moses wrote:But the continuous rain of the past 40 days (maybe) is beginning to ease.
I don't personally believe the 40 days and 40 nights reference actually refers to any events lasting for 40 days and 40 nights, as the number 40 turns up in a lot of occult and Kaballistic literature and is purely symbolic.
Well it may not be purely
symbolic as it may have an actual non-symbolic reference somewhere that I haven't considered yet but in general the number 40 is symbolically representative of Venus, Mars and Saturn aligned as One.
The Holy Trinity, Holy/Divine Triad, Eye of Providence, etc. are made up of the 3 planets Mars, Venus and Saturn aligned together, but altogether they form a 4th entity as the 'Holy Trinity/Triad'. 3 parts plus the sum of the whole.
So the 3 as One is actually 4, and the 4 altogether are 0 - the 'black-hole sun', Eye of Providence, etc.
As everyone on this forum should be aware when you divide by 0 you get an infinity of black-holes...
When the 3 were 4 as 1 and 0 the 'rain'/plasma/oil/ etc. would have come down like a Son of a Gun for sure.
Note that the entire flood myth may not have actually referred to events occurring on this planet at that time as 'Noah' of the myth is representative of Saturn from what I've researched, though my level of certainty is low as it could be Mars rather but generally Mars is the 'mountain' and as such would be what the Ark(Venus?) came to rest on, leaving Saturn to be Noah by my reasoning.
The trouble is the minds of ancient man were quite crude and unsophisticated so what is 'reasonable' to me doesn't mean anything to their mythologies, haha. It really makes it difficult to unscramble some of the stuff, but it makes it more fun for me too.
But I am 100% certain that Noah and the Ark and the flood myth initially was entirely based on the planetary interactions and not necessarily an actual event occurring on this planet.
However quite obviously there were events on this planet that accompanied these celestial events no doubt but relying on the myths themselves to tell the tale of this planets specific history is not a wise idea in my view.
For example all the material I've gone through makes it quite clear the 'Eye-Land' Mountaintop(Mars) City of Atlantis is entirely based on the Venus-Mars-Saturn interactions and has nothing to do with an actual city or race that lived on this planet at any time.
Certainly there would be correlations with ancient cities that suffered similar fates at various times in history on this planet but to mistake cause and correlation is scientifically dangerous, and many on this forum have ranted about it before if I recall as the 'establishment' falls victim to such errors quite frequently.
Human history may be far more colorful than even the existing alternative theories can truly comprehend.