Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:13 pm

Sparky wrote:What quantities?

What would dissociate CH2O? Solar wind?

I am curious too.
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Dust jet Tutus around Comet 67P and Eta Carina

Unread postby leo vuyk » Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:02 am

67P Dust jets and Eta Carina jet skirts (like a ballet tutu) by Higgs field pinching of Birkeland Alfven circuits.
Birkeland Alfven current circuits of negative charged ions and electrons, between (New Physics) Dark Matter Black Hole nuclear charge splitters, will be found inside dumbbell shaped Comets like 67P C-G, also in Herbig Haro systems, Galaxies and even stellar systems (e.g. Eta Carina), according to Quantum FFF Theory.
Two Charge splitting new physics black holes are supposed to polarize the local oscillating Higgs field as the origin of negative charged Birkeland Alfven current circuits (Orange arrows) As a consequence jets of dust (Blue arrows) are observed from the “neck”of 67P and the neck of Eta Carina. see:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Fri Nov 07, 2014 6:01 am

IMHO, For an electric Universe we need a new physics hypothesis.

The Impossible Electric Dark Matter Black Hole as the Origin of New Physics even for Comets like 67P,C-G.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0044v4.pdf
Recent turmoil around the foundation of Black hole theory principles by Stephen Hawking
and others, is a clear sign of great uncertainty about black holes and adjacent subjects.
As a consequence, it seems a good moment to come up with a Black Hole alternative already
prepacked in my Quantum FFF Theory ( Function Follows Form)
Quantum FFF ( Function Follows Form) theory states, that the vacuum is seeded with fast
opposite oscillating massless 3-Dimensional torus shaped Preons, responsible for pair
production. Two Preons are able to change form into two entangled Fermion propeller strings
by an overflow of energetic opposite collision. This energy overflow is supposed to be
present at the black hole event horizon ( fig 5).
Thus the FORM of all particles is based on real joints and gears, responsible for the
FUNCTION even for composite Quarks and Photons, however all particles are instant
entangled and guided in a dual mirror multiversal way.
That dual oscillating Higgs particles are the same as Preons and are responsible for the
Casimir Dark Energy of 126 GeV recently observed in the LHC at CERN.
That the oscillating Higgs vacuum system is the messenger medium of all Photon information
and Black Holes are equipped with a nucleus of compacted Higgs particles, compressed by
the oscillating Higgs vacuum.
The vacuum energy flow around such a Black hole indicates that different sized globular
horizons are needed, an event or Photon horizon and two Fermion repulsion horizons, which
can explain lots of astronomical unresolved phenomena such as the peculiar shape of
dumbbell Comets like Hartley 2 and 67P C-G (Churyumov-Gerasimenko)..

and : http://vixra.org/pdf/1411.0039v1.pdf
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Tue Nov 11, 2014 5:52 am

New evidence for dust and water ice production from the inside of Comet 67P CG, with cracking observable noise from the inside of the comet..
see:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

Criss Cross Scratches at (water ice) rocky Comet 67P CG. by plate tectonic motion and internal growth?
According to Quantum FFF Theory, comets are not only eroding ice balls heated by the sun. They also CREATE MATTER like H2O Carbon etc. by one or more internal NEW PHYSICS electric Dark Matter Black Holes. Criss cross scratches seem to be the evidence of the growing process of ice plates or funnels into different directions.
The Rosetta lander Philae, will be able to check this in the next days, by microphone observed noise of kracking ice plates.

see also: http://vixra.org/abs/1410.0039
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:15 pm

It became just clear that the Comet produces noise even outside the comet!! It is magnetically singing.
See:
http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/2014/11/11 ... ing-comet/
“This is exciting because it is completely new to us. We did not expect this and we are still working to understand the physics of what is happening,” says Karl-Heinz.
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:04 am

Anomalous gravity effects on boulders “glued“ to the surface of
Comet 67P CG, explained by assumed internal dual gravity point sources, such as dark matter (new black hole) point sources. (leading to new physics)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

for more background behind the Quantum FFF Theory, see:
http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby Sparky » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:18 am

The lander is on the comet! Will it experience more gravity than expected? :?
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Sparky
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:45 pm

Sparky wrote:The lander is on the comet! Will it experience more gravity than expected? :?

My model predict that yes.
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby Sparky » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:43 pm

leo vuyk wrote:
Sparky wrote:The lander is on the comet! Will it experience more gravity than expected? :?

My model predict that yes.


Well, that's good, as the report says they had a bit of a problem with the "attachment screws"....Maybe there is enough gravity to hold it down for the experiments... ;)
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/12/world/com ... ?hpt=us_t3
Shortly after landing was confirmed, the probe tweeted: "Touchdown! My new address: 67P!" Later, it tweeted again: "I'm on the surface but my harpoons did not fire."-------------The comet's gravity is so weak that engineers have come up with ingenious solutions to keep Philae in place. At touchdown two harpoons were due to fire out from the legs and screws on each of the three feet were designed to help attach it to the comet. It is this system that engineers are now checking.----------Daniel Brown, an astronomy expert at Nottingham Trent University in the UK, said: "Although we have landed on planets, moons and asteroids, it has never been attempted for a nucleus of a comet -- and with good reason. These objects have a very low gravity, are loosely composed of ice, dust and rocks, and are very irregular in shape. They are temperamental in their behavior and notoriously difficult to predict.
:roll:
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Sparky
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:15 pm

An anonymous reaction from Lubos Motl blog says:

"Apparently, Philae has indeed made contact with the comet, and the contact was very soft according to the on-board accelerometers. However, it seems that the anchors did not fire, and there was no information of whether that meant the harpoons or the screw-feet. But it isn't known whether Philae is securely fixed to the comet or if it's still bouncing around in the 10 microgee environment. The communication has been quite ratty, which suggests a suboptimal antenna pointing. The commentator ignored that and after half a minute of actual coverage the stream went back to the political speeches.

Hopefully, we will soon be informed that Philae is safe and isn't still bouncing across the surface or buried in a landslide."

A "soft landing" could mean that the lander is covered with dust.
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Will electric Comet 67P C-G be the start of NEW PHYSICS?

Unread postby leo vuyk » Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:37 am

Potential Philae landing gravity and dust (avalanche) problem, by tilted (non perpendicular) gravity vector and the thick dusty/snowy surface of Comet 67P CG.
Dust/snow layer seems to be 2-3 meter thick, because landslide A, is a clear avalanche of 100x11 meter estimated depth 2-3 meter.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

All in line with quantum FFF Theory . http://vixra.org/abs/1410.0039
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

Unread postby leo vuyk » Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:39 am

Potential Philae landing gravity and dust (avalanche) problem, by tilted (non perpendicular) gravity vector and the thick dusty/snowy surface of Comet 67P CG.
Dust/snow layer seems to be 2-3 meter thick, because landslide A, is a clear avalanche of 100x11 meter estimated depth 2-3 meter.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

All in line with quantum FFF Theory . http://vixra.org/abs/1410.0039

The fact that there are no photos fromthe surface of 67P CG is supporting the idea that Philae is submerged in the dusty top layer.
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Will electric Comet 67P C-G be the start of NEW PHYSICS?

Unread postby Sparky » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:48 am

I have seen no evidence of loose dust or snow. Every image that I have seen shows hard, rocky surface. :?
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Sparky
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm

Re: Will electric Comet 67P C-G be the start of NEW PHYSICS?

Unread postby leo vuyk » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:51 am

Sparky wrote:I have seen no evidence of loose dust or snow. Every image that I have seen shows hard, rocky surface. :?


Yes it is perhaps hard to identify as landslide A and B.
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

Re: Will electric Comet 67P C-G be the start of NEW PHYSICS?

Unread postby leo vuyk » Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:35 am

CosmicLettuce wrote:
I'm terribly ignorant of the details of the Philae, so forgive me. There isn't enough "gravity" to pull the probe back to the comet. What I heard was that not only did the probe "bouce" off the surface, but it also began rotating. So somehow, the probe righted itself and attempted another landing, which also "bounced", but then it turned around once again and finally "landed". So my only guess is that there's an automatic navigation system on the probe that is programmed to "land the f*cker!" And so it did!!!! Yehaw!!! I, for one, am very very proud today to being a witness to such an incredible and amazing accomplishment! AND, we still have Rosetta for another 20 months! It's gonna be awesome!

Can anyone confirm or deny this guess of mine?

Hang in there, Philae!

Peace, CL

Leo Vuyk wrote:

Besides the incredible bouncing and landing also incredible is: the camaras did not send pictures of the bouncing, while there are taken before and after the bouncing clear photos by the l;ander.
It looks as if an invisble hand took the lander into that other position.
What is also strange , that the accelerometer seems to have shown unexpected small values.
leo vuyk
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:49 am

PreviousNext

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Solar and 1 guest