Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:08 pm

Wilbert Smith was a Senior Radio Engineer for the Canadian government. He worked on a top secret Geo Magnetic Technology project in the 1950's called Project Magnet.

http://www.mysteriesofcanada.com/Canada ... magnet.htm

The only reason I put this in Mad Ideas is because this document circulates in the UFO circle due to the content.
Having said that, it is a real and valid document as far as I have been able to determine. His knowledge and ideas are evident in his book "The New Science" which is well worth the read.

This formerly "Top Secret" document was retrieved from the University of Ottawa Library archives by Nick Balaskas (York University).

Wilbert B SMITH
Project Magnet

For the past several years we have been engaged in the study of various aspects of radio wave propagation. The vagaries of this phenomenon have led us into the fields of aurora, cosmic radiation, atmospheric radio-activity, and geo-magnetism. In the case of geo-magnetics our investigations have contributed little to our knowledge of radio wave propagation as yet, but nevertheless have indicated several avenues of investigation which may well be explored with profit. For example, we are on the track of a means whereby the potential energy of the earth's magnetic field may be abstracted and used.

On the basis of theoretical considerations a small and very crude experimental unit was constructed approximately a year ago and tested in our Standards Laboratory. The tests were essentially successful in that sufficient energy was abstracted from the earth's field to operate a voltmeter, approximately 50 millivolts. Although this unit was far from being self-sustaining, it nevertheless demonstrated the soundness of the basic principles in a qualitative manner and provided useful data for the design of a better unit.

The design is now completed for a unit which should be self-sustaining and in addition provide a small surplus of power. Such a unit, in addition to functioning as a "pilot power plant" should be large enough to permit the study of the various reaction forces which are expected to develop. We believe that we are on the track of something which may well prove to be the introduction of a new technology.

While in Washington attending the NARB Conference, two books were released, one titled "Behind the Flying Saucers" by Frank Scully, and the other "The Flying Saucers are Real" by Donald Keyhoe. Both books deal mostly with the sightings of unidentified objects and both books claim that flying object were of extra-terrestrial origin and might well be space ships from another planet. Scully claimed that the preliminary studies of one saucer that fell into the hands of the united States Government indicated that they operated on some hitherto unknown magnetic principles. It appeared to me that our own work in geo-magnetics might well be the linkage between our technology and the technology by which the saucers are designed and operated. If it is assumed that our geo-magnetic investigations are in the right direction, the theory of operation of the saucers becomes quite straightforward, with all observed features explained qualitatively and quantitatively.

I made discrete inquiries through the Canadian Embassy staff in Washington who were able to obtain for me the following information;

a. The matter is the most highly classified subject in the United States Government, rating higher even than the H-bomb,

b. Flying saucers exist.

c. Their modus operandi is unknown but concentrated effort is being made by a small group headed by Dr. Vannavar Bush.

d. The entire matter is considered by the United States authorities to be of tremendous significance.

I was further informed that the United States authorities are investigating along quite a number of lines which might possibly be related to the saucers such as mental phenomena and I gather that they are not doing to well since they indicated that if Canada s doing anything at all in geo-magnetics they would welcome a discussion with suitably accredited Canadians.

While I am not yet in a position to say that we have solved even the first problems in geo-magnetic energy release, I feel that the correlation between our basic theory and the available information on sauces checks too closely to be mere coincidence. It is my honest opinion that we are on the right track and are fairly close to at least some of the answers.

Mr Wright, Defense Research Board liaison officer at the Canadian Embassy in Washington, was extremely anxious for us to get in touch with Dr Solandt, Chairman of the Defense Research Board, to discuss with him future investigation along the lines of geo-magnetic energy release.

I do not feel that we have as yet sufficient data to place before Defense Research Board which would enable a program to be initiated within organization, but I do feel that further research is necessary and I would prefer to see it done within the framework of our own organization with, of course, full cooperation and exchange of information with other interested bodies.

I discussed this matter fully with Dr Solandt, Chairman of Defense Research Board. On Novemebr 20th and placed before him as much information as I have been able to gather to date. Dr Solandt agreed that work on geo-magnetic energy should go forward as rapidly as possible and offered full cooperation of his Board in providing laboratory facilities, acquisition of necessary items of equipment, and specialized personnel for incidental work in the project. I indicated to Dr Solandt that we would prefer to keep the project within the Department of transport for the time being until we have obtained sufficient information to permit a complete assessment of the value of the work.

It is therefore recommended that a Projet be set up within the framework of this Section to study this problem and that the work be carried on a part time basis until such time as sufficient tangible results can be seen to warrant more definitive action. Cost of the program in its initial stages are expected to be less than a few hundred dollars and can be carried by our Radio Standards Lab appropriation.

Attached hereto is a draft of terms of reference for such a project which, if authorized, will enable us to proceed with this research work within our own organization.

W.B. Smith
Senior Radio Engineer

http://www.rexresearch.com/smith/magnet.htm




The New Science by Wilbert B. SMITH (1910-1962)
http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:NOd ... cd=3&gl=ca

It is a really nice EU document.
Take the time to read the above book by this man who was working on Geomagnetic Technology. It makes all the work I have done on Nilola Tesla, Konstantine Meyl Longitudinal Scalars and Howard Johnson Spintronics fall into place. It also involves the Zome model of 2,3,5 infinity and dimensions without strings, something he calls the Q Factor. I often take the Fifth Dimension work of Klauza Klein as valid without resorting to strings, the work of Smith works from Six Dimensions which makes more sense in a right angle universe.

The Tempic Field is the same thing as Meyls Hydromagnetic Field in his Unified Field Theory I have posted. Very interesting read with that information as a background to context the information Mr Smith gives about dual opposite vortex spins electron positron fundamental units, quaternions, scalars and right angle phenomenon and reality. Again gravity is a subset of the three field model of this EU.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:09 pm

Wilbert Smith was a Canadian Radio Engineer, his research was in Radio Wave Propagation, Aurora, Cosmic Radiation, Atmosphereic Radio Activity and Geo Magnatism. He was the Superintendent of Radio Engineering with the Department of Transportation. In his essay The New Science, Wilbert advances a unified concept governing our awareness of reality, explains the generation of this reality, and describes the factors which mold it into the numerous forms in which we find it. His approach is unique … in bringing into play not only those factors which are usually considered as physical and material, but also the more subtle yet no less important influence of the mental and spiritual. As shown in Table 1, reality is structured in The New Science on the basis of 12 orthogonal principle dimensions organized into four “fabrics”, each having three parameters. Each parameter is said to include all of the parameters that precede it.

Table 1.
The 12 Dimensions of the New Science Four Fabric Parameter
Space Fabric: Length, Area, Volume
Field Fabric: Gradient, Divergence, Curl
Control Fabric: Randomness, Free Will, Sequence
Percipitation Fabric: Form, Multiplicity, Aggregation

The Space and Field fabrics are obvious principles for describing physical reality as we know it. The Length, Area, and Volume parameters of the Space fabric specify the 3-dimensional nature of our reality. The Gradient parameter of the Tempic Field fabric is a scalar that specifies the property of change, and is the basis for our experience of time. Divergence is a vector parameter that is the basis for electric fields, which spread out everywhere from points of reference. Curl is another vector parameter that, with the Divergence parameter, forms the basis for oriented magnetic fields.

The Control fabric deals with the role that free will plays in creation. The Randomness parameter is the basis for the unrestricted orientation that objects defined by the Space and Field fabrics can have. The existence of orientation introduces an asymmetry not present in operations on previous parameters. That is, not all orientations are equivalent. The parameter of Free Will addresses the need to make a choice to resolve the asymmetry. The Sequence parameter, which includes the previous element of free will, is the basis for order or specific arrangement in reality.

The Percipitation fabric contains the principles that permit the creation of matter. The Form parameter is the basis for the existence of boundaries in reality. The Multiplicity parameter permits the creation of more than one form, and enables the various elements of matter and energy to come into existence. The Aggregation parameter permits the assembly of these elements into purposeful structures, both animate and inanimate.

The set of principles takes on new meaning when it is recognized as a recipe for creating rather than merely describing reality. If we are to take an active role in creating the fundamentals of a complex reality, then inclusion of the Free Will parameter is essential.

Recall that each parameter includes all of the parameters that precede it. For example, the concept of volume includes the concepts of length and area. But note that Volume is placed before the principle of Free Will. From this, we can infer that volume is not subject to some decision in order to be a property of reality. Therefore, the concept of volume does not exist at the pleasure of some consciousness having free will. The placement of the Length, Area, Volume, Gradient, Divergence, Curl, and Randomness principles before Free Will means that these basic attributes of the universe are not altered by choice. The remaining principles of Sequence, Form, Multiplicity, and Aggregation are, however, all subject to free will. Physical entities such as atomic particles and biological organisms depend on these principles for their existence and, therefore, are subject to manipulation by consciousness.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:14 pm

Wilbert Smith Flash Show
http://www.checktheevidence.com/WBSmith ... %20Web.swf

Historical Information on Wilbert Smith
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/muf ... bsmith.htm

Radio show with his son James Smith a Ottawa High School Vice Principle
http://www.checktheevidence.com/Disclos ... 0Smith.mp3

Audio Speech on UFO by Wilbert Smith circa 1950's
http://www.checktheevidence.com/WBSmith ... ch1958.mp3

UFO's, 1950 Wilbert Smith
http://www.presidentialufo.com/crashed_saucer.htm

Project Magnet and Wilbert Smith and Dr. Vannevar Bush
http://presidentialufo.com/embassy.htm

In this letter written from Wilbert Smith to the Canadian Embassy in Washington, Wilbert Smith details the developments related to Project Magnet. He states that there are three full-time engineers working on Project Magnet, and that the project is classified "Secret."

