical examples of pyroelectric crystals are tourmaline, lithium sulfate monohydrate, cane sugar, and ferroelectric barium titanate.

Pyroelectric crystals can be regarded as having a built-in or permanent electric polarization. When the crystal is held at constant temperature, this polarization does not manifest itself because it is compensated by free charge carriers that have reached the surface of the crystal by conduction through the crystal and from the surroundings. However, when the temperature of the crystal is raised or lowered, the permanent polarization changes, and this change manifests itself as pyroelectricity.

The magnitude of the pyroelectric effect depends upon whether the thermal expansion of the crystal is prevented by clamping or whether the crystal is mechanically unconstrained. In the clamped crystal, the primary pyroelectric effect is observed, whereas in the free crystal, a secondary pyroelectric effect is superposed upon the primary effect. The secondary effect may be regarded as the piezoelectric polarization arising from thermal expansion, and is generally much larger than the primary effect.
Ferromagnets
http://electron9.phys.utk.edu/phys136d/ ... terial.htm
Ferromagnetic materials are materials that have magnetic properties similar to those of iron. They can become permanently magnetized. Examples of ferromagnetic materials are nickel, cobalt, and alnico, an aluminum-nickel-cobalt alloy.
Our Iron Sun
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienc ... Iron%20Sun
The image of the sun above was recorded in the light given off by iron atoms that have lost 11 of their 26 electrons. The energy required to remove that many electrons is far greater than the energy available at the surface of the sun. These iron ions occur high in the sun's atmosphere--in the corona--where the effective temperature is 2 million degrees or more, 400 times that of the photosphere.

The sun's atmosphere contains a complex of electrical fields that are strong enough to pull off those 11 electrons. A field that strong will also accelerate the ions to speeds interpreted as high temperatures. This activity is only one element in a circuit that connects the sun with electrical currents in the Galaxy. These galactic power lines are the source of energy that "lights" the stars, including the sun. The energy from those power lines is liberated at the photosphere rather than being transported from the core to the surface.

The voltage between the sun and its galactic environment is not distributed uniformly and gradually. As is typical with plasma behavior, most of the voltage difference occurs in "double layers" (DLs). These are thin layers with an excess of positive ions on one side and an excess of negative electrons on the other. They resemble, and act like, capacitors: They store electrical energy in the strong electrical field between the positive and negative layers.

Each DL is separated from the next by a low voltage gradient, across which ions and electrons "drift." This drift current is often called a wind. A familiar example is the "solar wind" that drifts from the DLs near the sun to the DLs that make up the heliopause at the other end of the sun's connection with the galactic currents.

When the low-energy iron ions from the photosphere drift into the DL above the stronger electrical field strips off more electrons and accelerates the ions to high speeds. The strength of the field keeps the ions moving in alignment so it is not apparent that their energy is increasing. But when they emerge into the low-voltage gradient of the corona their motion becomes turbulent, like that of water in a waterfall when it hits the river below. Because temperature is a measure of randomness of motion, the corona appears to "heat up" suddenly, and the 11-times-ionized iron atoms begin to radiate their newly acquired energy.

What the Electric Universe sees in "the iron sun" is the iron-ion component of the electric current driving the sun's radiation output as part of a galactic electrical circuit.
Is hydrogen fusion really a type of magnetic induction?

The Core of the sun -- a ball-of-light
http://www.grandunification.com/hyperte ... heSun.html
The current model for the sun is that it is a gravitationally collapsed ball of gas and dust that has so much internal pressure that it has heated the core particles to a temperature where they fuse hydrogen nuclei into heavier particles using fusion.

The Ball-of-Light Particle Model predicts something significantly different. Instead of being formed from a gravitationally collapsed gas and dust cloud, the Ball-of-Light Particle Model predicts the sun as a large decaying ball-of-light. The central core is a single object decaying. As the central core decays, electromagnetic waves on the surface of the core induce normal elementary particles that create an envelope of material that surrounds the core. While the envelope of surrounding material does contain hydrogen, and some of the hydrogen does fuse according to normal fusion theory, the majority of the sun's source of energy does not come from fusion -- or fission either. The major source of the sun's energy is the decaying central core.

The general relationship for the Ball-of-Light Particle Model is E cross B = G -- i.e., the gravitational field strength is proportional to the cross product of the Electric field strength and the Magnetic field strength. This level of understanding can be accomplished with simple math. A description slightly more in depth is: the mass of an elementary particle is equal to the integration, over a sphere, of the cross between the electric and magnetic field strength. This level of understanding can be accomplished with calculus. A description a lot more in depth is: the characteristics of photons and every elementary particle can be predicted using, the electromagnetic fields on the surface of an elementary particle, classical electromagnetics, and spherical harmonics.

In essence, almost every particle of material that exists in the envelope of the sun -- excepting particles pulled in by gravity -- is created, that is, induced by the electromagnetic fields on the surface of the core of the sun. Small, intense electromagnetic fields induce particles such as: electrons, protons, neutrons, and other normal atomic nuclei. Larger less intense fields may not be able to induce individual particles, but they can induce the plasma to move and undulate.

A new hypothesis for the primary energy production process is needed -- one that does not rely on the conversion of hydrogen using fusion.

The Ball-of-Light Particle Model predicts nuclear fusion occurs in a much smaller volume than current theory predicts. Instead of fusion occurring in the core of the sun, fusion occurs in just the inner layer of the outer envelope. No fusion is occurring in the core because it is one solid object to begin with.
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/1147/The-Sun-and-Energy
The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.

The sun’s energy source is thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside the sun’s core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the sun’s core trigger high energy collisions that create the main constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium, helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created that expand and accelerate the universe.

It is well known the sun has a powerful magnetic field. What is its source? According to the Ball-of-Light Particle Model, the core of the sun is a single object -- a ball-of-light. This elementary particle has by its very nature powerful electric and magnetic fields on its surface. The sun's magnetic field is simply a reflection of the core's magnetic field.

Many of the observed phenomena on the sun are magnetic so it is reasonable to think that the sun is heated by magnetic induction.

If the sun is heated from magnetic fields from the center of the galaxy, where is the energy of the galaxy is coming from? The magnetic fields create mass in the stars, and when this mass is ejected into space as solar wind, it starts to free fall to the center of the galaxy.

The gravitational potential energy of the free falling dust and gas is collected by accretion disks of black holes at the galactic center. This gravitational potential energy is much higher than the energy used to create the mass. The accretion disks combined with the dynamo effect create the magnetic fields at the galactic center that produce more mass at the stars, and so forth.

In additional to the property of a superconductor the sun has the property of a magnet. The sun magnetic filed has similarities to the earth magnetic field. The sun has a dipole magnetic field, and it is similar to that of a bar magnet.

Two stars could be imagined as a superconductor and a magnet. When one star moves toward a second star according to Lenz’s law the second star will repel the first star and oppose the movement. The magnetic fields of the first star induce electro-motive forces and currents, according to Faraday’s law, in the second star, and those currents create magnetic fields that repel the first star. This means that the stars will resist relative movement in the galactic disk. This leads to the rigid model of the galactic disk shown in this figure and a rotation curve shown in Figure 5. The actual flat rotation curves of the galaxies imply that the stars move in relation to each other. This creates induction currents and heat that fuel the stars.

mague
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 2:44 am

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by mague » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:59 am

Word of God

Ancient Egypt
So far, we know Hu as the personification of Divine Utterance. However, some legends maintain that he was not just a part of creation, but that he was the creator. It is said that as Hu drew his first breath, there was in that sound the essence of his name. Hence, we have the name Hu, which sounds remarkably like the sound of an expelling breath.

With each breath Hu expelled, creation took place. The first breath created the Soul of Osiris. His last creation was the Sun. So it is said that Hu is the Word of God, the first and the last breaths, Hu Hu.

Source: http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/hu.htm
Hu is recognized in many other cultures and religions all over the world.

The Hu Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23Z9l_Ni428

Space Odyssey 2001/ Richard Strauss: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igAy4bG8 ... re=related
Listen to the sound at the beginning and how it reminas in the background all the time.

Space Odyssey 2010 (starts at 1:25): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EALnJHyz ... re=related

Sound of Sun: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGwDdTZBAEY and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIJLM2oZip8
Earth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoOg4US5 ... re=related
Io: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAKXaUMZ ... re=related

There are many more. I think NASA itself released a CD or DVD.

Bringing Matter To Life With Sound :

This is just awesome. Form a swiss scientist in 1960. Its really worth to go for the whole 30 minutes.
Part1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05Io6lop3mk
Part2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahJYUVDY ... re=related
Part3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4jUMWFK ... re=related

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:50 am

For some reason I am receiving error messages for the youtube videos that say the URLs are invalid and cannot be loaded; I have no idea why unless it has to do with my "cookie management" settings.

lizzie
Guest

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by lizzie » Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:29 pm

Mague said: So far, we know Hu as the personification of Divine Utterance. However, some legends maintain that he was not just a part of creation, but that he was the creator. It is said that as Hu drew his first breath, there was in that sound the essence of his name. Hence, we have the name Hu, which sounds remarkably like the sound of an expelling breath.
I think this is the real “breath of Hu." I bet he could actually raise the dead.

http://www.wimp.com/throatsinging

seasmith
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: On “gods”, genes, alchemy, bioluminesence, and longevity

Unread post by seasmith » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:38 pm

`
Lizzie wrote,
On the Production of Aetheric Stress Waves Utilizing Sound Vibration"
http://keelynet.com/davidson/sound1.htm
The wavelength of sound: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) rattles the nucleus with microwaves and lasers do it with light, but these are all electromagnetic in nature and their wavelengths are on the order of nuclear particles. So, how can sound shake the nucleus in other than as a mass aggregate mode (i.e., the entire block of material) as a sonic resonator? If one examines the wavelengths of sound in various substances one comes to the amazing conclusion that they can be on the order of the nuclear magnetic resonance wavelengths (NMR). NMR is based on the proton spin which produces a small magnetic moment. The thing which makes this so is the fact that the speed of sound is much slower that EM so a relatively low frequency (i.e., compared with microwaves or lightwaves) doesn't travel very far before it has gone through a complete cycle and that distance is on the order of the proton spin resonance frequency. Thus, it is easy to see that sound can also resonate with the atomic level insofar as frequency is concerned.

The nucleus and the aether - It is now fairly well established that the zero point energy (ZPE) is in a wild interchange with the nucleus. The nucleus is directly connected to the aetheric field. The aether is flowing into and out of the nucleus all time. The nucleus has a wonderful little dance going on vibrating and rotating and sucking and shooting out the local adjacent aether.

Have often thought of sound waves acting as magnetism does in an EM/ES milieu,
(tho in a denser plain or field of motion, inducing cymatic hierarchies on {a} molecular scale.

Still looking for the 'speed of magnetism' ...

~

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests