Aether Physics Model vs. Electromass Hypothesis

[KickLaBuka]

* What does JL think of that? I think APM regards Planck's constant as a true constant.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

It is with great honor to provide you with mathematical prous and conceptual bias that can beat quantum mechanics, the aether physics model, general relativity, etc. This thread is directed at APM and QM and Plank's constant and so on. But it should not avoid the obvious question as to General Relativity or Special Relativity.

Equation 1: The line integral of the electromagnetic spectrum received is equal to a geometric combination of mass and charge.
Equation 2: The partial time derivative of the received spectrum is equal to the spatial integral of the sum of the fields with respect to the change in a unit of this time quantity.

This thread is designed to both protect my hypothesis, equally discounting the accepted and fringe models. I hope that this can stretch broadly enough for the responders to both discredit my hypotheses or support their own models against me.

With kindest regards,
Justin Sandburg

[Lloyd]

Equation 1: The line integral of the electromagnetic spectrum received is equal to a geometric combination of mass and charge.
Equation 2: The partial time derivative of the received spectrum is equal to the spatial integral of the sum of the fields with respect to the change in a unit of this time quantity.

* 1. Are you saying that wavelength or frequency is a product of mass and charge? How do you derive a formula for that?
* 2. What's the significance of the time derivative of the spectrum? What do you mean by the sum of the fields? - the sum of the forces of the electric and or magnetic fields of EM radiation? - or the sum of what exactly?
* And how does this relate to Electric Universe theory?
* By the way, the concepts of integration and differentiation have some basic flaws, which this website helps clear up: http://wbabin.net/mathis/mathis3.htm

[KickLaBuka]

And how does this relate to Electric Universe theory?

I want full response from the EU scientists and moderators of this forum. I also want an answer from them about their prior knowledge to describe this thread:

http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpB ... f=3&t=1945

When both are answered, I will give you the mathematics of electromass.

-Justin Sandburg

[davesmith_au]

Justin.

With all due respect, I want peace and love and lots of hippie stuff but I won't get it by shouting around on a public forum.

If you seek discourse with EU scientists, contact them directly with your papers. This is a public forum where members of the general public can discuss the published theories of EU, not a hotline to the boss. The moderators are volunteers. I am a volunteer. Demanding responses from volunteers over issues which they do not control anyhow is not considered good form. As for the thread you've linked to, I can't even begin to understand your gripe.

Cheers, Dave.

[Lloyd]

As for the thread you've linked to, I can't even begin to understand your gripe. - DS

* Yeah, Kick, exactly what are you referring to on that thread? And what are you wanting to know about it?

* By the way, I can't download your book. It gets stuck about 3/4ths of the way through.

[seasmith]

K,

I can't download the book either.

s
~

[KickLaBuka]

With all due respect, I want peace and love and lots of hippie stuff but I won't get it by shouting around on a public forum. As for the thread you've linked to, I can't even begin to understand your gripe.

No problem Dave Smith et al. I have no gripe really. None of the posters can explain the entire math. None can derive it the way I have with every notation. So you see, that thread had to happen. Word got out and a bunch of people got Nobel Prize happy, but the word got out. There was a beautiful shedding of information. Sorry to those who got caught up in the hype. As always, thanks to the real scientists.