Most importantly Smith mentions that an article and Smith's revision of the article written by Major Donald Keyhoe, regarding the work being done on Project magnet had been sent to Dr. Vannevar Bush "for clearance." Bush was identified by Wilbert Smith in his November 1950 Top Secret Memo as the head of a small group working on the flying saucer program.

A group of Canadian Scientists has been working for some time on certain problems connected with the earth’s magnetic field. These investigations appear to point the way to new technology in magnetics, and if the initial conclusions are correct, they offer a ready-made explanation for many of the striking features, which have been reported in connection with the sighting of flying saucers. The basic promise is that it is possible to produce a magnetic “sink” within the earth’s field; that is, a region into which the magnetic flux will flow at a controlled rate, giving some of its potential energy in the process. Such a sink would have many interesting properties, such as the following;

1. Electrical power could be obtained from the collapse of the earth’s magnetic field into the sink.

2. Powerful reaction forces could be developed into a conducting ring surrounding the sink and offset from it, sufficient to support a suitably designed ship and to propel it.

3. If the rate of flow of magnetic flux is modulated the resulting magnetic disturbance could be used for communication purposes.

It is curious to note that most of the descriptions of flying saucers are in accordance with the design, which would be necessary to exploit the properties of a magnetic sink. For example, the saucers are described as consisting of a large circular disc, slightly dished, with a small central cabin. In this sense, the sink could be located in the upper central part of the cabin, and the collapsing field in cutting through the surrounding magnetic ring would induce in it an electric current, which would react with the magnetic field that induced it, producing a force, which would have a substantial vertical component. Support and propulsion of the ship would then be a combination of this resultant force, the airfoil action of the disc, and the interaction between currents in the disc by its rotation and the main field.

Rotation of the disc may be either deliberate, for induction of eddy currents or may be incidentally caused by the electronic drag of the very large current circulating around the disc. In any case, there is good observational evidence that the disc appears to rotate.

Since the lift on the saucer will be proportional to the product of the earth’s magnetic field and the field produced by the current induced by the disc, it follows that when the saucer is accelerating upwards, a greater force is required and hence a greater circulating current. If the circulating current is sufficiently large and the cooling of the disc is inadequate, it may become red or even white hot, which is in line with several reported observations. Also, under certain conditions of operation a very high voltage may be built up between the center and the rim of the disc, which would result in corona discharge through the surrounding air if the saucer were at a sufficiently high altitude. Such a discharge would resemble the northern lights but would be very much more intense. This also seems to be confirmed by observations.

Navigation of such a flying saucer would be a very complex process indeed. In the first place the earth’s magnetic field makes all sorts of angles with the horizontal, depending upon geographical latitude, and upon peculiar local conditions. Thus, the direction of the force, which results from the interaction of the earth’s field and the field of the disc, may be in almost any direction.

Furthermore the tilt of the saucer to get the reaction force in the wanted direction most probably will result in aerodynamic forces in some other direction. Navigation therefore would resolve into a determination of the field direction, comparison with the direction in which it is desired to move, and an analysis of the aerodynamic forces, which would result from such a motion, and the suitable correction in the initial tilt of the saucer and the flow of magnetic flux. It is doubtful if a human pilot could manage to do all this at the speed that which would be necessary to maneuver a saucer at the speeds and through the intricate motions, which have been observed. It is therefore highly probable that the saucer control systems are semi if not totally automatic, and most likely a push button effort.

There are many reports of saucers hovering in one spot for some time. For a saucer designed to operate as described, this would probably be its easiest maneuver, as it would be necessary merely to adjust the flux flow and tilt until the resultant force exactly balanced the weight of the saucer. There would be little or no aerodynamic problem in this case.

The only sound, which would be expected from such a saucer, would be a swish as of any object passing through the air, plus any incidental noises, which might originate with the internal machinery of the saucer. There would be no roar of engine exhaust or jets, or beat of propellers, or any other noises usually associated with aircraft.

It would be quite possible for a saucer such as has been described to leave vapor trails if it happened to pass through a region of supersaturated air, with a sufficient voltage on the disc to produce a corona discharge. The ions produced by the discharge would form nuclei for the condensation of droplets of water or crystals of frost, and the path of the saucer would be marked by the resulting visible cloud.

http://www.presidentialufo.com/keyhoe_redraft.htm



The Field Fabric sets up three, and only three fields! Tempic, Electric, Magnetic Fields which are capable of exercising forces on the field structures which constitute matter and energy, so gravity must be due to the operation of one or more of these three fields. The fact that observation indicates that gravity falls off as the inverse square of the distance indicates that it is essentially an electric field, divergence. The fact that we cannot cancel it out by the application of the electric fields to which we have access is due to the fact that we cannot make the canceling field coherent, and the best we can do is to integrate the effects of the fields, not the fields themselves, to produce an opposing force in a limited region.

When the basic particle was being considered, it was established that four kinds of particles were possible: right hand and left hand spin and right hand and left hand precession, which gave particles having positive charges with plus and minus increments, but all having the same magnetic moments and tempic fields. Within these particles, and within systems made up of them as atoms, etc., there is field coherence, so that there are specific values for these fields determined by the particles themselves, and outside of them the fields will also be quite specific.

Since Gravity is essentially an electric field phenomenon, albeit not an electrostatic one, its distribution and behavior will be much the same as any other electric field, except for its dynamic characteristic. Altering the polarization will alter the force exerted by gravity, but because this is a square relationship, no such alteration can make the force negative (operate in the opposite direction). However, altering the divergence will alter both the magnitude and direction of the force, and the trick for controlling gravity is precisely this.

Since the gravitational field is due to the skew electric field, or stated differently, to the induction from the motional electric field, this is the logical region to explore for the mechanism by which fields may be produced to combine with the gravitational field to produce a resultant having a divergence more to our liking.

In taking a quick look at the gravitational relationships of the basic particles alone there are some interesting aspects. Since in an established region practically all the precessions are the same, the free particles will have a motional field of polarity the same as the particles making up the composite ones, and therefore they will be "repelled" by gravity. This repulsion, however, will be quite a bit less than the electrostatic attraction, so a compromise position will be established at such a distance that everything will be in equilibrium.

In the atomic structure there are therefore the electric field forces holding the electrons onto the nucleus, the magnetic forces fixing them in position, the gravitational forces tending to push them away and resulting in a compromised location, with the tempic field contributing to the dynamic conditions within and contiguous to the structure. All these forces have been developed from the basic concepts already put forward and are possible of confirmation by experiment if we ask nature the right questions. These same forces extend beyond the atom into molecular chemistry, crystal forms, and amorphous aggregates. These dame forces exist within the atomic nuclei together with others resulting from the interpenetration of the fields and their coherence. Matter, though magnificently complex is elegantly simple in its basic structure when understood.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:15 pm

I understand his interpertation of gravity as an element of the EMT field as a push instead of a pull. I remember reading this about ten years ago since no one still has given a good explanation of gravity. They mentioned it could be a push and not a pull.

Interesting.

I need to go back and review the work by Konstantine Meyl and his Unifed Field Theory to compare his view of gravity with a dual opposite vortex electron/positron model and Hydromagnetic ie Tempic Field.

After a quick review of the Meyl model the gravity effect is a closed field line of the EM field. I can see that as a repulsion. Its also interesting that his electron vortex has 511Kv from edge to center at which point it becomes a planar vortex and longitudinal.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:17 pm

Since the gravitational field is due to the skew electric field, or stated differently, to the induction from the motional electric field, this is the logical region to explore for the mechanism by which fields may be produced to combine with the gravitational field to produce a resultant having a divergence more to our liking.

So if gravity is a skew of the electric field what does that mean to its manipulation? A quick look at wiki show a connection to curl. Maybe someone could jump in here and help me understand the relationship to Meyls closed field line model vs the divergence model. Are they two sides of the same coin? It says the divergence of a vector field is a scalar.



In vector calculus, the divergence is an operator that measures the magnitude of a vector field's source or sink at a given point; the divergence of a vector field is a (signed) scalar. For a vector field that denotes the velocity of air expanding as it is heated, the divergence of the velocity field would have a positive value because the air expands. If the air cools and contracts, the divergence is negative. The divergence could be thought of as a measure of the change in density.

A vector field that has zero divergence everywhere is called solenoidal.
In physical terms, the divergence of a three dimensional vector field is the extent to which the vector field flow behaves like a source or a sink at a given point. It is a local measure of its "outgoingness"—the extent to which there is more exiting an infinitesimal region of space than entering it. If the divergence is nonzero at some point then there must be a source or sink at that position

The Laplacian of a scalar field is the divergence of the field's gradient.

The divergence of the curl of any vector field (in three dimensions) is constant and equal to zero.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergence



Divergence


The physical significance of the divergence of a vector field is the rate at which "density" exits a given region of space. The definition of the divergence therefore follows naturally by noting that, in the absence of the creation or destruction of matter, the density within a region of space can change only by having it flow into or out of the region. By measuring the net flux of content passing through a surface surrounding the region of space, it is therefore immediately possible to say how the density of the interior has changed. This property is fundamental in physics, where it goes by the name "principle of continuity." When stated as a formal theorem, it is called the divergence theorem, also known as Gauss's theorem. In fact, the definition in equation (1) is in effect a statement of the divergence theorem.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Divergence.html


More Links on Divergence


The divergence is a scalar function of a vector field. The divergence theorem is an important mathematical tool in electricity and magnetism.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/diverg.html
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:19 pm

posted by stefanr

Check the index of the scalar waves book of Meyl and find "Laplace" and if you would be so kind to copy and paste it here, there might be correlation

I thought Meyl appraoched it like:


Two elementary particles or two accumulations of matter concisting of these are able to reduce the distance to each other for reason of their fields, which we interpret as a force of attraction.

The electromagnetic interaction of a particle is a result of the influence of the open field lines arising from it on the dimensions of the space, in which it is.

Gravitation is a result of the influence of the field lines with a closed course running parallel to the surface of the particles on the dimensions of the space, in which they are.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:21 pm

Here is the page you requested. Not sure how that helps me in my quest to understand gravity as a squew of the electric field. Skew actually means divergence correct?


The divergence is a scalar function of a vector field. The divergence theorem is an important mathematical tool in electricity and magnetism.

Sssssoooooo
If Longitudinal Energy and the scalar is instantneous in its relationship to the three fields then divergence being a scalar is important if its gravity. I can see the closed line being repulsive and balanced by electrostatic attraction at the atomic level. Is that not correct?

Laplace versus Maxwell by Konstantine Meyl
Longitudinal waves as is well-known don't know a fixed velocity of propagation at all.
Since they run in the direction of an oscillating field pointer also the vector of velocity
will oscillate. For so-called relativistic velocities in the range of the speed of light c the
field vortices are subject to the Lorentz contraction. That means, the faster the oscillating
vortex is on its way, the smaller it gets. The vortex, as a mediator of a scalar wave
carrying impulse, permanently changes its diameter.

Since, in the case of the vortices, it should concern rolled up waves, the vortex velocity
will continue to be c, with which the wave now runs around the vortex centre in a circle.
From that follows that if the diameter gets smaller, the wavelength of the vortex as well
will decrease, whereas the eigenfrequency of the vortex accordingly increases.
If the next moment the vortex oscillates back, the frequency again decreases. The vortex
acts as a frequency converter! The mixture of high-frequency signals distributed over a
broad frequency band formed in this way, is called noise. A noise signal indeed is
measured from the outside with the help of broadband receivers.. We also speak of
antenna noise and with this knowledge we can further specify the 20% antenna losses:
The antenna produces 20 % noise, which can be put equal to the generated vortices
because of the wave damping.

At this point the Maxwell theory doesn't leave us room for interpretation at all. If in the
textbooks the impression is aroused, as if the noise were an independent discipline, than
that is not true at all. How much the noise is connected with the electromagnetic waves,
proves a short look at the wave equation.

The wave equation found in most textbooks has the form of an inhomogeneous Laplace
equation. The famous French mathematician Laplace considerably earlier than Maxwell
did find a comprehensive formulation of waves and formulated it mathematically (eq.
26.12), which until today is still accepted as valid.

On the one side of the wave equation the Laplace operator stands, which describes the
spatial field distribution, and which according to the rules of vector analysis can be
decomposed into two parts. On the other side the description of the time dependency of
the wave can be found as an inhomogeneous term.

If the wave equation according to Laplace (26.12) is compared to the one, which the
Maxwell equations have brought us (26.11), then two differences clearly come forward:
1. In the Laplace equation the damping term is missing. It doesn't describe the
formation of vortices, and that means vortices do not exist at all, or present vortices
have been there from the beginning.
2. With divergence E a scalar factor appears in the wave equation, which founds a
scalar wave.

At this point at once hot tempered discussions concerning the question of the existence of
scalar waves blaze up. But this question has already been answered clearly with the vortex
consideration. Since an accepted description of longitudinal and scalar waves exists with
the plasma wave and the plasma wave can be derived directly without postulate from the
term of the wave equation (chapter 21.4/21.5), which founds scalar waves, there are
further arguments present for their existence.

In Maxwells equation
Description of electromagnetic waves with vortex damping
Example: sunlight and the damping in the ionosphere

In Laplaces equation
Description of transverse electromagnetic waves (Hertzian waves)
and longitudinal scalar waves (Tesla radiation).
1st example: propagation of light as a wave or as a particle.
2nd example: useful signal or noise signal of an antenna.

Vortices propagate longitudinally as a scalar wave!



Meyl on Gravitation.
Gravitation is a result of the influence of the field lines with a closed
course running parallel to the surface of the particles on the
dimensions of the space, in which they are.



Gravitation
For uncharged, neutral particles (neutron, atom, molecule etc.) both the magnetic and the
perpendicular standing electric field lines have a closed course. Now both run
parallel to the surface of the particle.
As is said, the density of field lines with a closed course can't be influenced from the
outside. If we approach a particle, the consequence of an increase of the density without
exception is a decrease of the linear measures and thus a larger force of attraction. For this
case of field lines with a closed course, for which in general it doesn't give a field
attenuation and no forces of repulsion, there holds:
Gravitation is a result of the influence of the field lines with a closed course running
parallel to the surface of the particles on the dimensions of the space, in which they are.
Both interactions logically have an infinite range. Both form a whole in the influence of
the fields on the size conditions.

It surely is of the greatest importance that for this derivation of the field dependency of the
Lorentz contraction from the known equations of transformation of the electromagnetic
field we could do completely without the introduction of new factors of description or
neglects.
Solely by consistent derivation and interpretation of the result the unification already has
suceeded and the electromagnetic interaction and the gravitation could, with the derived
field dependent Lorentz contraction, be traced back to a single basic phenomenon. Doing
so we have to pay attention to the fact that the observer is subjected to the same Lorentz
contraction as his measuring technique and therefore he can't see the field dependency at
all. Merely as being an exterior observer it in rare cases will be possible to him to see the
curvature of space in the presence of strong fields.

From this for an astronaut practical consequences result. If he namely would land on
Jupiter, he would think flat hills to be gigantic mountains, that small he would be! Vice
versa if he landed on the moon, high mountains would appear to be insignificant hills, not
because of wrong altitude readings of the terrestrial mission control and measurement
centre, but only because of his own body size. The astronauts of the Apollo missions were
not prepared for this circumstance and after their landing on the moon were completely
surprised, how little validity learned textbook physics has, hardly has one left the earth.

They have brought photographs with them which prove the Lorentz contraction to depend
on the field and therefore on gravitation.
The fact that force effects should arise from the interactions is an auxiliary concept and
auxiliary description of the observing person founded in pure usefulness. The Lorentz
force therefore shouldn't be regarded as cause anymore. It actually appears only as
property of the field factors. Seen this way it only would be consistent to do without space
charges and currents as a result of moving charges and to assume a source-free and
quanta-free field description (fig. 6.4: j = 0).

From an unified theory it is demanded that it besides the electromagnetic interaction and
the gravitation also is able to integrate the strong and the weak interaction. We will also
solve this problem.

If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:23 pm

Ovbiously its a difficult subject on some levels based on this google search. But as I look around I did find this article by a math teacher and divergence, skew and curl.


For years I stared at the formulas for divergence and curl, and saw the concepts explained from a number of different points of view. But I could never manage to see them in a way that really made sense or to explain them in a way that I thought would be satisfactory to students.

Finally, I thought that maybe I had some answers. And so I started writing up what I had figured out, which was certainly simple enough. And then, after writing it up, I realized that there were other things that probably ought to be considered.

I had a final version, I thought, that explained about as much as could be explained. It was eight pages long. And then I realized that what I had figured out for curl was just plain wrong. Irretrievably incorrect. And so I needed to go back to the beginning and try again.

And then I started thinking that the idea of eigenvalues might hold the key I really needed. Looking at the eigenvectors and eigenvalues associated with various two-dimensional vector fields seemed rather enlightening, and I spent considerable time creating pictures (using the "picture" capability in LaTeX) to illustrate these various examples. But in all honesty, I could not say for sure that this was getting me closer to an understanding of divergence, and it seemed clear that it was not very relevent to the concept of curl. (In the ideal case, eigenvalues depend on the diagonal entries of a matrix; curl depends on the off-diagonal entries.)

I wound up with another finished version of an article, or so I thought. I think this one was fourteen or fifteen pages long.

I put this on on my web site, then went on a trip for a month. And on the airliner, and in the city where I was visiting, I had some more thoughts. And I came home a wrote still a new final version of my article. This one, I think, was almost thirty pages.

And at this point, I thought I had about as good an explanation as one could give, especially for divergence.

I still didn't have a good answer to the question of what the significance of divergence and curl was in the three-dimensional case. I was pretty sure that the answer in two dimensions was not the correct answer for three dimensions, but I had a hard time finding good examples to show this.

And I was really frustrated that I couldn't find a good intuitive meaning for the direction of the curl vector.

My feeling was that even though examples showed that the fact that a vector field had a non-zero curl did not necessarily indicate that the vector field was a rotation, still it ought to indicate that it was somehow like a rotation, and the direction of the curl vector ought to indicate the axis around which the rotation took place.

And then by some miracle --- and I no longer remember quite how it happened --- I realized that curl could be related to skew-symmetric matrices, and I vaguely remembered having once heard (at the time, I didn't pay much attention) that skew symmetric matrices could be used to represent rotations. If I'd known more about the use of matrix-theoretic methods in mechanics, I would have realized this much earlier. Anyway, by using the decomposition of a matrix into a symmetric and a skew-symmetric part, I now had an explanation for what curl is that actually made sense.

Because of the way my thinking about divergence and curl had first started, I had been especially concerned from the beginning with the special case of a vector field with constant magnitude. But it seemed to me now that this might be one of those cases where an answer is hard to find because one is really not asking the right question. Certainly in one respect looking at field with constant magnitude is not very natural, since such fields rarely occur naturally in applications.

http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~lee/calculus/Curl.html
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:24 pm

I would love for Thornhill to help me understand this issue of gravity as a closed field line and/or a skew of electricity and the EU. Based on the two models (Meyl/Smith) presented that share so much in common I have to think that something is fundamentally correct about their vision of the EU. Are three fields the fundamental unified field? Are Dual Opposite Vortex magnetic fields and electric currents the fundamental form of those three fields? Are the four fundamental electric currents as described by Dollard the correct archetype for electricity? How do we relate the Amperian Currents of Howard Johnson and Spintronics to Geo Magnatism? What about the MJ-12 documents and Hannes Alfven saying that MHD could power a UFO? Wilbert Smith had a interesting view of a TOE in his New Science thesis that was motivated by a belief in UFO technology. I cannot help but think that the UFO technology and the EU model are directly related. After all if gravity is a product of the EMT Fields then would that not finally give us a functional way to make a UFO operate>

This blew my mind. I was going through the MJ-12 web page and lookie what I found. Dr. Hannes Alfven was consulted due to his work on electric conducting fluids in magnetic fields.
http://209.132.68.98/pdf/cia_oscurapeak.pdf
Analysis of the fusion reactor and the surface tension qualites of the outer skin of the aerodyne suggest the craft moves through the air by MHD. It is believed the craft travels through space utilizing a ionizing plasma and the planets magnetic lines of force flowing into the atmosphere. This may help explain how the fusion reactor can function in a space enviorment.


I did find this quote from Wilbert Smith.

In order to hold a flying saucer against gravity, it is necessary to arrange things so that gravity will push a bit instead of pulling. This is done by introducing a downward divergence of the tempic field in the region occupied by the greater part of the saucer, with zero divergence in the region occupied by the crew, so that the outward divergence operating on the whole ship will equal the downward divergence operating on part of the ship, and the crew will be subject to normal outward divergence and hence normal gravity. There will of course be a compensating increased outward divergence somewhere near the ship, but this is usually distributed over a fairly large volume so as to cause a minimum of external disturbance.
http://www.treurniet.ca/Smith/TOC.htm




This web page has some more explanations from wilbert smith on gravity and divergence and rotating magnetic fields. I think I understand now.
http://www.treurniet.ca/Smith/TOC.htm

Rotating magnetic fields movement is gravity.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:26 pm

posted by stefanr\

Oh why not. See where it ends.

The following quotes are all from the Scalar Waves book of Meyl. (good book for little money, check out his site.)

Quote:
18.4 Effects under high tension
It crackles in the laboratory of high-tension. The air smells electrically charged. Only in a
corner someone sits and waits with much perseverance and patience, until something
happens. Then he lets thunder down lightnings of several millions of Volts on a small
sample. It flashes and crashes and still nothing happens.
No, it doesn't concern Tesla! Tesla has worked purposeful. In addition has Tesla only
called himself inventor. But the man in the corner feels himself a discoverer and as it is
proper for a discoverer, he has immediately named the effect after himself. As a real
American he lets market himself and his discovery by the media and a video tape.
Doing so he obviously doesn't know at all, what he wants to have discovered, of what this
Hutchison effect actually consists. It perhaps is an event of pure chance, for which he
sometimes has to wait hours. If it very suddenly would occur, then it is a real potpourri of
all already discussed effects: metal spoons are bending (fig. 14.13), massif steel rods are
breaking, light effects are being observed (chapter 17.9 PP), water starts to dance and to
cook (chapter 18.1), without getting hot and finally do some samples take off and fly
crosswise through the room. He then speaks of anti-gravitation.
In the video tape can be seen, how he brings about a physical length contraction as a result
of a locally produced field concentration with two as an interferometer configured Tesla
coils. In a bottle for instance the air volume is changed. This confirms the correctness of
the here presented theory of objectivity (chapter 6.6 PP).
In any case no-one is amazed more about the results of chance than John Hutchison
himself. Overwhelmed by the magic, the charm of the effects and the feeling to be able to
move freely outside the trodden out ways of physics, he still sits in his corner with the
video camera and waits, until finally something happens again.
There is worked with tension voltages, which are considerably higher than 511 kV, the
calculated tension voltage of their own of the charge carriers (fig. 7.1). One thus by no
means has to be amazed, if under the influence of several millions of Volt electrons are
taken apart and metallic objects are breaking or bending.
The extreme tension voltage and field change we owe an oscillation of length and of size,
which spontaneously can lead to an interaction with neutrinos. Materialized neutrinos
again are responsible for glowing phenomena and for the electrolysis of water, which
under the impression of the rising gas bubbles seems to dance and to cook. For my readers
and participants of the energy technical seminar therefore models of explanation are
available.
One effect we still haven't discussed and analysed more in detail: the antigravitation resp.
the levitation. As long as no reproducible field conditions are present and the chunks are
accelerated in any arbitrary direction, it will be difficult to understand the physical course
of a levitation.
In chapter 9.3 we already had become acquainted with and discussed a levitation device
with the flying disc of John Searl. for which the field conditions are comprehensible.


Quote:
18.5 Flying discs
The Searl-disc can be calculated relatively good with the Faraday equation concerning
unipolar induction. To estimate the order of magnitude, we just suppose the roller magnets
produce an induction of one Tesla and the radius is one meter, then between the centre of
the flying disc and its edge 511 kV is applied, if the revolutions per minute has reached
the value of 80000 revolutions per second. As soon as the revolutions per minute is
reached, the neutrino conversion can start.
The at the edge of the disc arising corona, which consists of individual electrostatic
discharge flashes, takes care for the necessary dU/dt, by every blow and every spark is
drawing the potential for a short time towards ground. The tension voltage jumps in swift
order between values of above 511 kV and zero Volt to and fro. In connection with the
already discussed unipolar field configuration neutrinos are being collected in this way.
A technological challenge represents the layered construction of the roller magnets and the
rings, which have to withstand extreme centrifugal forces (fig. 18.5). Friction however is
not a theme, since on the one hand the air inside the disc ionises and a vacuum is formed
and on the other hand the air split between rollers and discs increases by the field
dependent contraction of the metal parts.
Actually one in this case by no means can speak of antigravitation, because the gravitation
isn't really vanishing. The disc even in flight still is heavy tons. Here merely a resonant
interaction is built up which is larger than the gravitational pull of the earth. The disc is
attracted by the cosmic source of neutrinos, with which it has built up the resonance.
Exactly there it will fly!
The by Searl designed controlling in my opinion actually can't have functioned satisfactorily.
He uses emission plates, as he calls them, which alternatively are switched on by
means of switches and are able to form electrostatic forces with some air charge carriers.
In reality the drive probably is comparable to that of a sailing ship, for which the wind
always blows from one direction. The ship isn't pushed by the wind, as one erroneously
could think, but rather by the under pressure behind the sail pulled forward. Without
steering facility the object always is driven in direction of the drain. The sailor would say,
the ship without helmsman drifts towards lee.
Searl in this way has lost all flying discs which were started. By using solar neutrinos they
presumably have fallen into the sun and burnt. The controlling should function analogous
to a sail, then one would stand a chance, by "traversing" against the "wind", to sometime
again come back to the starting-point


Quote:
18.6 Propulsion with neutrinos
In search for an ideal propulsion system for spacecrafts the flying discs of John Searl still
have demonstrated a further possibility. After the start occasionally were left strange
particles on the ground, which hadn't be there before. The flying device obviously had
materialized them and dropped them at the start.
With this materialization of neutrinos the chance is showing of a very efficiently working
recoil propulsion. If namely the neutrinos are converted into matter then they by that gain
back their rest mass. If this takes place in flight then the materialized particles also bring
along kinetic energy. It then works as ajet engine for which the direction of the jet can be
directed and in that way the vehicle can be controlled comfortable.
In the case of the Searl-disc the materialization of neutrinos rather happens as a not
understood side effect. In the case of a systematic use however the principle will show a
characteristic property. Instead of a vapour trail a beam of light will shine out of the
flying object in the direction of the emitted particles, but it will break off abruptly after a
cartain distance.
To blame is the part, which has become anti-matter, which it is true as well contributes to
the recoil, but simultaneously annihilates with incompatible particles of matter under
emission of particles of light. If in some distance all antiparticles are used up then also the
beam of light comes to an end.
It here concerns necessary properties of a corresponding propulsion technology for
spacecrafts, which don't have to drag their propelling energy along with them. Our space
technicians finally could handle another than the "hammer throwing method", in which
case the "hammer" by means of terrible fuel consumption after a phase of acceleration
only staggers uncontrollable through space under the influence of its inertia.
With a neutrino propulsion on the other hand one at any time can accelerate or brake. It
will strongly influence the field around itself, so that can be reckoned that for every
acceleration a field dependent change of size should be perceptible by an outside observer.
If therefore a corresponding flying device is accelerating then it will suddenly become
smaller and that then looks so as if it would have moved away with a jump without
temporal delay, but that isn't the case at all.
The jerky movements only would be a result of the perception with our eyes by means of
the propagation of the light. Since the passengers are exposed to the same field, they
change their body size along with that of the vehicle. They actually notice nothing of an
apparently infinite acceleration, which only observers on the outside would observe and
which indeed no living being could stand.
Nowhere the explanation crisis is larger than in space travel! The theory of objectivity
represents a real help, because it perhaps as the only one puts us in a position to conceive
and understand not understood observations as necessary technological consequences.
Only by uncovering parascientific as purely physical phenomena man of today will be
able to free himself from the constraints of magic and his own illusions.
Is the until now discussed cases resonant or other force effects are being used, whereas the
gravitation remains unchanged. Closed field lines after all cannot be influenced, normally
at least. Perhaps an indirect possibility exists to have an effect on the gravitation?

Quote:

18.7 Antigravitation or levitation
The night already had fallen over Finland, but at the University of Tampere the light still
was on. Then a scientist put his beardy head through laboratory door and with a "hello
folks" blew the smoke of his pipe over the cryostat for the examination of superconductive
materials. The scientists were speechless, because the smoke seemed to hit an invisible
wall and was drawn upwards in direction ceiling almost at a right angle.
After having aroused the curiosity, Dr. Eugene Podkletnov also has held other materials
above hi s rotating disc and had to discover that these as well lose weight, and that he
actually influences the gravitation with his experiment. Even the air pressure at the
corresponding place in a lying above floor was smaller.
With a superconductive disc of 30 cm diameter cooled by liquid nitrogen a reduction of
gravity for 2% to 4% can be obtained, if the disc rotates with more than 5000 revolutions
per minute. With the revolutions per minute also the effect increases, but it is independent
from the excitating field<ii>. Finally the fields of the superconductive currents in the ring
remain existing unchanged even after switching off the excitation and it only depends on
these fields.
The shielding effect of the arrangement on electromagnetic fields already had been known
before and should be examined closer in the laboratory. One only was surprised that the
gravitation could be shielded as well, that obviously both interactions are related.
According to the prediction of the theory of objectivity the closed magnetic field lines
gravitate and the field components directed towards the centre of the earth cause the
measurable force of weight. By the very strong superconductive fields obviously field
overlaps and possibly a local driving out of field occurs, like one has long known for eddy
currents (Meissner effect).
With that the earth gravitational field of course is not cancelled, but merely spatially
moved, or it partly has changed its direction. If only a small part of field pointers turns out
of their orientation towards the centre of the earth, then at that point the force of weight is
reduced to a corresponding extent. The theory of objectivity requires that!
By the way reports exist, according to which even without rotation a weight reduction can
occur for superconductive rings, and others, where is worked even entirely without superconduction.
As core material for the ring ferrite or a strong permanent magnet is used. In
that case depends on the circumstance that the ring-like coil is operated in self-resonance
and always in the right moment again is excited anew by induction. The ring core then
stores the fields up over time, exactly as the superconductor.
Stricktly speaking it are the atomic nuclei and in the end all elementary particles, which
are aligning in the high field. Dr. Ning Li wants to artificially produce gravity, by
directly influencing the quanta. With that she comes the phenomenon very close<iii>. The
possibilities of this effect nevertheless are very limited, since two percent more or less are
not exactly much, and the dream of the complete cancelling of gravity or even inertia
possibly stays just a dream. It stricktly speaking just concerns influencing the gravitation
and not antigravitation!


Quote:
18.8 Discussion concerning the effect of closed field lines
If we now direct our eyes exclusively to the lower half of fig. 15.5, in which the consequences
of closed field lines are listed. Without the possibility of a direct focussing like
for open field lines, the caused force effects turn out extremely small. With that they are
less suitable for an use of free energy. The considerations in that context rather aim at
technologies to reduce weight, like they would be worth striving for for flying devices.
If we allege that here in the same way the force effects of magnetic H-fields exceed those
of electric E-fields for three to four powers of ten. Then it will hardly play a role for the
force of weight of a body with or without additional electric charge, if its E-field lines are
closed as well or are open. The increase in weight of an uncharged body only will have an
effect in the third till fourth place after the decimal point. Seen so in the case of the
gravitation it primarily concerns an effect of the magnetic field, more strictly speaking the
effect of closed magnetic field lines (chapter 6.9).
If one succeeds in influencing these magnetic fields for instance by the influence of
extremely strong fields of a superconductor, then also the gravitation will change, as has
been shown (chapter 18.7). Let's imagine, in the case of a systematic procedure we would
succeed in a perfect influencing, for which no component of the H-field lines points into
the direction of the centre of the earth anymore, then an uncharged body would only have
one tenthousandth of its original weight, whereas a charged body actually would weigh
nothing anymore. This state of the weightlessness supposes that all E-field pointers point
into the direction of the centre of the earth or diametrically in the opposite direction, since
E- and H-field are standing perpendicular to each other. Unfortunately such a field
distribution technically hardly can be realized and so the ,,flying carpet" furthermore
remains reserved to the fairytales.
An effective reduction of weight of planes and other flying objects however seems by all
means feasible, and so slowly the number of research facilities increases, which more or
less officialy have a critical look at the cancelling of gravity and the levitation. The
theories on which they are basing, however often sound very bizarre and moreover are
completely unphysical. Maybe a look at the distribution of field lines, as proposed here,
helps to get further.
In the case of the levitation, which occurs strictly speaking only in the case of oscillation
for closed field lines, resonance again plays the crucial role for the coming about of the
interaction. In connection with neutrinos the resonance can serve less the collecting; we
rather need it for the materializing, for the production of mass, charge and energy.
For the artificial production of a levitation either a mechanical oscillation in the atomic or
molecular domain is needed, like for instance is produced by a rotating water molecule, or
a resonant oscillation of size takes place by use of electrostrictive or magnetostrictive
materials, like piezocrystals or oscillating quartzes.(there comes your tensegrity fascia again)
In this context surely is of great importance that also the temperature could be identified as
a particle immanent oscillation of size (chapter 8.3). That's why besides a cold materialization
or cold fusion also exists, at least theoretically, the possibility of a hot materializatin
or hot fusion
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:27 pm

posted by stefanr

So if I understand it correctly the curl /skew/ divergence have more to do with mathematical description of the properties of scalars than with the closed field lines of which specifically the magnetic ones are fundamental to gravity.

And MHD is the plasma expression of scalar waves.
It is why Alfven warned about taking MHD too simple.
If the medium doesn't have any charge carriers, hence a 'vacuum', thus no plasma, scalars are still possible in the fields.
The rotation implied by mathematical decriptions like laplace, curl and skew are nice pointers to vortices.

A nice visual for this thread is the NASA STS-shuttle videos thread

For the sake of association I will later igive link to another thread, where I will further detail about the following book:

Title: The Unobstructed Universe (1940)
Author: Stewart Edward White

http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0301131.txt

Read the whole book and it might give you a sense of 'the scalar world' and
its consequenses. As an extra it gives a lot more
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:15 pm

Wilbert Brockhouse Smith
(1910-62)

Canadian Radio Engineer and Ufologist
From material by Arthur Bray, David Haisell and Greg Kanon
Edited by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Wilbert Smith was born in Lethbridge, Alberta, graduated from University of British Columbia in 1933 with a B.Sc. in electrical engineering and went on to obtain his M.A.Sc in 1934 at the same university. After graduation he became chief engineer for radio station CJOR in Vancouver.

Smith did much to encourage improvements in the technical side of broadcasting facilities in Canada, and took a strong personal interest in the formation of the Canadian Association of Broadcast Consultants, which often advised the federal Department of Transport (DOT) on frequency allocation and other technical matters. He also played an important role in liaison between that department and the Canadian Radio Technical Planning Board. In 1939, he joined the federal Department of Transport. He was engaged in engineering Canada's war-time monitoring service and, in 1947, was in charge of establishing a network of ionospheric measurement stations, several of which were in isolated parts of the North.

At the time of his death, he was superintendent of Radio Regulations Engineering with the Department of Transport [DOT], responsible for the engineering aspects of all matters concerning the use of radio in Canada, including equipment standards, radio relay systems (micro-wave), broadcast facilities and interference studies.

Smith's area of research was in radio wave propagation, a study which eventually led him into fields such as auroras, cosmic radiation, atmospheric radio-activity and geo-magnetism. It was the latter of these fields which really attracted his attention and caused him to speculate that the potential energy of the Earth's magnetic field might be extracted and used. He had already progressed to the stage of developing a crude experimental model to demonstrate his theory, and successfully tested the unit which, in his words, "demonstrated the soundness of the basic principles in a qualitative manner and provided useful data for the design of a better unit." (1)

Smith's curiosity got the better of him when he read a magazine article on 'Flying Saucers' in the late 1940s and from then on he took a great interest in investigating flying saucers or UFOs. In DOT, he was engaged in research on the collapse of the Earth's magnetic field as a source of energy. As Smith believed that flying saucers may be operating on magnetic principles, it seemed that this work of DOT might explain their operation.

He believed, quote: "that we are on the track of something which may well prove to be the introduction to a new technology." This "is borne out by the investigations which are being carried on at the present time in relation to flying saucers." (2)

The investigations he was referring to were those being carried out by the US Government at that time. In late 1950 Smith had attended a North American Radio Broadcasting conference in Washington, DC, and while there, made enquiries through the Canadian Embassy staff who were able to inform him that:

the matter of UFOs was the most highly classified subject in the US, rating higher than the H-bomb
UFOs exist
their modus operandi is unknown, but concentrated effort is being made by a small group headed by Dr. Vannevar Bush, (Editor: Of 'MJ12' fame)
the entire matter is considered by US authorities to be of tremendous significance.(3)
Smith felt the preliminary result of his work in geo-magnetism correlated with the available data on reported UFO behavior, and that they were fairly close to some of the answers. The Defence Research Board liaison officer at the Canadian Embassy in Washington evidently agreed with Smith for he was extremely anxious for him to get in touch with Dr. Solandt, Chairman of the Defence Research Board upon Smith's return to Ottawa, to discuss with him future investigations along the line of geo-magnetism energy release.
Consequently, upon his return to Canada, Smith met with Solandt on November 20, and obtained his support. Solandt agreed that work on geo-magnetic energy should proceed as rapidly as possible and offered DRB's co-operation in providing laboratory facilities, acquisition of equipment, and specialized personnel.(4)

On November 21 he outlined his proposal in writing to the Controller of Telecommunications, indicating Defence Research Board's support and requesting that a project be set up and carried out on a part-time basis "until such time as sufficient results would warrant more definitive action". (5)

The proposal outlined seven avenues of investigation, all dealing with geo-magnetic research, none dealing with UFO investigation. 6 He proposed the work be classified since he felt that the lesser known and little explored aspects of magnetism might hold the key to a new and significant technology, and its impact on our civilization would have to be assess if his suspicions proved correct. Commander C.P. Edwards, then Deputy Minister of Transport for Air Services gave the project his blessing, requesting that he be kept posted from time to time.

It is curious that the avenues of investigation Smith proposed made no reference to UFOs. Could it have been that Smith willfully omitted such reference in order to ensure a greater probability that the project would be approved? Or was he only interested in UFOs because they seemed to be demonstrating that some of his concepts were apparently being applied, whereas his main interest was indeed in the new technology which he felt he was on the verge of initiating?

Smith's curiosity was responsible for Project Magnet's initiation in November 1950, and for its relatively secret progress for a few years at least. It is significant, though, that the official 'Magnet' report, when eventually released many years later, dealt only with UFO sighting analysis, and made no mention of Smith's geo-magnetics research.

Curiously, the Canadian government in all its wisdom, saw the need for still another project to analyze UFO reports, less classified than Project Magnet, but still confidential. During the early months of 1952 there was a noticeable increase in the number of UFO incidents covered by the Canadian Press. (7,8,9) Several of these involved reports of disc-shaped craft over Royal Canadian Air Force bases, many reported by service personnel themselves.

The Defence Research Board (DRB) noted this increase, and DRB chairman Solandt asked staff member Harold Oatway to get a committee together "to see if we can make anything out of these flying saucer reports". (10)

Had Solandt forgotten about Smith and Magnet? It's doubtful.

Oatway was a friend of Smith and knew of his involvement. As we shall see Smith had not been forgotten, but the reason for setting up a further project remains unclear, unless, of course, Smith was too busy with his research. Why they didn't merely enlarge Magnet remains a mystery.

On April 22, 1952, the committee gathered by Oatway held its first meeting, with Peter Millman, head of the Dominion Observatory, as its chairman. Smith, Edwards and Solandt were also among those present.

It was agreed that there was a need to formally investigate UFOs, and that a committee should be formed to lead this activity and to standardize procedures, etc.(11) From the minutes of this meeting we read, "This committee was to prepare a brief of instructions for observers; examine interrogation ; and to establish a standard method of recording and indexing for subsequent analysis." (12) (And if I may be permitted, I would like to note that thirty years later, we are still doing the same thing!) It was also decided that "the function of DRB should be mainly advisory as the collection of reports could best be done by field organizations." (13)

Two days later, the newly formed committee assembled, classifying its work as 'confidential', and identifying themselves as 'Project Theta'.

On May 19, 1952 they met for a second time and among other things, re-named themselves 'Project Second Storey' since 'Theta' was apparently not on the list of valid names for projects of this type.

On June 25, 1952 Smith submitted an interim report on Project Magnet in which he stated that it appeared evident that flying saucers are emissaries from other civilizations and actually operate on magnetic principles, magnetic principles which we have failed to grasp due to our not paying enough attention to the structure of fields in our study of physics. (14)

On July 31, Project Second Storey held their third meeting where, among other items of business, a letter containing several of Smiths motions, presumably based on his progress in Magnet, was tabled and discussed. Also, the final form of the 'Project Second Storey Sighting Report was approved, and distribution of same was determined.

There was no mention in the minutes of any reference to Smiths decisive statement in his interim 'Magnet' report.

The fourth meeting of Second Storey was not held until November 17, followed by the fifth on March 9, 1953. Smith had been working on some 'weighting factors' to be applied to witness testimony to help arrive at some measure of report significance. At the fifth meeting his system was adopted temporarily without alterations. At this point, though, it was probably felt irrelevant since Chairman Millman noted "that evidence to date (and note that this was not Second Storey's evidence to which he was referring, since they had so far only managed to standardize their procedures) did not seem to warrant an all out investigation by the Canadian Services but it might be well to continue to collect at some central location all forms which may be submitted to the Services." (15) Millman reached this conclusion following discussions with the chairman of DRB on the future activities of the committee. They seemed to be again ignoring Smith's statement in his preliminary report on Magnet; or were they trying to play it down?

And as it turned out, Millman's conclusion was based on activities in the U.S. in the wake of the Robertson Panel, which is now know to have been a CIA whitewash. So here is further evidence of top level U.S. Canadian inter-relationship in the UFO field, and if we assume this inter-relationship continued after the Robertson Panel, it is safe to assume that investigation of UFOs in Canada was placed under the control of some branch of Canadian Intelligence. We can only guess that Smith's interim 'Magnet' report probably played a significant part in this assumed decision.

In concluding the fifth meeting of Second Storey, it was agreed that a further meeting would take place after the Department of Transport had completed its analysis. That is, after the Magnet Report was finished. This was accomplished on August 10, 1953 but there are no minutes available of any further Second Storey meetings, although there is evidence that further meetings did take place. One wonders why the minutes were nod made public. Recent correspondence between Canadian ufologist Arthur Bray and Dr. Allen McNamara (without even having been asked the question) that the Project Magnet report was submitted to Second Storey in 1953. (This from a letter dated July 25, 1979.) (16) So it was 26 years before any indication of further Second Storey meetings surfaced.

During the summer of 1953, Wilbert Smith obtained approval from the Department of Transport (DOT) to set up some UFO detection equipment at Shirley's Bay, near Ottawa, and by the end of October the installation was complete. The instruments included a gamma-ray counter, a magnetometer, a radio receiver (to detect the presence of radio noise, and a recording gravimeter. (17)

News of Magnet finally leaked to the media presumably because of the conspicuous nature of the Shirley's Bay installation. (18) As expected, denials were attempted; on the very day the station went into operation Dr. Solands was quoted as saying reports of the station's establishment were completely untrue. However, he was forced to back down on this, and later claimed he actually had only said that such a station was not being operated by his department, and that he personally had no knowledge of its existence. (19) Even this was difficult to accept since the installation was located next to DOT's Ionosphere Station on Defence Research Board (DRB) property, and in fact, the building was loaned to Smith by DRB. (20)

Public awareness of this project was to be a source of frustration, annoyance and embarrassment to DRB and DOT, and it put Smith in an awkward position since he was still officially a member of the Second Storey Committee. This was probably a contributing factor to the contents of Millman's November 21st summary report of Project Second Storey. He announced that Project Second Storey's forms and instructions for filing of sighting information were available for any government department seriously interested in pursuing the matter further, but the committee felt that, owing to the impossibility of checking independently the details of the majority of sightings , most of the material did not lend itself to a scientific method of investigation. (21)

Could it be that they were not aware of the scientific study being conducted in the U.S. at that time by the Air Force on UFO reports collect from June 1, 1947 to December 31, 1952? The study was initiated in 1952 and continued through 1954, and proved beyond a doubt the existence of an unidentified phenomenon, even though the conclusions were worded in such a way as to divert attention from the evidence. The study to which I am referring was known as 'Project Blue Book Special Report #14' which is probably the most constantly referred to in the literature of Stanton Friedman, and more recently was the subject of a paper by Bruce Maccabee in the Journal of UFO Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, entitled the 'Scientific Investigation of Unidentified Flying Objects'.

It is difficult to believe Millman's statement, and perhaps his remarks were designed to appease 'somebody' in the event Smith's association with Second Storey eventually became public knowledge, and also to save face in view of the Adamski & contactee activity now the public eye.

At 3:01 in the afternoon of August 8, 1954 the instrumentation at the Shirley's Bay installation registered an unusual disturbance. In Smith's words "the gravimeter went wild", (22) as a much greater deflection was registered than could be explained by conventional interference such as passing aircraft. Smith and his colleagues rushed outside only to find a heavy overcast. Whatever was up there as hidden in the clouds. The only evidence they had was the deflection registered on the chart recorder paper.

Two days later the controller of Telecommunications issued a form letter, which was also authorised as a press release, admitting that the DOT had been engaged in the study of UFOs for three and a half years, that considerable data had been collected and analysed, but it had not been possible to reach any definite conclusion, and since new data simply confirmed existing data, there seemed little point in carrying the project any further on an official level. This, despite the fact that "new data... confirmed existing data", which is what one would expect of a positive scientific experiment!

Project Magnet was to be dropped, but Smith would continue to receive and catalogue data on an unofficial basis.(23) In Smith's words, Magnet went "underground"(24) probably joining Second Storey.

The detection of 'whatever it was' two days before had evidently inspired rapid action. Does it seem likely that a project, which had finally apparently detected what it was looking for, would be terminated? Justification for changing to a 'Top Secret' classification perhaps... It is apparent that pressure was applied to Smith to down-play or even deny the Shirley's Bay incident.

Researcher Greg Kanon writes: "In an abrupt about face, Smith announced, before the May 17th 1955 session of the Commons' Special Committee on Broadcasting, that no UFOs had ever been detected at the Shirley's Bay Station. At about this same time, Captain Edward J. Ruppelt (who earlier served as chief UFO investigator for the U.S. Air Force) was reportedly told by RCAF Intelligence officers that only 'officially' had the Shirley's Bay Station produced negative results. These developments led some UFO researchers to conclude that Smith had been successfully silenced by officialdom."(25)

Whatever the case, Smith kept busy over the next few years, and we get a glimmer of what he was up to from a presentation he gave about five years later to the Illuminating Engineering Society's Canadian Regional Conference during which he stated:

"We know that gravity is not all Newton visualised. Far from being a basic force in nature, it is really a derived function, and is the consequence of a dynamic condition, not a static one. We know what goes into its makeup; we know its formula and we have a pretty good idea of how to go about bringing it under control. We have conducted experiments that show that it is possible to create artificial gravity (not Centrifugal force) and to alter the gravitational field of the Earth. This we have done. It is Fact. The next step is to learn the rules and do the engineering necessary to convert the principle into workable hardware." (26) That statement was made in 1959. The question is, what has been achieved since then?

It has been claimed by some that Smith turned away from orthodox scientific work to the more metaphysical aspects of what he termed 'the new science'. Such was not the case. He carried on his normal scientific work and at the same time delved into the science of metaphysics as a possible answer to the UFO mystery, which apparently produced some concrete results in the laboratory. In the realm of purely orthodox science, Smith was working on the development of an anti-gravity device and believed himself to be on the verge of an important breakthrough just prior to his death.

In the area of metaphysics, Smith claimed to communicate with 'occupants' of UFOs through a contact who provided him with certain information. One instance pertained to areas of reduced binding in our atmosphere. All matter is held together by forces which are not clearly understood and are known as 'binding forces'. Smith was informed that there are areas of reduced binding and that many air crashes were due to entering such regions, where the planes literally fell apart. He was told that means of detecting such areas were easily available to us and that suitable instruments could be constructed. By building a 'binding meter' according to the principles given to him, he was able to locate regions of reduced binding. He recommended to the government that further investigation be conducted, but because of the unorthodox source of his information, he was unable to obtain official recognition of this work and his letters were added to the 'crank file'.

The last ten years of Smith's life were devoted to intensive thought and study. He formulated several of his ideas into a book titled 'The New Science'.

Smith died of cancer on December 27, 1962. The respect he commanded was reflected in his being posthumously awarded the Lieutenant-Colonel Keith S. Rogers Memorial Engineering Award for dedicated service in the advancement of the Technical Standards in Canadian Broadcasting. This award, presented by the Canadian General Electric Company, was well deserved. Smith was one of the foremost thinkers of his time - a well respected ufologist - one of the first of our breed.


1. Memorandum to the Controller of Telecommunications, W.B. Smith, Nov. 21, 1950, p.2. 2. ibid, p.2.
3. ibid, p.3.
4. ibid, p.4.
5. ibid, p.4.
6. Project Magnet, program, W.B. Smith, p.2.
7. Ottawa Journal, April 16, 1952.
8. Toronto Globe & Mail, April 16, 1952.
9. Ottawa Journal, April 17, 1952.
10. 'I Believe Flying Saucers Come From Outer Space', by Alan Phillips, Weekend Magazine, V.7, #27, 1957, p.4.
11. Minutes of a DRB meeting to discuss flying saucers, April 22, p.1.
12. ibid. p.1.
13. ibid. p.2.
14. Interim Report on Project Magnet, W.B. Smith, 1952.
15. Minutes of the 5th Second Storey meeting, March 9, 1953, p.2
16. The UFO Connection, Arthur Bray, Jupiter Publishing, 1979, p.69
17. The UFO Connection, Arthur Bray, Jupiter Publishing, 1979, p.63.
18. Sudbury Star, Nov. 12, 1953.
19. Toronto Daily Star, Nov. 14, 1953.
20. Letter from Dr. N.M. Millman, Sept. 24, 1968, NRC files.
21. Project Second Storey - Summary Report, Dr. P.M. Millman, chairman, Second Storey Committee, Nov. 21, 1953. Bray, p.63.
22. Form letter signed by the Controller of Telecommunications, DOT, Aug. 10, 1954.
23. 'Project Magnet - The Canadian Flying Saucer Study', Topside, Winter/Spring 1963.
24. Canadian UFO Report, Vol.3, No.6, p.23.
25. 'Sputniks, Saucers and Spacecraft', W.B. Smith, - a paper delivered to the Illuminating Engineering Society, Canada Regional Conference, at a luncheon in Ottawa, June 11,1959.
26. ibid.

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/muf ... bsmith.htm


Wilbert Smith Flash Documentry.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/WBSmi ... %20Web.swf
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:57 pm

I find the most telling ideas in Wilbert Smiths model. Like Dave Thomson of APM, he has Frequency as a proper definition of what we perceive as Time. Time is the recipercal of Frequency. Wilbert Smith uses Dimensions to produce Forces, again another common ontological approach of APM. In the Standard Model Forces fill Empty Space. You of course have to ask why and from where? This problem is the main problem of the Standard Model. If one is to reconstruct reality, one must make clear attempts to seperate Units from Dimensions, and one must be careful to see the object and not its image. Something again that Smith and Thomson harp on, and for good reason. Its amazing once its pointed out, how much lack of understanding is prevelent by men with degrees, only dogma, and not even logical dogma at that. Certainly as I type this I am listening to the History Channel and the Universe Series is on. They just finished saying the Universe will end in a Big Freeze due to the Second Law of Thermodyanamics (entropy). They even said that people ask how can you be so sure? Yet they know for a fact that this is the absolute end of the Universe....I don't buy it. I do not believe they understand the Universe or Entropys role in it properly.
:?

The use of words and open ended definitons is a huge problem I am just beginning to truly get a handle on, and I believe one reason why you get lost trying to correct anyone, as we ourselves are confused due to the double talk and how much variation is laid on specific words. Energy is a good place to start. Energy is a unit! Therefore Energy and Mass are not equal, dispite what you may believe at present. Matter is another problem word. So is Time. Spin is not properly understood. You could write a book just about that...I believe that Dave Thomson did just that with APM.

