Miles Mathis on Halton Arp

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Miles Mathis on Halton Arp

Unread postby D_Archer » Tue Feb 20, 2018 3:59 am

he would have made more progress in the margins if he
had either stuck to data, or embraced a better theory.

What was that theory? It was the 1977 theory of Jayant Narliker, that the redshifts were explained by
increasing particle masses. According to him, the data could be incorporated without doppler provided
fundamental particle masses were increasing with time.

my main reason for disliking it is that there exists a far simpler explanation which does not requiring changing

It is a unified field redshift, caused mostly by charge



- Shoot Forth Thunder -
User avatar
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests