Leo Vuyk's Comet Hypothesis

[leo vuyk]

If Rosetta is able to discriminate peculiar DARK MATTER gravity point sources inside 67P-CG, and the intrinsic EM field, as the elecric universe theory predict,
THEN ESA will be able to boost astro- and physics understanding more than Eddington did 95 years ago ( bending of light) RIGHT?

SEE: Schoemaker Levy 9 lessons for Comet 67P CG.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl ... t-67p.html
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl

[leo vuyk]

This Viscout aero member asked: "admin please ban this member" WhAT IS WRONG ?

If Rosetta is able to discriminate peculiar DARK MATTER gravity point sources inside 67P-CG, and the EM field, as the elecric universe theory predict,
THEN ESA will be able to boost astro- and physics understanding more than Eddington did 95 years ago ( bending of light) RIGHT?

SEE: Schoemaker Levy 9 lessons for Comet 67P CG.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl ... t-67p.html

admin please ban this member.

[Michael Anteski]

What I would dispute about that dissed Post is the remark that Eddington "advanced understanding" 95 years ago by his measurements indicating the bending of distant starlight on the way to earth by the Sun.

To start with the Michelson-Morley Expt., it was thought back then that the aether had been disproven by the failure of the MMX to find an aether "wind" effect using optical measurements of refracted light beams, measured at different angles. -That led physicists like Einstein to start coming up with models for how the world could work without a transmissional aether medium. -Then supposedly Eddington "showed Einstein was right" by finding that starlight beams bend in the vicinity of the Sun. -However, all this could be explained without throwing out the aether.

The MMX had wrongly used inertial criteria for an "aether" in interpreting their optical data. An aether derived from original space would not be inertial, rather it would be composed of contiguous units derived from preceding oscillating contiguous points of original space, and an aether so derived would conduct energic impulses via contiguous transmission, so that inertial effects such as an "aether wind" would not obtain. -So Eddington did not necessarily "prove Einstein's relativity" by showing the bending of starbeams.

With a transmissional aether, photonic units from a distant star would leave the star highly energized from its nearby strong photonic energies. Then, travelling through the aether of intervening space, the light beam would gradually diminish its light-energy through interacting, in the aether, with the much-less-photonically-energized outer-spatial regions. -Then, once again reaching a highly-photonically-energized region as it nears our Sun, the light beam would undergo re-energization and its path through the region around the Sun would be affected and would "bend", as was observed by Eddington, whose observations therefore did not necessarily rule out the aether or rule in relativity.

[leo vuyk]

Dear Michael, That is an interesting view on Eddington, yes he did not rule out the ether. but he did support the whole community to support Einstein's ideas. and we know what the result was and is.

[leo vuyk]

Will the Rosetta probe show us the start of new dark matter physics next weeks?
The Rosetta probe is orbiting the Comet 67P C-G at the moment.
Anomalies are found in the mass/volume relation of the comet ( too heavy)
Secondly it seems to expand in volume given by the linear impressions at "the head of the duck".
My own interpretation of Comets is: that they are formed by ( new physics) micro dark matter gravitating point sources ( or micro black holes).
Comet 67P seems to be based on at least two Dark Matter nuclei.
IMHO, the smallest DM point sources could be interpreted as stringy quantum knot produced by electro magnetic interference at the solar surface being the start of small comets or even by the so called sprites observed above thunderclouds. See: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/?details=1 and
Ball Lightning, Micro Comets, Sprite-Fireballs, Solar Bright Points and Xray/ Gamma Flashes According to Quantum FFF Theory. http://vixra.org/pdf/1104.0044v6.pdf
And : The Impossible Zero Point Electric Black Hole as the Origin of New Physics even for Comets like 67P,C-G. http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0044v3.pdf
New physics could be found, if the Comet shows also an electric and magnetic field created by both dark matter black holes expected to be the origin of a system (circuit) of Birkeland Alfven currents between them.
Also gravity anomalies should be found at both sides of the extended symmetric centreline of the two component duck.
The huge crater at the top of the head of the duck could be a tell tale.
At the bottom of the duck there are three large craters, so this could be a sign for multiple micro dark matter point sources of different size or magnitudes.
Conclusion: next weeks could be breathtaking and a start for new dark matter physics.
See:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl ... et-at.html
and http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl ... t-67p.html

[viscount aero]

Conclusion: next weeks could be breathtaking and a start for new dark matter physics.

I actually agree with you They must invoke some form of "dark matter" answer to prevent their fantasy icy comet model from shattering.

[leo vuyk]

Conclusion: next weeks could be breathtaking and a start for new dark matter physics.

I actually agree with you They must invoke some form of "dark matter" answer to prevent their fantasy icy comet model from shattering.

So we both wait for the bang!

[Frantic]

Comet 67P seems to be based on at least two Dark Matter nuclei.

How do dark matter nuclei keep from continually accumulating dust on their long journey through space? An electric charge can be neutralized, gravity can only grow and grow...

[leo vuyk]

Comet 67P seems to be based on at least two Dark Matter nuclei.

How do dark matter nuclei keep from continually accumulating dust on their long journey through space? An electric charge can be neutralized, gravity can only grow and grow...

If you allow new physics as described at Quantum FFF theory, then you know that there are two sorts of dark matter based black holes both able to produce something out of nothing ( the Higgs field) : H and O ( Hydroxyl)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/?details=1

[leo vuyk]

The Electric Comet and nuclear expansion by matter creation out of “nothing”

The Comet 67P “Grooves”or impressions show at both body parts of the duck, the expansion of the Comet from the inside !!
The comet expansion is assumed to be originated by the internal (new physics) Dark Matter Black holes with Higgs vacuum based pair production (creating something out of nothing) and some annihilation ( x-ray ,gamma ray) at their horizons, but mainly into (proton electron plasma) Hydrogen and O atom ( hydroxyl) and even C production.
( image below) Electrical model of a NEW physics dual dark matter black hole system with Hydroxyl H O production by Dumbbell dark matter black holes. see;
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0044v4.pdf

[leo vuyk]

Carbonated Black Water Ice mountain peaks at Comet 67P- CG, is a strong indication for dual nuclear H2, O and even C production, including upward pressure on ice mountain formation, from inside two nuclei of the Comet.
According to Quantum FFF Theory. See:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/?details=1
http://vixra.org/abs/1402.0044
http://vixra.org/abs/1104.0044

for outgassing see also:
http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/2014/10/03 ... et-67pc-g/

[leo vuyk]

IMHO, Hyperion shows a central growing process like corals do.
So perhaps Hyperion is something in between an electric Comet and a Moon.
see: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

[Frantic]

IMHO, Hyperion shows a central growing process like corals do.
So perhaps Hyperion is something in between an electric Comet and a Moon.
see: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

ok, so organisms are living on Hyperion growing its mass like coral? How do they survive living on a cold black-hole coral structure? Do you not differentiate between biotic and abiotic?

[leo vuyk]

IMHO, Hyperion shows a central growing process like corals do.
So perhaps Hyperion is something in between an electric Comet and a Moon.
see: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

ok, so organisms are living on Hyperion growing its mass like coral? How do they survive living on a cold black-hole coral structure? Do you not differentiate between biotic and abiotic?

IMHO comets are growing material fromthe inside, just like coral.
So a small Big Bang process: something out of nothing.
You wont believe this, unless you read this:
Evidence for Electric Dark Matter Black Hole Dust Production Inside Comets Like 67P,C-G
http://vixra.org/abs/1410.0039

[Rossim]

IMHO, Hyperion shows a central growing process like corals do.
So perhaps Hyperion is something in between an electric Comet and a Moon.
see: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@ ... hotostream

ok, so organisms are living on Hyperion growing its mass like coral? How do they survive living on a cold black-hole coral structure? Do you not differentiate between biotic and abiotic?

IMHO comets are growing material fromthe inside, just like coral.
So a small Big Bang process: something out of nothing.
You wont believe this, unless you read this:
Evidence for Electric Dark Matter Black Hole Dust Production Inside Comets Like 67P,C-G
http://vixra.org/abs/1410.0039

If you really think that article is accurate then I believe we've lost you. Why invent dark matter, dark energy, Higgs particles and such when good 'ol fashioned plasma physics works just fine? You have a charged body traveling through an increasing voltage potentional, that's it.