There is telling science for its age as well in Wilbert Smith and The New Science. Even his talk of bending light is something that the military has commented on in recent times. Certainly it seemed like Science Fiction in 1950....yet he spoke of it matter of factly.
8-)

Today the military is using Stealth Planes in public and have commented on Optical Stealth projects with much success...event to the point of invisible tanks. That was mainstream news not long ago. So Wilbert Smith was way ahead of his time.
:D


The Tempic Field
Verbatim extracts from the Smith archive
They tell me that our universe is actually twelve dimensioned, built in four fabrics of three dimensions each. The fabrics are all at right angles to each other except for the "skew" which is responsible for the frozen reality which we call matter.

The conventional theories of space-time-fields which we are taught are actually special cases, and derived from the fundamentals by holding several factors constant. Unfortunately, the models of atoms, etc. which we conjure up are inadequate and misleading and conventional science which is based on them, and using the restricted theories, naturally can't take us very far. It is as if we have climbed the tree of knowledge, crawled out on the first branch we came to and are now busily engaged calipering the twigs; ignoring completely the other branches.

Our greatest failing is assuming that each bit of information which we glean must be fastened firmly onto something which we already know, or think we do. As a result our science is a terrible hodge-podge of patch work, perturbations and correction factors, and ever so much more complicated than it need be.

There are three basic fields in nature, which manifest mathematically as gradient, divergence and curl, or; tempic, electric and magnetic. Time we think is the reciprocal of the derivative of the tempic field, and it is not basic in its own right. We might incompletely describe the tempic field as that which produces change. Or we might regard it somewhat as the Heaviside operator "p" when applied to functions involving time. But we find it simpler to just write "J" and treat it exactly as we would any other field function, by writing back from observation to determine what the function is.

I am informed that what our clocks register is not actually time, but rate of change of entropy and that time is actually a field which makes the entropy change; that there is very little difference between time and the other two fields which make up the field fabric, magnetic and electric. It is true that there is a "skew" between the time field and what our clocks do, otherwise there would be no components between the space and field fabrics, and no interchange of matter and energy.

We were told to expect a change in our time scale, starting this spring. You see, time as we know it is a result of the operation of a "time field" which resembles closely electric and magnetic fields. The thing that Einstein considers as the fourth dimension is really an entropy vector which we have trained ourselves to consider as time. We do not know how fast the time scale is to change but we already have indications that it has shifted a fraction of a second.

I have a very recent communication from one of the boys topside, to the effect that our physicists are going to carry out an experiment dealing with the lifetime of mesons at high velocities. The results of this experiment will, if interpreted correctly, establish definitely the field nature of time and the fact that it is not a constant immutable quantity. I have been requested to bring this to the attention of the scientists involved, so that they can follow up the lead to the obvious advantage of our world.

The people from elsewhere are quite capable of altering the time field in their vicinity to their own ends, much the same as electric and magnetic fields may be manipulated; and therefore, having three variables to play with there are many more combinations possible, and so the saucers can do things which seem to contradict our physics, because we hold as constants some of the things which they vary. There is ample evidence about us to confirm these things, if we will but look at it squarely and not try to explain it away as something else. Lately there have been a surprising number of references in the literature implying the field nature of time. I don't know how much of this is inspired and how much our people figured out for themselves, but the fact remains that this is the trend.

Space itself is not at all as we imagine it. Light does not travel in straight lines out in space, but in curves somewhat resembling parabolas which are the result of the light passing through regions where the time field is not uniform. Our sun is not at all where it appears to be, is actually much bigger and much closer than we think. The planets do not revolve around the sun in a planar orbit but are offset way off to one side so that the orbits lie as rings along a solid hyperbola. This may seem queer but is none the less true, and follows precisely from the concept of time as a field. This is a hard concept to appreciate but when mastered makes for an enormous simplification in all physical sciences.

Knowing about the tempic (time) field has obviously led to the question of the true positions of our planets and I have been working along that line. It is most remarkably consistent but rather disturbing to realize that the things in the sky just aren't where they seem to be. There are some dillies of mathematical equations to be solved, several of which I have no idea how to tackle. The saucer people use operational methods, of which I have a glimmering but not nearly enough to use profitably, so I have to do it the hard way. However, one fact stands out above all else; mankind could never find out about the tempic field by observation alone, since the light linkage and mechanical linkage between astronomical bodies is exactly self compensating! The only clue that I know of is the odd shapes of the distant nebulae.

The time field is probably the most fundamental concept, but I am satisfied that it is right, because using it as a basis, practically all the other phenomena which they describe can be worked out and theoretically confirmed. You see, time as we recognize it is really an entropy scale brought about by the action of a field which is similar in all respects to the electric and magnetic fields but at right angles to them both. Because of our point of view since we are made of matter having spins all lined up in the field fabric, the three fields appear different to us. The tempic field is actually 1/t and is the field which communications continually refer to as "frequency", which by definition is 1/t. The tempic field is as much a part of matter as either of the other two fields, and when there is lots of matter there is a strong field, and in this field equal intervals of action contain our "time" inversely proportional to the field strength. For confirmation I would refer you to the distribution of mass within the various nebulae, the corresponding tempic field distribution, and the dynamics of rotation of the nebulae. The resulting development is most elegant both in confirming the field nature of time and the heretofore unexplained shapes of many of the nebulae!

I am well aware that regarding time as a variable places modern science in the untenable position of trying to lift itself by its bootstraps; but I can only say that these are not my ideas but originate with those to whom our science resembles medieval superstition. I do not understand them fully and I have much to learn, but I have mastered a few basic principles and of these I am sure.

Time as a field function is not the same function as registered by our clocks, which record the changing entropy of a system, but is the function which makes this happen. There is only one reality in our universe, and that is the concept of spin, and from this derive twelve dimensions. Twelve dimensions are necessary and sufficient to express our universe in its entirety.
Dimensions must include as well as their vector dimensions, the component of reality in that direction, for without the reality there would be no dimension.
Dimensions are arranged in four fabrics of three each, linked by a "quadrature concept". This is the concept that Relativity strives for by introducing √-1 between the space and the time axis.
The concept of "force" is a fiction which we invented to stultify our thinking. It is merely a cover-up for our lack of understanding of the interaction of reality.
The foregoing will probably sound most sacreligious to the ears of orthodoxy, but I don't mind in the least if these ideas are not immediately subscribed to. Science has a long and lurid history of reluctance to accept ideas which subsequently proved to be of great value.

Time, as our clocks measure it, is really the rate of change of entropy in this part of our universe, and exists because of the presence of the basic reality. It may be altered by altering the configuration and proportion of the basic fields or it may be increased or decreased in a certain region by redistribution of reality. This may seem to be quite complicated, and it is for anyone with our limited understanding of nature; but really quite simple to those whose understanding transcends ours.

In order to hold a flying saucer against gravity, it is necessary to arrange things so that gravity will push a bit instead of pulling. This is done by introducing a downward divergence of the tempic field in the region occupied by the greater part of the saucer, with zero divergence in the region occupied by the crew, so that the outward divergence operating on the whole ship will equal the downward divergence operating on part of the ship, and the crew will be subject to normal outward divergence and hence normal gravity. There will of course be a compensating increased outward divergence somewhere near the ship, but this is usually distributed over a fairly large volume so as to cause a minimum of external disturbance.

One of the inadequate ideas we have is that light always travels in straight lines. This is true only when it is travelling in a uniform tempic field or in line with the direction of divergence in a diverging field. If a wave front of light is passing through a region where one side of it enjoys more "time" than the other, the side having larger "time" will travel farther, and the beam of light will refract away from the region of increased "time". A beam of light passing near to a saucer which is making use of altered tempic field for support will be deflected and appear to originate from somewhere else than its true source. If the field configuration around a saucer is favourable the light originating from the saucer may be bent so that none of it arrives at the position of the observer, in which case the observer sees nothing. In these cases, the saucer may be quite clearly visible from some other angle or position. If the saucer is seen, and then disappears, it is probably due to the alteration of the field conditions by the occupants.

Table of Contents

http://www.treurniet.ca/Smith/Tempic.htm
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby Grey Cloud » Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:53 am

Hi guys,
Thanks for a fascinating dialogue, although once again 99.99% of it went over my head. I don't know if this is relevant but have you heard of Eric Laithwaite, a British scientist/engineer who did a lot of work of magnets, gyroscopes, spin etc? He also feel foul of the scientific thought-police for his ideas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Laithwaite

http://www.gyroscopes.org/1974lecture.asp

http://www.gravitycontrol.org/Eric-Laithwaite.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaOIWXqH9Io

P.S. Please don't try to explain any of your stuff to me it's way, way over my head.
If I have the least bit of knowledge
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
Grey Cloud
 
Posts: 2477
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:47 am
Location: NW UK

Re: Recovered Geomagnetic Technology

Unread postby junglelord » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:30 am

A new link to the Wilbert Smith book The New Science.
http://www.rexresearch.com/smith1/newsci.htm
The original link is no longer functional.

Take the time to read through this document several times. Its a good head space.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord
User avatar
junglelord
 
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada


Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests