SRĐAN mathematics

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: SRĐAN mathematics

Unread postby msbiljanica » Wed May 06, 2015 12:27 am

Theorem - contact number is sorted horizontally, two natural straight line provide a natural straight line

Proof - [tex]11\rightarrow1[/tex]
yy.png
yy.png (4.85 KiB) Viewed 1776 times


[tex]2\underline{2 }2+_3^{\underline0}2\underline{2 }2=(2,2)[/tex]

[tex]2\underline{2 }2+_3^{\underline1}2\underline{2 }2=(1,1)[/tex]

[tex]2\underline{2 }2+_3^{\underline2}2\underline{2 }2=0[/tex]

[tex]2\underline{2 }2+_3^{\underline3}2\underline{2 }2=1[/tex]

[tex]2\underline{2 }2+_3^{\underline4}2\underline{2 }2=2[/tex]

[tex]2\underline{2 }2+_3^{\underline5}2\underline{2 }2=1[/tex]

[tex]2\underline{2 }2+_3^{\underline6}2\underline{2 }2=0[/tex]

[tex]+_3[/tex]
- addition rule 3


(CM.) - No "addition rule 3"
msbiljanica
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Re: SRĐAN mathematics

Unread postby willendure » Wed May 06, 2015 12:32 am

seasmith wrote:
I've heard of Quaternions being useful in some areas of physics.

Do you know of anybody who actually uses that byzantine math ?
`


I don't.

But I'm still wondering what does SRDAN maths have to do with EU? I brought up the Quaternions as an example of where an alternate math has been used to suit some situations in physics better, rather than as an example of something wonderful. I'm wondering is there supposed to be some link between SRDAN and physics, does it let us understand plasma physics more easily or some such thing?
willendure
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:29 am

Re: SRĐAN mathematics

Unread postby msbiljanica » Thu May 07, 2015 9:53 am

Theorem - contact numbers, sorting is done horizontally, two natural straight lines provide a natural straight line , when there arre two (more) results between them becomes void.

Proof [tex]11\rightarrow1(\underline1)[/tex]
yy1.png
yy1.png (5.26 KiB) Viewed 1750 times


[latex]2\underline{2 }2+_4^{\underline0}2\underline{2 }2=2\underline2 2[/latex]

[latex]2\underline{2 }2+_4^{\underline1}2\underline{2 }2=1\underline3 1[/latex]

[latex]2\underline{2 }2+_4^{\underline2}2\underline{2 }2=0[/latex]

[latex]2\underline{2 }2+_4^{\underline3}2\underline{2 }2=1[/latex]

[latex]2\underline{2 }2+_4^{\underline4}2\underline{2 }2=2[/latex]

[latex]2\underline{2 }2+_4^{\underline5}2\underline{2 }2=1[/latex]

[latex]2\underline{2 }2+_4^{\underline6}2\underline{2 }2=0[/latex]

[latex]+_4[/latex]
- addition rule 4

(CM.) - No "addition rule 4"
msbiljanica
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Re: SRĐAN mathematics

Unread postby msbiljanica » Thu May 14, 2015 9:55 am

Theorem - The contact number is sorted horizontally only be a natural straight line that gives a natural straight line , when there are two (more) results merge

Proof - [tex]1\rightarrow 1 (\underline{s})[/tex]
www.png
www.png (4.75 KiB) Viewed 1702 times


[tex]4{+_3^{\underline0}}2=2[/tex]


[tex]4{+_3^{\underline1}}2=2[/tex]


[tex]4{+_3^{\underline2}}2=2[/tex]


[tex]4{+_3^{\underline3}}2=4[/tex]


[tex]4{+_3^{\underline4}}2=6[/tex]


[tex]+_3 [/tex]- addition rule 3


(SM.) - no "addition rule 3 "


NOTE, the previous [tex]+_3[/tex] becomes [tex]+_4[/tex] , the previous[tex]+_4[/tex] becomes [tex]+_5[/tex]
msbiljanica
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Re: SRĐAN mathematics

Unread postby msbiljanica » Sun May 17, 2015 11:47 pm

error corrected in PDF, in Serbian language, soon will be in English

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=700D973D1A1F1E0!148&authkey=!ADW1rlkP--a4Vsc&ithint=file%2cpdf
msbiljanica
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Re: SRĐAN mathematics

Unread postby silvanelf » Sat Jun 02, 2018 12:56 pm

seasmith wrote:
I've heard of Quaternions being useful in some areas of physics.

Do you know of anybody who actually uses that byzantine math ?`


Is this a serious question? Here are just 2 physics papers, I can easily post a list with 20 or 30 references:

"Quaternions: a history of complex noncommutative rotation groups in theoretical physics"
https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.04885

"Quaternionic Groups in Physics: A Panoramic Review"
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9905125
silvanelf
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu May 31, 2018 12:52 pm

Previous

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests