A field is a region which has a unique characteristic. The space fabric, in displaying the characteristic of Change, has a unique characteristic, so that this characteristic which so appears can qualify as a field. But the filed must be "somewhere" and the space fabric fills this need, just as Area is necessary for the evolution of the concept of Volume.
Suppose we call this field of Change a Tempic Field to give it a name of its own, so that we can study its relationship to those things which impinge upon our awareness. Inspection of the Concept shows that if the Change is great the tempic field must be great, but we associate Change with our Concept of Time which is something against which we gauge a rate of change. Expressed mathematically this rate can be written as dS/dt which expresses the manner in which something changes with respect to time. More explicitly this should be written as TS where T is the tempic field operator, and S is the aspect of Reality upon which it operates. A convenient, though only partially adequate description of the Tempic Field is "Frequency", since we recognize frequency as being a certain number of somethings per unit of time, and is dimensionally the reciprocal of Time.
Heretofore we have always considered Time as an immutable flow against which everything evolving Change could be measured, whereas, it is really the converse which is true; Change is the basic concept and Time its derivative. Unfortunately, our mathematics are geared to the Time concept and will require considerable reworking to fit them into this more precise concept, but when this is done there will result a most elegant simplification in all the analysis involving time. In the meantime the transition in thinking can be made less painful if we merely regard Time as the consequence of the existence of a Tempic Field, and is by no means fixed.
It may be interesting at this point to mention something about the velocity of light. This quantity is generally recognized to be something rather basic in our universe, being the "rate at which space changes with time", but when viewed in the light of this new field concept is merely the tempic field intensity, or how the tempic field is distributed in space. We have been told that light doesn't "travel"; it "is", which is an idea not at all foreign to the field concept. Of course, it follows that the velocity of light will be a constant only under conditions of constant tempic field, and if this field changes so will the velocity of light change.
Having had a superficial look at the Tempic Field and its derivation we may now allow our Awareness to inspect the next parameter which is Divergence to see if it is something which can be recognized. Previously we noted that Reality had to extend to infinity from zero in order to establish Space and that unity, so far as Awareness was concerned, lay half way between. With the application of the Quadrature Concept to the parameter of Change or Tempic Field, Divergence is established, from which we derive a starting point a t zero and a finish at infinity. Between these two limits and through unity there is divergence, which we can recognize as the Electric Field, but with the exception that there is no point charge at the zero. Our Awareness, however, established the "charge" at radius unity, with exactly one half of it being "inside" and the other half being "outside". The real significance of this boundary will be apparent when we study the tenth parameter.
When Divergence was established by Awareness, the Quadrature Concept was applied to the Tempic Field, so we may expect within the electric field two quantities, scalar and vector, or quantity and its manner of distribution. These attributes we recognize immediately as pertaining to the electric fields with which we have experience.
While the Tempic field is purely scalar, the application of the Quadrature Concept gave it an aspect which is vectorial in establishing the Electric Field, in that it now has "direction" as well as "quantity". In dealing with this parameter both these aspects should always be included. Otherwise the analysis is bound to be incomplete. In other words, mere vectorial summation is not sufficient and the scalar values must be integrated also. Also, we must get away from the idea that they are the manifestation of the fifth parameter from zero to infinity and in themselves are the reality.
When Awareness inspects Divergence through the Quadrature Concept and establishes Curl. Similar appreciation results, and we see in Curl many of the characteristics of the Magnetic Field, but again we have a boundary within which is half the reality and outside of which is the other half. We call that within (or without) this boundary the magnetic moment, but again we cannot establish a point source. Also, dealing with magnetic fields we must always include the scalar as well as the vectorial aspects.
Just as Area has Length incorporated in it, and Volume has Area incorporated in it, so has the Electric Field the Tempic Field incorporated in it. Each of these three fields are mutually at right angles to each other. The three fields together are the manifestation of Reality in the Field Fabric as perceived by Awareness. The interrelationships between these various fields manifests to our Awareness as Matter and Energy, and the great variety of these manifestations is well known to us.
http://www.rexresearch.com/smith/newsci~1.htm
I am not sure if what we look at is the real or the illusion concerning light. Does light travel or does the Scalar gradient density field move underneath it?>
.....standing/scalar waves but,
not in this dimensional plane. The matrix, be it Aether,
or just the omni-directional..........
3rd cent:Amazingly, recent galaxy-cluster mapping has shown geometry!
The local voids to outline Close-packed Octahedra
Quote:This seems stunning, but is probably due to gravitational / expansive forces finding equilibrium in minimum-energy vectors.
If we have 2 octahedrons (and presumably more in a 3-D grid) then we also have tetrahedral voids, because octahedrons
don't fill-space (like stacking cubes). It requires alternating Octa-Tetra combination to fill space in this type matrix.Might the "matrix" have a charge-coherent, interconnected 3+D geometry?
~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does a crystal-like electro-magnetic field resonate ?
junglelord wrote:<snip>
here is a video of a electron riding a wave of light taken with laser pulses of attoseconds in length, the first time ever.
http://www.atto.fysik.lth.se/video/emovie.mov
<snip>]
webolife wrote:Thanks, @rcus, for your anti-esoterica comment.
I know that my unified field view is foreign to most contributors here, and being able to discuss/explain it in such a way as to actually achieve understanding [both others' and my own], rather than mystification, is my hope and intent.
A comment on your allur-ring rings ringing : The cause-effect question is always on the forefront of my thoughts... does geometry invoke structure? or does structure invoke geometry? Is the building the product of the blueprint, or is the blueprint based on the building? My tendency is to first look through the latter window, then through the former, but then I rest in the light of the former. When I see hexagonal/trisogonal structure, for example, at various scales/orders of magnitude, I clarify my unified field. When I apply the unified field to understanding new vistas, at whatever scale, I find myself satisfied and undaunted. Energy vortices puzzled me at first, and then Axis Monday throws Morning Glory roll clouds at me[Planetary Science forum], and I'm thinking, well of course!! This is a bit random, sorry... to sum it up, where others may see coincidence, I see a fundamental principle at work, with either a geometric cause or consequence.
@rc-us wrote:... so the architect conceives or gets a concept of a building and, working backwards from that, draws up plans/blueprints to bring it across-over-down into grosser, physical existence.
Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas
Users browsing this forum: BillGardiner1952, JP Michael and 1 guest